he
> crazies that are producing software screaming AGILE and quick releases
> which still has not solved the problem of crap code?)
>
> Ooops, bit of a rant sorry all,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On Thursday, March 21, 2019, 12:37:23 PM EDT, Matthew Macy <
> mm...@freebsd.or
These were run with ZoF compiled with -O0 and INVARIANTS. Take what you
read with a grain of salt.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 09:28 Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
> There is a benchmark comparing ZFS in FreeBSD 12 with ZFS in TrueOS
> based on ZFSonFreeBSD 9https://zfsonfreebsd.github.io
> >>> A couple small steps have been taken toward eliminating the need for
> >>> this
> >>> hack: the addition of the "page size index" field to struct vm_page and
> >>> the
> >>> addition of a similarly named parameter to pmap_enter(). However, at
> >>> the
> >>> moment, the only ta
0p (mfi) raid controller with
1GB NVRAM)
In our case the DB size is significantly bigger than RAM, and we also
run with a large (3GB) work mem, which seems to exacerbate the slow-down
effect.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
x27;t construct a fair test of database performance
against other OSes/filesystems if you restrict yourself to using exactly
the same hardware.
Basically, install the FreeBSD box on UFS2 and try again.
Cheers,
Matthew
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
side of the FreeBSD community actually runs
public c= omparisons of FreeBSD against anything?
Matthew
-- Sent from my HP Pre3
_
On Jan 4, 2012 1:58 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Thanks.
>
&= gt; My req
elp do
a lot of the infrastructure and automation lifting.
Regards,
Matthew
On 12/22/11 8:56 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Guys, girls, fuzzy creatures,
This is by far the best example of a constructive email in this entire thread.
If people would like to help, Erik here is exactly the kind of person
w
iables and to
possibly inject actions to measure = impacts.
We're more than happy to work with you guys, = and are willing to
help
do a lot of the infrastructure and automation= lifting.
Regards,
Matthew
On 12/22/11 8:56 AM, Adrian Chadd wrot= e:
install them. = Then you run about 49 individual steps.
Matthew
-- Sent from my HP Pre3
_
On Dec 20, 2011 5:30 PM, Adrian Chadd = ; wrote:
Is there a specific version of the test suite that = should be used,
to
be asked to push the comparison up to openbenchmarking at the end.
Matthew
On 12/20/2011 01:39 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 12/20/11 21:20, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
Interestingly, while people seem to be (arguably rightly) focused on
criticising Phoronix's benchmarking, nobody has offer
ed benchmarks from the FreeBSD
perspective
2) Tuning guide documented somewhere within the community
3) Comparative results based on the communities testing.
All concrete, and all achievable.
Regards,
Matthew
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing
e case.
Thanks 'someone'.
Matthew
Dec 16, 2011 8:46 AM,= Adrian Chadd wrote:
Can someone please write up a nice, concise blog post somewhere
outlining all of this?
Extra bonus points if it's a blog t= hat is picked up by
blogs.freebsdish.org and/or some of the
e ZFS
pools helps.
See http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_for_Databases for
more details. Just about everything on that page applies equally to
FreeBSD as it does to Solaris.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
Hi all,
I'm involved in the Phoronix test suite. I'm on freebs d-performance, so
if you have any questions - CC me or
freebsd-performance. Regards,
Matthee
_
On Aug= 29, 2011 5:38 AM, Yamagi Burmeister wrot
phoronix-test-suite benchmark pts/npb
And choose either the MG.B or LU.A subtest. We'll be trying to remove
the HW from being a potential factor.
Also note that scalability of 6 cores + HyperThreading also dropped off
fairly heavily (so did OpenIndiana).
Thanks in advance.
Matthew
[1]
[ Trim CC a bit]
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:56:35PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> >
> > Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience
> > is that Linux's interactive
heavy load was always
much worse than FreeBSD's. So maybe that's just them catching up to
where we already are ;)
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fulle...@over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
On the Internet, nobod
owadays to
make that viable for many purposes.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
ime to run some benchmarks, using something like dt on a
FreeBSD raw partition with lots of small sequential writes and using
the (now deprecated) 'raw' bound devices in fc5 might get more of an
apple-apple.
On 5/16/07, Randy Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 200
filesystem? ext3?
I want one of these failing machines *in my lab*.
On 5/14/07, Randy Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Matthew Jacob spaketh thusly:
-}Time frame to resolution involves getting a machine into my lab that
-}evidences the poor performance and the t
s too high and
> this
> is normal?
>
> --
From the boot messages you have included below it seems that you have a
Dell SAS-5i (Internal PCIe) controller and not a Perc/5[ie].
The SAS-5 known to have very poor performance (1Mb/s 100%busy) under
certain loads (cvsup).
I ha
speeds things up,
but it ain't that.
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
___
freebsd-performance
6-stable machine.
dd does ridiculously small (512 byte?) read/writes, so it's gotta do a
LOT of system calls and a lot of context switching when you don't give
it a bigger blocksize.
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator | http://ww
g
around in my bookmarks from a previous iteration. Point (5) makes me
twitch every time I read it;)
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
On the Internet, no
at the time is.
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
x)
No it doesn't (have really high usage, that is). It just has messed
up statistics, which is standard on SMP machines; see the archives.
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
On the Internet, n
the 32/64
split.
And don't forget bragging rights! Servers always run faster when
they're cool...
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
On the
27 matches
Mail list logo
