Message from eBay Member Regarding Item #300178854689

2007-12-17 Thread eBay member digerati_auctions
eBay sent this message! This message originated from eBay. [1]Learn more. [ltCurve.gif] Question about ltem -- Respond Now [rtCurve.gif] [s.gif] eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member through My Messages. Responses sent using email will go to the eBay member

Re: TeTeX and TeXLive

2007-12-17 Thread Parv
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Hiroki Sato thusly... ... I have tried to create TeXLive port and have some working results, but I cannot commit it because the following issues still remain: 1. Compatibility with other packages which uses TeX. Some depend on old teTeX structure,

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2007-12-17 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Bugs can be in one of several states: o - open A problem report has

Ports Re-engineering: Semi-official statement of scope and schedule

2007-12-17 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Project Name: Ports 2.0 Disclaimers: 1. This project is not meant to completely supplant the current ports system for a minimum of 2 years 2. For non-core team versions all standard FreeBSD change management procedures and policies will be

logistics of re-engineering discussions/work

2007-12-17 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 By the end of today or tomorrow the ports re-engineering team will have the following established for most future discussion of the project: * Mailing list * WWW site with Wiki I will be starting one final thread on the issue in -ports@

Re: make config-conditional recursive ?

2007-12-17 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 14/12/2007 19:22 RW said the following: On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:57:12 +0200 Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is make config-conditional recursive ? No, but config-recursive is conditional but it's not conditional :-) -- Andriy Gapon

Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In order to finalize the general nature of the ports re-engineering effort this thread is designed to specifically explore the features people want to see. Please supply one or more of the following: * Up to 4 user stories of how you would like to

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread David Southwell
On Monday 17 December 2007 04:01:16 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: In order to finalize the general nature of the ports re-engineering effort this thread is designed to specifically explore the features people want to see. Please supply one or more of the following: * Up to 4 user stories of how

Re: make config-conditional recursive ?

2007-12-17 Thread RW
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:59:53 +0200 Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 14/12/2007 19:22 RW said the following: On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:57:12 +0200 Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is make config-conditional recursive ? No, but config-recursive is conditional but it's

Re: TeTeX and TeXLive

2007-12-17 Thread Trix Farrar
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:59:55PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: Nikola Le??i?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 2. Finer-grained package management is needed. Creating a TeXLive port as one very large package is possible but I do not think it would work well. There are many people who do not

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread Alejandro Pulver
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:48:07 -0600 Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In order to finalize the general nature of the ports re-engineering effort this thread is designed to specifically explore the features people want to see. Please supply one or more of the following:

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Alejandro Pulver wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:48:07 -0600 Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One thing to look at is package building. I don't know how they build the official packages, but my guess is that they build each one from a clean system. But, for example, you have

Re: TeTeX and TeXLive

2007-12-17 Thread Albert Shih
Le 17/12/2007 à 11:02:45+0900, Hiroki Sato a écrit Bakul Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ba Why not add TeXLive port even as it is, so that people can ba play with it? As for modularization, I hope you don't go the ba extreme of a zillion little pieces but instead

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread Alejandro Pulver
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:27:33 -0600 Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Auto-detection is certainly avoidable. Some for example only enable detection of MMX/SSE/etc instructions when not building in pointyhat/tinderbox. IIRC ports should respect the users' choice, but it's

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread Alejandro Pulver
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 06:44:25 -0800 Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In order to finalize the general nature of the ports re-engineering effort this thread is designed to specifically explore the features people want

libcaca and libslang

2007-12-17 Thread Andriy Gapon
It seems that libcaca grows unrecorded dependency on libslang if it is present in a system. I recently upgraded slang to libslang2-2.1.3 and the only dependency before the upgrade was 'most'. Now, when I run mplayer I get: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libslang.so.1 not found, required by

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread David Wood
Dear all, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes One thing to look at is package building. I don't know how they build the official packages, but my guess is that they build each one from a clean system. But, for example, you have tons of little

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread Mark Linimon
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:59:54PM -0300, Alejandro Pulver wrote: if not already done, AFAIK tinderbox has an option to run parallel builds, but don't know about pointyhat) using multiple processors. pointyhat is actually the dispatch machine. It does not actually build packages. The current

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Dec 17, 2007, at 9:19 AM, David Wood wrote: Dear all, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stephen Montgomery- Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes One thing to look at is package building. I don't know how they build the official packages, but my guess is that they build each one from a clean

Re: courier-imap-4.3.0 breaks connecting/logging in for some users

2007-12-17 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 07:49:30PM +0100 I heard the voice of Stefan Bethke, and lo! it spake thus: No errors are logged [...] If you try logging in manually, I think you'll find it complaining about the uid/gid of the maildir; the latest version seems more strict about that on the IMAP side,

courier-imap-4.3.0 breaks connecting/logging in for some users

2007-12-17 Thread Stefan Bethke
Hi there, just a quick observation since I don't have time to fully debug this tonight: On 6-stable from mid-October 4.2.1 ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.3-release/mail/courier-imap-4.2.1,1.tbz works fine, but the most recent port # $FreeBSD:

