I started noticing some TCP weirdness when I moved my bandwidth
stats site from my office to my colo facility last week. The colo
is five miles away by road and 1200 miles away by network. Netscape
would stop for seconds at a time while loading the graph images but
there was no consistency. Wor
Mike Smith wrote:
> >
> > > >The Intel driver will be the preferred driver for these cards.
> > >
> > > That still is under discussion.
> >
> > More to the point, let the respective drivers stand on their own merits.
> > There is no need to "decide" for one or the other.
>
> This is, unfortuna
>As I mentioned above, we CAN license the driver code and the DDK for
>development. This means that you could produce FreeBSD drivers which we
>could then distribute in a binary form under a free end-user license.
>
>Frankly this is the only way I can see that FreeBSD drivers for the 5xx
>series
>
> > >The Intel driver will be the preferred driver for these cards.
> >
> > That still is under discussion.
>
> More to the point, let the respective drivers stand on their own merits.
> There is no need to "decide" for one or the other.
This is, unfortunately, not entirely true. One of the
A belated welcome to being a FreeBSD committer! We look forward eagerly to all
contributions you and Intel's experience with networking can bring to us all!
-matt
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> All,
>
> Intel Corporation has released a gigabit driver for
> PRO/1000 series of
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 06:05:01PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > you write:
> > >> What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the
> > >> BSD license! (and the Linux one under the GPL)
> > >
> > >Many Intel software product
Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> you write:
> >> What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the
> >> BSD license! (and the Linux one under the GPL)
> >
> >Many Intel software products are released under a BSD-like license.
> >
> >Consider the ACPI CA codeb
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
write:
>> What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the
>> BSD license! (and the Linux one under the GPL)
>
>Many Intel software products are released under a BSD-like license.
>
>Consider the ACPI CA codebase we use.
>
>> > The driver will be co
> What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the
> BSD license! (and the Linux one under the GPL)
Many Intel software products are released under a BSD-like license.
Consider the ACPI CA codebase we use.
> > The driver will be committed to -CURRENT first and MFC'ed to
> > -STABL
Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Intel Corporation has released a gigabit driver for
> PRO/1000 series of adapters.
That is funny! jlemon commited his gx driver for the same boards
just two weeks ago.
What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the
BSD license! (and the Linu
Yay..stable jumbo frames! :^)
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> All,
>
> Intel Corporation has released a gigabit driver for
> PRO/1000 series of adapters.
>
> The driver is available for download from the following
> url:
>
> http://appsr.intel.com/scripts-df/Product_Filter.asp
All,
Intel Corporation has released a gigabit driver for
PRO/1000 series of adapters.
The driver is available for download from the following
url:
http://appsr.intel.com/scripts-df/Product_Filter.asp?ProductID=415
The driver will be committed to -CURRENT first and MFC'ed to
-STABLE later.
T
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, setantae wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 06:31:31PM +0100, Gérard Roudier wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, setantae wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 06:54:17PM -, Andrey Pugachev wrote:
> > > > I am just curious, can FreeBSD kernel perform function calle
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Makoto Matsushita writes:
>I really know I'm doing a stupid thing, but here is benchmark results
>of both "plain" and "patched" 5-current (as of Nov/26/2001). Patched
>FreeBSD is about 10% faster than before.
... but only if you spend most of your time running CPU
On 2001-11-28 19:59:38, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
> >As I said, Richard's a member of the Samba team. He's also going to
> >be working on FreeBSD in the foreseeable future, so his intentions
> >here are completely honourable :-) He's sent me the report, but since
> >I didn't say I
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 06:35:48PM +, John Vinters wrote:
>
> I've (reasonably) recently installed 4.3-Release on a system running
> Samba and a few light telnet apps, and noticed similar performance
> problems.
>
> The SMB sessions would randomly change speed, and telnet sessions would
> su
Thanks to everyone who responded to my query.
It looks like vinum and/or ccd will do exactly
what I want and they look very straightforward
to configure.
I probably could have discovered this myself
(as several people pointed out), but I was
blinded by my assumption that RAID implied
redundancy-
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Dan Ellard wrote:
>Are there a way under FreeBSD to build a file
>system using more than one special file?
>
>For example, I have a machine with three 9G
>SCSI disks, and I'd like to build a 27G file
>system by combining them.
