panic: loading if_bfe after boot

2010-10-30 Thread Paul B Mahol
Hi, Loading if_bfe module after boot hangs machine, it works/attach fine from loader. Tell me if you need bt. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebs

Re: panic: invalid PDPE on recend amd64

2010-10-30 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 10/30/10, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 10/30/10, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 30/10/2010 17:43 Paul B Mahol said the following: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Booting amd64 kernel panic in pmap_demote_DMAP(): invalid PDPE >>> >>> This is on: >>> &g

Re: panic: invalid PDPE on recend amd64

2010-10-30 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 10/30/10, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 30/10/2010 17:43 Paul B Mahol said the following: >> Hi, >> >> Booting amd64 kernel panic in pmap_demote_DMAP(): invalid PDPE >> >> This is on: >> >> Copyright (c) 1992-2010 The FreeBSD Project. >> Copyright

panic: invalid PDPE on recend amd64

2010-10-30 Thread Paul B Mahol
Hi, Booting amd64 kernel panic in pmap_demote_DMAP(): invalid PDPE This is on: Copyright (c) 1992-2010 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered t

Re: Broadcom BCM4310 USB Controller (Wifi)

2010-10-29 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote: >> I booted the 8-CURRENT this morning, loaded the module with kldload(8) and >> wlan0 came up by its own (I did not realized this yesterday). I have in >> rc.conf: >> >> wlans_ndis0="wla

Re: Broadcom BCM4310 USB Controller (Wifi)

2010-10-28 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 10/28/10, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El dia Wednesday, October 27, 2010 a las 12:07:51PM -0500, Scot Hetzel > escribio: > >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Alberto Villa wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> >> NDISulator doe

Re: Broadcom BCM4310 USB Controller (Wifi)

2010-10-27 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 10/27/10, Alberto Villa wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >>> i've tried ndis without success... >> >> Sharing you experience would help (if you are not on amd64). > > i'm on i386 at the moment, but i'll switch to

Re: Broadcom BCM4310 USB Controller (Wifi)

2010-10-26 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 10/26/10, Alberto Villa wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote: >> I have a new laptop Acer Aspire One D250 and pulled out HEAD from SVN >> today morning. As far as I can see in sys/dev/bwi and sys/dev/bwn the >> above chip is still not supported. I am wrong? > > i have

Re: [RFC] More meaningful information about ENOEXEC for kldload(8)

2010-10-25 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 10/25/10, Xin LI wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > Here is a simple patch that adds more meaning messages when kldload hits > ENOEXEC. > > Before patch: > > kldload: can't load geom_eli.ko: Exec format error > > After patch: > > kldload: can't load geom_eli.

Re: panic on kthread_exit under INVARIANTS

2010-10-12 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 10/12/10, David Xu wrote: > Paul B Mahol wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If kernel threads were created via kproc_kthread_add() >> when last kernel thread exits it will trigger panic. >> >> It panics in queue.h probably introduced with rec > > > I

panic on kthread_exit under INVARIANTS

2010-10-11 Thread Paul B Mahol
Hi, If kernel threads were created via kproc_kthread_add() when last kernel thread exits it will trigger panic. It panics in queue.h probably introduced with recent commit. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm

Re: Move banner to games

2010-10-07 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 10/7/10, army.of.root wrote: > On 10\10\02 18:48, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 10/2/10, Brandon Gooch wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I see no point to have it in usr/bin. >>> >&g

Re: Move banner to games

2010-10-02 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 10/2/10, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I see no point to have it in usr/bin. > > Cool! This is the first time I've heard of this program! How come the > folks at my university who manage the line prin

Move banner to games

2010-10-02 Thread Paul B Mahol
Hi, I see no point to have it in usr/bin. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Sleep/Lenovo SL410

