Gentlefolk,
I have run into a problem building a FreeBSD 9 world & kernel on a
FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT host.
I have my FreeBSD 9 tree located in /usr/src-9 which was refreshed via svn
yesterday.
The build is being executed on a host running FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #3 r308389 .
The steps that
Noticed in 2013 a problem with FreeBSD 9 due to a MFC which
broke my VPN. There's a bug report with a trivial patch at:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179829
The problem is still present in FreeBSD 10 and the code in
HEAD also looks unchanged (meaning the problem likely
- Original Message -
From: Dieter BSD dieter...@engineer.com
To: hack...@freebsd.org, curr...@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 1:19:32 AM
Subject: Re: Awful FreeBSD 9 block IO performance in KVM
da0: 3.300MB/s transfers
da0: Command Queueing enabled
root@freebsd
On 19 July 2012 11:27, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dear Everyone,
FreeBSD 9 has awful block IO performance in KVM. I have experienced it
and others have experienced it. Someone posted slides to slideshare with
benchmarks documenting it:
http://www.slideshare.net/TakeshiHasegawa1
On 07/20/2012 03:44 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 19 July 2012 11:27, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dear Everyone,
FreeBSD 9 has awful block IO performance in KVM. I have experienced it
and others have experienced it. Someone posted slides to slideshare with
benchmarks documenting
On 20 July 2012 15:26, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am in the process of setting up a VM instance specifically for this.
While installing it, I noticed that qemu-kvm printed 'lsi_scsi: error:
ORDERED queue not implemented', which might be a clue as to why the
block device performance
On 06/22/12 08:22, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Friday 22 June 2012 08:01:38 O. Hartmann wrote:
I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
shown below.
When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected
At 09:21 23/06/2012, you wrote:
I tried the USB drive this morning with the recommended quirk shown
above on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r237462: Sat Jun 23 01:00:35 CEST 2012
without success. I get the same error message as shown above. With or
without quirk.
I then started Windows 7 on the same
On 21 June 2012 23:22, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
usbconfig -d 7.6 add_quirk UQ_MSC_NO_INQUIRY
Then re-plug it.
I'm sorry to say a lot of USB flash sticks out there are broken and only
tested with the timing of MS Windows. Part of the problem is that it is
difficult to
On 06/23/12 10:39, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 09:21 23/06/2012, you wrote:
I tried the USB drive this morning with the recommended quirk shown
above on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r237462: Sat Jun 23 01:00:35 CEST 2012
without success. I get the same error message as shown above. With or
without
On Saturday 23 June 2012 11:52:53 Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 21 June 2012 23:22, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
usbconfig -d 7.6 add_quirk UQ_MSC_NO_INQUIRY
Then re-plug it.
I'm sorry to say a lot of USB flash sticks out there are broken and only
tested with the timing of
and hardware in the lab on last week.
I reformatted the USB drive with extFAT and standard block size on
Windows 7. The USB drive is now seen again on FreeBSD and recognized as
this points that the pendrive's controller is not just flaky but horrid.
The communiation with OS, and how/whether it
I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
shown below.
When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected.
A Linux system at the lab was also capable of recognizing it. After
that, I tried to operate
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:01 PM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
shown below.
When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected.
A Linux system
On Friday 22 June 2012 08:01:38 O. Hartmann wrote:
I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
shown below.
When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected.
A Linux system at the lab was also capable
incapable of handling the 64GB drive. I do not have issues with USB
it's not about capacity. But seems some quirks for that pendrive (which
have buggy firmware) has to be added, as it doesn't respond for inquiry
command.
sorry i am not USB expert.
umass1: Lexar USB Flash Drive, class 0/0,
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:22:19 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
(snip)
I would be more than glad to open up an office to certify USB devices for use
with FreeBSD :-)
My elder colleague often told me that it is the easiest and well-working way
to check whether the one is
On 22.06.12 09:22, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
I'm sorry to say a lot of USB flash sticks out there are broken and
only tested with the timing of MS Windows. Part of the problem is that
it is difficult to autodetect these issues, because once you trigger
the non- supported SCSI command, then
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:01 AM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD
shown below.
When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was
visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected.
