On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:14:41AM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> On Thursday 19 October 2006 00:35, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > Could anyone please let me know the status of the iSCSI initiator that
> > was floated here some time ago? Is it in a commitable state and, if
> > not, ca
Could anyone please let me know the status of the iSCSI initiator that
was floated here some time ago? Is it in a commitable state and, if
not, can I help with testing (we have some Netware targets)?
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 05:42:13PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> Ceri Davies wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 08:34:30AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> >
> >>>>On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:53:42PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> >
> >
> >>&
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 08:34:30AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> >>On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:53:42PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> >>>For the filesystem I can use geom_label and /dev/ufs/UnlikelyString, but
> >>>I'd
> >>>also like to have i
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 03:57:42PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:53:42PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to configure a bootable image to be used in various situations
> > and on various (mostly unknown) hardware.
> >
I'm trying to configure a bootable image to be used in various situations
and on various (mostly unknown) hardware.
For the filesystem I can use geom_label and /dev/ufs/UnlikelyString, but I'd
also like to have it try to configure whatever interfaces the machine
happens to have via DHCP.
Other t
On 4/4/06 02:04, "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>> The topic is "6.1... your questions answered"
>>
>> Is there any call for it to be streamed out?
>
>
> I ask because we usually stream the meetings when there is a speaker,
> but this is more round tabl
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 10:40:58AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 24 March 2006 08:55, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:06:18PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > >
> > > While perusing my Daemon book I noticed that it mentioned the existence
> &g
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:06:18PM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
>
> While perusing my Daemon book I noticed that it mentioned the existence
> of the st_birthtime field in struct stat. I then also noticed that not
> many utilities expose this: the Daemon mentions dump(8), restore(8) an
While perusing my Daemon book I noticed that it mentioned the existence
of the st_birthtime field in struct stat. I then also noticed that not
many utilities expose this: the Daemon mentions dump(8), restore(8) and
the only other one I could find was stat(1).
The attached patch adds st_birthtime
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:13:12AM +0100, Dirk Engling wrote:
>
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Ceri Davies wrote:
>
> >I don't see your point. I thought you just wanted to download the
> >packages and dependencies.
>
> Yes. pkg_add on the other hand leaves me with load
On 6 Jan 2006, at 23:30, Dirk Engling wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Ceri Davies wrote:
The package cluster uses chroot() for this.
Sure, but some post install scripts better run inside the running
jail, those script will do stuff like creating users and installing
files with user ids
On 6 Jan 2006, at 20:59, Dirk Engling wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Matt Emmerton wrote:
What about pkg_fetch -R?
This command is not in the base system. Since there is some logic
in pkg_add for resolving dependencies and fetching packages I
hoped, there might be some easy way not involvi
On 5 Jan 2006, at 18:43, Ahnjoan Amous wrote:
In 5.2.1-RELEASE, setfacl updates the modification time of the file
when acls are changed. I haven't been able to find any complaints
about this behavior, is this something folks on the list would expect
when using setfacl? If so, does anyone know
On 21 Dec 2005, at 16:01, Juhana Tahvanainen wrote:
how about:
FreeBSD-Handbook-General (guaranteed to work with all FreeBSD
systems, doesn't include stuff in FreeBSD-Handbook-BRANCH.x)
FreeBSD-Handbook-4.x (guaranteed to work with 4.x branch, doesn't
include stuff in FreeBSD-Handbook-G
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:56:44AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 23 December 2005 05:43 am, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:18:26AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > Sounds good (you could just go back to using -static in that case, but
> >
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:18:26AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> Sounds good (you could just go back to using -static in that case, but that's
> a minor detail). Still have TORTUOUS change in your diff. :)
No harm done :)
New version fixing both issues at
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ceri/crunchg
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 04:41:01PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 December 2005 04:31 pm, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 01:43:58PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 20 December 2005 10:58 am, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > > > On Tue, De
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 01:43:58PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 December 2005 10:58 am, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 10:29:27AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > The other concern is does this force the entire crunch to require a
> > > wor
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 03:46:53PM +0100, Joel Dahl wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:22 +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > This is exactly the idea that I have been pimping to anyone who will
> > listen for the last three months or so. I also think that it is
> > advantageous fo
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 10:29:27AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 December 2005 06:41 am, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > Adrian Steinmann's talk at EuroBSDcon regarding a single user SSH daemon
> > for rescue purposes highlighted an interesting point regarding some
>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:34:23AM +0100, Dirk GOUDERS wrote:
>
> > 3. Full review and update of the install docs, handbook, FAQ, etc.
