This has bugged me for a long time and I guess my morning coffee hasn't
kicked enough for me to let it go today. It's not documented anywhere
that I can find and that includes a grep of all src and man pages.
Google and Ask just give the What is vnlru? page in a handful of
languages, a whole
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 10:51 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does vnlru stand for? VNode List Recycling Unit? Someone please
tell me. I lost Deep Thought's email address, so I'm a bit stuck.
I wasn't in on the naming, but I'll bet it stands for something along
the lines of VNode Least
On 10/29/06 13:34, Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 10:51 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does vnlru stand for? VNode List Recycling Unit? Someone please
tell me. I lost Deep Thought's email address, so I'm a bit stuck.
I wasn't in on the naming, but I'll bet it stands for
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:22:03AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
sio2 irq10 981321757
sio3 irq11 981382757
Total 2316081 1788
Looks like everything is fine and the message is just false alarm.
It might be a
sio2 irq10 981321757
sio3 irq11 981382757
Total 2316081 1788
Looks like everything is fine and the message is just false alarm.
It might be a false alarm. The interrupt rate is kinda high,
indicating that you are
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:35:16PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:42:46PM +0300, Andrew L. Neporada wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 02:52:21PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Chances are you don't have things configured quite correctly in the
bios. The interrupts
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:00:08PM +0300, Andrew L. Neporada wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:35:16PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:42:46PM +0300, Andrew L. Neporada wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 02:52:21PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Chances are you don't
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 02:52:21PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Chances are you don't have things configured quite correctly in the
bios. The interrupts aren't asserting proplerly.
Interrupts 3,4,10,11 are reserved for ISA cards in BIOS.
Tweaking PnP aware OS [Y/N] setting doesn't help.
I've
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:42:46PM +0300, Andrew L. Neporada wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 02:52:21PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Chances are you don't have things configured quite correctly in the
bios. The interrupts aren't asserting proplerly.
Interrupts 3,4,10,11 are reserved for
Hi!
I am getting configured irq .. is not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 error
(warning?) while booting 4.10:
...
sio0: irq maps: 0x1 0x11 0x1 0x1
sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
sio0: type 16550A
sio1: irq maps: 0x1 0x9 0x1 0x1
sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0
sio1: type
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew L. Neporada [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: sio2: configured irq 10 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
: sio3: configured irq 11 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
:
: The box in question has Vortex86-based ICOP-6047 3.5 mainboard with 4
: serial ports
Hello hackers!
On my system which connected to Internet I''ll see many processes like (sh):
# ps axu | more
USERPID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND
root 59548 1,0 0,0 00 ?? Z11:00 0:00,00 (sh)
root 59588 0,0 0,0 00 ?? Z11:02
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 11:55:18AM +0600, Dmitry A. Bondareff wrote:
Hello hackers!
On my system which connected to Internet I''ll see many processes like (sh):
# ps axu | more
USERPID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND
root 59548 1,0 0,0 00 ?? Z
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: We were looking at a toshiba tecra 8100 and tryinmg to see if the
: modem was usable from BSD.. We've given up.. We think it may be some kind of
: Winmodem thingy.
Yes. As far as I can tell, there hasn't
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 04:44:07PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
It's also a possible message, if you have a serial port
disabled in the BIOS, but the hardware probe finds the
hardware there, because the BIOS is merely advisory, and
you have not disable PnP OS in the BIOS.
Something along
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
: what on earth is this trying to tell me?
: WHAT bitmap?
Bitmap of probed irqs of '0' means that the driver put the card into
an interrupt 'state', yet no
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
: what on earth is this trying to tell me?
: WHAT bitmap?
Bitmap of probed irqs of '0' means that the
ANother case of the obscure beyond belief
message:
sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
what on earth is this trying to tell me?
WHAT bitmap?
julian
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
ANother case of the obscure beyond belief
message:
sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
I would assume it means that 0x is the bitmap of probed irqs and that
irq3 0x10 configured for sio1 is not in that bitmap.
isa/sio.c:
/*
* Turn off all
19 matches
Mail list logo
