[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lookup /etc/hosts for IPv6 address
lookup DNS for IPv6 address ---
lookup /etc/hosts for IPv4 address
lookup DNS for IPv4 address
Ben dislikes the second item on the above.
What I dislike
Wmmm, strangely enough, current getaddrinfo() still specifying
AI_CANONNAME inside. (It should be removed to conform current
spec, but as far as I checked, still there seems to be apps
which got into trouble with that change.)
I'm not sure what is meant in above (shin, if possible
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
Ben, if you run tcpdump, do you see forward lookups for ?
yes:
10:32:43.545488 platinum.scientia.demon.co.uk.1787
magnesium.scientia.demon.co.uk.domain: 42376+ ? localhost.scientia.demon.co.uk.
(48)
10:32:43.545951
I'm not sure what is meant in above (shin, if possible email me
in Japanese privately).
Woops sorry, just replace AI_CANNONNAME with AI_ADDRCONFIG.
Now I see what you meant. Thanks. Then maybe getipnodebyname()
misbehaving?
itojun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
I'm not sure what is meant in above (shin, if possible email me
in Japanese privately).
Woops sorry, just replace AI_CANNONNAME with AI_ADDRCONFIG.
Now I see what you meant. Thanks. Then maybe getipnodebyname()
misbehaving?
Yes it won't be spec conformant. But,,,
I wrote:
I'm not sure where /etc/hosts would go.
sorry, forget that bit, I wrote that before I'd finished writing the
search order, which did include /etc/hosts in the end.
--
Ben Smithurst / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / PGP: 0x99392F7D
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
lookup /etc/hosts for IPv6 address
lookup DNS for IPv6 address ---
lookup /etc/hosts for IPv4 address
lookup DNS for IPv4 address
Ben dislikes the second item on the above.
What I dislike really is looking up
lookup "foo" in /etc/hosts for either address type
lookup "foo.domain." in DNS ()
lookup "foo.domain." in DNS (A)
lookup "foo." in DNS ()
lookup "foo." in DNS (A)
this seems the best to me, but I wouldn't know if it's a) easy, b) possible,
c) standards conforming. I'm not sure
59:29 2000
+++ defaults/rc.confTue Feb 15 03:58:15 2000
@@ -184,6 +184,29 @@
### Miscellaneous network options: ###
icmp_bmcastecho="NO" # respond to broadcast ping packets
+### IPv6 options: ###
+ipv6_enable="NO" # Set to YES to set up for IPv6.
+ipv6_ne
. For now I've found the really simple solution (I knew there would be
one) I should have found straight away... add IPv6 addresses to the DNS for
the hosts on my network, as IPv4-mapped addresses, i.e.
magnesium A 192.168.91.34
:::192.168.91.34
simple solution (I knew there would be
one) I should have found straight away... add IPv6 addresses to the DNS for
the hosts on my network, as IPv4-mapped addresses, i.e.
magnesium A 192.168.91.34
:::192.168.91.34
I would prefer
Is it just some misconfiguration of mine which causes getaddrinfo()
with an unqualified hostname, IPv6 and hints-ai_family == AF_UNSPEC
to block (trying a DNS lookup I guess), even when the hostname has a
perfectly good IPv4 address, or is this normal behaviour? This seems
rather annoying
Is it just some misconfiguration of mine which causes getaddrinfo()
with an unqualified hostname, IPv6 and hints-ai_family == AF_UNSPEC
to block (trying a DNS lookup I guess), even when the hostname has a
perfectly good IPv4 address, or is this normal behaviour? This seems
rather annoying
Hello,
FYI, recently IPv6 scoped addr format is changed on KAME
repository, so the change is also merged to 4.0.
The scoped addr format is typically used for IPv6 link local addr.
before: addr@scope
after:scope%addr
Before change, they were printed like this,
%netstat -r -f inet6
If memory serves me right, Ollivier Robert wrote:
Please use consistent names like "mroute6d_flags" and "mroute6d_program".
Thanks...these changes will be reflected in the next version I post.
For your information, I didn't use different naming conventions just for
the hell of it...I just
Hi,
could you please tell me how to configure a IPv6 only Interface. I want
the Interface to fetch its prefix from a Router. But the Interface only
gets a Link-Local address when I make a 'ifconfig vx0 up'.
I worked fine with 3.3 and KAME, but as is seems, there is no more
/usr/local/v6. So
If memory serves me right, Kurt Bauer wrote:
could you please tell me how to configure a IPv6 only Interface. I want
the Interface to fetch its prefix from a Router. But the Interface only
gets a Link-Local address when I make a 'ifconfig vx0 up'.
I worked fine with 3.3 and KAME
of the functionality of rc.net6 could be folded
into /etc/network. I've thought of writing up patches for this, but I'm
not sure when the IPv6 initialization should take place with respect to
the IPv4 interface configuration, starting up of daemons, setting of
various syctls, etc. (Also
/network. I've thought of writing up patches for this, but I'm
not sure when the IPv6 initialization should take place with respect to
the IPv4 interface configuration, starting up of daemons, setting of
various syctls, etc. (Also, there's some new variables that should be
defined in /etc
If memory serves me right, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote:
In KAME environment, IPv6 related configurations are done at
last of rc.conf. So it is at almost end of configuration.