2010-10-01 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 10/1/10, Ian Smith wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Matt wrote: > > Success! > > > > After setting every possible suspend/resume sysctl, > > "sysctl hw.pci.do_power_resume=0" > > allowed suspend and resume. Still beeps 1-3 times before suspend, with > rapid > > sleep light flashing until su

Re: Clang now builds world and kernel, on i386 and amd64

2010-09-25 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 9/22/10, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Hi, > > As of r212979, you should now be able to build world and kernel on i386 > and amd64 with clang, without any additional patches! > > To do so, make sure you have updated your installed world to at least > r212904 (which has the most recently imported clan

Re: ISO9660 4GB directory structures boundary limit and growisofs

2010-04-27 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/19/10, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 4/19/10, Tom Evans wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >>> On 4/17/10, Paul B Mahol wrote: >>>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Tim Kientzle >>>> wrote: >>>>> Paul B Ma

Re: Switchover to CAM ATA?

2010-04-23 Thread Paul Wootton
later. This could get a little messy having ad2, ad4, ad12, ad20 and ad22, but at least if I added a new drive, it would always attach to say ad8. Can this be done on the new CAM ATA? Paul ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: ISO9660 4GB directory structures boundary limit and growisofs

2010-04-19 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/19/10, Tom Evans wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 4/17/10, Paul B Mahol wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Tim Kientzle >>> wrote: >>>> Paul B Mahol wrote: >>>>> >>>>>

Re: ISO9660 4GB directory structures boundary limit and growisofs

2010-04-19 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/17/10, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote: >> Paul B Mahol wrote: >>> >>> It is apparently not possible to make use of -use-the-force-luke=4gms >>> on FreeBSD when appending new session after 4GB. Mount

Re: ISO9660 4GB directory structures boundary limit and growisofs

2010-04-17 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Paul B Mahol wrote: >> >> It is apparently not possible to make use of -use-the-force-luke=4gms >> on FreeBSD when appending new session after 4GB. Mounted disk >> afterwards  show nothing. >> >> Shou

Re: ISO9660 4GB directory structures boundary limit and growisofs

2010-04-17 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/17/10, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 17/04/2010 02:07 Paul B Mahol said the following: >> Hi, >> >> It is apparently not possible to make use of -use-the-force-luke=4gms >> on FreeBSD when appending new session after 4GB. Mounted disk >> afterwards show nothing.

ISO9660 4GB directory structures boundary limit and growisofs

2010-04-16 Thread Paul B Mahol
Hi, It is apparently not possible to make use of -use-the-force-luke=4gms on FreeBSD when appending new session after 4GB. Mounted disk afterwards show nothing. Should we allow it like linux does? ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lis

Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8)

2010-04-09 Thread Paul Wootton
tc/fstab anyway. DES But... If this is a fresh install, then you really have not lost anything if you making a mistake. If sysinstall / sade is run from a running system and a mistake is made then you could loose your data, but as you will need to have su-ed up, how does this differ from t

Re: newfs_msdos and DVD-RAM

2010-04-03 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/2/10, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 02/04/2010 22:26 Andriy Gapon said the following: >> >> OK, I did it again. >> I tested the below patch using the scenario described above. >> Could you please review and/or test this patch? >> If you like it and it works, I can commit it. >> Thanks! >> >> --- a

Re: gpart failing with no such geom after gpt corruption

2010-04-01 Thread Paul Wootton
Bartosz, One thing to remember is that GPT stores it's header and entry tables at both the start and end of the disk for redundancy. As far as I understand it, by making the disk physically smaller, the GPT primary header and entry data would have become invalid as the last partition would no

Re: fsck unable to read disk sectors

2010-03-29 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 3/29/10, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, > > when doing fsck on my / fs i get this error: > > "Cannot Read BLK. 471617640" and "The Following Disk Sectors could not be > read: 471617643". after this message the partition gets marked dirty. > > i performed the following steps to verify the pro

