Hi,
I tried to use (caddr_t)1 in PT_DETACH, but the code just
failed. I'm confused. It just seems the execve is stopped. Maybe I'd read
through the kernel source code to figure out where the problem is.
Jiangyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (diman) writes:
> Hope your program not named "./test" ??
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:04:08PM -0400, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
> The TCP checksum protects more than just the contents of the packet
> on the wire; it's also a (somewhat) weak check on the contents
> of your packet sitting in memory, and as it's going over the bus
> in your computer between mem
The TCP checksum protects more than just the contents of the packet
on the wire; it's also a (somewhat) weak check on the contents
of your packet sitting in memory, and as it's going over the bus
in your computer between memory and peripherals and for other end-to-end
sorts of issues.
Of course
> This "postmark" test is useless self flagellation.
The benchmark tests what it was meant to test: performance
on huge directories.
> The intent of the "test" is obviously intended to show
> certain facts which we all know to be self-evident under
> strange load conditions which are patently "
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gang,
>
> This may be my lack of understanding, but doing 'find / -fstype local'
> is
> definitely traversing nfs mounted directories for me in -current and
> -stable. The man page isn't 100% clear, but it seems to me that it should
> not be doing
FreeBSD Developers and Contributors,
One of the observations made occasionally about the FreeBSD community is
that although it has many of the benefits of a centralized development
organization, it's hard to get a sense of the architectural direction the
project as a whole is taking, as well as l
Munish Chopra wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 02:45:16PM -0400, Jason Andresen wrote:
> > One interesting theory on there was that the drives were overheating and
> > somehow damanging themselves. Although this doesn't seem too likely,
> > I wonder if it isn't a catalyst.
> >
> > Truthfully,
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 02:45:16PM -0400, Jason Andresen wrote:
> Munish Chopra wrote:
> > I just finished reading this:
> >
> > http://www.storagereview.com/jive/sr/thread.jsp?forum=1&thread=13134
> >
> > ...it's a message board at a pretty decent storage site. There aren't
> > too many great p
> Doug> Don't use nqnfs. It sucks.
>
> Ummm... I'm using a fstab line of:
>
> raid:/usr /raid nfs rw,-3,-s,-q,-b,-i 0 0
>
> ... which should invoke nfsv3?
Read the mount_nfs manpage:
-q Use the leasing extensions to the NFS Version 3 protocol to main-
> Hi all,
>
> We have a quite disapointing problem with a mylex 170 card, which causes
> a system crash every 6 hours.
> This card is installed in a VA Linux 2240 with 4 18GB drives, configured
> in a single RAID 5 pack, running a FreeBSD 4.2-stable system.
There are known problems with the 'mly
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> The intent of the "test" is obviously intended to show
> certain facts which we all know to be self-evident under
> strange load conditions which are patently "unreal".
> I would suggest a better test would be to open _at least_
> 250,000 connections t
Karsten W. Rohrbach([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.29 21:44:03 +:
> the author also addresses the typical GENERIC kernel problems on
> production machines (NBMCLUSTERS too low,...), anyway it's very
s/NBMCLUSTERS/NMBCLUSTERS/
uptime strikes back again ;-)
/k
--
> question = ( to ) ? be : ! be;
vishwanath pargaonkar([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.30 17:13:27 +:
> Hi,
> tell me how can i connect to remote system by using
> tip command.
> i have connected two machines by serial line.
> i gave tip cuaa0c and it said connected.but how can i
> make it to ask for user name.
> what shd i enter
Munish Chopra wrote:
> I just finished reading this:
>
> http://www.storagereview.com/jive/sr/thread.jsp?forum=1&thread=13134
>
> ...it's a message board at a pretty decent storage site. There aren't
> too many great posts, but what seems to be pretty consistent is that the
> problems arise (in
Matthew Jacob([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.28 09:54:28 +:
>
> Ah. You want to reinvent the drum?
matt,
when i recall it right, someone told me about a paper presented at
usenix about logging to a single disk which is exactly the thing that
would do the job here. it was, i think, discussed in a
Now I do. I've not needed to mount anything manually since everything is
in /etc/fstab. The output from the mount command during boot goes to the
console but, by default, none of the log files. Consequently, soft-updates
state is never displayed on a standard configuration except for the
me
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:08:28AM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:46:04PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, it sounds like you're not alone. If you check out various
> > > hardware message boards, there are people hopping mad about
> "Doug" == Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Doug> David Gilbert wrote:
>> May 29 22:32:22 arbiter /kernel: Nqnfs server, too many leases May
>> 29 22:32:52 arbiter last message repeated 5 times
>>
>> ... what do I increase for this particular complaint?
