Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:32:53PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
Hey All,
I been benchmarking Diablo Java under AMD64 on 6.2R and using the same
methods I posted a while ago detailed somewhat here
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/2006-August/005576.html
Hey All,
I been benchmarking Diablo Java under AMD64 on 6.2R and using the same
methods I posted a while ago detailed somewhat here
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/2006-August/005576.html
The difference here is that libthr now works under Amd64.
But it appears libthr to be about
Scott I. Remick wrote:
Just wanted to give those on the list a heads-up about this thread over on
WebHostingTalk:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=563624
It's been going on a few months now. Apparently a number of webhosts are
finding poor FreeBSD performance when compared with C
Yeah the static compiling recommendations by MySQL documents are really
more a linux thing more then anything else.
The other other thing to check is to make sure you use larger buffer
settings I recommend the large-my.cnf
cp /usr/local/share/mysql/my-large.cnf /var/db/mysql/
Then restart MySQL.
Massimo Lusetti wrote:
On 8/1/06, Michael Vince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
libc_r average hits per minute: 8,841
libc_r session average:4,481
libc_r transactions per minute: 2,947
libthr average hits per minute: 9,020
libthr session average: 4,380
libthr transactions per minute:
Greg Lewis wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 10:32:38AM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
Greg Lewis wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:57:24PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
I just ran it for you now, lower then the others.
libc_r average hits per minute: 6,859
libc_r session average
David Xu wrote:
Michael Vince wrote:
Hugo Silva wrote:
Today I decided to benchmark MySQL 5 performance on FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE.
This server is a Dual Xeon 2.8GHz, 4GB of RAM and 2x73GB SCSI disks
that do 320MB/s
For all the tests, I restarted mysqld prior to starting the test,
waited
Hugo Silva wrote:
Today I decided to benchmark MySQL 5 performance on FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE.
This server is a Dual Xeon 2.8GHz, 4GB of RAM and 2x73GB SCSI disks
that do 320MB/s
For all the tests, I restarted mysqld prior to starting the test,
waited for about 1 minute for it to settle down, an
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 June 2006 at 10:18:47 +0800, leo huang wrote:
Hi,
I benchmarked MySQL 4.1.18 on FreeBSD 6.1 and Debian 3.1 using Super Smack
1.3 some days ago.
...
The result surprise me. The MySQL Performance on FreeBSD6.1 is about
10 times of on Debian3.1??and
Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 6/25/06, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/25/06, Sean Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /dev/zero not exactly the best way to test sending data across the
> network. Especially since you'll be reading a 8k chunks.
>
> I could be wrong, strong possibil
Ivan Voras wrote:
Michael Vince wrote:
Interesting that the linux you are claiming to use would use prefork
Apache as default, while this is the default on FreeBSD I would think
the threaded worker would be used on a lot of linux dists, since they
don't have the option to easily rebui
Interesting that the linux you are claiming to use would use prefork
Apache as default, while this is the default on FreeBSD I would think
the threaded worker would be used on a lot of linux dists, since they
don't have the option to easily rebuild it.
Even if it is using prefork, the Linux Apa
Yes I was going to point out a article from Anandtech as well.
Its an older one but someone on Anandtech is a SQL performance article
benchmarking different server CPUs on Database performance.
It concluded that large CPU cache is very important for Databases.
Basically said having a large CPU
Michael Vince wrote:
I just ran a test on 6_stable (April 5th) on a Dell 2850 dual CPU
(single core 3.60GHz) using the AMD64 build of FreeBSD and got similar
speeds as you.
Its interesting how Sven could have 8 cores with what appears to be
less MySQL speed then just having a few cores.
After
David Xu wrote:
ÔÚ Thursday 06 April 2006 17:12£¬Michael Vince дµÀ£º
I have also done benchmarking with libthr against Apache using 'ab' and
found it can deliver an extra amount of megabytes/sec of data (I think
it was about an extra 2000/requests sec) at the cost of giving t
I just ran a test on 6_stable (April 5th) on a Dell 2850 dual CPU
(single core 3.60GHz) using the AMD64 build of FreeBSD and got similar
speeds as you.
Its interesting how Sven could have 8 cores with what appears to be less
MySQL speed then just having a few cores.
After enabling libthr it does
I use netperf which is a pure network traffic tester I also just use
basic 'ab/apache' tests which would also test HD/IO if getting large files.
