> On 19. Apr 2018, at 00:07, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
>
>
>> Am 17.04.2018 um 06:45 schrieb Niels Kobschätzki :
>>
>> solved now finally my problem after two weeks and it wasn't the NFS. I
>> just got derailed from the real solution again and again from some
>> people, thus I didn't look in t
> Am 17.04.2018 um 06:45 schrieb Niels Kobschätzki :
>
> solved now finally my problem after two weeks and it wasn't the NFS. I
> just got derailed from the real solution again and again from some
> people, thus I didn't look in the right place. The cache misses are gone
> now, the application
Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
[stuff snipped]
>I solved now finally my problem after two weeks and it wasn't the NFS. I
>just got derailed from the real solution again and again from some
>people, thus I didn't look in the right place. The cache misses are gone
>now, the application performs now faster
On 04/17/2018 01:03 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
> [stuff smipped]
>> I just checked the code to see if I can figure out where exactly I have
>> to put the printf(). And then I saw that there are ifdefs for
>> NFS_ACDEBUG which seems to be a kernel option. When I add NFS_ACDE
Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
[stuff smipped]
>I just checked the code to see if I can figure out where exactly I have
>to put the printf(). And then I saw that there are ifdefs for
>NFS_ACDEBUG which seems to be a kernel option. When I add NFS_ACDEBUG in
>the config-file for the kernel, the build fail
On 04/14/2018 03:49 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
> If you go into ncl_getattrcache() {it's in sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clsubs.c}
> and add a printf() for "time_second" and "np->n_mtime.tv_sec" near the
> top, where it calculates "timeo" from it.
> Running this hacked kernel might show you if either of th
15.04.2018 21:19, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
It is a website with quite some traffic handles by three webservers behind
a pair >of loadbalancers.
We see a loss of 20% in speed(TTFB reduced by 100ms; sounds not a lot but
>Google et al doesn?t like it at all) after upgrading to 11
[ Charset windows-1252 unsupported, converting... ]
> 15.04.2018 19:58, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> > Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
> > [stuff snipped]
> >> It is a website with quite some traffic handles by three webservers behind
> >> a pair >of loadbalancers.
> >> We see a loss of 20% in speed(TTFB re
15.04.2018 19:58, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
> [stuff snipped]
>> It is a website with quite some traffic handles by three webservers behind a
>> pair >of loadbalancers.
>> We see a loss of 20% in speed(TTFB reduced by 100ms; sounds not a lot but
>> >Google et al doesn’t lik
Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
[stuff snipped]
>It is a website with quite some traffic handles by three webservers behind a
>pair >of loadbalancers.
>We see a loss of 20% in speed(TTFB reduced by 100ms; sounds not a lot but
>>Google et al doesn’t like it at all) after upgrading to 11.1 with a combine
> On 15. Apr 2018, at 01:18, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
>>> On 04/14/2018 03:49 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
>>> Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
sorry for the cross-posting but so far I had no real luck on the forum
or on question, thus I want to try my luck here as well.
>>>
Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
>On 04/14/2018 03:49 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
>> Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
>>> sorry for the cross-posting but so far I had no real luck on the forum
>>> or on question, thus I want to try my luck here as well.
>> I read email lists but don't do the other stuff, so I just saw
On 04/14/2018 03:49 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
>> sorry for the cross-posting but so far I had no real luck on the forum
>> or on question, thus I want to try my luck here as well.
> I read email lists but don't do the other stuff, so I just saw this yesterday.
> Short answe
Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
>sorry for the cross-posting but so far I had no real luck on the forum
>or on question, thus I want to try my luck here as well.
I read email lists but don't do the other stuff, so I just saw this yesterday.
Short answer, I haven't a clue why cache hits rate would have cha
Hi,
sorry for the cross-posting but so far I had no real luck on the forum
or on question, thus I want to try my luck here as well.
I upgraded a machine from 10.3-Prerelease (custom kernel with
tcp_fastopen added) to 11.1-Release (standard kernel) with
freebsd-update. I have two other machines th
15 matches
Mail list logo