Doug> Don't use nqnfs. It
David Gilbert wrote:
>
> May 29 22:32:22 arbiter /kernel: Nqnfs server, too many leases
> May 29 22:32:52 arbiter last message repeated 5 times
>
> ... what do I increase for this particular complaint?
Don't use nqnfs. It sucks.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "uns
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:50:32AM -0400, Michael Adler wrote:
> Thank you for the tuning page! I and, I fear, others made the mistake of
> assuming that because SOFTUPDATES is in the kernel that it is automatically
> enabled for the disks. Nothing printed during boot leads me to believe
> ot
I went through some of those messages myself. I didn't read any IBM
technical reps, only marketing dweebs who told people that it was
the controller, which is bullshit. PC motherboard controllers do not
cause hard read errors on disks.
In my case it was a hard-read error on
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Brian Reichert wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:46:04PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Sounds like the DTLA series drives.. The biggest piles of junk I've seen!in
> > quite a while.
>
> Could someone give me a pointer to a current discussions concerning
> these drives? I'v
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:50:32AM -0400, Michael Adler wrote:
> Thank you for the tuning page! I and, I fear, others made the mistake of
> assuming that because SOFTUPDATES is in the kernel that it is automatically
> enabled for the disks. Nothing printed during boot leads me to believe
> ot
Hi,
tell me how can i connect to remote system by using
tip command.
i have connected two machines by serial line.
i gave tip cuaa0c and it said connected.but how can i
make it to ask for user name.
what shd i enter in /etc/remote.shd i enter remote
system name?
pls tell me details abt connectin
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:52:15PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> This is probably all well and good, but our adapter is a 10 Gb/s link
> and includes hardware CRC (actually two forms of this, LCRC on a per
> micropacket [32 byte] basis and ECRC over the entire message). Right
> now our goal is to s
Terry Lambert wrote:
> Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > 1. Have the ata driver leave the write cache setting
> > alone by default, providing a sysctl which can cause
> > disabled or enabled if requested. When the default is
> > allowed, put something in dmesg which says "Note: Write
> > caching may be
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > 1. Have the ata driver leave the write cache setting
> > alone by default, providing a sysctl which can cause
> > disabled or enabled if requested. When the default is
> > allowed, put something in dmesg which says "Note: W
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:46:04PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > Unfortunately, it sounds like you're not alone. If you check out various
> > hardware message boards, there are people hopping mad about recent IBM
> > drives having a high failure rate. :|
> >
> > But they
Dear All,
>
> Perhaps there should be a message somewhere prominent
> encouraging people to
> check whether their drives really have soft updates enabled.
> It would also
> be useful if something during boot showed whether a mount
> would be using soft updates.
>
Have you typed "mount" at
Thank you for the tuning page! I and, I fear, others made the mistake of
assuming that because SOFTUPDATES is in the kernel that it is automatically
enabled for the disks. Nothing printed during boot leads me to believe
otherwise and no mention was made of checking the flag using tunefs in
/
Hope your program not named "./test" ??
I changed it to /bin/sh and it works just fine.
It was hard to debug due to my own proggie bug :)
bb.
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
pid_t pid;
if(!(pid=fork())) {
/* child */
sometimes quota counts do go off (for example if you quotacheck
an active filesystem).
another possiblity is that the files have been opened, unlinked, but
not yet closed. These files are still open, and correctly counted
by the quota system, but not found by find.
The only way to test for eithe
If i understand ptrace(2) manual page correctly,
you should use
ptrace(PT_DETACH,pid,(caddr_t)1,0)
instead of
ptrace(PT_DETACH,pid,0,0) .
BTW you code is *very hard to debug* on my 4.1.1 :)
What your uname -a tells you?
May 29 22:32:22 arbiter /kernel: Nqnfs server, too many leases
May 29 22:32:52 arbiter last message repeated 5 times
... what do I increase for this particular complaint? I gather that
the thing that causes this is a rapid scan on the NFS partition that
my backup software does (using BRU).
