äÏÂÒÏÇÏ ×ÒÅÍÅÎÉ ÓÕÔÏË!
åÓÌÉ ÷ÁÍ ÉÎÔÅÒÅÓÎÏ, ËÁË ÌÀÄÉ ÚÁÒÁÂÁÔÙ×ÁÀÔ ÄÅÎØÇÉ × ÓÅÔÉ ÉÎÔÅÒÎÅÔ É ×Ù ÓÁÍÉ ÈÏÔÉÔÅ
ÉÈÚÁÒÁÂÁÔÙ×ÁÔØ...
ôÏ $5 + ÎÅÍÎÏÇÏ ÕÓÅÒÄÉÑ = ÐÏÌÕÞÁÊÔÅ ÄÅÎØÇÉ ×ÓÀ ÖÉÚÎØ
ðÏÄÒÏÂÎÏÓÔÉ: http://5dolors.non.ru ÉÌÉ http://5dolors.maza.ru/
úÁÒÅÇÉÓÔÒÉÒÏ×Á×ÛÉÓØ, ×Ù ÐÏÌÕÞÉÔÅ ÂÅÓÐÌÁÔÎÕÀ ËÏÎÓÕÌØÔÁÃÉÀ É
20020202-STABLE
> drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 1024 Feb 3 16:48 4.4-20020203-STABLE
> drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 1024 Feb 4 17:04 4.4-20020204-STABLE
> drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 1024 Feb 5 17:09 4.4-20020205-STABLE
> drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 1024 Feb 6 16:42 4.4-20020206-
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 20:24:33 -0800 (PST), John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If you're talking about efficiency, it doesn't matter very much. It's
>a rare program that loads more than, say, 20 shared libraries.
We have an application toolchain which basically puts each object into
its own s
I've played around with this a bit, and so far on my other test systems, as
long as I don't do anything beyond basic booting, ie load a mem manager,
device drivers, etc, it seems to work pretty well. Near as I can tell the
problem I'm running up against is in the initilization of the mii section
Hi!
I have FreeBSD 4.0:
# uname -aFreeBSD xxx 4.0-RELEASE FreeBSD
4.0-RELEASE #5: Wed Apr 11 16:06:03 GMT 2001 root@xxx:/usr/src/sys/compile/xxx
i386
Yesterday I've tried to update it teel
4.5-RELEASE.
Here is my cvsupfile:
# more /etc/cvsupfile*default
host=cvsup.FreeBSD.org*defaul
>
> I think I have to stick with the conventional setup, and go back to
> trying to answer my original questions:
>
> 1. Why is the machine trying to send packets to its own previous IP?
> 2. How do I stop that?
Well, for some brute-force debugging, maybe you can get some extra clues by
manu
M> Thank you for your response, Rogier.
RRM>> 1) Have you told natd the interface is dynamic and might change IPs?
M> Yes, of course.
RRM>> 2) If you're using ppp, why even bother with natd? The NAT in ppp uses the
RRM>> exact same libalias and gives you less headaches with ipfw because the
R
Umesh Krishnaswamy wrote:
> Are there any gotchas about porting over from Linux a multi-threaded
> application? FreeBSD version that I am using is 4.2.
FreeBSD 4.2 uses a user space threading model. Linux
threads are supported through the use of a GPL'ed kernel
module and library, so you will ne
What you are asking for is called "process group negaffinity";
a cheesy way to achieve this is to lock processes to a
particular processor instead (forced affinity), which will
make sure they don't run on the same processor. THis is a
cheesy way of doing it because with two processes on a four
CP
Reminder: status reports are due on Friday. Please submit them in a
timely manner so I can have the report ready in time for BSDCon.
Thanks,
(submission instructions below)
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network S
>be open source. It's a simulated web client and web server, running
>inside the kernel. It's good for load-testing and performance-testing
>many kinds of network devices. With two 1-GHz PIII boxes (one acting
>as the client and the other acting as the server) it can generate
>around 5 (act
use the linuxthreads port..
that will give you exact linux-threads compatibility..
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Umesh Krishnaswamy wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Are there any gotchas about porting over from Linux a multi-threaded
> application? FreeBSD version that I am using is 4.2.
>
> Thanks.
> Umesh.
>
In the last episode (Feb 06), Predius said:
> > Parasite (iPaq): 32MB Compact Flash card, formated as a FAT fs, loads DOS,
> > and uses dosboot.com (from netbsd) to load a freebsd kernel on the
> > filesystem.
