Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

2000-05-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 02:50:02PM -0500, Steve Price wrote: > I too like this idea and along the lines of what Lyndon suggested > how about the attached patch instead? This is a better patch to the proposed functionality. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebs

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

2000-05-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 03:46:40PM -0400, Will Andrews wrote: > Ok, what do other people think? I mean, it'd be easy to change the flag to > use this feature. -dl seems fine for this particular feature. -d is a better place to put this than "-l", as this is a debugging feature. -- -- David

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

2000-05-14 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
Chuck> Compatibility with those other makes is pretty low to begin Chuck> with, but it doesn't hurt, I guess, to allow for this. -dl Chuck> is ok with me. I just wouldn't consider the compatibility Chuck> thing a real issue if it weren't this easy to satisfy. It's not a big deal

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

2000-05-14 Thread Will Andrews
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 01:25:16PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > I like the idea, but the -l flag conflicts with a different usage for > SVR4 derived makes (on at least AIX, Irix, and Solaris): > > -l load >Specifies that no new jobs (commands) should be started >

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

2000-05-14 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
I like the idea, but the -l flag conflicts with a different usage for SVR4 derived makes (on at least AIX, Irix, and Solaris): -l load Specifies that no new jobs (commands) should be started if there are others jobs running and the load average

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

2000-05-14 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
It sounds like a useful feature to me. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send ma

make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles

2000-05-14 Thread Will Andrews
Hi all, Some time ago I was complaining about how there is no way to force make(1) to display the commands executed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles. So I went around and talked to a few people and one guy clued me in on how I would add something like this (sorry, I don't remember the name ri