A Linux system
Hello. I’m currently testing FreeBSD 9.0, I want to use it as a OS for a
PostgreSQL Server. However, it is recommended to modified some paramerts such
as semaphores (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/kernel-resources.html
):
kern.ipc.semmap=256
But when I tried to change the value on
Efraín Déctor wrote:
Hello. I’m currently testing FreeBSD 9.0, I want to use it as a OS for a
PostgreSQL Server. However, it is recommended to modified some paramerts such
as semaphores (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/kernel-resources.html
):
kern.ipc.semmap=256
But when I tried
-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: About kern.ipc.semmap on FreeBSD 9
Efraín Déctor wrote:
Hello. I’m currently testing FreeBSD 9.0, I want to use it as a OS for a
PostgreSQL Server. However, it is recommended to modified some paramerts
such as semaphores
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:02:15 -0600
Efraín Déctor efraindec...@motumweb.com wrote:
Hello. I’m currently testing FreeBSD 9.0, I want to use it as a OS
for a PostgreSQL Server. However, it is recommended to modified some
paramerts such as semaphores
Thank you, I don't know why PostgreSQL still recommends to use it. But now I
can keep testing FreeBSD 9.
Thanks everyone.
-Mensaje original-
From: Herbert J. Skuhra
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 3:52 PM
To: Efraín Déctor
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: About
On 03/23/2012 01:52, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:02:15 -0600
Efraín Déctorefraindec...@motumweb.com wrote:
Hello. I’m currently testing FreeBSD 9.0, I want to use it as a OS
for a PostgreSQL Server. However, it is recommended to modified some
paramerts such as semaphores
On 23 March 2012 09:20, Alexander Pyhalov a...@rsu.ru wrote:
On 03/23/2012 01:52, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:02:15 -0600
Efraín Déctorefraindec...@motumweb.com wrote:
Hello. I’m currently testing FreeBSD 9.0, I want to use it as a OS
for a PostgreSQL Server. However,
Hi!
Would you please submit this as a PR?
That way it Doesn't get (as) lost.
Thanks!
adrian
On 6 March 2012 16:53, Oliver Pinter pin...@tresorium.hu wrote:
Hi all!
I wrote a patch, to add support for Vodafone K3772-Z 3g modem.
--
Oliver Pinter
(Tresorium)
Hi!
usb/165815
On 3/7/12, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi!
Would you please submit this as a PR?
That way it Doesn't get (as) lost.
Thanks!
adrian
On 6 March 2012 16:53, Oliver Pinter pin...@tresorium.hu wrote:
Hi all!
I wrote a patch, to add support for Vodafone K3772-Z
Hi all!
I wrote a patch, to add support for Vodafone K3772-Z 3g modem.
--
Oliver Pinter
(Tresorium)
commit 092aa1246e1dde0ffe11a7bc06b540f4fa5851c9
Author: Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Mar 7 01:47:51 2012 +0100
added support for Vodafone 3772-Z to u3g driver
, Stephen
Subject: mps module compilation issue on FreeBSD-9 amd64
Hi,
I am seeing some uncommon problem while doing compilation of mps driver
(this is a latest driver from LSI).
Here are the steps I followed.
CASE-1
1. remove mps directory from sys/dev and sys/module and overwrite
Hi,
I am seeing some uncommon problem while doing compilation of mps driver (this
is a latest driver from LSI).
Here are the steps I followed.
CASE-1
1. remove mps directory from sys/dev and sys/module and overwrite those two
directories with my latest code.
2. go to sys/module/mps and run
On 21 September 2011 05:46, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
The patch in PR 160818 makes some clarifications and improvements to the new
boot menu. Obviously this is not for 9.0-RELEASE, just wanting to get it
out there so people can look at it.
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Warren Block wrote:
The patch in PR 160818 makes some clarifications and improvements to the new
boot menu. Obviously this is not for 9.0-RELEASE, just wanting to get it out
there so people can look at it.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160818
Among other
On 20-01-2012 7:57, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Warren Block wrote:
The patch in PR 160818 makes some clarifications and improvements to the
new
boot menu. Obviously this is not for 9.0-RELEASE, just wanting to get it
out
there so people can look at it.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joel Dahl j...@vnode.se wrote:
On 20-01-2012 7:57, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Warren Block wrote:
The patch in PR 160818 makes some clarifications and improvements to the
new
boot menu. Obviously this is not for 9.0-RELEASE, just wanting
George Kontostanos wrote:
Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting!
There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9
and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port
rebuild.
