On Mon, 28 May 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:31:58AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
[Someone wrote]
What was the reasoning for a serperate owner specification from BIN*?
Simple orthagonality. Ie, each bsd.*.mk file typically has a seperate
set of
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 03:06:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:59:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Shouldn't the includes/Makefile be installing headers using
INCOWN/INCGRP instead of BINOWN/BINGRP? I ran into this when trying
to do a 'make includes' as a normal
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 03:06:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:59:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Shouldn't the includes/Makefile be installing headers using
INCOWN/INCGRP instead of BINOWN/BINGRP? I ran into this when trying
to do a 'make includes' as a
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being
used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile.
And perhaps one should go read the commit message that introduced them...
it was an
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:26:11AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being
used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile.
And perhaps one
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:31:58AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being
used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile.
And perhaps
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:31:58AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being
used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile.
And
Shouldn't the includes/Makefile be installing headers using
INCOWN/INCGRP instead of BINOWN/BINGRP? I ran into this when trying
to do a 'make includes' as a normal user.
Kris
Index: include/Makefile
===
RCS file:
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:59:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Shouldn't the includes/Makefile be installing headers using
INCOWN/INCGRP instead of BINOWN/BINGRP? I ran into this when trying
to do a 'make includes' as a normal user.
Oops, hit send too soon; more changes are required of the
