Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:33:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: c0ldbyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org,
Steven Hartland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Devon Sean McCullough wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:02:33 +0100
.
Peace
--Devon
/~\
\ /Health Care
X not warfare
/ \
Dubya won the digital vote
Kerry won the popular vote
From: "Steven Hartland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ,
us code and bringing some extra bits from the libkvm changes
over, since gdb in 4.x doesn't use libkvm for kernel debugging).
If there's any significant interest, maybe somebody can be convinced to
commit it to RELENG_4 (ha ha ha).
Huge thanks to Peter who helped me out with understanding
"usbd_enable="YES"ifconfig_fxp0="DHCP"ifconfig_fxp1="inet
172.17.0.1 netmask
255.255.255.0"hostname="The-Server.KnightRaven.com"firewall_enable="YES"firewall_type="open"firewall_quiet="NO"natd_enable="YES"natd_flags="-f
/etc/natd.conf"natd_interface="fxp0"
Let me know if there are any other configuration files you need to look
at...
Any ideas or help is greatly appreciated!
Thank you!
Devon
that I need to do?
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Paetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Devon Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 3:22 AM
Subject: Re: IPDIVERT, having issues? [Moved to -questions]
>
And my apologies to those of you who found out that this file didn't
exist on the server yesterday -- it should be there now.
--Devon
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubs
d (and
possibly hints on doing it), or
b) Possible workarounds / hacks to do this faster for vr(4)
Any input is appreciated! (Except ``vr(4) is lol'')
Kind regards,
Devon H. O'Dell
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
2006/11/28, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
Just wondering, abstractly..
Both sides can read from and write to the socket file descriptor.
You'll need to develop a protocol to determine when either given side
is expecting to receive or to send data (if both sides sit around in
r
SI disks.
Hope this is of some use. I'd be interested in seeing what others are doing.
Kind regards,
Devon H. O'Dell
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Any particular reason you're looking into doing this?
Kind regards,
Devon H. O'Dell
_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]&%
---_ http://www.[1]rudyrockstar.com -_-__---
--
r someone could hack up demonstrating this principle solely (or
software package that's more straightforward and less abstracted that
PostgreSQL) would be greatly appreciated.
Kind regards,
Devon H. O'Dell
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--Devon
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
mal (as it would have to be
done on a per-packet basis). If we could store those IPs in a hash table
with a fast algorithm for O(1) lookup times, the prison subsystem would
experience significant feature improvements.
--
Kind regards,
Devon H. O'Dell | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IC
ity that you use. You'd have to write your own bloody
operating system because ``learning's in your best interest''.
I'm sure this will become another bikeshed, so I suggest whoever came up
with the idea to put up or shut up. People are interested in solutions,
not
hink this is
a problem, take a look at init(8) and learn about securelevels.
What happened: someone was unfamiliar with the syscall API. They crashed
their system. They screamed wildly, believing they'd found a buffer
overflow, when they'd merely overloaded
u very much.
Best regards,
You might want to look at various patches for FreeBSD multipath routing
that are available via the mailing lists. They're pretty easy to find
with a search for FreeBSD Multimath routing via google.
--Devon
___
[EMAI
I can do with little effort and in little time.
Congratulations, and good luck with your study!
Kind Regards,
Devon H. O'Dell
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
many cases, it's not practical to wait for
over a certain period of time to perform the combination of commands
needed to exploit software due to network or file issues. But it is a
very valid point.
--Devon
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
now that
not very many FreeBSD developers use IRC, but we are all available in
#dfinstaller on EFNet. We're using gettext for this at the moment.
Kind regards,
Devon H. O'Dell
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
y simple to extend, and it's not
very large.
I haven't looked at Drakx at all, so I can't say anything useful about that.
HTH,
Devon H. O'Dell
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
nd a half.
I have run the MIP patch and found no problems. I believe there is a
race condition that it introduces, but that could be irrelevant /
incorrect information. I'll leave it up to PJD and others to provide any
more information if it is necessary and
mpt to add
an alias into a jail:
j02# ifconfig fxp0 alias 192.168.2.1
ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): permission denied
Thanks.
--Devon
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send a
Justin Hopper wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for understanding my question, Devon. I guess at this point I'll
patch a system here and begin testing with it, and hopefully PJD or PHK
or somebody else @freebsd will respond with any plans to roll this
functionality into the base system. It's re
third questions are the most important, I think.
--Devon
pgpKSN1sdBwYt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
h of flags in my eventhandler function's 2nd
> > argument that I can then use to write to my device's
> > registers with the proper information
>
> These don't look like questions...