Re: newfs_msdos and DVD-RAM

2010-03-19 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Fabian Keil wrote: > Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> FreeBSD 9.0 CURRENT panics when mounting file system created via >> newfs_msdos on DVD-RAM disc. >> Something to do about divide by zero. > > I recently had a similar problem wit

newfs_msdos and DVD-RAM

2010-03-19 Thread Paul B Mahol
Hi, FreeBSD 9.0 CURRENT panics when mounting file system created via newfs_msdos on DVD-RAM disc. Something to do about divide by zero. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe,

Re: Can not boot after r203503. Unable to open /dev/ada(1/2)p3 for writing

2010-02-26 Thread Paul Wootton
Alexey Shuvaev wrote: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 02:47:06PM +, Paul Wootton wrote: Hi, I have an unusual problem. Last night I tried updating from my old-ish kernel/world to an up to date version. I had been using 202500-ish successfully. I can build and install the newer world and kernel

Can not boot after r203503. Unable to open /dev/ada(1/2)p3 for writing

2010-02-26 Thread Paul Wootton
give more information if required on monday Cheers Paul # DeviceMountpoint FStype Options DumpPass# raid250/root/ zfs rw 0 0 raid250/usr /usrzfs rw 0 0 raid250/var

Re: 5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-12-01 Thread Paul Murphy
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:01:23 -0500 (EST) Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues > list. The live version of this list is available at: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R/todo.html > > Automated mailing of this lis

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-p10 reproducible crash with Apache2

2003-11-03 Thread Paul Blazejowski
e apachectl restart to get httpd going otherwise my browser hangs with waiting for replay when i connect to the machine running httpd. Cheers, Paul signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Realtek 8139 + Acer Laptop

2003-09-27 Thread Bill Paul
you need to do to enable/power up the on-board NIC that we're not doing This is something you should be asking the PCI gurus about, not the networking gurus. -Bill -- = -Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senio

Re: Base packaging

2003-09-19 Thread Paul Richards
installation in a file rather than actually doing it, so you could run this dummyinstall step and then make package and you'll end up with a load of package files that can be installed later as root. Paul. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Base packaging

2003-09-19 Thread Paul Richards
emo, you can put the PORTNAME entry in any Makefile and the granularity of the package it creates is going to be based on the content of the pkg-plist and not where in the tree the Makefile is. I'll reply to your other mail with specific points. Paul.

Re: Base packaging

2003-09-18 Thread Paul Richards
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 12:09, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:28:31 +0100 > Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We have programs in the ports tree which use our bsd.*.mk > > > infrastructure. Will there be a problem if such a progra

Re: Base packaging

2003-09-18 Thread Paul Richards
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 11:25, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:27:03 +0100 > Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > However, I suspect that a marginally better place to use these would be > > > in the "make distribute" tar

Re: Base packaging

2003-09-17 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 06:53:41PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 04:27 pm, Paul Richards wrote: > >I was thinking of adding an option to install so it registers the file > >in a plist rather than actually doing the install. A seperate &quo

Re: Base packaging

2003-09-17 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 15:45, Mark Murray wrote: > Paul Richards writes: > > I've got a prototype setup that packages the base tree. It turned out to > > be very simple. It needs a lot more polishing and testing but it looks > > like this can definitely be made to work wit

Base packaging

2003-09-17 Thread Paul Richards
I've got a prototype setup that packages the base tree. It turned out to be very simple. It needs a lot more polishing and testing but it looks like this can definitely be made to work with just some tidying up and re-arranging of our existing make files. I've succesfully created packages of /sbin

Re: device_probe_and_attach: atkbd0 attach returned 6

2003-09-05 Thread Paul Murphy
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 20:55:39 -0700 "peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, I saw this post on > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2003-May/002982.html > on Mon May 12 22:36:58 PDT 2003. I am having problems with my nic > card. I also got the "device_probe_and_attach: atkbd0 att

Re: Text file busy

2003-09-05 Thread Paul Richards
problem that was fixed where you'd still get the error even though the program had stopped executing. Paul. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Text file busy