The relevant post is here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t
On 01/13/2012 02:06, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Why can't it be that only shared libraries should be bumped, but no
kernel incompatible changes were introduced?
Because one of the reasons we have major branches is so that we can
change the various API/KPI/etc. in the newer branch.
Doug
--
on 13/01/2012 12:19 Doug Barton said the following:
On 01/13/2012 02:06, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Why can't it be that only shared libraries should be bumped, but no
kernel incompatible changes were introduced?
Because one of the reasons we have major branches is so that we can
change the
12, 2012 at 8:42 PM, George Kontostanos
gkontos.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting!
There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9
and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port
rebuild.
The relevant post
on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following:
Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this
affects ports/misc/compat8x/
Looks like all the previous hints have not been clear enough.
There is no direct relation between COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and misc/compat8x.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following:
Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this
affects ports/misc/compat8x/
Looks like all the previous hints have not been clear enough.
There
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following:
Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this
affects
Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting!
There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9
and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port
rebuild.
The relevant post is here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=28831
Frankly, I am also
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Sean Bruno wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
Not in the Handbook. To make gmirror work with GPT, create GPT
partitions and mirror those. I wrote an article on that using multiple
partitions:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:22:10 +1100
Greg 'groggy' Lehey g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, 2 December 2011 at 1:50:19 +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:31:18 +0200
George Kontostanos gkontos.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this mean that loading ahci in loader.conf is useless
Hi everyone,
From my understanding as of 20110424 revision device ahci has been
integrated into kernel:
It is possible to load devices ahci, ata, siis and mvs as modules, but
option ATA_CAM should remain in kernel configuration to make ata
module work as CAM driver supporting
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:31:18 +0200
George Kontostanos gkontos.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
From my understanding as of 20110424 revision device ahci has been
integrated into kernel:
It is possible to load devices ahci, ata, siis and mvs as modules, but
option
Since a while, vlc on my FreeBSD 10 and FreeBSD 9 boxes do not show a
graphical interface anymore. Compiling multimedia/vlc works, either with
the legacy gcc or clang. But either way I compile vlc, the result is
always the same: no GUI. Instead, I receive the below show message:
VLC media player
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:40 AM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Since a while, vlc on my FreeBSD 10 and FreeBSD 9 boxes do not show a
graphical interface anymore. Compiling multimedia/vlc works, either with
the legacy gcc or clang. But either way I compile vlc, the result
Thank you! I see this fix in 9 STABLE.
Works)
2011/11/8 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org:
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 2:10:51 pm Pavel Timofeev wrote:
FreeBSD accessor 9.0-RC2 FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 #0: Tue Nov 8 20:52:11 MSK
2011 mox@accessor:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
RC2 is coming.
Not sure if anyone else is having problem with proftpd on freebsd 9,
but here is a patch to stop it terminating, should be included in next
release, courtesy of TJ saunders working with me on it.
Dan.
--
Dan The Man
CTO/ Senior System Administrator
Websites, Domains and Everything else
FreeBSD accessor 9.0-RC2 FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 #0: Tue Nov 8 20:52:11 MSK
2011 mox@accessor:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
RC2 is coming. Nothing changed.
2011/10/25 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org:
On Monday, October 24, 2011 7:21:27 pm Gunnar Schaefer wrote:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:40 PM,
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 2:10:51 pm Pavel Timofeev wrote:
FreeBSD accessor 9.0-RC2 FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 #0: Tue Nov 8 20:52:11 MSK
2011 mox@accessor:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
RC2 is coming. Nothing changed.
Sorry, haven't been able to merge them to 9 yet.
2011/10/25 John
Le 30.10.2011 01:31, Daniel O'Connor a écrit :
On 30/10/2011, at 24:40, David Marec wrote:
But, now running FreeBSD 9, I get new usb/devd behavior issues.
First, the ulpt module is always loaded. Is there any elegant way to get rid of
this 'self loading' behavior, except to remove it from
Le 29.10.2011 21:58, Jilles Tjoelker a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:10:46PM +0200, David Marec wrote:
So, what's should be the news groupuser's rights required by HPLIP/cups
on FreeBSD 9 ?
And, how to handle them with devd ?
Use devfs rules.
Doing this, device rights become
It would be nice, If somebody would write updated
manual documenting whole process of setting up hplip.
In past, I could only get it to the point of printing
test pages (sigh...)