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread Tom McLaughlin
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 11:42 -0300, Alejandro Pulver wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:48:07 -0600 Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip On the other hand some ports really need to be built from a clean system. Some of them autodetect ports that are already installed, and

kgpg

2007-12-17 Thread Chuck Robey
I am trying (with notiable lack of success so far, but I'll be posting to -questions about that, so don't answer it) to get seamoneky to cooperate with GNUpg ... so I saw a reference to another port, security/kgpg, and I went to build it. Unfortunately, kgpg has a dependency tp gnupg1, and I

Re: courier-imap-4.3.0 breaks connecting/logging in for some users

2007-12-17 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 17.12.2007 um 20:20 schrieb Matthew D. Fuller: On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 07:49:30PM +0100 I heard the voice of Stefan Bethke, and lo! it spake thus: No errors are logged [...] If you try logging in manually, I think you'll find it complaining about the uid/gid of the maildir; the latest

FreeBSD Port: net-mgmt/cricket

2007-12-17 Thread Tim Priebe
The following replacement patch for patch-lib-RRD-Format.pm makes cricket also work on amd64 FreeBSD systems: --- Format.pm.orig Wed Jan 21 04:11:09 2004 +++ Format.pm Mon Dec 17 22:47:18 2007 @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ $self-{'dsDef'} = a20 a20 L x4 d d x56; $self-{'rraDef'} =

gutenprint port problem with WITHOUT_X11=yes

2007-12-17 Thread David Raison
Dear maintainers, I've had a problem installing gutenprint on my lusitania gutenprint # uname -r 6.2-RELEASE-p9 As I use this machine as a file, printer and web-development server only, i.e. headless, I have set WITHOUT_X11=yes in my make.conf. Upgrading to gutenprint from gimp-print gave me

RE: FreeBSD Port: net-mgmt/cricket

2007-12-17 Thread Chris Haulmark
Hello Tim: The following replacement patch for patch-lib-RRD-Format.pm makes cricket also work on amd64 FreeBSD systems: [snip] I recommend that you use send-pr to submit this patch so it will not get lost in the email archives. Thanks for your great contribution! Chris Tim Priebe.

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In order to finalize the general nature of the ports re-engineering effort this thread is designed to specifically explore the features

ports.conf: Is there a reason behind not being default?

2007-12-17 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I think that ports-mgmt/portconf (a.k.a. /usr/local/etc/ports.conf) is a very handy feature that makes it much easier to store port options across upgrade. Is there a reason behind not making it into bsd.ports.mk? IMHO it's a big deal to take

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread Alejandro Pulver
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:49:45 -0500 Tom McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 11:42 -0300, Alejandro Pulver wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:48:07 -0600 Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip On the other hand some ports really need to be built

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread Alejandro Pulver
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:07:35 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon) wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:59:54PM -0300, Alejandro Pulver wrote: if not already done, AFAIK tinderbox has an option to run parallel builds, but don't know about pointyhat) using multiple processors. pointyhat is

Re: Request for Features: Ports Re-engineering

2007-12-17 Thread Mark Linimon
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:54:45PM -0300, Alejandro Pulver wrote: I remember some of my ports failed on ia64 (some time ago), what happened to it/them? There are 2 ia64 build machines, each of which has been upgraded to 7.0. However, neither is able to build packages at this time, so until

adding enigmail to seamonkey

2007-12-17 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to add enigmail to seamonkey, and not having much fun doing it. I'm rather hoping someone here can help me. First, I'm using Seamonkey's mailer (and not Thunderbird) because it handled the formatting of fixed-width-font lines better.

mailer question #2

2007-12-17 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Well, assuming that I can't get enigmail-seamonkey fixed up, I was wondering if I could get a recommendation about a mailer. This following is my list of requirements, so please don't lets open up a mailer free-for-all (I like the ACME mailer!)

adding enigmail to seamonkey

2007-12-17 Thread Robert Huff
Chuck Robey writes: Well, the enigmail-seamonkey install has the same somewhat bare hint, so I went looking for the Tools-AddOns menu, but that's a lost cause, it's not there, although the install comment in the port tells you it is. Well, sez I, go look into the .thunderbird file,

Re: mailer question #2

2007-12-17 Thread Chess Griffin
* Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-17 23:28:30]: Any mailers handling those 3 requirements? Some that come to mind are: mozilla-thunderbird, claws-mail, evolution, kmail. Hope this helps. -- Chess Griffin GPG Public Key: 0x0C7558C3 http://www.chessgriffin.com pgppmQ7A1AGpL.pgp

Re: mailer question #2

2007-12-17 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On December 17, 2007 11:28:30 PM -0500 Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Well, assuming that I can't get enigmail-seamonkey fixed up, I was wondering if I could get a recommendation about a mailer. This following is my list of requirements,

Re: ports.conf: Is there a reason behind not being default?

2007-12-17 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Xin LI wrote: Hi, I think that ports-mgmt/portconf (a.k.a. /usr/local/etc/ports.conf) is a very handy feature that makes it much easier to store port options across upgrade. Is there a reason behind not making it into bsd.ports.mk? IMHO it's a big deal to take the script into