Re: ports.conf: Is there a reason behind not being default?

Xin LI wrote: > Hi, > > I think that ports-mgmt/portconf (a.k.a. /usr/local/etc/ports.conf) is a > very handy feature that makes it much easier to store port options > across upgrade. Is there a reason behind not making it into > bsd.ports.mk? IMHO it's a big deal to take the script into > ports

Re: mailer question #2

--On December 17, 2007 11:28:30 PM -0500 Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Well, assuming that I can't get enigmail-seamonkey fixed up, I was wondering if I could get a recommendation about a mailer. This following is my list of requirements,

Re: mailer question #2

* Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-17 23:28:30]: > Any mailers handling those 3 requirements? Some that come to mind are: mozilla-thunderbird, claws-mail, evolution, kmail. Hope this helps. -- Chess Griffin GPG Public Key: 0x0C7558C3 http://www.chessgriffin.com pgppmQ7A1AGpL.pgp D

adding enigmail to seamonkey

Chuck Robey writes: > Well, the enigmail-seamonkey install has the same somewhat bare > hint, so I went looking for the Tools->AddOns menu, but that's a > lost cause, it's not there, although the install comment in the > port tells you it is. Well, sez I, go look into the .thunderbird > fil

mailer question #2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Well, assuming that I can't get enigmail-seamonkey fixed up, I was wondering if I could get a recommendation about a mailer. This following is my list of requirements, so please don't lets open up a mailer free-for-all (I like the ACME mailer!) unless

adding enigmail to seamonkey

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to add enigmail to seamonkey, and not having much fun doing it. I'm rather hoping someone here can help me. First, I'm using Seamonkey's mailer (and not Thunderbird) because it handled the formatting of fixed-width-font lines better. Where

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:54:45PM -0300, Alejandro Pulver wrote: > I remember some of my ports failed on ia64 (some time ago), what > happened to it/them? There are 2 ia64 build machines, each of which has been upgraded to 7.0. However, neither is able to build packages at this time, so until so

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:07:35 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon) wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:59:54PM -0300, Alejandro Pulver wrote: > > if not already done, AFAIK tinderbox has an option to run parallel > > builds, but don't know about pointyhat) using multiple processors. > > pointyha

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:49:45 -0500 Tom McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 11:42 -0300, Alejandro Pulver wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:48:07 -0600 > > Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On the other hand some ports really need to

ports.conf: Is there a reason behind not being default?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I think that ports-mgmt/portconf (a.k.a. /usr/local/etc/ports.conf) is a very handy feature that makes it much easier to store port options across upgrade. Is there a reason behind not making it into bsd.ports.mk? IMHO it's a big deal to take th

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> In order to finalize the general nature of the ports re-engineering >> effort this thread is designed to specifically explore the featu

RE: FreeBSD Port: net-mgmt/cricket

Hello Tim: > > The following replacement patch for patch-lib-RRD-Format.pm makes > cricket also > work on amd64 FreeBSD systems: [snip] I recommend that you use send-pr to submit this patch so it will not get lost in the email archives. Thanks for your great contribution! Chris > > Tim Prie

gutenprint port problem with WITHOUT_X11=yes

Dear maintainers, I've had a problem installing gutenprint on my lusitania gutenprint # uname -r 6.2-RELEASE-p9 As I use this machine as a file, printer and web-development server only, i.e. headless, I have set "WITHOUT_X11=yes" in my make.conf. Upgrading to gutenprint from gimp-print gave me t

FreeBSD Port: net-mgmt/cricket

The following replacement patch for patch-lib-RRD-Format.pm makes cricket also work on amd64 FreeBSD systems: --- Format.pm.orig Wed Jan 21 04:11:09 2004 +++ Format.pm Mon Dec 17 22:47:18 2007 @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ $self->{'dsDef'} = "a20 a20 L x4 d d x56"; $self->{'rraDef'

Re: courier-imap-4.3.0 breaks connecting/logging in for some users

On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:14:27PM +0100 I heard the voice of Stefan Bethke, and lo! it spake thus: > > Why it matters which client accesses the account, I cannot fathom. I can't imagine that it does, but it seems like most clients don't pass along the information. I have no idea why it doesn't

Re: courier-imap-4.3.0 breaks connecting/logging in for some users

Am 17.12.2007 um 20:20 schrieb Matthew D. Fuller: On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 07:49:30PM +0100 I heard the voice of Stefan Bethke, and lo! it spake thus: No errors are logged [...] If you try logging in manually, I think you'll find it complaining about the uid/gid of the maildir; the latest ve

kgpg

I am trying (with notiable lack of success so far, but I'll be posting to -questions about that, so don't answer it) to get seamoneky to cooperate with GNUpg ... so I saw a reference to another port, security/kgpg, and I went to build it. Unfortunately, kgpg has a dependency tp gnupg1, and I a

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 11:42 -0300, Alejandro Pulver wrote: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:48:07 -0600 > Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On the other hand some ports really need to be built from a clean > > system. Some of them autodetect ports that are already installed,