2003-09-04 Thread Paul Richards
Overwriting a file that's currently executing results in a "Text file busy" error. When did this start happening? This was something that was fixed way back on FreeBSD but it seems to be a problem again. Paul. intY has scanned this email for all known viruse

Re: databases/mysql323-client fails to build

2003-08-29 Thread Paul Blazejowski
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 10:58, Dan Langille wrote: > On 29 Aug 2003 at 10:52, Paul Blazejowski wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 10:38, Dan Langille wrote: > > > > > On a 5.1-release box, I tried to install databases/mysql323-client > > > and was told:

Re: databases/mysql323-client fails to build

2003-08-29 Thread Paul Blazejowski
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 10:38, Dan Langille wrote: > On a 5.1-release box, I tried to install databases/mysql323-client > and was told: > > configure: error: Your compiler cannot convert a longlong value to a > float! > If you are using gcc 2.8.# you should upgrade to egcs 1.0.3 or newer > and t

Re: bge driver not recognising BCM 5705M

2003-08-01 Thread Bill Paul
> >>>>> "Bill" == Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> I'm somewhat confused. > Bill> So am I: where were you when I asked sent e-mail to this list > Bill> asking for people to test the 5705 changes before I committed > B

Re: bge driver not recognising BCM 5705M

2003-08-01 Thread Bill Paul
y to experiment is compile your kernel _WITHOUT_ bge support, and then build if_bge.ko as a module: # cd /sys/modules/bge # make; make load -Bill --

RE: NATD question...

2003-07-28 Thread Paul A. Howes
I typed that wrong in the e-mail, but not in my configuration file. redirect_port 192.168.x.x:http The question still stands: Why didn't this work? Thanks! -- Paul A. Howes -Original Message- From: Hideyuki KURASHINA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday,

NATD question...

2003-07-28 Thread Paul A. Howes
rnal Web server is functional, and accessible to the internal network. I even added ipfw rules to allow for traffic on port , but still nothing. Am I missing something obvious here? Thanks! -- Paul A. Howes ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ma

Re: Help diagnosing NIS breakage ?

2003-07-17 Thread Bill Paul
k, though my test for the geteuid() == 0 case was a bit of a kludge since I don't actually have root on the test box. -Bill -- ===== -Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master o

Re: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5705M support

2003-07-15 Thread william paul
=== -Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of Unix-Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wind River Systems = &q

Re: Help diagnosing NIS breakage ?

2003-07-15 Thread Bill Paul
rning NS_SUCCESS all the time. I uploaded a new diff, please test this instead: http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul/getpwent.diff Thanks for providing me access to this machine, it helped me realize where I'd gone wrong in my patch. If this works for you, and if nobody objects, I will check it in.

More Broadcom BCM5705 updates

2003-07-14 Thread Bill Paul
I have merged in some additional updates provided by Paul Saab: - Support the BCM5782 chip (5705 workalike, new PCI ID) - Increase firmware handshake timeout - Always check for GMII PHYs at PHY address 1 (required for some chips, doesn't hurt on the others) - Add ASIC rev numbers for 57

Re: Help diagnosing NIS breakage ?

2003-07-14 Thread Bill Paul
ist. The fact that it fails for root means it must have something to do with probing for the master.passwd.by* maps, but I'm not sure what yet. -Bill --

Re: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5705M support

2003-07-14 Thread william paul
nformation and you don't have the information available, don't bother sending me an e-mail just to tell me that you don't have the information available. Wait until you do have the information available, and then e-mail me. You'll save precious time and electrons. -Bill --

Re: Help diagnosing NIS breakage ?

