On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, Marc Frajola wrote:
Hi...
I have spent a bit of time messing around with the command-line
fdisk and disklabel commands, and have been unable to setup a proper
fdisk and FreeBSD partition label solely from the command line.
Somebody didn't check the usual places!
hi..
there is no shift-keys retrieval ioctl implemented in FreeBSD... why?
the KDGKBSTATE ioctl returns just the lock-keys state. actualy it takes
the flags int and masks it with the lock-keys bitmask. some applications
need the shift-keys state (such as mcedit and the tvision library)
Hello all
How much disk space is it necessary to have the entire CVS repository ?
The idea is to build a custom release.
Tkx
Joao
^\ /^
O O
How much disk space is it necessary to have the entire CVS repository ?
Actually almost exactly:
/dev/ad0s3f992439 8482766476893%/usr/home/ncvs
uhm, approx. 800 MB.
The idea is to build a custom release.
This takes some more, I believe at least 3 GB or such.
Alex
To
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 01:49:14AM +0100, J Wunsch wrote:
Incidentally, i recently considered removing the entire bsddip port.
(I'm the maintainer of it.) There have never been any updates to the
original bsddip (AFAICT), ppp(8) is actively and nicely maintained by
Brian Somers, and nobody's
Is it valid to use proc0 for socreate() and sobind() in kernel?
In my case I need to create a TCP connection which is used from different
processes and which may be reconnected from different processes.
--
B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de
[EMAIL
:ps al on my system shows multiple nfsrcv hangs on processes such as df, ls
:and umount. Without any other characteristic problems, the nfs server
:machine's exports all seemed to be working correctly. However, *one* and
:only one of the mounts somehow went south. 'mount' on the client machine
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 11:47:33AM -0800, Brian Beattie wrote:
I have looked at the FAQ and find only a partial answer. I would like to
build a a release with base and X11, to do local installs of
4.0-current. I can build the base from /usr/src/release, I have the
XFree86 sources.
Can
Matthew Dillon wrote to Ryan Thompson:
:ps al on my system shows multiple nfsrcv hangs on processes such as df, ls
:and umount. Without any other characteristic problems, the nfs server
: [...]
I assume the hangs are on the client? Not surprising if its a 3.2
system. A whole
You'll need to get header files from your _target_ os and then tell gcc
where to find them.
What's your target OS ?
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Jason Allum wrote:
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:58:01 -0500
From: Jason Allum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-hackers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: powerpc
The story so far:
Recompiled the kernel with
controller scbus0 # SCSI bus (required)
device da0 # Direct Access (disks)
device sa0 # Sequential Access (tape etc)
device cd0 # CD
controller
On Sunday, 27 February 2000 at 0:59:30 -0800, Doug White wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, Marc Frajola wrote:
Hi...
I have spent a bit of time messing around with the command-line
fdisk and disklabel commands, and have been unable to setup a proper
fdisk and FreeBSD partition label solely
On 25-Feb-00 Victor Ivanov wrote:
The modem's escape sequense is three escape symbols (usually '+') which
maybe disabled if the escape symbol is 127 (stored in register 2):
ATS2=x where x127 disables it, so xxxATH0 won't work. It is good to
disable it (otherwise you get dropped with a
ok guys, here's just a little idea on how to get the hardware
manufacturer guys a little bit more responsive (in fact, i got somehow
"inspired" by the alsa sound project guys because they got something
similar)...
let's put up a list of hardware manufacturers that do not answer our
mails, that
I'm trying my first ever post-mortem on a core file, so please be kind:)
I recompiled the kernel with makeoptionsDEBUG="-g", copied the kernel
to kernel.debug, strip -g the kernel, and booted.
I set the dumpdev in rc.conf, and added to the savecore line in /etc/rc so
it looks like this:
I love the idea myself, but I have no power over FreeBSD :(
-MB
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
David,
I haven't done too much debugging with FreeBSD either. A few small
notes, however.
I don't think the gdb version shipped is ready to handle SMP kernels.
This is a deficiency, not sure someone is working on it, I believe not.
Having said this, it is probably impossible to find the kernel
hm
i mean, do the hardware people want their stuff supported or not? that's
the main question
some seem to choose the NOT.
/k
Chuck Robey([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 11:44:42PM -0500:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Michael Bacarella wrote:
I love the idea myself, but I have no power
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
hm
i mean, do the hardware people want their stuff supported or not? that's
the main question
some seem to choose the NOT.
right, and that is their perogative ... you can't create a "blacklist" and
publicize it, it makes us look bad, not
okay, thats a good point
let's concentrate on the good things in life ;-)
i mean, with all that yamaha crap i had going on the last weeks i am
really demotivated... they should be a little more open minded...
apparently, we got no contact i this company and so they wont have their
hardware
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
hm
i mean, do the hardware people want their stuff supported or not? that's
the main question
some seem to choose the NOT.
Hmmm. You're saying any one who disagrees with you chooses not to have
their stuff supported; "if you don't agree
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
ok guys, here's just a little idea on how to get the hardware
manufacturer guys a little bit more responsive
Please direct this to -advocacy, thanks.
Doug
--
"Welcome to the desert of the real."
- Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix"
To
i mean, do the hardware people want their stuff supported or not? that's
the main question
some seem to choose the NOT.
Hmmm. You're saying any one who disagrees with you chooses not to have
their stuff supported; "if you don't agree with me, you must be stupid",
right?
Your
tom brown wrote:
[Assuming you use a 3.x version]
The story so far:
Recompiled the kernel with
controller scbus0 # SCSI bus (required)
device da0 # Direct Access (disks)
device sa0 # Sequential Access (tape etc)
In reply:
ok guys, here's just a little idea on how to get the hardware
manufacturer guys a little bit more responsive (in fact, i got somehow
"inspired" by the alsa sound project guys because they got something
similar)...
let's put up a list of hardware manufacturers that do not answer
25 matches
Mail list logo