See vinum(8) or ccdconfig(8). A very quick peru
vinum..duh..sorry guys. My brain kicked out ccd before I could look it
up.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Michael Lucas wrote:
> man 8 vinum
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:48:48PM -0500, Dan Ellard wrote:
> >
> > Are there a way under FreeBSD to build a file
> > system using more than one special file?
man ccd
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Dan Ellard wrote:
>
> Are there a way under FreeBSD to build a file
> system using more than one special file?
>
> For example, I have a machine with three 9G
> SCSI disks, and I'd like to build a 27G file
> system by combining them.
>
> Thanks,
> -Dan
>
>
man 8 vinum
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:48:48PM -0500, Dan Ellard wrote:
>
> Are there a way under FreeBSD to build a file
> system using more than one special file?
>
> For example, I have a machine with three 9G
> SCSI disks, and I'd like to build a 27G file
> system by combining them.
>
> Th
* Dan Ellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011128 11:49] wrote:
>
> Are there a way under FreeBSD to build a file
> system using more than one special file?
>
> For example, I have a machine with three 9G
> SCSI disks, and I'd like to build a 27G file
> system by combining them.
Yup, see the vinum man p
Are there a way under FreeBSD to build a file
system using more than one special file?
For example, I have a machine with three 9G
SCSI disks, and I'd like to build a 27G file
system by combining them.
Thanks,
-Dan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe free
I could not even get 'Current' to boot at all under VMware 3.0 without
applying the patch that was mentioned a couple weeks ago under Win2K...
--
Glenn Gombert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
(513) 587-2643 x2263 - voicemail/fax
Makoto Matsushita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> iedowse> Some
I could not even get 'Currnet' to boot at all under VMware 3.0 without
applying the patch that was mentioned a couple weeks ago under Win2K...
--
Glenn Gombert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
(513) 587-2643 x2263 - voicemail/fax
Makoto Matsushita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> iedowse> Some
I've (reasonably) recently installed 4.3-Release on a system running
Samba and a few light telnet apps, and noticed similar performance
problems.
The SMB sessions would randomly change speed, and telnet sessions would
suffer from occasional "hesitation" (this is on a Dual PIII-700 MHz
machine w
> As a follow-up, I've just checked the newreno setting on the boxes I
> experienced the problems with - newreno is on.
> I'll try turning it off and see if I experience any problems. BTW, what does
> it do exactly?
It's supposed to make performance of resends/ACKs better in the case of
packet lo
> I had a similar problem, especially with different FreeBSD 4.x boxes (4.1.1,
> 4.2, 4.3, 4.4-stable after dirpref merge) and with Windows NT systems, but
> the crap performance was only1 limited to FTP. SSH, NFS and CVS operations
> were all fine.
We're not using any of the other listed service
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> I am quite happy for the report to be sent out. I do not believe I have
> an ax to grind here.
>
> While my background is more in Linux over the last few years, it has
> been fun to play around with FreeBSD (and it has more of an Ultrix feel
> to it
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 06:37:05PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
> don't. Which would have been more useful: say to Richard "sorry, my
> plate's full", or "I can't help you, but I'll try to find people who
> aren't too aggressive to help you". Nate has given some information.
> You can't blame him fo
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:51:11AM -0700, Nate Williams wrote:
> > >Note, some of the performance issues were made better by disabling the
> > >TCP newreno implementation, but it's still poor and very inconsistent
> > >for hosts not on the local network, while the Linux box next to it gets
> > >mu
iedowse> Someone mentioned on a list somewhere that vmware takes forever to
iedowse> emulate the cmpxchg instruction, and that using the I386_CPU version
iedowse> of atomic_cmpset_int() helps a lot.
I really know I'm doing a stupid thing, but here is benchmark results
of both "plain" and "patche
> FWIW, I'm seeing this as well. However, this appears to be a new
> occurance, as we were using a FreeBSD 3.X system for our reference test
> platform. I recently updated it to FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE, and I'm getting
> nothing but complaints about broken connections, poor performance, and
> very i
Hello,
> Also, a query on my timesheets shows that I had the same FTP problems
> on a FreeBSD 3.2 box with the dc driver talking to an NT4 Terminal
> Server with onboard Intel 8255x controller via a 10/100 hub (full
> duplex), and also a FreeBSD 4.0 box with the rl driver talking to an
> NT4 Term
Someone recently submitted a PR about TCP based NFS being significantly
slower under 4.X. I wonder if it could be related?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/32141 There is quite a lot of
detail in the PR and the submitter has no
trouble reproducing the problem.