It turns out this won't work real well, because if I do this, then
inetd gets started before we start up the IPv6
serious.
In KAME environment, IPv6 related configurations are done at
last of rc.conf. So it is at almost end of configuration.
It turns out this won't work real well, because if I do this, then
inetd gets started before we start up the IPv6 interfaces, which is
bad for any IPv6 services
According to Bruce A. Mah:
+ ### IPv6 options: ###
+ ipv6_enable="NO"# Set to YES to set up for IPv6.
+ ipv6_network_interfaces="auto" # List of network interfaces (or "auto").
+ ipv6_gateway="NO" # Set to YES if this h
On Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 05:40:18PM -0500, Barry Lustig wrote:
--- ipme.c.~1~ Mon Jun 15 06:53:16 1998
+++ ipme.c Sat Nov 20 18:21:26 1999
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
if ((s = socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0)) == -1) return -1;
- len = 256;
+ len = 1024;
for (;;) {
if
Apart from disabling INET6 in the inetd build, is there any way of
supressing inetd from trying to bind v6 services? I like using rup
on the internal network, but it's not working on my latest-sup-current.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the
+1522,9 @@
} else
sep-se_proto = newstr(arg);
if (strncmp(sep-se_proto, "rpc/", 4) == 0) {
- if (sep-se_family != AF_INET) {
- syslog(LOG_ERR, "IPv6 for RPC is not supported yet");
+
Some more information: I can not reproduce the problem with a -current as of
yesterday on my home system. I'll re-check my system at work next week and let
you know.
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ "Reliability means never
_/ _/ _/ having
549
2000-01-14 17:09:10.132548500 end msg 15657
The strange hostname should have been the name of our local smarthost.
After taking
optionsINET6 #IPv6 communications protocols
optionsIPSEC #IP security
optionsIPSEC_ESP #IP security
---
http://paradise.kame.net/v6proxy/diana2/shin/work/freebsd/tcp-apps.2114
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~shin/tcp-apps.2114
They includes,
-inetd
-libutil
-rlogin
-rlogind
-rshd
-telnetd
As far as I checked, those apps seems to be working over both
IPv4 and IPv6.
Sorry
:10.132110500 bounce msg 15657 qp 549
2000-01-14 17:09:10.132548500 end msg 15657
The strange hostname should have been the name of our local smarthost.
After taking
#optionsINET6 #IPv6 communications protocols
#optionsIPSEC #IP security
#optionsIPSEC_ESP
According to Yoshinobu Inoue:
I recommend you to try libpcap-3.5 and tcpdump-3.5 obtained
from www.tcpdump.org.
It would be nice to upgrade our tcpdump/libpcap to have these...
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #77:
I suppose something going wrong when multiple mbuf cluster is
used for encrypted TCP connection.
Because as I tried to cat several different sized files,
catting files bigger than around
2048(mbuf cluster size) minus protocol header size
seems to cause the problem.
Because mbuf cluster could be
I think we have already fixed this in the past, by deep-copying cluster
mbufs... ipsec_copypkt() in sys/netinet6/ipsec.c.
i'm running telnet chargen all the time between kame/bsdi3 and
kame/netbsd and having no problem.
note that there are differences among
I prepared some IPv6 tcp related apps and libs patches.
Anyone interested, please try them.
(Each of following 2 url has the same patches.)
http://paradise.kame.net/v6proxy/diana2/shin/work/freebsd/tcp-apps.2114
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~shin/tcp-apps.2114
They includes,
-inetd
and tcpdump-3.5 obtained
from www.tcpdump.org.
As far as I tried it on the current, it successfully print out
IPv6 and IPsec related headers.
Please add --enable-ipv6 option for each configure.
To print out IPv6 packets,
tcpdump -i ifname -p ip6
To print out IPsec esp packets,
tcpdump -i ifname -p
Hello, looks like I'll join the fray as well.
I've just turned on IPSec between two machines, an i386 and Alpha,
both running very recent currents, each has the IPSEC and IPSEC_ESP
config options set, but does not have IP6 support enabled. I used
setkey and could establish what appear to
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Leif Neland wrote:
Kernel build stops with "Don't know how to make sha1.c".
sha was removed a few days ago, a "heads up" said.
Different instance - that was just SHA1-format passwords.
Kris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
The 1st thing I want to be tested is that, a kernel with
following additions to the config file
options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols
options IPSEC #IP security
options IPSEC_ESP #IP security (crypto; define w
I fixed the bug and using the patched machine from remote. Now
it seems to be working well.
I also simplified the patch to nfs_socket.c.
Updated patches are below. (patches to trpt is same as last version.)
http://paradise.kame.net/v6proxy/diana2/shin/work/freebsd/kernel-tcp.2107
additions to the config file
|
| options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols
| options IPSEC #IP security
| options IPSEC_ESP #IP security (crypto; define w/ IPSEC)
| options IPSEC_IPV6FWD #IP security tunnel
Thanks! Your patch worked so now there's no problem getting outside
using natd.