2003-07-14 Thread Bill Paul
gt; > just hides the bug again. As a work-around, we could try yp_order > > first, and if that fails, try yp_master. It's not a bug in our implementation, it's implementation weirdness in the server. :) -Bill --

Broadcom 5705, addendum

2003-07-13 Thread Bill Paul
and miidevs into /sys/dev/mii - Recompile your kernel and/or if_bge.ko and miibus.ko modules. -Bill -- = -Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of Unix-Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wind

Call for testers: Broadcom 5705 gigabit ethernet

2003-07-13 Thread Bill Paul
y help anyone is able to provide. -Bill -- = -Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of Unix-Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wind River Systems = "If stupidity were

Call for testers: rl(4) optimized for 8139C+

2003-07-04 Thread Bill Paul
fact say 8139C+.) I hope RealTek has actually sold this chip well, because it actually seems to perform really well. -Bill -- = -Bill Paul(510) 749-23

Re: Best way to get max KVA setting?

2003-07-01 Thread Paul Saab
Terry Lambert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > It was for a guy who was was running with PAE enabled on an > 8G machine, and the autotuning was shooting him in the foot > when it tried to grab enough memory to create kmem_map entries > for the 8G of RAM in his 2G KVA space, and its head exploded. Wron

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Bill Paul
re otherwise not working, > so it should be fairly safe. This patch also tests good with my drive. -Bill -- = -Bill Paul(510) 749-23

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Bill Paul
aid: "Bill! Your driver hasn't worked right on in months! I'm at wit's end! You leave me *NO* alternative! I'm just going to have to fix it for you! At gunpoint! No no, don't try and stop me! This is for your own good!" well, then, gosh, I'd let 'em. B

Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Bill Paul
you all for your attention. Don't forget to tip the waitress. -Bill P.S.: Be sure to join us next time when I ream out whoever it was that broke support for my 3Com 3c575C cardbus ethernet NIC. -- = -Bil

Re: Email accounts on FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-21 Thread Paul Richards
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 05:16:11PM -0400, Alex Ayala wrote: > Ok, maybe...yes I read what I wrote and didn't quite explain what I really > wanted to say. > > I want to setup accounts on my box so users can retrieve emails by accessing > my pop server. Do I need to setup user accounts on my box wit

Possible EHCI bugs

2003-06-15 Thread Bill Paul
ng in the USB code is re-using a free()ed memory buffer. Unfortunately, I don't have this particular hardware available to me, and I don't know how much debugging support the individual at Transmeta will be able to offer. (He has his own problems.) Hopefully this will at least help spur some

Belkin USB 2.0 Cardbus card

2003-06-13 Thread Paul T. Root
B 1.1 ports, and I'm able to mount a CD. Any chance burning on it could happen? CD VCD and DVD +/- RW. Thanks, Paul. -- Paul T. RootCCSA, CCSE, CCNA Qwest CommunicationsPAG: +1 (877) 693-7155 600 Stinson Blvd, Flr 1SWRK: +1 (612) 664-3385 Minneapolis,

Re: kernel: lnc0: Missed packet -- no reviece buffer QWE

2003-06-11 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 03:39:33PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: > I get this all the time on my FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE system, which is a P75 with a > lnc NIC. The man page does say this driver is one of the more verbose ones, > and I think the message about no recieve buffer is just that the system cann

Re: CURRENT console setttings borked

2003-06-11 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:21:16PM -0400, Andrew Lankford wrote: > Info about my buildworld: > > FreeBSD bogushost2 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Wed Jun 11 21:33:34 EDT 2003 >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ARL5KERNEL i386 > > In addition to my pppoe/adsl connection no longer

sh job control

2003-06-11 Thread Paul Richards
I've installed a current built last night and job control no longer works in /bin/sh or /usr/local/bin/zsh, but it does with csh. ctr-c and ctrl-z are just ignored with both the sh style shells. -- Tis a wise thing to know what is wanted, wiser still to know when it has been achieved and wisest o

Re: kernel: lnc0: Missed packet -- no reviece buffer QWE

2003-06-11 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 09:51:02PM +1000, Anthony Wyatt wrote: > Hi Everyone, > I'm in the process of hand building a FreeBSD 5.1 CURRENT #2 box. I now have a > booting system that I can log onto and use, but my network interface does not work > :-( > > I get lots of: > kernel: lnc0: Mi

