Re: With feature freeze being in place

> >Also, usual tools, rlogin, rlogind, rsh, rshd, telnet, > >telnetd, ftp, ftpd, and inetd are already IPv6 capable. > > Hm. rlogin and rsh attempt to connect, but my inetd isn't listening; > do I have to update inetd.conf to get inetd to listen on IPv6 addresses? Yes, if tcp, please specify

Re: With feature freeze being in place

> Yesterday, I tested ping6 between two hosts using link-local > addresses, and it worked. The week before, however, I couldn't get a > different machine to transmit packets when it had IPv6 in the kernel. > I'm not sure about the relative dates involved. > > -GAWollman Some driver seems to hav

Re: With feature freeze being in place

>Also, usual tools, rlogin, rlogind, rsh, rshd, telnet, >telnetd, ftp, ftpd, and inetd are already IPv6 capable. Hm. rlogin and rsh attempt to connect, but my inetd isn't listening; do I have to update inetd.conf to get inetd to listen on IPv6 addresses? telnet can't parse ::1: emachine% teln

inet6 (was Re: With feature freeze being in place)

i've had ipv6 working with freenet6.net.. well, partially working, the full feature should work fine soon though. the tunneling through gif works, and i'm about to test IPSec with IPv4. more testing is in order though, so, i'll try to pass on some more info when i have it. -- jan On Thu, 27 J

Re: With feature freeze being in place

< said: > Is there a quick primer on getting IPv6 up and running? I built a > kernel with INET6 and the ipsec stuff, and my interfaces now have IPv6 > addresses, but no userland apps seem to be able to parse IPv6 addresses, > e.g. "ping ::1" says "no such host". (This is 4.0-2125-CURRENT).

Re: With feature freeze being in place

> >Test IPv6 support! You've all been asking for it, test it. > > Is there a quick primer on getting IPv6 up and running? I built a > kernel with INET6 and the ipsec stuff, and my interfaces now have IPv6 > addresses, but no userland apps seem to be able to parse IPv6 addresses, > e.g. "ping ::

Re: With feature freeze being in place

>Test IPv6 support! You've all been asking for it, test it. Is there a quick primer on getting IPv6 up and running? I built a kernel with INET6 and the ipsec stuff, and my interfaces now have IPv6 addresses, but no userland apps seem to be able to parse IPv6 addresses, e.g. "ping ::1" says "no

Re: With feature freeze being in place

< said: > Comparing LINT and GENERIC is made more difficult by the significantly > different ordering. Is there some good reason for this, or would an > offer of GENERIC re-written into the same order as LINT be accepted? Speaking as the person who attempted to impart some semblance of order to

Re: With feature freeze being in place

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rodney W. Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ohhh.. and please update your cvsup-mirror stats, the sizes of things are way > way way out of date: I think I'm just going to remove the stats and replace them with a URL for an automatically-updated list. It's pract

Re: With feature freeze being in place

On 2000-Jan-23 07:03:10 +1100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Also, are GENERIC and LINT in sync? Comparing LINT and GENERIC is made more difficult by the significantly different ordering. Is there some good reason for this, or would an offer of GENERIC re-written into the sa

Re: With feature freeze being in place

> > Also, are GENERIC and LINT in sync? > > Do we want a LINT for alpha too? I guess so. I'm in favour of it. We could start of with simply copying GENERIC. Nick -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] USB project http://www.etla.net/~n_hibma/ To Unsub

Re: With feature freeze being in place

On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote: > It works for me. Not all mirrors carry the more esoteric > collections like gnats. I know that cvsup[15678] carry it. I think > cvsup2 doesn't, and I'm not sure about 3 and 4. Hah, I forgot to delete the tag=. line. Oops :) - alex To Unsubscribe

Re: With feature freeze being in place

> In article , > Alex Zepeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm looking at /usr/{src,}/share/examples/cvsup/gnats-supfile, and as > > "equipped" it's not working (well it goes through the motions but checks > > out no files). Hmm. > > It w

Re: With feature freeze being in place

In article , Alex Zepeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm looking at /usr/{src,}/share/examples/cvsup/gnats-supfile, and as > "equipped" it's not working (well it goes through the motions but checks > out no files). Hmm. It works for me. No

Re: With feature freeze being in place

On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Nick Hibma wrote: > - writing manpages (or send a skeleton of to someone who will > finish it) > - update HARDWARE.TXT > - check UPDATING > - replace controller with device in all manpages > - improving manpages in general > - FIXING

Re: With feature freeze being in place

> On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 09:01:36PM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > > -On [2122 15:22], Nick Hibma ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > - update HARDWARE.TXT > > Urgh... > > > doing them or mdoc if someone wrote the bare text. But if someone takes > > this task from my shoulders,

Re: With feature freeze being in place

On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 09:01:36PM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > -On [2122 15:22], Nick Hibma ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > - update HARDWARE.TXT Urgh... > doing them or mdoc if someone wrote the bare text. But if someone takes > this task from my shoulders, I'd be happy. >

Re: With feature freeze being in place

-On [2122 15:22], Nick Hibma ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > - writing manpages (or send a skeleton of to someone who will > finish it) Damn right! =) > - update HARDWARE.TXT > - check UPDATING > - replace controller with device in all manpages I think I solved

With feature freeze being in place

we all should have time to fix up all those little things that needed to be done anyway. Like: - writing manpages (or send a skeleton of to someone who will finish it) - update HARDWARE.TXT - check UPDATING - replace controller with device in all manpages