> > There are sections that are embarrassingly out of date (one section of
> > the handbook apparently states that we only support a single brand of
> > wifi car
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 05:37:20AM -0500, Allen wrote:
> On Saturday 17 December 2005 03:55, Christian Brueffer wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:55:00AM +, Allen wrote:
> > > I know about the port tool, but what I'd love to have is a tool you
> > > could run from the CLI or the GUI that w
+.Ic libs_so
+keyword was added in 2005 by
+.An Adrian Steinmann Aq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+and
+.An Ceri Davies Aq [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Index: crunchgen.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/crunch/crunchgen/crunchgen.c,v
retrieving revision
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:11:15PM +0300, Michael Bushkov wrote:
> Ceri Davies wrote:
>
> >I realise that you weren't asking for comments, but I took a quick look
> >at http://www.rsu.ru/~bushman/nsswitch_cached/nss_cached.patch and have
> >some. I
In the list that shall not be cc'd to, on Tue, Nov 01, 2005
at 04:15:07PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> Michael Bushkov disk some interesting work for use under the Google
> Summer of Code and I'd like to see the appropriate parts committed.
> Unfortunately, this isn't an area I have great depths o
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:52:02PM -0400, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> The security code of the web interface seems to really screw people
> over (the image displaying a text that you have to enter).
>
> It goes like this:
> - open web page
> - enter PR
> - enter security code but get anything wrong (
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 03:42:51PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:53:11PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote..
> > For statistical purposes, where can I get information such as the number
> > of developers (with commit bit?) active on the FreeBSD project?
>
> I don't think there is a
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 06:10:06PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:21:10AM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > I don't really think that this benchmark is bad news for either OS. My
> > only real concern are the process creation/termination results on FreeBSD.
&g
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 01:10:04AM -0800, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
>
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > the benchmark you cited is for uniprocessor systems
> > only.
> > It says nothing about multiprocessor performance,
> > which is what FreeBSD
> > is aiming for.
> Doesn't the (ULE) scheduler have a switch t
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:19:02AM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> Anyone having one of the Oracle linux dists running under FreeBSD?
I have 9i running. It turned out to be easier doing it that way than
finding a Linux dist that would work. I followed the instructions at
http://ezine.daemonne
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 05:09:06PM -0600, Kevin Lyons wrote:
> you missed the rest of the thread. /bin/csh is not /bin/tcsh. i have
> run into a fairly important compatibility problem brought on by this. later.
As you've been told, calling tcsh as csh should activate csh
compatibility mode. If
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 06:59:32PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 04:00:25PM -0600, Kevin Lyons wrote:
> Thus, if there is a bug in tcsh's csh compatibility mode, you really
> might do better to report it to the tcsh maintainers - on the several
> occassions when I've neede
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 08:27:45PM +1000, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Dmitry Karasik wrote:
>
> > I just wonder, if 'rm' is so fearful to you, why bother changing rm(1)?
> > Write a simple wrapper around, as many sysadmins do for their needs, and
> > use it instead of rm.
>
> Preci
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 05:22:50PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 8:57 PM +0300 10/2/04, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >On 2004-10-02 21:23, Lee Harr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > John Beck, who works for Sun, has posted an entry in his blog
> > > > yesterday about "rm -fr /" protection, wh
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 11:51:43AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> Adding protection that prevents foot-shooting is not something without
> precedent to FreeBSD either:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/boot0cfg/boot0cfg.c.diff?r1=1.13&r2=1.14
Is that the correct reference?
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 11:23:52AM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> [ Sorry to be so negative ... ]
>
> At very least you should consider to error out silently as POSIX requires "-f"
> to be silent. Other than that you should really look into the standards and
> what they way about rm and friends.
Are
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 08:26:53PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If the controller on these boards doesn't detect a drive attached, then
> > the BIOS for the controller doesn't get installed, so make sure that
>
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:28:24PM +, Mark wrote:
> Vladim?r Benc wrote:
>
> > If a BSD box doesn't "see" the third IDE, this seems to be in the
> > BIOS is Enabled only Primary IDE Controller. You must enable both
> > Channels on the controller.
