Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-28 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 03:06 AM 11/28/2006, Massimo Lusetti wrote: FWIW I would definitively like to see it. But thanks for going so far.. Tried it with the patch branch. With the em nics, the box locks up with 2 streams. It works now with bge, but rates are pretty slow (220Kpps), and very slow with pf enable

Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-28 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 03:28 AM 11/24/2006, Massimo Lusetti wrote: On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:52 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > I might give OpenBSD a quick try as a reference. That would be very interesting. OK, I added OpenBSD to the mix as well. Results are pretty crappy with the base default install. With one s

Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-28 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 03:06 AM 11/28/2006, Massimo Lusetti wrote: On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:36:34 -0500 Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I added OpenBSD to the mix as well. Results are pretty crappy > with the base default install. With one stream, the box essentially > live locks. This was just with the

Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-28 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:36:34 -0500 Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I added OpenBSD to the mix as well. Results are pretty crappy > with the base default install. With one stream, the box essentially > live locks. This was just with the stock kernels from the CD. The > PCIe bge ni