on 21/11/2012 09:51 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
Problem solved. Raidz pool mount without zpool.cache.
# zpool status -v
pool: zsolar
state: ONLINE
scan: resilvered 2,56M in 0h0m with 0 errors on Tue Nov 20 10:26:35 2012
config:
NAME STATE READ
Hi!
My system:
# uname -a
FreeBSD open.technica-03.local 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0:
Tue Oct 30 14:13:01 EET 2012
root@open.technica-03.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP64R amd64
# zpool status -v
pool: zsolar
state: ONLINE
scan: resilvered 2,56M in 0h0m with 0 errors on Tue Nov
on 20/11/2012 10:57 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
Hi!
My system:
# uname -a
FreeBSD open.technica-03.local 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0:
Tue Oct 30 14:13:01 EET 2012
root@open.technica-03.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP64R amd64
# zpool status -v
pool: zsolar
Hi!
Are there any other unusual messages before this line?
Could you please try adding vfs.zfs.debug=1 to loader.conf and check again?
Could you also provide 'zdb -CC zsolar' output and 'zdb -l /dev/gpt/diskX' for
each of the disks. These could be uploaded somewhere as they can be quite
on 20/11/2012 12:45 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
Hi!
Are there any other unusual messages before this line?
Could you please try adding vfs.zfs.debug=1 to loader.conf and check again?
Could you also provide 'zdb -CC zsolar' output and 'zdb -l /dev/gpt/diskX'
for
each of the
2012/11/20 Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com:
All those files just redirect to the homepage for me...
Fixed.
Please download and view files:
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/disk0.txt
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/disk2.txt
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/disk3.txt
Hi!
Can not parse the config for pool message explains what happens but not
why...
Could you please apply the following patch, un-ifdef the DEBUG sections of
it
and try again?
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/spa_generate_rootconf.debug.diff
I use spa_generate_rootconf.debug.diff.
make
2012/11/20 Andrei Lavreniyuk andy.l...@gmail.com:
Hi!
Can not parse the config for pool message explains what happens but not
why...
Could you please apply the following patch, un-ifdef the DEBUG sections of
it
and try again?
on 20/11/2012 14:41 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
Hi!
Can not parse the config for pool message explains what happens but not
why...
Could you please apply the following patch, un-ifdef the DEBUG sections of
it
and try again?
2012/11/20 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org:
on 20/11/2012 14:41 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
Hi!
Can not parse the config for pool message explains what happens but not
why...
Could you please apply the following patch, un-ifdef the DEBUG sections
of it
and try again?
What about the un-ifdef the DEBUG sections of it part?
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_000.jpeg
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_001.jpeg
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_002.jpeg
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_003.jpeg
on 20/11/2012 15:34 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
What about the un-ifdef the DEBUG sections of it part?
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_000.jpeg
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_001.jpeg
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_002.jpeg
on 20/11/2012 15:56 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 20/11/2012 15:34 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
What about the un-ifdef the DEBUG sections of it part?
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_000.jpeg
http://tor.reactor-xg.kiev.ua/files/zfs/20121120_001.jpeg
Sorry to make you jump through so many hoops.
Now that I see that the probed config is entirely correct, the problem
appears to
be quite obvious: vdev_alloc is not able to properly use spa_version in this
context because spa_ubsync is not initialized yet.
Let me think about how to fix
on 20/11/2012 16:59 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
Sorry to make you jump through so many hoops.
Now that I see that the probed config is entirely correct, the problem
appears to
be quite obvious: vdev_alloc is not able to properly use spa_version in this
context because spa_ubsync is
on 20/11/2012 17:06 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 20/11/2012 16:59 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
Sorry to make you jump through so many hoops.
Now that I see that the probed config is entirely correct, the problem
appears to
be quite obvious: vdev_alloc is not able to properly
2012/11/20 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org:
on 20/11/2012 17:06 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 20/11/2012 16:59 Andrei Lavreniyuk said the following:
Sorry to make you jump through so many hoops.
Now that I see that the probed config is entirely correct, the problem
appears to
be quite
on 18/11/2012 13:48 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 18/11/2012 02:26 Bartosz Stec said the following:
W dniu 2012-11-16 17:17, Guido Falsi pisze:
On 11/16/12 16:45, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Guido, Bartosz,
could you please test the patch?
I have just compiler an r242910 kernel with this
On 11/19/12 14:00, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/11/2012 13:48 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 18/11/2012 02:26 Bartosz Stec said the following:
Thank you both very much for testing!
Committed as r243213.
BTW, if you have some spare time and a desire to do some more testing, you can
try the
on 19/11/2012 17:07 Guido Falsi said the following:
On 11/19/12 14:00, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/11/2012 13:48 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 18/11/2012 02:26 Bartosz Stec said the following:
Thank you both very much for testing!
Committed as r243213.
BTW, if you have some spare time
on 18/11/2012 02:26 Bartosz Stec said the following:
W dniu 2012-11-16 17:17, Guido Falsi pisze:
On 11/16/12 16:45, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Guido, Bartosz,
could you please test the patch?
I have just compiler an r242910 kernel with this patch (and just this one)
applied.
System booted so it
W dniu 2012-11-16 17:17, Guido Falsi pisze:
On 11/16/12 16:45, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 13/11/2012 18:16 Guido Falsi said the following:
My idea, but is just a speculation, i could be very wrong, is that
the geom
tasting code has some problem with multiple vdev root pools.
Guido,
you are
on 13/11/2012 18:16 Guido Falsi said the following:
My idea, but is just a speculation, i could be very wrong, is that the geom
tasting code has some problem with multiple vdev root pools.
Guido,
you are absolutely correct. The code for reconstructing/tasting a root pool
configuration is a
On 11/16/12 16:45, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 13/11/2012 18:16 Guido Falsi said the following:
My idea, but is just a speculation, i could be very wrong, is that the geom
tasting code has some problem with multiple vdev root pools.
Guido,
you are absolutely correct. The code for
On 11/16/12 17:13, Niclas Zeising wrote:
Just to confirm, since I am holding back an update pending on this.
If I have a raidz root pool, with three disks, like this:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
zroot ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1-0
on 16/11/2012 18:13 Niclas Zeising said the following:
Then I'm fine to update without issues. the problem is only if, as an
example, you
have a mirror with striped disks, or a stripe with mirrored disks, which it
seems
to me the original poster had.
Am I correct, and therefore ok to
On 11/16/12 16:45, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 13/11/2012 18:16 Guido Falsi said the following:
My idea, but is just a speculation, i could be very wrong, is that the geom
tasting code has some problem with multiple vdev root pools.
Guido,
you are absolutely correct. The code for
27 matches
Mail list logo
