On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 12:24:30PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> On Tue, 21-Aug-2001 at 03:07:33 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andre Albsmeier writes:
> > : As I wrote in my PR (#29845), my problems also happen with
> > : the 3C589 which uses the ep driver. So we c
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andre Albsmeier writes:
: Attached below is the dmesg... It hangs only when warm booting; after
: a power toggle everything is OK...
...
: pcic0: Event mask 0xf stat 0x3419
: ###
: ### Now it hangs until poweroff/po
On Tue, 21-Aug-2001 at 23:44:40 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andre Albsmeier writes:
> : I still have the hangs on a warm reboot but this is a different
> : story...
>
> Eh? what kind of hangs and when?
Attached below is the dmesg... It hangs only when warm booting
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andre Albsmeier writes:
: I still have the hangs on a warm reboot but this is a different
: story...
Eh? what kind of hangs and when?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
On Tue, 21-Aug-2001 at 11:45:12 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Malone writes:
> : Andre Albsmeier, who's seeing various network problems, is using
> : the xe driver (also PCMCIA I think), but the problems go away if
> : he uses an Etherexpress card on the PCI bus
3c975 ATM Link (3Com) works in FreeBSD 4.x?
I not found any reference about him in /stand/help/HARDWARE.TXT.
He works in FreeBSD or OpenBSD?
Where I can find more information about this card?
Thanks,
Enciso
---
Luis Fernando Enciso <[EMAIL PROT
Hi,
Several weeks ago, Jiangyi Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent me an early patch that
re-enabled mbtypes statistics under the mbuf allocator in -CURRENT (I had
disabled them temporarily while I worked on the allocator semantics itself).
Just a couple of days ago, I cleaned up the patch, fixed i
-current freeBSD
It is not important, but I just meant that it helps to get things
integrated if they are provided as patches against 5.x instead of 4.x, but
if it is hard for you, because you have no 5.x then it is not a
probelm. someone will get it going.. Did you base it on previous work?
O
yes, I agree..
It is nice of you to make this available..
I'm sure that soemone will work on getting it into -current.
(please don't delete it for a while.
others may take some time to get to it, but at least now they have your
email in teh archives to say where to get it...)
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001
If memory serves me right, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
> On 2001.08.21 15:42 Harkirat Singh wrote:
> >
> > Hello Julian,
> >
> > As a student while doing my project I surfed a lot for SACK
> > patch
> > in FreeBSd Release4.3. I felt that if someone like me in need of SACK
> > src
> > can
> A verions of your code that will compile/run on FreeBSD 5-CURRENT. It's
> the bleeding edge developer branch of the FreeBSD code. Someone correct
> me if I'm wrong, but I think you'll need to build a -CURRENT machine to
> do this. Then ensure/port the code to (hopefully) compile/run on both
On 2001.08.21 15:42 Harkirat Singh wrote:
>
> Hello Julian,
>
> As a student while doing my project I surfed a lot for SACK
> patch
> in FreeBSd Release4.3. I felt that if someone like me in need of SACK
> src
> can use it and can save time in writing the code. That was the only
> purpose
Hello Julian,
As a student while doing my project I surfed a lot for SACK patch
in FreeBSd Release4.3. I felt that if someone like me in need of SACK src
can use it and can save time in writing the code. That was the only
purpose to send the previous mail in the newsgroup.
I am not sure
Before it can be checked in it has to go to -current.
If you could make a -currnt version it would greatly increas the chance
that it can be integrated..
(it has to go in -current first, and then if people have tried it out, it
can go into 4.x)
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Harkirat Singh wrote:
>
Hello All!
In the past there were may queries about SACK and FACK support in
FreeBSD, I was one of them who enquired about this in mailing group.
We have implemented SACK+FACK in FreeBSD Release 4.3, it is freely
available at www.cs.pdx.edu/~singh/software.html.
I have tested it in 3-h
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Malone writes:
: Andre Albsmeier, who's seeing various network problems, is using
: the xe driver (also PCMCIA I think), but the problems go away if
: he uses an Etherexpress card on the PCI bus of the same machine.
:
: It seems unlikely to be PCMCIA related (
On Tue, 21-Aug-2001 at 03:07:33 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andre Albsmeier writes:
> : As I wrote in my PR (#29845), my problems also happen with
> : the 3C589 which uses the ep driver. So we can sum up to:
> :
> : 1.) Intel Etherexpress PRO/100 PCMCIA (xe driver)
On Tue, 21-Aug-2001 at 03:07:33 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andre Albsmeier writes:
> : As I wrote in my PR (#29845), my problems also happen with
> : the 3C589 which uses the ep driver. So we can sum up to:
> :
> : 1.) Intel Etherexpress PRO/100 PCMCIA (xe driver)
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andre Albsmeier writes:
: As I wrote in my PR (#29845), my problems also happen with
: the 3C589 which uses the ep driver. So we can sum up to:
:
: 1.) Intel Etherexpress PRO/100 PCMCIA (xe driver) crashes
: 2.) 3Com 589D EtherLink III PCMCIA (ep driver)
On Tue, 21-Aug-2001 at 09:35:34 +0100, David Malone wrote:
> > I've just done a further test. I've mounted a directory tree from
> > Vaio to Vaio using localhost (lo driver) and the test has run
> > smoothly. So chances would be good the bug is in the ep driver.
> > Unfortunately...
>
> Andre A
> I've just done a further test. I've mounted a directory tree from
> Vaio to Vaio using localhost (lo driver) and the test has run
> smoothly. So chances would be good the bug is in the ep driver.
> Unfortunately...
Andre Albsmeier, who's seeing various network problems, is using
the xe driver
21 matches
Mail list logo
