On Sat, 3 Jul 1999, Doug wrote:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
[Bcc:ed to net, committers; please follow up on hackers]
Attached are patches for renaming 'pseudo-device bpfilter' to
'peudo-device bpf', courtesy of glimpse(1) and ed(1). LINT and GENERIC
build fine with these patches; I
[Bcc:ed to net, committers; please follow up on hackers]
Attached are patches for renaming 'pseudo-device bpfilter' to
'peudo-device bpf', courtesy of glimpse(1) and ed(1). LINT and GENERIC
build fine with these patches; I haven't tried to run a kernel built
with them, though. Also, although I
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
[Bcc:ed to net, committers; please follow up on hackers]
Attached are patches for renaming 'pseudo-device bpfilter' to
'peudo-device bpf', courtesy of glimpse(1) and ed(1). LINT and GENERIC
build fine with these patches; I haven't tried to run a kernel built
On Sat, 3 Jul 1999, Doug wrote:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
[Bcc:ed to net, committers; please follow up on hackers]
Attached are patches for renaming 'pseudo-device bpfilter' to
'peudo-device bpf', courtesy of glimpse(1) and ed(1). LINT and GENERIC
build fine with these patches; I
Doug d...@gorean.org writes:
Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but are there any circumstances
where naming the kernel include file bpf.h would conflict with
/usr/include/net/bpf.h?
I don't think so. The bpf.h created by config(8) resides in the
compile directory and is only used
Dag-Erling Smorgrav d...@flood.ping.uio.no writes:
That said, thanks for asking - while looking into this matter I found
another problem :) new patches will be available soon.
Nothing serious; a corrected patch is available on my freefall web
page (http://www.freebsd.org/~des/software/)
DES
--
6 matches
Mail list logo