Before release preferably?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Freebsd-9-amd64
Or just extend hplip section in handbook.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/printing-lpd-alternatives.html
It could be roughly based upon this:
http://freebsd.kde.org/howtos/hplip.php
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Freebsd-9-amd64-USB-HPLIP-what-s
Le 30.10.2011 10:04, Jakub Lach a écrit :
Or just extend hplip section in handbook.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/printing-lpd-alternatives.html
It should be a good idea, I agree.
Especially in this case, where nobody now knows how and where HPLIP
rights have to be settled.
It
Le 30.10.2011 08:28, David Marec a écrit :
I have a similar problem..
Le 30.10.2011 08:28, David Marec a écrit :
I have a similar problem..
A new behavior occurs since I updated the world kernel this morning.
`devd` now executes the entry for hplip, as I defined it inside
On Sunday 30 October 2011 01:31:21 Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I'm not sure what would load it automatically - it may be built into the
kernel though. Anyway, as you say it should work with ulpt loaded anyway.
Hi,
ulpt is autoloaded by /etc/devd/usb.conf
--HPS
; }'`
#
echo setting suitable rights for $dev
/usr/sbin/chown cups:hplip /dev/usb/$dev.[0-9]
/bin/chmod g+rw /dev/usb/$dev.[0-9]
But, now running FreeBSD 9, I get new usb/devd behavior issues.
First, the ulpt module is always loaded. Is there any elegant way to get
rid of this 'self loading
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:10:46PM +0200, David Marec wrote:
So, what's should be the news groupuser's rights required by HPLIP/cups
on FreeBSD 9 ?
And, how to handle them with devd ?
Use devfs rules.
Pasting from http://www.stack.nl/~jilles/unix/freebsd-devfs.txt
Create or edit /etc
Le Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:58:53 +0200,
Jilles Tjoelker jil...@stack.nl a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:10:46PM +0200, David Marec wrote:
So, what's should be the news groupuser's rights required by
HPLIP/cups on FreeBSD 9 ?
And, how to handle them with devd ?
Use devfs rules
On 30/10/2011, at 24:40, David Marec wrote:
But, now running FreeBSD 9, I get new usb/devd behavior issues.
First, the ulpt module is always loaded. Is there any elegant way to get rid
of this 'self loading' behavior, except to remove it from /boot/modules ?
Anyway, it sounds like HPLIP
2011/10/24 Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org
On 2011-10-23 21:56, Dennis Koegel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:57:59PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I found a document that suggests a possibility of BIOS writing more bytes
to the
array than its current size of 0x42: [...]
Could you please
on 24/10/2011 21:23 John Baldwin said the following:
On Monday, October 24, 2011 12:25:09 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
Also, perhaps edd_params_v3 and edd_params_v4 should inherit edd_params in
some
smarter way to avoid verbatim duplicates.
Yeah, probably so. We will probably never even use
On Monday, October 24, 2011 7:21:27 pm Gunnar Schaefer wrote:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Dennis Koegel wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:33:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Perhaps try http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/edd_params.patch
GCC chokes here in drv.c:{49,50}: cannot
:
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
mirror)
as test. [...]
It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
But after reboot my server don't boot from hd.
We have the same issue on a DL580 G7. Install runs fine, but when it's
time
On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the CFLAGS in
sys/boot/i386/gptboot/Makefile from -O1 to -Os
on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the CFLAGS in
On Monday, October 24, 2011 9:47:42 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
on 24/10/2011 18:33 John Baldwin said the following:
On Monday, October 24, 2011 9:47:42 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
I found a document that suggests a possibility of BIOS writing
On Monday, October 24, 2011 12:25:09 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 24/10/2011 18:33 John Baldwin said the following:
On Monday, October 24, 2011 9:47:42 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:33:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Perhaps try http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/edd_params.patch
GCC chokes here in drv.c:{49,50}: cannot convert to a pointer type:
v86.ds = VTOPSEG(params);
v86.esi = VTOPOFF(params);
Changed this to params. Also
On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Dennis Koegel wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:33:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Perhaps try http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/edd_params.patch
GCC chokes here in drv.c:{49,50}: cannot convert to a pointer type:
v86.ds = VTOPSEG(params);
23.10.2011 11:12, Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote:
In the mentime, can you please advice how can I use camcontrol in order to
disable APM for my HDD?
