> > Hopefully there will be direct memory bus connected nic's in future.
> > (HyperTransport connected nic's)
>
> Well that is going to be an AMD only solution, and I'm not even shure
> that AMD would like to have other things than CPU's on that bus.
There are FPGAs that plug into a CPU socket (
Thats why my next router will be based at this box:
http://www.axiomtek.com/products/ViewProduct.asp?view=429
Nice piece of hardware.
Don't like the 2.5" one disk option though.
And not shure what to think of:
"Seven 10/100/1000Mbps (through PCI-E by one
interface) ports (RJ-45)"
Which seems to
Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
I have a 1.2Ghz Pentium-M appliance, with 4x 32bit, 33MHz pci
intel e1000 cards. With maximum tuning I can "route" ~400mbps
with big packets and ~80mbps with 64byte packets. around 100kpps,
whats not bad for a pci architecture.
To reach higher bandwiths, better busses
I have a 1.2Ghz Pentium-M appliance, with 4x 32bit, 33MHz pci intel e1000
cards.
With maximum tuning I can "route" ~400mbps with big packets and ~80mbps
with 64byte packets.
around 100kpps, whats not bad for a pci architecture.
To reach higher bandwiths, better busses are needed.
pci-express
I have a 1.2Ghz Pentium-M appliance, with 4x 32bit, 33MHz pci intel
e1000 cards.
With maximum tuning I can "route" ~400mbps with big packets and ~80mbps
with 64byte packets.
around 100kpps, whats not bad for a pci architecture.
To reach higher bandwiths, better busses are needed.
pci-express ca
Hi,
thank you very much. Problem wasn't netither in version of bsd nor
in configuration. Problem was in hardware. I change bge ethernet
card to intel and it working.
--
S pozdravem,
Bc. Radek Krejca
ICQ: 65895541
___
freebsd-performance@freeb
What kind of network cards are you using, and what bus type are they using?
>From my experience, I was never able to get over ~300Mbps routing from
one PCI-X NIC to another PCI-X NIC. I switched out the bus to a
PCI-Express and put a couple of Intel PCI-E 4x gigabit cards in and I
was able to get
Dear Kevin,
I upgrade to 7.0RC3 but still the same. 418Mbit is the roof.
older fbsd's are faster than newer.
How are the nic's connected to the cpu?
lspci -v
V7 is not (in my experience) slower than V4, v5, or v6.
v6 is at least slower than v4.
http://www.tancsa.com/blast.html
(look at t
> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:05:18 +0100 (CET)
> From: Ingo Flaschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi,
>
> >> ZB> - upgrade at least to 6.3. upgrading to 7.0 might also be better,
> >> depending
> >> ZB> on hardware choices
> >> ZB> - ensure your ethernet cards are on f
Hi,
ZB> - upgrade at least to 6.3. upgrading to 7.0 might also be better,
depending
ZB> on hardware choices
ZB> - ensure your ethernet cards are on fast enough busses. 'em' (Intel
Ether
ZB> Express 1000) flavor ports are my personal favorite
ZB> - enable polling (this will make a _huge_ dif
Bc. Radek Krejca escreveu:
Hi,
ZB> - upgrade at least to 6.3. upgrading to 7.0 might also be better, depending
ZB> on hardware choices
ZB> - ensure your ethernet cards are on fast enough busses. 'em' (Intel Ether
ZB> Express 1000) flavor ports are my personal favorite
ZB> - enable polling (thi
On 25/02/2008, Bc. Radek Krejca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ZB> - upgrade at least to 6.3. upgrading to 7.0 might also be better,
> depending
> ZB> on hardware choices
> ZB> - ensure your ethernet cards are on fast enough busses. 'em' (Intel
> Ether
> ZB> Express 1000) flavor ports
Hi,
ZB> - upgrade at least to 6.3. upgrading to 7.0 might also be better, depending
ZB> on hardware choices
ZB> - ensure your ethernet cards are on fast enough busses. 'em' (Intel Ether
ZB> Express 1000) flavor ports are my personal favorite
ZB> - enable polling (this will make a _huge_ differen
Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2008 8:00 AM, Bc. Radek Krejca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I have FreeBSD box as router
> > FreeBSD pvt-gw.starnet.cz 6.1-RELEASE-p12 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p12 #2: Wed
> > Jan 31 21:28:44 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DL360-G4
>
Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 8:00 AM, Bc. Radek Krejca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have FreeBSD box as router
FreeBSD pvt-gw.starnet.cz 6.1-RELEASE-p12 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p12 #2: Wed
Jan 31 21:28:44 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DL360-G4
i386
But spee
On Feb 5, 2008 8:00 AM, Bc. Radek Krejca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have FreeBSD box as router
> FreeBSD pvt-gw.starnet.cz 6.1-RELEASE-p12 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p12 #2: Wed
> Jan 31 21:28:44 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DL360-G4
> i386
> But speed is only about 382 M
Hi,
I have FreeBSD box as router
FreeBSD pvt-gw.starnet.cz 6.1-RELEASE-p12 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p12 #2: Wed Jan
31 21:28:44 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DL360-G4 i386
But speed is only about 382 Mbit. I have following values in
sysctl.conf:
net.inet.ip.fastforwardi
17 matches
Mail list logo