On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:12:16AM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
[longish exchange preserved for the benefit of the newly-CC'd people:
yar@ as a de-facto maintainer of libexec/ftpd, and -hackers for
additional discussion]
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:12:24AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Thu, Jan
Lately Peter Pentchev told:
Attached is a patch to the libexec/ftpd source, which adds a new -P
option taking an argument of either a numeric port number or a service
name as described in the getaddrinfo(3) manual page. What do people
think about adding this functionality?
looks good
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:47:49PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:12:16AM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:12:24AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 01:09:29AM +0100, Julian Mayer wrote:
hello
there is a bug in
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:47:49PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Attached is a patch to the libexec/ftpd source, which adds a new -P
option taking an argument of either a numeric port number or a service
name as described in the getaddrinfo(3) manual page. What do people
think about adding
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:47:06PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:47:49PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Attached is a patch to the libexec/ftpd source, which adds a new -P
option taking an argument of either a numeric port number or a service
name as described in the
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:53:44PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Peter, here is a bit reworked version of your patch.
Does it look reasonable?
Yes, this looks fine; the data connection port issue was brought up by
Matthew Seaman in a private message to me, which I did not respond to
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:11:21PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:53:44PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Peter, here is a bit reworked version of your patch.
Does it look reasonable?
Yes, this looks fine; the data connection port issue was brought up by
Matthew
7 matches
Mail list logo