Panic - blockable sleep lock

2003-06-10 Thread Paul Richards
Just got this: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) sellck @ /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:1190 Debugger("panic") Stopped at Debugger+0x54: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0 db> t Debugger(c029bc34,c02de7a0,c029e847,df12da20,1) at Debugger+0x54 panic(c029e847,c02a9469,c029f08e,c029f065,4a6)

Re: Way forward with BIND 8

2003-06-06 Thread Paul Richards
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:01:02AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Brad Knowles wrote: > > > At 12:09 AM -0700 2003/06/06, Doug Barton wrote: > > > > > FYI, for those wondering why I'm not considering BIND 9 for import, please > > > see http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/whybind8.h

Re: Way forward with BIND 8

2003-06-06 Thread Paul Robinson
why 9 is evil and 8 is great... > 9 in production can do so using the port. Using the combination of NO_BIND > in /etc/make.conf and PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 in ports/net/bind9, you can > even have exactly what you're asking for. But why make

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-06 Thread Paul Richards
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:06:16PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 15:51, Paul Richards wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:43:20PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:16, Paul Richards wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-06 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:43:20PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:16, Paul Richards wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:33:46PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > > > Interfaces actually can be added at runtime. Existing objects (i.e. > > > ob

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-04 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:33:46PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > Interfaces actually can be added at runtime. Existing objects (i.e. > objects instantiated before the new interface was added) will continue > to work as before. If methods from the new interface are called on old > objects, the defaul

Re: ACPI and PCI vs interrupt routing on Sony VAIO's

2003-06-04 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 04:42:56AM -0700, Jun Su wrote: > Good Explain. > The same problem is in my PCG-R505DC. Yes, it sounds exactly like the problem with my laptop too. -- Tis a wise thing to know what is wanted, wiser still to know when it has been achieved and wisest of all to know when it

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-04 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:09:00PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 18:19, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > Notice how thread 1's _m gets set based on the results of the kobj > > > lo

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-04 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:01:07AM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Tuesday 03 June 2003 12:00 am, Paul Richards wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:09, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Paul Richards <[E

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-04 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 00:03, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Richards wr > ites: > >On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:36, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > >> I thought the point in KOBJ was that it was extensible so you could > >>

Re: fxp0: device timeout with 5.1BETA2

2003-06-04 Thread Paul Richards
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:17, Tobias Roth wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:59:22PM +0100, Paul Richards wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:00, Tobias Roth wrote: > > > > > > fxp0: device timeout > > > > > > > I get these as well. Is it on irq9

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-04 Thread Paul Richards
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:09, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : The possible methods available in an interface are fixed, they're > : defined in the .m files. > > No it isn'

Re: fxp0: device timeout with 5.1BETA2

2003-06-04 Thread Paul Richards
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:00, Tobias Roth wrote: > Hi > > I still get a > > fxp0: device timeout > I get these as well. Is it on irq9 by any chance, along with acpi0 ? -- Tis a wise thing to know what is wanted, wiser still to know when it has been achieved and wisest of all to know when it i

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-04 Thread Paul Richards
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:36, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Baldwin writes: > > > >On 02-Jun-2003 Paul Richards wrote: > >> On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> The

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-04 Thread Paul Richards
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote: > > The tradeoff with using an index into an array is that there'd be a > heavy penalty for growing the array if an extra method didn't fit, but > that would be exceptionally rare and with our present usage we'd never &

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-04 Thread Paul Richards
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 18:19, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : I'm not sure that kobj actually needs to be MP safe if the kobj > : struct is always embedded in a structure at a higher le

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-04 Thread Paul Richards
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 08:56:59AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : You should look at kobj, it's precisely this sort of dynamic > : dispatching that it was designed to support

