Am 08.06.2007 um 05:41 schrieb Greg 'groggy' Lehey:
How do I terminate the IP-IP tunnel at my end?
I'm using OpenVPN for similar porposes, albeit on lower latency DSL
links. OpenVPN can run over UDP or TCP, and can work through NAT,
and even with dynamic IPs.
Stefan
--
Stefan Bethke
Am 08.06.2007 um 17:47 schrieb Oliver Fromme:
While OpenVPN works well usually, it is generally not
advisable to run it over TCP, especially if your link
is not guaranteed to have 0% packet loss, which might
be the case for satellite links. Running OpenVPN over
UDP is fine.
Sure, but
Stefan Bethke wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
How do I terminate the IP-IP tunnel at my end?
I'm using OpenVPN for similar porposes, albeit on lower latency DSL
links. OpenVPN can run over UDP or TCP, and can work through NAT,
and even with dynamic IPs.
While OpenVPN works
I've used OpenVPN myself to tunnel official IP addresses
to my (dynamic) DSL link at home. You need to have a
server outside somewhere, of course, but that shouldn't
I find that vtun is a pretty reliable and less heavyweight solution for
this- I use it to get a tunnel to a secondary lab of
On 08.06.2007, at 20:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only problem here is that this isn't a solution for providing
routing for somebody else's Class C block.
Why?
inetnum: 192.109.197.0 - 192.109.197.255
netname: LEMIS-LAN
descr:LEMIS Lehey Microcomputer Systems
descr:
On 08.06.2007, at 20:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only problem here is that this isn't a solution for providing routing
for somebody else's Class C block.
Why?
inetnum: 192.109.197.0 - 192.109.197.255
netname: LEMIS-LAN
descr:LEMIS Lehey Microcomputer Systems
descr:
In a few weeks' time I'll be moving house, and it looks as if the new
address currently doesn't have ADSL, so I'll be forced to use
satellite again. I've done some investigation, and the costs don't
look too prohibitive, but almost nobody is prepared to route my /24
net block (192.109.197.0/24).
7 matches
Mail list logo
