On Mon, June 20, 2005 10:51 am, David Sze said:
>
> I'll be re-running super-smack against an InnoDB table. Any additional
> requests for configurations to test, or other tweaking suggestions?
Any chance you could compare performance on MySQL 4.0 and 4.1 while you're
at it?
_
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 04:08:45PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> I realize every additional variation increases the testing load, but I'd
> be interested in seeing linuxthreads performance on 5.x/6.x also. While
> we've worked hard to improve native threading, linuxthreading remains
> fully
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, David Sze wrote:
I'll be re-running super-smack against an InnoDB table. Any additional
requests for configurations to test, or other tweaking suggestions?
This is what I'll be trying:
FreeBSD/amd64 4.11-RELEASE, linuxthreads
FreeBSD/amd64 5.4-RELEASE, lib
At 04:59 PM 19/06/2005 +0100, Robert Watson wrote this to All:
BTW, could you run 'file' on the Linux and FreeBSD MySQL binaries and
confirm that they're both either 32-bit i386 binaries, or 64-bit amd64
binaries?
I can no longer run tests on the machine because it's in production, but I
wil
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Bruce Evans wrote:
|On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|> This was first posted on freebsd-question, but I could not find
|> the solution yet.
|> Maybe you could help me.
|
|Maybe a little. I don't use 5.4...
It happens on 5.3 also. Not tested o
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was first posted on freebsd-question, but I could not find
the solution yet.
Maybe you could help me.
Maybe a little. I don't use 5.4...
I?ve installed FreeBSD 5.4 on a new machine with the following
hardware:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, David Sze wrote:
FreeBSD/amd64 5.4-RELEASE (libpthread, system and process scope)
FreeBSD/amd64 6.0-CURRENT (libpthread, libthr, system and process
scope)
CentOS/amd64 4.0 (i.e. RHEL4.0)
I couldn't get libthr to work on FreeBSD/amd64 5.4-RELEASE, mys