Re: courier-imap-4.3.0 breaks connecting/logging in for some users

On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 07:49:30PM +0100 I heard the voice of Stefan Bethke, and lo! it spake thus: > > No errors are logged [...] If you try logging in manually, I think you'll find it complaining about the uid/gid of the maildir; the latest version seems more strict about that on the IMAP side,

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

On Dec 17, 2007, at 9:19 AM, David Wood wrote: Dear all, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stephen Montgomery- Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes One thing to look at is package building. I don't know how they build the official packages, but my guess is that they build each one from a clean

courier-imap-4.3.0 breaks connecting/logging in for some users

Hi there, just a quick observation since I don't have time to fully debug this tonight: On 6-stable from mid-October 4.2.1 works fine, but the most recent port # $FreeBSD: ports/mail/courier-

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:59:54PM -0300, Alejandro Pulver wrote: > if not already done, AFAIK tinderbox has an option to run parallel > builds, but don't know about pointyhat) using multiple processors. pointyhat is actually the dispatch machine. It does not actually build packages. The current

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

Dear all, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes One thing to look at is package building. I don't know how they build the official packages, but my guess is that they build each one from a clean system. But, for example, you have tons of little p

libcaca and libslang

It seems that libcaca grows unrecorded dependency on libslang if it is present in a system. I recently upgraded slang to libslang2-2.1.3 and the only dependency before the upgrade was 'most'. Now, when I run mplayer I get: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libslang.so.1" not found, required by

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 06:44:25 -0800 Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > In order to finalize the general nature of the ports re-engineering > > effort this thread is designed to specifically explore the features >

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:27:33 -0600 Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Auto-detection is certainly avoidable. Some for example only enable > > detection of MMX/SSE/etc instructions when not building in > > pointyhat/tinderbox. IIRC ports should respect the users' choice, but >

Re: TeTeX and TeXLive

Le 17/12/2007 à 11:02:45+0900, Hiroki Sato a écrit > Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > ba> Why not add TeXLive port even as it is, so that people can > ba> play with it? As for modularization, I hope you don't go the > ba> extreme of a zillion little pieces but

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

Alejandro Pulver wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:48:07 -0600 Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One thing to look at is package building. I don't know how they build the official packages, but my guess is that they build each one from a clean system. But, for example, you hav

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:48:07 -0600 Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In order to finalize the general nature of the ports re-engineering > > effort this thread is designed to specifically explore the features > > people want to see. > > > > Please supply one or more of the f

Re: TeTeX and TeXLive

On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:59:55PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Nikola Le??i?? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > 2. Finer-grained package management is needed. Creating a TeXLive > port as "one very large package" is possible but I do not think it > would work well. There are many people who do

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In order to finalize the general nature of the ports re-engineering effort this thread is designed to specifically explore the features people want to see. Please supply one or more of the following: * Up to 4 user stories

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In order to finalize the general nature of the ports re-engineering effort this thread is designed to specifically explore the features people want to see. Please supply one or more of the following: * Up to 4 user stories

Re: make config-conditional recursive ?

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:59:53 +0200 Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 14/12/2007 19:22 RW said the following: > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:57:12 +0200 > > Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Is make config-conditional recursive ? > > > > No, but config-recursive is condition

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

On Monday 17 December 2007 04:01:16 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > In order to finalize the general nature of the ports re-engineering > effort this thread is designed to specifically explore the features > people want to see. > > Please supply one or more of the following: > > * Up to 4 user stories o

Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In order to finalize the general nature of the ports re-engineering effort this thread is designed to specifically explore the features people want to see. Please supply one or more of the following: * Up to 4 user stories of how you would like to us

Re: make config-conditional recursive ?

on 14/12/2007 19:22 RW said the following: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:57:12 +0200 > Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Is make config-conditional recursive ? > > No, but config-recursive is conditional but it's not conditional :-) -- Andriy Gapon __

logistics of re-engineering discussions/work

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 By the end of today or tomorrow the ports re-engineering team will have the following established for most future discussion of the project: * Mailing list * WWW site with Wiki I will be starting one final thread on the issue in -ports@ in

Ports Re-engineering: Semi-official statement of scope and schedule

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Project Name: Ports 2.0 Disclaimers: 1. This project is not meant to completely supplant the current ports system for a minimum of 2 years 2. For non-core team versions all standard FreeBSD change management procedures and policies will be f

Current unassigned ports problem reports

Current FreeBSD problem reports The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Bugs can be in one of several states: o - open A problem report has bee

Re: TeTeX and TeXLive

in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Hiroki Sato thusly... ... > I have tried to create TeXLive port and have some working results, > but I cannot commit it because the following issues still remain: > > 1. Compatibility with other packages which uses TeX. Some depend > on old teTeX structu

Message from eBay Member Regarding Item #300178854689

eBay sent this message! This message originated from eBay. [1]Learn more. [ltCurve.gif] Question about ltem -- Respond Now [rtCurve.gif] [s.gif] eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member through My Messages. Responses sent using email will go to the eBay member d