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-03 Thread Paul Richards
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:04:11AM -0700, Hiten Pandya wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 08:17:03AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Hiten Pandya wrote: > > > My fingers have been itching to do this since the day phk@ planted this > > > idea in my brain (re: cdevsw initialisations). Basically, it ch

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-06-03 Thread Paul Richards
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 06:28:26PM -0400, James Tanis wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:39:18 -0400 (EDT) > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > It has been committed. Build rtld with WITH_LIBMAP defined and then > > setup a libmap.conf. > > > > -- > > Alright, I compiled and

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica - Imported sources

2003-06-03 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:39:44PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Wed, 28 May 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > > --On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 03:59:24 -0500 Larry Rosenman > > >> Ok, with today's sources, I still get a page not present panic for > > >> address (0x7) on transistion to battery. > > >

Re: policy on GPL'd drivers?

2003-05-29 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 17:48, dave wrote: > > > > I don't think anyone is talking about symbol versioning. The issue is > > stamping the API at a particular point in time that shows it behaves in > > a specified guaranteed way. > > > > The module system has all the hooks to deal with versioning. Wha

Re: policy on GPL'd drivers?

2003-05-29 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 12:04:17PM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > Harti Brandt wrote: > > >MD>NO no and again no. This would repeat the same design mistake > >MD>that is already in Linux. On API level you DO NOT WANT versioning. > >MD>What you really want is: type signature cheking. Like for examp

Re: gbde Performance - 35Mb/s vs 5.2 MB/s

2003-05-28 Thread Paul Richards
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 10:11:19AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Guido van Rooij writes: > >On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 02:25:08PM +0200, Heiko Schaefer wrote: > >> > >> Poul gave me the following tip on this list in a mail on Tue, 29 Apr 2003: > >> > >> "Remember

ATA problems on Promise controller

2003-04-05 Thread Paul van der Zwan
With a -current kernel ( cvsupped today ) I can no longer boot. It hangs on the drives connected to the promis controller built into my MSI KT266 mobo. The messages are like ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting Same for ad3. It tries falling back to pio mode but after that it hangs

Re: mkioctls failed on SMP system?

2003-03-15 Thread Paul Dekkers
Ah, I should have mentioned that: there is about 8 GB available on /vol4, on /usr there is 3 GB, / 300 MB, so I don't think it's worth trying on another disk... BTW, It looks like the problem is in the ioctl_includes=`` - it never gets any further. (Checked with echo's.) Paul

mkioctls failed on SMP system?

2003-03-15 Thread Paul Dekkers
usr.bin/kdump/mkioctls /usr/obj/vol4/src/i386/usr/include > ioctl.c /vol4/src/usr.bin/kdump/mkioctls: Out of space *** Error code 2 I can hack around this, and copy an ioctl.c from another system, but I guess that's not the way to go ;-) Is this a known problem? Paul P.S. I rebooted my mac

Re: Sony VAIO, psm and acpi

2003-03-06 Thread Paul Wankadia
At 05:11 PM 6/03/03 +0900, User Takawata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I also wrote it before. But I didn't commit because I don't tested it. >If you tested your patch, I'll willing to commit. Aye, I did this on my VAIO (PCG-GRX5P) and it seems to work fine... --- acpi.c.old Thu Mar 6 18:48:

Sony VAIO, psm and acpi

2003-03-05 Thread Paul Wankadia
After seeing the "yet another Sony Vaio PS/2 mouse ID" commits to src/sys/isa/psm.c from six weeks ago, I've hacked my src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c so now acpi_isa_pnp_probe() will try the compatibility ID like isa_pnp_probe() does in src/sys/isa/isa_common.c. It's quite trivial, so is there some reas

Re: Checksum offload support for Intel 82550/82551

2003-02-26 Thread Bill Paul
me know how this works. -Bill -- ===== -Bill Paul(510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of Unix-Fu [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wind River Systems =

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >