"Donald J . Maddox" wrote:
Yeah, I thought that APM was APM, but the apm device does nothing
on my desktop with power management hardware... That is, things like
'shutdown -p now' don't work, both 'apm' and 'apmd' just return
'device not configured', etc. Interestingly, at least 'shutdown
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
If this is still about the Presario laptop, APM works (or did up to
november) on the Compaq Presario 1621. Note the apm and acpi can't be
used together in the same kernel.
It's a 1700; previously I had a 1600 which worked better with everything
(the VIA sound was
AGX wrote:
Antonio, you are welcome to contribute to FreeBSD.
I would like to know if you think that is usefull or not to do this
job or if there are more urgents work to do upon the FreeBSD distribution/
installation process. I've wasted 4 years trying to create my personalized
GNU/Linux
On Thu 2001-01-04 (23:13), AGX wrote:
I firstly developed everything using cdialog but them are very buggy
togheter with somebody i did developed "libgringo" that is a generic
library that interface both ncurses and Gtk (depending how you
compiled it) and allow you to write script that can
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Doug White wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Zhiui Zhang wrote:
I have written a KLD and am debugging it. The program often hangs after
runs for a while (I guess it enters into some dead loop). Is there a way
to attach to the process and somehow find out which code it is
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:57:37PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
Warner Losh wrote:
APM is standard. Except when it is broken in some brain damaged ways.
However, you likely have your apm device disabled in your kernel and
all you need to do is enable it.
Nope - as I said,
Alfred Perlstein writes:
So in Linux, if you have a "a+" file, you can
1) seek somewhere (mid file)
2) read some data (not until EOF)
3) after the read you are at EOF again?
this doesn't sound really intuative.
No, it doesn't sound intuitive; luckily, that isn't what happens;)
The issue
Has the issue with the new rev intel parts been resolved yet?
Dennis
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Does anyone know if any work is being done on this? Especially the TCP/IP
over firewire (rfc2734), which would make it nice and easy to network up
my vaio with my desktop PC :)
--
Simon Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Joshua Rosen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010105 09:31] wrote:
Alfred Perlstein writes:
So in Linux, if you have a "a+" file, you can
1) seek somewhere (mid file)
2) read some data (not until EOF)
3) after the read you are at EOF again?
this doesn't sound really intuative.
No, it
Plz search -hackers
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know if any work is being done on this? Especially the TCP/IP
over firewire (rfc2734), which would make it nice and easy to network up
my vaio with my desktop PC :)
--
Simon Dick
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Graham Wheeler writes:
: Nope - as I said, I added log messages to apm.c to log the BIOS probe
: and they log a failure (I have "device apm0" in my config file).
What's the failure mode? Is it enabled in the BIOS (I assume it is,
otherwise it wouldn't work in 'Doz).
On 05-Jan-01 Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:57:37PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
Warner Losh wrote:
APM is standard. Except when it is broken in some brain damaged ways.
However, you likely have your apm device disabled in your kernel and
all you need to do
I'm chasing down a syslogd problem on a 3.4-R box, only to discover
that I'm being bit (still!) by a PR I submitted two years ago:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=8865
I'm responsible for a wad of machines hanging off of a terminal server.
- I wanted syslog messages reported to
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:19:56AM -0800, Doug White wrote:
1) Can a native binary dlopen a Linux ELF GL, yes or no?
No. The linux compatbility is through the image activator. The syscalls
have to be translated, otherwise if you were running as root and loaded a
linux lib into a freebsd
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
This is a FAQ; you have a geometry mismatch.
Make sure the BIOS on the card is set for 2GB mode, make sure sysinstall
detects a */128/32 geometry. 8GB mode doesn't work (my fault, will be
fixed once I get my lab set up and some free time).
Hmm, I just
Sorry, got no answer in -questions.
Just my quarterly check to see whether there's support coming up for
hardware assisted IPsec, SSL, whatever?
In addition to SSL on web servers, we'd recently have found some need
like to run TLS for SMTP and postfix.
Thanks,
Len
Gerhard Sittig wrote:
[ this message is no personal affront against you, Doug, but an
expression of what feeling this kind of behaviour causes for
those who want to share and find themselves ignored ]
Actually, I wouldn't care if it were, but thanks for the clarification.
FYI, you
nCipher's nFast card supports FreeBSD 3.3 and 3.4.
http://www.ncipher.com/products/nfast_specs.html
-Charles
-Original Message-
From: Len Conrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 3:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: encrypt h/w for FreeBSD?
Sorry,
On 05-Jan-01 Charles Randall wrote:
nCipher's nFast card supports FreeBSD 3.3 and 3.4.
http://www.ncipher.com/products/nfast_specs.html
I think Mike Smith is 'sort of' working on support for HW crypto cards.. No idea
how far he has got.
---
Daniel O'Connor software and network
Hi All,
I want to try to boot the diskless system, so I compile nb8390.com with
NE2000 support. But I got the following error during the process. Did I
make a mistake?
# make
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
21 matches
Mail list logo