For what it is worth
Hi,
Can someone please help me with (hopefully) a simple problem (don't know
if this is -questions or -hackers question).
I want to set up a 4.4 (stable) system to use the IRS facilities in bind
(9.2) - I can build the static and shared libbind libraries (ldconfig
finds shared libraries ok), and
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:41:18AM -0700, Nate Williams wrote:
> > I've just been talking with a friend of mine from the Samba team.
> > He's about to change jobs, and a lot of his work in future will
> > involve FreeBSD. He's just been doing some performance testing, and
> > while the numbers ar
386BSD got it from the MACH Vm
which was grafted into BSD some time in 1990 or the late 80's
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, setantae wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 06:31:31PM +0100, Gérard Roudier wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, setantae wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 06:54:17PM -
Howdy,
As a follow-up, I've just checked the newreno setting on the boxes I
experienced the problems with - newreno is on.
I'll try turning it off and see if I experience any problems. BTW, what does
it do exactly?
Also, a query on my timesheets shows that I had the same FTP problems on a
FreeBSD
any one know special pointers regarding topic of ipsec?
Thans in advance!
--
WWW.XGFORCE.COM
The Leader in System Clustering Technology
--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "uns
Howdy,
I had a similar problem, especially with different FreeBSD 4.x boxes (4.1.1,
4.2, 4.3, 4.4-stable after dirpref merge) and with Windows NT systems, but
the crap performance was only limited to FTP. SSH, NFS and CVS operations
were all fine. The pre-4.3 boxes are all using RTL8029 cards, an
Greg Lehey wrote:
> I think I made a mistake by not opening this immediately. Certainly I
> haven't seen any particularly animosity here so far, and Richard can
> defend himself, so: FreeBSD hackers, meet Richard Sharpe. Richard,
> meet the hackers.
>
> As I said, Richard's a member of the Sam
> > If you want me to shutup and go into a corner, it might make you feel
> > better, but it certainly won't solve the real problem.
>
> I made it clear that my problem was not with the complaint itself.
No, you didn't.
> My problem with it was with the lack of technical backing or any
> real w
On Wednesday, 28 November 2001 at 2:22:40 -0600, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Nate Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011128 02:14] wrote:
>>
>> If you want me to shutup and go into a corner, it might make you feel
>> better, but it certainly won't solve the real problem.
>
> I made it clear that my pr
* Nate Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011128 02:14] wrote:
>
> If you want me to shutup and go into a corner, it might make you feel
> better, but it certainly won't solve the real problem.
I made it clear that my problem was not with the complaint itself.
My problem with it was with the lack of
> > I know my lack of information isn't helping much, and that I've not done
> > much to help debug the problem. However, all my attempts to track down
> > what is causing this from a high-level (w/out digging into the code
> > itself and analyzing tcpdump output) have come up empty.
>
> It's no
On Wednesday, 28 November 2001 at 2:03:21 -0600, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011127 23:08] wrote:
>> I've just been talking with a friend of mine from the Samba team.
>> He's about to change jobs, and a lot of his work in future will
>> involve FreeBSD. He's just
* Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011127 23:08] wrote:
> I've just been talking with a friend of mine from the Samba team.
> He's about to change jobs, and a lot of his work in future will
> involve FreeBSD. He's just been doing some performance testing, and
> while the numbers are pretty even (s
I think I made a mistake by not opening this immediately. Certainly I
haven't seen any particularly animosity here so far, and Richard can
defend himself, so: FreeBSD hackers, meet Richard Sharpe. Richard,
meet the hackers.
As I said, Richard's a member of the Samba team. He's also going to
be
* Nate Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011128 01:41] wrote:
>
> I know my lack of information isn't helping much, and that I've not done
> much to help debug the problem. However, all my attempts to track down
> what is causing this from a high-level (w/out digging into the code
> itself and analy
50 matches
Mail list logo
