On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Brent Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Brent Jones wrote:
...
The issue I am seeing, is that for certain file types, the FreeBSD NFS
client will either issue an ASYNC write, or an FSYNC.
However, NFSv3 and v4 both support "safe" ASYNC writes in the TCP
vers
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Brent Jones wrote:
> I'm reviving this, as I too am seeing something eerily similar. I have
> made my own thread under freebsd-stable, so I will hopefully move that
> discussion to this list.
>
> I believe we are seeing performance problems when the FreeBSD NFS
>
I'm reviving this, as I too am seeing something eerily similar. I have
made my own thread under freebsd-stable, so I will hopefully move that
discussion to this list.
I believe we are seeing performance problems when the FreeBSD NFS
client issues FSYNC NFS instead of ASYNC, sending performance to
oo bs=64k count=1
It transferred 6.6 GB in roughly
From: Michelle Li
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 7:25:02 PM
Subject: Re: ZFS, NFS and Network tuning (Paul Patterson)
...and the dmesg?
please post
freebsd-p
Li
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 7:25:02 PM
Subject: Re: ZFS, NFS and Network tuning (Paul Patterson)
...and the dmesg?
please post
freebsd-performance-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: Send freebsd-performance mailing
list submissions to
freebsd-performance@
7:25:02 PM
Subject: Re: ZFS, NFS and Network tuning (Paul Patterson)
...and the dmesg?
please post
freebsd-performance-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: Send freebsd-performance mailing
list submissions to
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
It makes it real hard for the thread have integrity. (Heck, many of you
are interested in the results. :-) )
P.
From: Paul Patterson
To: Paul Patterson ; freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 1:59:54 PM
Subject: Re: ZFS, N
formance digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: ZFS, NFS and Network tuning (Paul Patterson)
2. Re: ZFS, NFS and Network tuning (Paul Patterson)
3. Re: ZFS, NFS and Network tuning (Paul Patterson)
4. intel i7 and Hy
8 1:03:14 PM
Subject: Re: ZFS, NFS and Network tuning
Hello all,
I guess I've got to send this as I've already had about 5 responses claiming
the same thing. This is not a disk bottleneck. The ZFS partition is capable
of performing at the theoretical max of the drives. The machine is
elow and see if there's anything glaring However, the lack of consistency
shows something is wrong network wise.
P.
From: Paul Patterson
To: Paul Patterson ; freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 9:47:59 AM
Subject: Re: ZFS, N
erson
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 8:04:37 PM
Subject: ZFS, NFS and Network tuning
Hi,
I just set up my first machine with ZFS. (First, ZFS is nothing short of
amazing) I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 as an NFS server with ZFS striped across
two volum
Hi,
I just set up my first machine with ZFS. (First, ZFS is nothing short of
amazing) I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 as an NFS server with ZFS striped across
two volumes (just testing throughput for now.) Anyhow, I was benching this
box, 4GB or RAM, the volume is on 2x146 GB SAS 10K rpm drives
12 matches
Mail list logo