>
> Looks like I stumped freebsd-questions, anyone else care to take a whack at
> this?
Using the nmdm driver for serial console debugging in vmware I was really
surprised to notice that the thing actually doesn't work at all (anymore).
As far as I could find out it only supported one pair.
Also after a close, when I would do a "ls -al /dev/nmdm*", I would get a
kernel panic.
I re
Looks like I stumped freebsd-questions, anyone else care to take a whack at
this?
Joshua Coombs
- Original Message -
From: "Predius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:47 PM
Subject: Diskless USB Issue
> I'm working on setting up a Compaq iP
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:38:47PM -0800, Umesh Krishnaswamy wrote:
> Are there any gotchas about porting over from Linux a multi-threaded
> application? FreeBSD version that I am using is 4.2.
Anything which uses libpcap doesn't work in a multithreaded environment
until version 4.5.
Edwin
--
Hi Folks,
Are there any gotchas about porting over from Linux a multi-threaded
application? FreeBSD version that I am using is 4.2.
Thanks.
Umesh.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Feb 3 16:48 4.4-20020203-STABLE
drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 1024 Feb 4 17:04 4.4-20020204-STABLE
drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 1024 Feb 5 17:09 4.4-20020205-STABLE
drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 1024 Feb 6 16:42 4.4-20020206-STABLE
Shouldn't these directories be named 4.5-x-STABLE b
Karl Dietz asked for this to be forwarded to the lists, so here it is.
- Forwarded message from Karl Dietz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "Karl Dietz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:02:51 +0100
To: "Jonathan Hanna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Whats wi
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00C8_61B51E0B.B8331E48"
Thank you for your response, Rogier.
RRM> 1) Have you told natd the interface is dynamic and might change IPs?
Yes, of course.
RRM> 2) If you're using ppp, why even bother with natd? The NAT in ppp uses the
RRM> exact same libalias and gives you less headaches with ipfw because the
RRM> trans
Short answer: no.
This requires some way of telling processes which CPU to bind to,
i.e., CPU affinity.
Right now, FreeBSD assigns processors based on a simple "scatter"
algorithm.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:31:58AM -0500, Charles Peterman wrote:
>
> I am currently playing with a dual CPU mach
I am currently playing with a dual CPU machine.
With 4.5, is there a way to guarantee that
two specific processes never end up on the same
processor?
Or does this question betray my fundamental
ignorance of how processes are allocated on an
SMP based machine?
Thanks much,
Charles Peterman
To
Paulo Valdez wrote:
>
> This was a problem of mine awhile back it seems that in linux you are able
> to mount vcds but in Freebsd it is not well supported. I have managed to
> mount my vcds and use xine and mplayer to view them, but as far a looking
> into the vcd itself like a directory Freebsd
Wayne Pascoe wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I am trying to break into contributing to FreeBSD. I've been reading
> through the PR database, but the one thing that I do not see is the
> closed PR's.
>
> The reason I want to see these is to see some sample problems, and how
> they were closed. Being ab
Hi there,
I am trying to break into contributing to FreeBSD. I've been reading
through the PR database, but the one thing that I do not see is the
closed PR's.
The reason I want to see these is to see some sample problems, and how
they were closed. Being able to see the patch, etc. would also be
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 07:50:14PM -0800, Jonathan Hanna wrote:
>
> On 07-Dec-01 Jonathan Hanna wrote:
> >
> > Latest data point here: this time it was fixed mysteriously.
> > After noticing it was down, "netstat -m" showed no serious mbuf
> > use or peak use. "ep0" had:
> > ep0: flags=cc43
Op zoek naar een baan, opleiding, personeel of informatie over een bedrijf?
Kijk dan op www.banenladder.nl
De Banenladder
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
This was a problem of mine awhile back it seems that in linux you are able
to mount vcds but in Freebsd it is not well supported. I have managed to
mount my vcds and use xine and mplayer to view them, but as far a looking
into the vcd itself like a directory Freebsd seems to have lack of suppo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Pentchev writes:
>Maybe we should CC phk@ explicitly then :) Poul-Henning, you removed
>the syscalls-hide file; could you shed some light on what it was meant
>to be used for? :)
I have no idea and I couldn't find anybody using it so I nuked it...
--
Poul
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00C4_03E14D8D.A0707E67"
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 05:11:37PM -0500, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
[top-posting; format recovered]
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 03:58:16PM -0500, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> > >
> > > While adding a system call, I notice in file syscall-hide.h there are
> > > m
32 matches
Mail list logo