>
> All three IDE controllers are enabled in t
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 01:14:46PM +0100, Friedemann Becker wrote:
> hello,
>
> I sent a new bugreport via the web interface and noticed two things I
> wondered about:
>
> - in the multiline forms it seems like there would be linebreaking
> when typing in the report, but on the website it show
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:12:02AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Leo Bicknell wrote:
> >In a message written on Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 01:47:57PM -0600, Brandon D.
> >Valentine wrote:
> >
> >>I'm afraid there's not much that FreeBSD can do about this. All PRs are
> >>forwarded to the public freebsd-
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:51:53PM +, Paul Robinson wrote:
> Just a thought:
>
> How about everything that hasn't been touched in 3 years gets put into a
> special state of "closed-believed-dead", everything over 12 months (or
> 6?) gets the same AFTER an e-mail has been sent out to the orig
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 04:36:47PM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:35:01AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Every FreeBSD release cycle in the past year has hit bumps due to install
> > floppy problems. This is becoming more and more of
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:35:01AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> All,
>
> Every FreeBSD release cycle in the past year has hit bumps due to install
> floppy problems. This is becoming more and more of a burden on the
> Release Engineering Team, as we simply do not have the resources to
> constantly
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:45:25PM -0600, Ryan Sommers wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 20:29, Nick Rogness wrote:
> > 1) Allow for paid development for a specific bug/feature
> >
> > - Setup some program that allows users like myself to pay for a
> > developers time to fix a specific
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 12:12:03PM -0500, Lucas Holt wrote:
> Funny, I see people switching to *BSD from Linux all the time. I've
> "converted" quite a few people at Western Michigan where i'm a student.
>
> Most people think of FreeBSD as the "new" linux. You have to think to
> use it, as opp
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:31:32PM -0800, Rayson Ho wrote:
> I am wondering if it is useful to have a "secure" file flag??
>
> The secure file flag will be set for files that contain sensitive data.
> Then the OS will take special care when operating on those "secure"
> files.
>
> e.g. when delet
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:46:02AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> ISTR there is a tool (other than systat -vmstat) that shows interrupt
> statistics for all interrupts, but I can't find anything except the
> hw.intrnames and hw.intrcnt sysctls, which aren't directly human-
> readable. Does an
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:23:56AM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> In the meantime I'm trying to figure out if there's some simple hack
> to disregard these wildcard A records, short of requesting zone
> transfers of the root nameservers (e.g. via peering with
> f.root-servers.net) and purging t
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 10:45:48AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> maybe we should make some sort of geographical registration
> web page so that people can find each other?
ports/astro/xearth/files/freebsd.committers.markers ?
Ceri
--
The power of the heroic dwarves has come!
To Unsubscribe:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:33:53AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> If you don't have the machine-power to run make release yourself,
> I hope the japanese snapshot server is producing good snapshots,
> if that fails, I would appreciate if somebody will produce and put up
> good releases and/or I
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 05:00:05PM +0100, Dominic Marks wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 04:30:24PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 01:48:12PM +0100, Dominic Marks wrote:
> > > I had this problem. To get good backtraces I do the following. I don't
>
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 01:48:12PM +0100, Dominic Marks wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 12:26:41PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> >
> > I've had another kernel panic, this time from a cold boot (the machine had
> > been powered off overnight), with a new world
I've had another kernel panic, this time from a cold boot (the machine had
been powered off overnight), with a new world and kernel built yesterday:
FreeBSD rhadamanth.private.submonkey.net 4.6-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE #0: Wed
May 1 21:59:38 BST 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/us
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 05:59:26PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
>
> Any further information can be provided if you give me instructions on how to
> get it.
Bugger, scratch that; I just deleted the vmcore (no, I have no idea why either).
Aargh.
Ceri
--
get the cool shoe shine
To Un
Hi all,
Earlier today I suffered a kernel panic while the system was coming back up
from "shutdown -r now".
This is an SMP system running 4.6-PRERELEASE from May 1st. Here's uname -a :
FreeBSD rhadamanth.private.submonkey.net 4.6-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE #0: Wed
May 1 21:59:38 BST
56 matches
Mail list logo