@reboot camcontrol idle ada0 -t 300 ; camcontrol idle ada1 -t 300
--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 09:59:45PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 22/10/2011 16:21, Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote:
ataidle -P 0 /dev/ada0
ataidle: error opening /dev/ada0
Thanks for reporting the breakage, I'll see if I can get it fixed in
time for 9.0.
Wow, it would be great! :)
In the
on 22/10/2011 01:22 Gunnar Schaefer said the following:
On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
A litmus question: do those experiencing the trouble all have BTX_SERIAL
defined?
Not sure where BTX_SERIAL would be defined, but I'm seeing the problem with
the generic kernel. Does
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the CFLAGS in
sys/boot/i386/gptboot/Makefile from -O1 to -Os -mrtd (partially reverting
an earlier commit) fixed gptboot. The next test for someone to do would be
to
try just
on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the CFLAGS in
sys/boot/i386/gptboot/Makefile from -O1 to -Os -mrtd (partially
reverting
an earlier commit) fixed gptboot.
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:57:59PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I found a document that suggests a possibility of BIOS writing more bytes to
the
array than its current size of 0x42: [...]
Could you please test this hypothesis by trying the following patch?
With -O1 and this patch, it boots.
On 2011-10-23 21:56, Dennis Koegel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:57:59PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I found a document that suggests a possibility of BIOS writing more bytes to the
array than its current size of 0x42: [...]
Could you please test this hypothesis by trying the following
Hello, can somebody please advice how to disable APM power management for HDD
on laptops?
camcontrol cmd ada0 -a EF 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 -v
camcontrol: error sending command
(pass0:ahcich0:0:0:0): SETFEATURES. ACB: ef 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
(pass0:ahcich0:0:0:0): CAM
Why do you not want to use ataidle?
--
Bruce Cran
(ataidle maintainer)
On 22 Oct 2011, at 11:36, Eugene Dzhurinsky jdeve...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, can somebody please advice how to disable APM power management for HDD
on laptops?
camcontrol cmd ada0 -a EF 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 02:23:53PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
Why do you not want to use ataidle?
ataidle -P 0 /dev/ada0
ataidle: error opening /dev/ada0
ataidle -P 0 /dev/ad4
ataidle: error: identify device /dev/ad4
ls -l /dev | grep ad
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel4 Oct 22 18:16
On 22/10/2011 16:21, Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote:
ataidle -P 0 /dev/ada0
ataidle: error opening /dev/ada0
Thanks for reporting the breakage, I'll see if I can get it fixed in
time for 9.0.
--
Bruce Cran
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
as test. [...]
It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
But after reboot my server don't boot from hd.
We have the same issue
2011/10/21 Dennis Koegel d...@neveragain.de
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
mirror)
as test. [...]
It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
But after reboot my server
2011/10/21 Dennis Koegel d...@neveragain.de
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
mirror)
as test. [...]
It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
But after reboot my server
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:58:51AM +0200, Dennis Koegel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
as test. [...]
It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
But after
On Oct 21, 2011, at 1:58 AM, Dennis Koegel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
as test. [...]
It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
But after reboot my server
On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
mirror)
as test. [...]
It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
But after
on 21/10/2011 23:33 John Baldwin said the following:
On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
mirror)
as test. [...]
It was fresh install
on 22/10/2011 00:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 21/10/2011 23:33 John Baldwin said the following:
On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array
FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
mirror)
as test. [...]
It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
But after reboot my server don't boot from hd.
We have the same issue on a DL580 G7. Install runs fine, but when it's
time for the first boot
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
as test.
It was installed long time ago and often I did csup/rebuild.
Yesterday I updated it to 9.0-RC1 and everything was fine.
Today I downloaded BETA3 iso and tried to install it.
bsdinstall is good. CD ISO boots
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 15:49:44 +0400
arrowdodger 6year...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:44 PM, arrowdodger 6year...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:30:25PM +0400, arrowdodger wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:56 PM, matt sendtom...@gmail.com wrote:
/usr/src/sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_asus.c
Might be a good place to start?
You can use 'acpidump -dt acpidump.aml' to get a dump of the laptop's
acpi in the file acpidump.aml...This may allow you to determine what
changed,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:44 PM, arrowdodger 6year...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:30:25PM +0400, arrowdodger wrote:
Hello. I've used FreeBSD 8-STABLE on my Asus K40IN notebook. This
notebook
has an
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
