Re: divert socket

I try to explain better my problem: when my daemon tries to read from this socket, recv tells me it read 68 bytes, for example, which is about message size at application layer, but what I read is not I expect (string without sense). Is there a particular way to read from a raw socket or a

Re: ng_fec on 4.7-RELEASE-p6

Hello, Yes, I did ifconfig fxp[01] up. I didn't matter. All I can say is that I am using this on an earlier STABLE and on CURRENT with success... --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

mount_null evil ?

Hi ! I´m currently developing a jail-management solution - I use a readonly mount_null for central software-management of the jails. The manpage of mount_null says the following: - - man mount_null BUGS THIS FILESYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED (READ: IT DOESN'T WORK) AND

Re: Realtek

Luigi Rizzo wrote: At this price level, you can also consider the Intel PRO1000/MT (part number is PWLA8492MT) which has two Gig-E ports (copper), is well supported under FreeBSD by the Intel-supported em driver, and costs $174 (list price, if you shop eg. on yahoo you can find it cheaper

Re: Realtek

Terry Lambert writes: | No, the best thing about all GigE is that you don't need a twisty | cable, It Just Works. They should do the same thing for the 100Mbit, | IMO. 8-). They have started that. Via has atleast one auto-mdi/mdi-x nic chip. We'd like it if more companies start doing it but I

Re: Realtek

Wes Peters writes: | On Friday 07 March 2003 09:16, Doug Ambrisko wrote: | You did something truly bizarre. I've tested similar cards on many | machines ranging from K6-2 400MHz to P4 2.4GHz and the RealTek | performance has always been at or near the bottom of the heap. On the | slower

Insecure PHP installation?

Hi all I know PHP is not in the base system, but I thought I could ask here anyway. I have installed PHP on my FreeBSD 4.7 computer and did a find / -perm +0002. I could see that /usr/local/bin/pear is a script and world writable, isn't that a little dangerous? br socketd ps: Please CC to me as

Re: Insecure PHP installation?

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all I know PHP is not in the base system, but I thought I could ask here anyway. You should have asked this on [EMAIL PROTECTED],org, and cc'ed the PHP maintainer, FYI. I have installed PHP on my FreeBSD 4.7 computer and did a find / -perm

patch for vinum

Hi, Can somebody commit the following patch for vinum. This is already inside FreeBSD-5.0, but seems to be forgotten in 4.X-STABLE. It fixes a strange (and unknown) error code when doing vinum detach. The error variable is not set to 0. Peter *** dev/vinum/vinumioctl.c.orig Sun Feb 3

[hawkeyd@visi.com: Patches for SA-03:02 (OpenSSL) and RELENG_4_6_2]

Any sharpies out here that can verify whether OpenSSL under RELENG_4_5 is the same as RELENG_4_6_2? I have a RELENG_4_5 box that needs the OpenSSL patch, and it appears that only the FreeBSD CVS version numbers keep the patches from applying cleanly in just seven of the modules affected.

Re: mount_null evil ?

Marc, I?m currently developing a jail-management solution - I use a readonly mount_null for central software-management of the jails. The manpage was written May 1, 1995 - is using this tool still dangerous I have used it for read-only mounts since way back and have not have any problems,

Re: mount_null evil ?

On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 15:32, Andrew J Caines wrote: Marc, I?m currently developing a jail-management solution - I use a readonly mount_null for central software-management of the jails. The manpage was written May 1, 1995 - is using this tool still dangerous I have used it for

Re: mount_null evil ?

Andrew J Caines wrote: I?m currently developing a jail-management solution - I use a readonly mount_null for central software-management of the jails. The manpage was written May 1, 1995 - is using this tool still dangerous I have used it for read-only mounts since way back and have not

redirect everything to socks5

Living in rural slow connection land, I've been playing around with satellite Internet. The problem is the company only has Win drivers. (Linux driver is in the works, but no plans to open source it, will be released as a binary - the bastards) Anyhow, to get the download speed of the satellite

Re: Insecure PHP installation?