It is good info. I committed it.
I've gone through the checklist in your original message as well, and
have found so far:
Thanks a lot.
1) /sbin/route somehow assumes prefixlen 64 instead of 0 for the
I found the problems I was seeing. I had an old configuration of dhclient
dating from before it was integrated into FreeBSD. At that time, I just called
dhclient without specifying the interface. (I only had one NIC.) Dhclient then
tried using all interfaces it could find. One of the
it is sent to faith0 then it actually go to looutput(),
and the log messages
looutput: af=0 unexpected
is printed there.
Faith has LOOPBACK flag set before, but it is changed to
BROADCAST to announce routes destined to faith interfaces via
IPv6 routing daemon. Because usually routing daemons
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote:
The 1st thing I want to be tested is that, a kernel with
following additions to the config file
options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols
options IPSEC #IP security
options IPSEC_ESP
I have a DEC Alpha at home running 4.0-current and am willing to help out with
the testing. I am not the worlds greatest coder, but am willing to do what I can
--
E-Mail: William Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 07-Jan-00
Time: 12:09:03
FreeBSD 3.4
These are my results:
% ifconfig -a
xl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet6 fe80:1::250:daff:fe20:495b prefixlen 64
inet 24.218.93.188 netmask 0xfc00 broadcast 24.218.95.255
ether 00:50:da:20:49:5b
Get IPv6 into the tree. Now. Thank you.
Start helping and stop asking. Now. Thank you.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 04:17:52PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Get IPv6 into the tree. Now. Thank you.
Start helping and stop asking. Now. Thank you.
State specifically what is needed. Now. Thank you.
Part of the lack of help may be the result of people clueless as to where
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 04:32:21PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
Get IPv6 into the tree. Now. Thank you.
I don't know quite what makes you think that we came down in the last
shower of rain, but has it ever occurred to you that we're not
_completely_ stupid?
Sure it has. I think I'm
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 04:17:52PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Get IPv6 into the tree. Now. Thank you.
Start helping and stop asking. Now. Thank you.
State specifically what is needed. Now. Thank you.
Part of the lack of help may be the result of people clueless
Do you _always_ assume that anyone other than yourself is a complete
moron?
Where did this and all that other stuff come from?
You have to ask this?
What makes you think that we don't want this code integrated, or
that we don't care about it? Have you bothered to actually read
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 07:04:16PM -0500, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -wk, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -hm
^^^
Damnit! I've asked for some features in GCC, GNU grep, and GNU diff. I
want them *NOW* in time for 4.0-RELEASE. So where the fsck are
Get IPv6 into the tree. Now. Thank you.
I don't know quite what makes you think that we came down in the last
shower of rain, but has it ever occurred to you that we're not
_completely_ stupid?
Do you _always_ assume that anyone other than yourself is a complete
moron? What makes you
Get IPv6 into the tree. Now. Thank you.
I don't know quite what makes you think that we came down in the last
shower of rain, but has it ever occurred to you that we're not
_completely_ stupid?
Do you _always_ assume that anyone other than yourself is a complete
moron? What makes you
Hello,
I prepared tcp for IPv6 patches to the current.
I would like it to be reviewed and confirmed in many
environment before committing it, because I think updating tcp
code is very critical to system stability.
The patches are placed below.
http://paradise.kame.net/v6proxy/diana2
Hi Lists,
How are the implementation of IPv6 in FreeBSD 4.0? Is it available? Is it
stable?
What is better: use FreeBSD 3.4 with Kame or FreeBSD 4.0?
Thanks,
Luciano Rabelo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hi Lists,
How are the implementation of IPv6 in FreeBSD 4.0? Is it available? Is it
stable?
The work on the current is still going on.
Followings are already committed, and seems to be working well.
-most of IPv6 extensions in kernel(tcp for IPv6 and IPv6 multicasting not yet)
-IPsec
../../netinet6/in6.c: warning: 1 trigraph(s) encountered
haven't seen one of THOSE for a while
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Julian Elischer wrote:
../../netinet6/in6.c: warning: 1 trigraph(s) encountered
haven't seen one of THOSE for a while
A warning, or a proper trigraph?
{"/usr/src/sys/netinet6"}$ grep '??.' in6.c
* SIOCGLIFADDR: get first address. (???)
I think the way
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 23:02:21 +0900
../../netinet6/in6.c: warning: 1 trigraph(s) encountered
haven't seen one of THOSE for a while
Could you tell me which line was that? I don't see any...
Indeed. The only line I see (as of the 1.1 version of the file,
"David" == David Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 23:02:21 +0900
../../netinet6/in6.c: warning: 1 trigraph(s) encountered
haven't seen one of THOSE for a while
Could you tell me which line was that? I don't see
{"/usr/src/sys/netinet6"}$ grep '??.' in6.c
* SIOCGLIFADDR: get first address. (???)
I think the way this has been fixed before is to change it to something
like (?!?) =)
I adopted the fix, thanks.
Yoshinobu Inoue
--
Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to
401 - 461 of 461 matches
Mail list logo
