hi Mike,
thanks for sharing your experinces
BR
collfire
FreeBSD The Power to Serve
Original Message Follows
From: Mike Horwath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cacti system tuning
Date: Sun,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:19:02AM -0800, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> it's also much easier to debug problems with either the poller itself
> or the devices being polled.
>
> i'd use the php poller with cacti.
Agreed. I had problems with the poller taking too long to process
our 1200 datasources but
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 07:32:09PM -0600, Mike Horwath wrote:
> cactid does GREAT on a small number of polls, but seems to *skip* or
> *drop* readings on higher than ~1500 polls in my experience.
cactid is just rtgpoll (from rtg.sourceforge.net) with a few
customizations. unfortunately, the copy
Mike Horwath a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:56:27PM +0100, Guillaume wrote:
>> That's not a lot for a Cacti server running on this hardware !
>>
>> Do you use cactiD as pooler ?
>>
>> CactiD is a "C" poller to replace the php poller, the performence is
>> really higher !!
>
> Not in my exp
cool fire a écrit :
>
>
> hi Guillaume,
>
> the cactid can't update the graph
>
> BR
>
>
>
>
> FreeBSD The Power to Serve
>
>
>
> From: Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
> Subject
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:56:27PM +0100, Guillaume wrote:
> That's not a lot for a Cacti server running on this hardware !
>
> Do you use cactiD as pooler ?
>
> CactiD is a "C" poller to replace the php poller, the performence is
> really higher !!
Not in my experience using FreeBSD 4.x...
The
cool fire a écrit :
> Hi silencer,
>
> i have 50+ 2900/3500 switches in my cacti,
>
> under every devices, i have all 24/48 ports monitored.
>
> BR
>
> coolfire
>
>
Hi,
That's not a lot for a Cacti server running on this hardware !
Do you use cactiD as pooler ?
CactiD is a "C" poller to r
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 02:33:18PM +0800, cool fire wrote:
> Hi silencer,
>
> i have 50+ 2900/3500 switches in my cacti,
>
> under every devices, i have all 24/48 ports monitored.
So, ~1800 ports?
I am monitoring 1893 ports with FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE, 1GB RAM, Xeon
3.0Ghz with HTT off.
I am *not
thanks eric,
i am gonna report these infos to you in three days.
BR
coolfire
From: Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cool fire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cacti system tuning
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:02:24 -0600
On 11/10/06 01:5
Hi silencer,
i have 50+ 2900/3500 switches in my cacti,
under every devices, i have all 24/48 ports monitored.
BR
coolfire
From: Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cacti system tuning
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:42:44 +0100
Eric Anderson a
Eric Anderson a écrit :
> On 11/10/06 01:55, cool fire wrote:
>> hi all,
>> i have my cacti running on a server of Xeon2.4GHz with 1G RAM,
>> the system is running freebsd FreeBSD cacti 6.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD
>> 6.0-RELEASE-p5 #0: Fri Mar 17 09:03:11 CST 2006 and havey loaded as
>> follows:
>>
>>
On 11/10/06 01:55, cool fire wrote:
hi all,
i have my cacti running on a server of Xeon2.4GHz with 1G RAM,
the system is running freebsd FreeBSD cacti 6.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD
6.0-RELEASE-p5 #0: Fri Mar 17 09:03:11 CST 2006 and havey loaded as
follows:
3:53PM up 51 days, 22:15, 1 user, load
hi all,
i have my cacti running on a server of Xeon2.4GHz with 1G RAM,
the system is running freebsd FreeBSD cacti 6.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD
6.0-RELEASE-p5 #0: Fri Mar 17 09:03:11 CST 2006 and havey loaded as
follows:
3:53PM up 51 days, 22:15, 1 user, load averages: 1.97, 1.95, 1.95
what sh
13 matches
Mail list logo
