On 02/11/15 10:23, Martin Simmons wrote:
FWIW, the pre-9.0 installer (sysinstall) creates /usr/compat with /compat
linked to it, but it bsdinstall doesn't. See
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2011-December/009339.html
__Martin
_
On 02/12/15 06:58, Patrick Powell wrote:
On 02/11/15 06:54, Patrick Powell wrote:
Note: just as a side note on this, shouldn't the location actually
be /usr/local/compat? But I digress...
Murphy's Law Strikes Again. I wanted to see what the latest
port/package did:
# pkg install linux
On 02/11/15 06:54, Patrick Powell wrote:
Note: just as a side note on this, shouldn't the location actually be
/usr/local/compat? But I digress...
Murphy's Law Strikes Again. I wanted to see what the latest
port/package did:
# pkg install linux_base-c6
Updating FreeBSD repository catal
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:12:43 -0800, Kevin Oberman said:
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Chris H wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:34:19 -0800 Patrick Powell
> > wrote
> >
> > > On 02/08/15 02:10, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800
> > > > Patrick Powel
On 02/10/15 21:02, Chris H wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:12:43 -0800 Kevin Oberman wrote
Thanks for the informative response, Kevin.
FWIW as most of the servers I manage use nVidia video; in anticipation
of installing the nvidia drivers, I always install the
emulators/linux_base-* port prior
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:12:43 -0800 Kevin Oberman wrote
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Chris H wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:34:19 -0800 Patrick Powell
> > wrote
> >
> > > On 02/08/15 02:10, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800
> > > > Patrick Powell wrote
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Chris H wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:34:19 -0800 Patrick Powell
> wrote
>
> > On 02/08/15 02:10, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800
> > > Patrick Powell wrote:
> > >
> > >> The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, ra
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:34:19 -0800 Patrick Powell wrote
> On 02/08/15 02:10, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800
> > Patrick Powell wrote:
> >
> >> The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, rather than
> >> /usr/compat
> >>
> >> However, some FreeBSD FAQ an
On 02/08/15 02:10, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800
Patrick Powell wrote:
The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, rather than
/usr/compat
However, some FreeBSD FAQ and other documents appear to refer to
/usr/compat.
Question: when did the move from us
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:43:15 -0800
Patrick Powell wrote:
> The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, rather than
> /usr/compat
>
> However, some FreeBSD FAQ and other documents appear to refer to
> /usr/compat.
>
> Question: when did the move from using /usr/compat to /compat t
The latest linux-base appears to install into /compat, rather than
/usr/compat
However, some FreeBSD FAQ and other documents appear to refer to
/usr/compat.
Question: when did the move from using /usr/compat to /compat take
place (just out of curiosity)?
Question: can linproc be in /com
11 matches
Mail list logo