For the 'em' driver I have seen some posts/cvs commit updates to the
driver saying it now works better without polling then with polling. I
think this
Joao Barros wrote:
On 1/26/06, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rich Murphey wrote:
I'm curious whether Robert's patch might have an
effect on samba3 performance as well.
No real difference here, tried ACPI-fast, i8254, and TSC. :( My
transfers still average at 10MB/s (a
Chris wrote:
On 01/01/06, Michael Vince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
huang leo wrote:
Hi, all:
We had evaluated MySQL performance on FreeBSD and Linux. The result is
attached.
We are longing for your feedbacks!
Best regards,
Leo Huang
Really good work.
I gav
huang leo wrote:
Hi, all:
We had evaluated MySQL performance on FreeBSD and Linux. The result is
attached.
We are longing for your feedbacks!
Best regards,
Leo Huang
Really good work.
I gave your results some thought and was thinking that maybe you should
check to see if you reached the
Chris wrote:
Make sure your compile your MySQL dynamically which is done by default,
if you include 'BUILD_STATIC=yes' you ruin your ability to change
threading libs.
portupgrade -N -m 'BUILD_OPTIMIZED=yes'
/usr/ports/databases/mysql41-server
Or upgrade
portupgrade -R -m 'BUILD_OPTIMIZED=yes'
Hi All,
I been benchmarking a Java servlet I have created and I want to be able
to handle a massive amount of simultaneous connections.
So far using benchmarking tools I have been able to get around 2,565
threads on the Tomcat 5.5 Java process (with native 1.4.2 Java)
according to ps -auxwH |
It would be good to actually see the Linux performance on the exact same
hardware, all we ever see is how it is on FreeBSD.
MySQL has very frequent use of queries of the system time and is well
known in FreeBSD to be slower because its more expensive to call
compared to Linux, which has less p
Joao Barros wrote:
Hi,
Last month I started a thread[1] on current@ about this, but I guess I
should have done it here, my apologies for that.
After my initial post I did some more testing and I'm going to start
clean here with all my findings :)
I started with Samba 3 installed on a PIII 733
works fast for me but when I turn SMP on
read performance drops 50%+ (raid1,raid5,raid10 and single volumes).
I don't know if its aac problem or what.
In leenox it works very well though.
Yours
Markus Kovero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:17 PM 11/2/2005 +1100, Michael VInce wrote:
| Fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:29 AM 11/2/2005 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
| At 05:47 AM 02/11/2005, Achim Patzner wrote:
| >>For SATA I have always been getting the Dell 750s (now 850s) which
| >>use the 'aac'
| >>Adaptec AdvancedRAID Controller driver, do 'man aac' for more details.
| >
| >Did y
For SATA I have always been getting the Dell 750s (now 850s) which use
the 'aac'
Adaptec AdvancedRAID Controller driver, do 'man aac' for more details.
Dell supply them with a 64meg cache and are hardware raid, I have always
just installed FreeBSD on them and only 1 hard drive comes up as RAID
Hi,
I have done all my Postgres optimization configuration via sysctl or the
postgresql.conf no kernel recompilation was performed.
I did benchmarks at complete default FreeBSD / Postgres configuration
and benchmarks after.
I found raising the values to probably not much more then 1/4 of what
ut MySQL performance, oh well, I
guess there was something else building up in my mind that felt like
coming out.
My rant is complete.
Thank you.
Michael Vince wrote:
I tried some benchmark testing on a Dell 1850 5.4-Release-P2 with
generic kernel.
From what I have seen from your postings I
lect_index10 7 0 13398.76
For me this is as fast as I need my database to be but I can understand
there is a difference here between FreeBSD and Linux that would make you
prefer it as the db OS choice.
Regards,
Mike
Steve Roome wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 12:06:41AM +1000, Mic
Your posting a lot of configuration here except the most easily
important one for performance in MySQL, thats your my.cnf configuration file
You will more then double your performance if you just start off by copying
/usr/local/share/mysql/my-large.cnf
to
/var/db/mysql
MySQL out of the box setup
Hi guys
On one of my web servers I have a really high usage of mbuf clusters in
use on a web server that does about 3million hits a day.
4294914731/262144 mbuf clusters in use (current/max)
Does any one know why this is? I was thought it may of been hit by a
small syn flood that went un noticed
32 matches
Mail list logo
