At 12:31 AM 10/20/2005 +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
| - Original Message -
| From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > I have been thinking about getting one. The guy I bought my 3ware 9500S-12
| > card has one he's getting ready to benchmark. I asked him to send me the
| > details and I will pass
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have been thinking about getting one. The guy I bought my 3ware 9500S-12
card has one he's getting ready to benchmark. I asked him to send me the
details and I will pass them along here if I get them. He did mention it
supports SATA2 -
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Tancsa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/spool/test bs=32k count=2
2+0 records in
2+0 records out
65536 bytes transferred in 7.587819 secs (86370011 bytes/sec)
Interesting results there that's very similar to what I get here (
At 11:04 AM 10/19/2005 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
| At 07:23 PM 18/10/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| >At 11:36 PM 10/18/2005 +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
| >| Anyone got any SATA RAID 5 controllers they can recommend
| >| 64Bit PCIX.
| >|
| >| Steve
| >
| >Hi Steve,
| >
| > I am using the 3W
No problem I was initially very impressed with this card, great throughput
( after tweaking ), easy install and cheap; but then this problem hit.
It gets a DMA timeout on one of the disks which it then drops from the
RAID5 unfortunately it then gets the same error on another disk and does
the sam
At 07:23 PM 18/10/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:36 PM 10/18/2005 +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
| Anyone got any SATA RAID 5 controllers they can recommend
| 64Bit PCIX.
|
| Steve
Hi Steve,
I am using the 3Ware 9500S-12 on our servers and like it very
much. It's very
easy to setup,
Wow! Nice to know, then. The only machine that uses a reasonable (not
even high) amount of small writes is under RAID 1+0 (or 0+1, don´t
remember). The other are mainly backup and department storage.
I´m now warned. :P Thanks and sorry,
Túlio G. da Silva
Steven Hartland wrote:
Unfortunatel
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
eirini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello to all fellow freebsd users :)
hi, welcome :-)
> first mrtg. mrtg works fine except one minor problem
> with cron.
> It will not start! I edit it with crontab -e and added
> the line
> */5 * * * * root /usr/local
Hello to all fellow freebsd users :)
I am new in unix and BSD and I have encoured some
problems
trying to "play" with all it's features. :)
The problem I have is that I tried configuring mrtg in
my
freebsd 5.4 stable machine, as well as smb. And
that's where
my problems start!
first mrtg. mrtg w
Unfortunately the 1820A is the one I have and its major unstable under
high transaction RAID5 ( rsyncing a LARGE amount of small files ). I've
contacted highpoint but after an initial promising email that they have
forwarded the problem to engineering they are now refusing to respond
to email. Bee
For price/benefit, I too recommend the HPTs, specially the 1820A. It´s
not THE killer for speed, but it´s fairly stable, factory-supported on
FBSD, has good management utils (including remote, via daemon) and is
about half the price of its competitors. Besides, the "A" model has its
own XOR pr
At 07:18 AM 19/10/2005, Richard Tector wrote:
I've got a system here running 6.0-RC1 with the 8 port PCI-X Areca card and
a 7 disk RAID5 array of 320GB Western Digital disks. I have to agree with
Mike here, they are indeed extremely fast and I can't say I've ever had any
issues with it. Recommend
I've got a system here running 6.0-RC1 with the 8 port PCI-X Areca card and
a 7 disk RAID5 array of 320GB Western Digital disks. I have to agree with
Mike here, they are indeed extremely fast and I can't say I've ever had any
issues with it. Recommended.
However, I haven't had much cause to use th
13 matches
Mail list logo