On Monday 10 March 2003 10:59, Doug Barton wrote: On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all I know PHP is not in the base system, but I thought I could ask here anyway. You should have asked this on [EMAIL PROTECTED],org, and cc'ed the PHP maintainer, FYI. I have installed

Re: Insecure PHP installation?

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Wes Peters wrote: -bash-2.05b$ pkg_info | grep php mod_php4-4.2.3 PHP4 module for Apache EANCIENTPHP I think that the problem is specific to 4.3.x. FYI dirk, I did the 'find / -perms +0002' myself, and php is installing a whole bunch of stuff with world write, so

Re: divert socket

--- Ferruccio Vitale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I try to explain better my problem: when my daemon tries to read from this socket, recv tells me it read 68 bytes, for example, which is about message size at application layer, but what I read is not I expect (string without sense). Is there

Re: 3 IDE devices on Promise card + FreeBSD == not possible?

Pete [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: atacontrol create mirror ad6 ad7 This is starting to _really_ confuse me. Does FreeBSD have two software RAID systems? Yes (vinum and raidframe) Is there something built into the ATA controller drivers that can do software RAID too? It looks

Re: 3 IDE devices on Promise card + FreeBSD == not possible?

It seems Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Pete [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: atacontrol create mirror ad6 ad7 This is starting to _really_ confuse me. Does FreeBSD have two software RAID systems? Yes (vinum and raidframe) And ccd :) Is there something built into the ATA

Re: 3 IDE devices on Promise card + FreeBSD == not possible?

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Søren Schmidt wrote: No, thats not the case, the ATA driver has a built in RAID engine to use with Promise and HighPoint controllers. The reason it is like this is that it is nessesary to read the RAID config off the disks in a vendor specific way, and neither of

Re: Realtek

On Monday 10 March 2003 08:47, Doug Ambrisko wrote: Hmm, I thought I had said benchmark in your environment. We have a closed box that is sort-of a router and a bridge. So your only inputs is really network traffic. That is what we tune the box for. So it would be interesting to see you

Re: #warning must be protected by #if __GNUC__ in headers?

Craig Rodrigues wrote: In sys/syslimits.h, I see: #if __GNUC__ #warning No user-serviceable parts inside. #endif Does the use of #warning need to be protected by #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files? Yes. It is a preprocessor directive specific the GCC preprocessor. This was discussed

Freebsd 5.0-RELEASE named pipes

Hi! I installed FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE (generic kernel). When I try to direct stream to a named pipe, I get: Resource temporarily unavailable. [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# mkfifo f; find /etc f [1] 2200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# -bash: f: Resource temporarily unavailable ??? Thanks, Borut To

Re: Freebsd 5.0-RELEASE named pipes

Hi! The system doesn't wait for me to open the reader, I get the message instantly. I worked on 4.7 still does (also on linux, netbsd, ... :-) ) This is NetBSD 1.6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo test f [1] 2383 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat f test [1]+ Doneecho test f

Re: Freebsd 5.0-RELEASE named pipes

On Monday 10 March 2003 10:22 pm, Borut Kurnik wrote: Hi! The system doesn't wait for me to open the reader, I get the message instantly. I worked on 4.7 still does (also on linux, netbsd, ... :-) ) Ok then you may want to either use 4.7, or upgrade to -current and see how it does there.

Re: Freebsd 5.0-RELEASE named pipes

On Monday 10 March 2003 09:22 pm, Borut Kurnik wrote: I worked on 4.7 still does (also on linux, netbsd, ... :-) ) This is NetBSD 1.6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo test f [1] 2383 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat f test [1]+ Doneecho test f And this is FreeBSD 5.0

Re: Freebsd 5.0-RELEASE named pipes

bash-2.05b.004 here too. But -current might help. Borut On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 04:51, David Syphers wrote: On Monday 10 March 2003 09:22 pm, Borut Kurnik wrote: I worked on 4.7 still does (also on linux, netbsd, ... :-) ) This is NetBSD 1.6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo test f [1]