...
Hi,Sorry I didn't point out that my purpose is just to
stop the debugging and leave the subprocess alone. It's supposed after
PT_DETACH, the subprocess should continue, but it didn't. That's what I felt
weird. Any clue?
Jiangyi- Original Message - From: "diman"
<[EMAIL PRO
To attach debugger to a process please use PT_ATTACH
request instead of PT_DETACH. Use PT_DETACH to stop
debugging a process and leave it alone.
On 30 May 2001, Jiangyi Liu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The ptrace(2) man page is probably outdated. I used PT_DETACH in the
> fol
Hi all,
The ptrace(2) man page is probably outdated. I used PT_DETACH in the
following code, but it didn't run ./test. I also tried to use
ptrace(PT_DETACH, pid, (caddr_t)1, 0) to detach, but it failed too.
BTW, if I omit wait(0) and ptrace(PT_DETACH, ...) in the code, after
it runs there is a p
Le 2001-05-30, Terry Lambert écrivait :
> SoftICE is actually overkill; ddd and gdb are probably best,
> unless you are talking protected mode code.
For a nice visual debugger, you can also give GVD (GNU Visual
Debugger) a try. See:
http://libre.act-europe.fr/gvd/
Thomas.
--
[EMAIL PROT
In local.freebsd-stable, you wrote:
>However, the problems begin when somebody whose share I mounted
>decides to switch off his computer: I (obviously) cannot read from the
>mountpoint anymore, but there also is _no way_ of forcefully
>unmounting the share anymore.
Maybe smbfs should be ported t
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:59:59AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > 1. Have the ata driver leave the write cache setting
> > alone by default, providing a sysctl which can cause
> > disabled or enabled if requested. When the default is
> > allowed, put something in dmesg which says "Note: Write
"Nickolay A. Kritsky" wrote:
>
> Hi all.
> I am using assembly language to write some useful programs
> for my FreeBSD 3.3_release and i need some debugger. I am
> not happy with gdb. Can you tell me if there is some Soft-ICE
> type debuggers under this OS ?
SoftICE is actually overkill; ddd
Mike Silbersack wrote:
> As to technical arguments for enabling write caching under
> uncertain power conditions, I can't come up with any.
> (Until the BIO_ORDERED work is done; is anyone actually
> working on it?)
Apparently IBM has finally released an IDE drive that can
do tagged command queue
Gang,
This may be my lack of understanding, but doing 'find / -fstype local' is
definitely traversing nfs mounted directories for me in -current and
-stable. The man page isn't 100% clear, but it seems to me that it should
not be doing that. My debugging got as far as determining that the
Andrew Reilly wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:25:16PM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> > One of my personal mail folders has 4400 messages in it, and
> > I've only been collecting that one for a few years. It's not
> > millions, but its a few more than the "500" that I've seen some
> > discuss h
Ed Hudson wrote:
>
> the cost of soft updates, and the cost of hw.ata.wc=0
>
> enclosed is a .jpeg of an xgraph of the following interactive test:
[ ... ]
> hw.ata.wc=0, soft-updates enables.
> hw.ata.wc=0, soft-updates disabled.
> hw.ata.wc=1, soft-updates disabled.
>
Jesús Arnáiz wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm working on a project in which I need to develop and
> installer able to install Internet/intranet servers.
>
> I want to do it compiling FreeBSD binaries and, the program,
> only have to copy these on the new system.
>
> The problem is with some packages lik
Dave Hayes wrote:
> You can't make that assumption just yet (although it seems
> reasonable). We really don't know exactly what the problem they are
> trying to solve is. Network news sites running old versions of
> software (as an example, I know someone who still runs CNEWS) have
> very clear re
I'm struck by the old axiom:
You can have it fast.
You can have it reliable.
You can have it cheap.
But you can only have 2 of the 3.
If you figure out how to get all 3. Call me.
-gordon
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 04:31:17PM +, E.B. Dreger wrote:
> >
This "postmark" test is useless self flagellation.
The intent of the "test" is obviously intended to show
certain facts which we all know to be self-evident under
strange load conditions which are patently "unreal".
We already knew the limitations on putting many files
in a directory; the only u
49 matches
Mail list logo