They're not stated as such; I've only taken a brief look around the
watchdog functionality and I just wanted to confirm that this is how
the stuff works so I don't end up goofing it up :).
>
> Warner
Thanks for the help!
--Devon
pgpEDn9ivlh3s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:02:15AM +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:55:53PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > I'm busy writing a Ziatech 5503 watchdog driver for FreeBSD (and
> > > porting all the watchdog stuff to DragonFly BSD) and Plan 9.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:43:41AM +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:02:15AM +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:55:53PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > > I'm busy writing a Ziatech 5503 watchdog driver for
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 02:24:54PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday 19 March 2005 04:04 am, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:43:41AM +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, hate replying to myself. Turns out the value here is vari
bit of your own advice `c0ldbyte'. I'm
personally sick of your condescending attitude towards everybody
on the public lists. Cut it out.
--Devon
pgpNJ6xL4OHDT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
und on cvsweb this morning:
>
>
> http://grappa.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/i386/i386/bcopy.s?cvsroot=dragonfly
>
>
> I dunno if Matt has benchmarks for before and after.
>
> David.
I believe it was asserted on the list that the modification
doubled
(ifnet, int, caddr_t)
Kind regards,
Devon H. O'Dell
pgpdBYRntqE5Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:02:33 +0100 Steven Hartland asked this question
but no answer was posted. The trouble is likely no client reverse DNS
either because it is missing or slow. Adding the client to /etc/hosts
on the server seems at first to do nothing but after a minute or so it
stops hanging a
ability to break out of a
jail as more of a threat than that. Additionally, I'm pretty sure
it wouldn't be very difficult to prove that there are no issues
with this. Read only mounts are so useful, and frequent, that I'm
quite sure we'd know if there were security issues with
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:46:43PM +0300, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org wrote:
> blagodarq za izpratenoto ot Vas pismo nai skoro shte vi otgovorq!!
Turn this off.
pgpfqXCgnd4rU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:47:32PM +0200, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:46:43PM +0300, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org wrote:
^- whoops, I didn't notice that.
> > blagodarq za izpratenoto ot Vas pismo nai skoro shte vi otgovorq!!
>
> Turn this off.
ers do not.
An older workaround # echo hosts: files >> /etc/nsswitch.conf
disables DNS on the entire server. I know /etc/host.conf
controlled host lookups, now vanished with no trace.
I guess /etc/hosts lacks reverse lookups.
Peace
is
feature?
I'm not sure the rationale is appropriate, though. You should be more
worried about prioritizing ACKs if this is an asynchronous low-speed
connection.
--Devon
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
th someone asking
whether it still applied and the answer was, ``No.''
--Devon
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
es the pseudo-device) that hasn't been committed
to my Perforce tree yet.
I certainly haven't given up on the project; I simply haven't had the
time to make as much progress as fast as I did in the beginning.
--Devon
> --
> Peter Jeremy
on I asked in the first place is because
there are no mailing list articles about this (that Google could find
with about 31899821498 different queries, anyway ;) and the webpage
gives me the idea that it doesn't support larger devices.
--Devon
__
le storage device/hard drive issues in the
future. It looks like Firewire is also taken care of, but you never know
what else there might be in the future.
--Devon
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
mp;
mv /dev/dsp1 /dev/dsp0 && mv /dev/dsp.tmp /dev/dsp1
Not sure how terribly well that'd work (and it's a horrendous hack),
though you can select the output device in mplayer with the ao: option.
I don't know anything about R
t if (fw_enable && IPFW_LOADED) (I believe this is true for
ip_output() as well). Why are these variables and sections compiled in
by default instead of left out if no firewall is existent in the
kernel?
Hope that doesn't sound too ambigu
Op 4-dec-03 om 15:28 heeft Marko Zec het volgende geschreven:
On Thursday 04 December 2003 15:13, Devon H.O'Dell wrote:
I've been looking through the IP stack for shits and giggles and was
wondering why a few things are the way they are with IPFW's
implementation.
I went back thr
On Thursday, December 4, 2003, at 05:28 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Devon H.O'Dell wrote:
This is obviously the most logical explanation. There's a good bit of
questioning for PFIL_HOOKS to be enabled in generic to allow ipf to be
loaded as a module as well. If this i
ar to you.
My car accident no matter.
You are an idiot. Get your head out of your ass.
Thank you
Jessem.
Jesse,
Please keep this crap off the FreeBSD mailing lists and in private
emails.
Thanks,
Devon
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
46 matches
Mail list logo
