I'm using FreeBSD 4.3,
I have seen there is no /usr/libexec/aout/objdump, there is only
/usr/libexec/elf/objdump
why ?
is it possible to objdump aout binaries ?
thanks,
Amir.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:39:09PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote:
Here is the code for a scsi removable media drive. If this is to become a
module, the cam/scsi attachment must be removed. I have tried calling
cam_sim_free() and xpt_bus_deregister() but when the module is reloaded, the
cam
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 02:54:29PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
| On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:39:09PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote:
|
| Here is the code for a scsi removable media drive. If this is to become a
| module, the cam/scsi attachment must be removed. I have tried calling
|
RTFS ;))
s man resolv.conf talks about options, but not timeout or retry
You may use MTA config. E.g. sendmail does control these options with config:
I use only postfix
If you use another MTA, you can port sendmail's way to implement these
options: it changes internal resolver data.
I will
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
Zhihui Zhang wrote:
According to the red daemon book, alias vnodes are used to make cache
coherent (vp as a key). But getblk() stuff does not seem to check it.
This makes me feel the code is there for historical reasons.
The BSD 4.4 book was
But the unit numbers can and do recycle.
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:39:09PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote:
Here is the code for a scsi removable media drive. If this is to become a
module, the cam/scsi attachment must be removed. I have tried
Isn't this what 'camcontrol rescan' is for?
G'luck,
Peter
--
This sentence contains exactly threee erors.
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:38:53AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
But the unit numbers can and do recycle.
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:38:53AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
|
| But the unit numbers can and do recycle.
So the question is then, how can i get it to do that?
Jonathon
--
Microsoft complaining about the source license used by
Linux is like the event horizon calling the kettle black.
To
make buildkernel is rather easy way to work it around: in
any case object tree is machine-dependent, and one yet
another directory does not destroy anything. ;|
The make buildkernel approach sucks for incremental
builds, since you are unable to avoid the config run
each time, and a lot of
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 08:09:46PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:38:53AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
|
| But the unit numbers can and do recycle.
So the question is then, how can i get it to do that?
If 'camcontrol rescan' would do what you want, then look at how
it
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 12:23:35PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
make buildkernel is rather easy way to work it around: in
any case object tree is machine-dependent, and one yet
another directory does not destroy anything. ;|
The make buildkernel approach sucks for incremental
builds,
Zhihui Zhang wrote:
I think you got me wrong. I was talking about a device
with more than one names. So we can have more than one
vnode for the same device. (If there is more than one name
to the same device in the same FS, they can share the vnode,
otherwise, they cannot.)
This is not how
Peter Pentchev wrote:
Terry, this is simply not true. Even in -stable, config(8)
is smart enough to try reading the opt_*.h files, and not
change them if they already contain the values it is about
to write there.
Rerunning config and make depend always result in more
things being
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 02:03:53PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Peter Pentchev wrote:
Terry, this is simply not true. Even in -stable, config(8)
is smart enough to try reading the opt_*.h files, and not
change them if they already contain the values it is about
to write there.
On 23-Jun-01 Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 12:23:35PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
make buildkernel is rather easy way to work it around: in
any case object tree is machine-dependent, and one yet
another directory does not destroy anything. ;|
The make buildkernel
[ peter@ cc'd because he's done a lot of work with config(8) ]
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 22-Jun-01 Dima Dorfman wrote:
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) Split sys/i386/conf/NOTES up into MI and MD parts. The MI portion would
become sys/conf/NOTES and would
16 matches
Mail list logo
