On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
Performance isn't even the main thing. As I said earlier, it's plain
bloody unreliable. Linux people avoid the EtherExpress because they
think something is wrong with the card. They were surprised when I
reported that it works without any problems
Linux people avoid the EtherExpress because they think something is
wrong with the card.
Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B cards in FreeBSD
These cards work well in our many 3.x and 4.x systems.
But I just built up a Redhat 6.2 box with one, and all seemed to be
working fine, but
Mike Wade writes:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
Performance isn't even the main thing. As I said earlier, it's plain
bloody unreliable. Linux people avoid the EtherExpress because they
think something is wrong with the card. They were surprised when I
reported that it works
At 08:51 AM 01/26/2001, Mike Wade wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
Performance isn't even the main thing. As I said earlier, it's plain
bloody unreliable. Linux people avoid the EtherExpress because they
think something is wrong with the card. They were surprised when I
At 09:47 AM 01/26/2001, Jim Sander wrote:
Linux people avoid the EtherExpress because they think something is
wrong with the card.
Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B cards in FreeBSD
These cards work well in our many 3.x and 4.x systems.
But I just built up a Redhat 6.2 box with
At 11:43 AM 01/26/2001, Aleksandr A.Babaylov wrote:
Mike Wade writes:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
Performance isn't even the main thing. As I said earlier, it's plain
bloody unreliable. Linux people avoid the EtherExpress because they
think something is wrong with the
On Friday, 26 January 2001 at 9:47:38 -0500, Jim Sander wrote:
Linux people avoid the EtherExpress because they think something is
wrong with the card.
Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B cards in FreeBSD
These cards work well in our many 3.x and 4.x systems.
But I just built up a
7 matches
Mail list logo