> Palle,
>
> I really haven't kept pace with Intel versus AMD in a while, my
> understanding is that AMD is still the only 64bit game in town.
>
Pls. don't top post!!
>
> -Alfred
>
> * Palle Girgensohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070910 03:16] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are looking at getting a server fo
Hi,
Martin Cracauer wrote:
For integer workloads Intel's Core2-base Xeons outperforms K8 (the
old-school AMD64) by about 25-30% per clock per core. K10 seems to be
5-15% faster than K8 for integer workloads (I hope to run my benchmark
suite on one thi week or weekend).
the guys at heise.de pu
On Monday 10 September 2007 14:46:21 Martin Cracauer wrote:
> For integer workloads Intel's Core2-base Xeons outperforms K8 (the
> old-school AMD64) by about 25-30% per clock per core. K10 seems to be
> 5-15% faster than K8 for integer workloads (I hope to run my benchmark
> suite on one thi week
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Palle,
I really haven't kept pace with Intel versus AMD in a while, my
understanding is that AMD is still the only 64bit game in town.
For a database, the more memory you can get, the better.
I've found many machines with 4 gigs of ram to not be enough to
get decent per
Palle,
I really haven't kept pace with Intel versus AMD in a while, my
understanding is that AMD is still the only 64bit game in town.
For a database, the more memory you can get, the better.
I've found many machines with 4 gigs of ram to not be enough to
get decent performance from a database t
On Mon, September 10, 2007 11:46 am, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> On the other hand, if you want K8 or K10 in a modern SMP mainboard you
> have to live with NVidia for chipsets, and the socket F boards all have
> the MPC55 SATA controller, which iirc is unsupported by both BSD and
> Linux. MPC65 moved
For integer workloads Intel's Core2-base Xeons outperforms K8 (the
old-school AMD64) by about 25-30% per clock per core. K10 seems to be
5-15% faster than K8 for integer workloads (I hope to run my benchmark
suite on one thi week or weekend).
However, tasks that use multiple cores and have thread
Be very, very careful in purchasing Core 2 Duo. There are major
problems with the chip that have been documented across the board.
Many, many people are steering clear of the chip for at least a year.
This brings up a simple thought... is it better to stick with a tried
and true chip at pre
Hi,
We are looking at getting a server for running postgresql. Only postgresql,
a dedicated machine. Since we know FreeBSD very well, we plan on using it
as the OS.
We have an offer for an IBM server, x3650, with 2 * DC Intel Xeon 5160,
Raid with two clusters, one for database and one for xl
Hi,
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Now, I hear rumors that AMD is to be preferred over Intel for
performance reasons. Any comments on that? Are we better off getting AMD
processors, when running Unix?
AMD announced today the new quad core. Their benchmarks are promising.
But not the dual core ve
--On måndag, september 10, 2007 18.32.18 +0800 Erich Dollansky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Now, I hear rumors that AMD is to be preferred over Intel for
performance reasons. Any comments on that? Are we better off getting AMD
processors, when running Unix?
AMD
Hi,
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Now, I hear rumors that AMD is to be preferred over Intel for
performance reasons. Any comments on that? Are we better off getting AMD
processors, when running Unix?
AMD announced today the new quad core. Their benchmarks are promising.
But not the dual core ver
> We are looking at getting a server for running postgresql. Only postgresql,
> a dedicated machine. Since we know FreeBSD very well, we plan on using it
> as the OS.
>
> We have an offer for an IBM server, x3650, with 2 * DC Intel Xeon 5160,
> Raid with two clusters, one for database and one for x
Hi,
We are looking at getting a server for running postgresql. Only postgresql,
a dedicated machine. Since we know FreeBSD very well, we plan on using it
as the OS.
We have an offer for an IBM server, x3650, with 2 * DC Intel Xeon 5160,
Raid with two clusters, one for database and one for xl
14 matches
Mail list logo
