Re: [PATCH] trafshow port broken

2009-03-31 Thread Alexey V. Degtyarev
Hi Lawrence, thank you for your report, the ports/133193 pr was commited yesterday as the fix for this problem. You're listed as the maintainer for the FreeBSD net/trafshow port. The port doesn't compile on 8.0-CURRENT (r190457) amd64 at the moment. The recent import of the new pcap

Re: Dangling extern C in pcap.h (was: Re: nmap broken on current)

2009-03-31 Thread Rui Paulo
On 30 Mar 2009, at 20:47, Daniel Roethlisberger wrote: Daniel Roethlisberger dan...@roe.ch 2009-03-30: Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net 2009-03-30: On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 07:23:00PM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: the nmap port is broken on current: Shouldn't this be reported to the port's

INDEX build failed for 6.x

2009-03-31 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: lxde-meta-1.0: no entry for lxde-common=0::/a/erwin/tindex/ports/misc/lxde-common Committers on the hook: danfe lth miwi olgeni

INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x

2009-03-31 Thread Erwin Lansing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

why was XFree86 dropped for ports?

2009-03-31 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I cc'd flz because I saw an email from March of 2008 which announces that Florent Thoumie (flz) himself deleted the XFree86-4 port. I need to understand why all support for XFree86 has been removed from our ports. It doesn't make sense to me. Here

ansi colors in ports

2009-03-31 Thread Sandra Kachelmann
Why does freebsd ports not use ansi colors? This would be so nice :-) Eg. ECHO_MSG would be so much more visible within the compilation soup. Gentoo uses colors too! Sandra ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Collecting pkg-message files [was: ansi colors in ports]

2009-03-31 Thread Wesley Shields
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 07:28:34PM +0200, Sandra Kachelmann wrote: Why does freebsd ports not use ansi colors? This would be so nice :-) Eg. ECHO_MSG would be so much more visible within the compilation soup. Gentoo uses colors too! I have no comment on using ANSI colors, but I'd like to point

Cannot build mplayer with x264 on current

2009-03-31 Thread Jakub Lach
libx264.c: In function 'X264_init': libx264.c:165: error: 'x264_param_t' has no member named 'b_bframe_adaptive' libx264.c:228: error: 'struct anonymous' has no member named 'b_bidir_me' libx264.c:229: error: 'struct anonymous' has no member named 'b_bframe_rdo' libx264.c:254: error: 'struct

Re: ansi colors in ports

2009-03-31 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hi, On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Sandra Kachelmann s.kachelm...@googlemail.com wrote: Why does freebsd ports not use ansi colors? This would be so nice :-) Perhaps because it is unneccessary? IMHO, I prefer the ports infrastructure to be functional, rather than nice looking any day. Eg.

Re: LATEST_LINK not in index

2009-03-31 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Pav Lucistnik wrote: Dominic Fandrey píše v so 28. 03. 2009 v 19:23 +0100: I'm working on a binary package upgrade tool that gets all required information from the INDEX file downloadable from the package repositories. This means you do not need a local copy of the ports tree to use it.

Re: why was XFree86 dropped for ports?

2009-03-31 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:13:46PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: I need to understand why all support for XFree86 has been removed from our ports. Because no one volunteered to do the work to support it. At any given time there are at least a couple of dozen X11-related PRs outstanding, and more

Re: ansi colors in ports

2009-03-31 Thread Lars Eighner
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Sandra Kachelmann wrote: Why does freebsd ports not use ansi colors? This would be so nice :-) Eg. ECHO_MSG would be so much more visible within the compilation soup. Gentoo uses colors too! In fact, some ports do use ansi color for some things. It pretty much depends

Re: Status of devel/boost upgrade

2009-03-31 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
Hi! By the way, I've just ran into this sample of code in www/openvrml: .if exists(${LOCALBASE}/include/boost/python.hpp) LIB_DEPENDS+= boost_python.4:${PORTSDIR}/devel/boost-python .else LIB_DEPENDS+= boost_regex.4:${PORTSDIR}/devel/boost .endif and thought: why don't we create something

Re: ansi colors in ports

2009-03-31 Thread Eitan Adler
Perhaps because it is unneccessary? IMHO, I prefer the ports infrastructure to be functional, rather than nice looking any day. It could be both ;) Functional is often a result of a nice looking display as well. -- Eitan Adler Security is increased by designing for the way humans actually

INDEX build failed for 6.x

2009-03-31 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait../a/erwin/tindex/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 634: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk part is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOME=yes before bsd.port.pre.mk? === palm/synce-vdccm failed *** Error code 1 pkg_info: not found

Re: INDEX build failed for 6.x

2009-03-31 Thread Alexander Logvinov
Hello! INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait../a/erwin/tindex/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 634: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk part is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOME=yes before bsd.port.pre.mk? === palm/synce-vdccm failed Sorry, this is my fault.

Re: why was XFree86 dropped for ports?

2009-03-31 Thread matt donovan
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:13:46PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: I need to understand why all support for XFree86 has been removed from our ports. Because no one volunteered to do the work to support it. At any given

Re: why was XFree86 dropped for ports?

2009-03-31 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 matt donovan wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com mailto:lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:13:46PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: I need to understand why all support for XFree86

Re: why was XFree86 dropped for ports?

2009-03-31 Thread matt donovan
snip I don't know git anywhere's near as well as I know cvs, but it seems to me that xorg doesn't have any TAGS so you can't ask for a particular release, isn't that true? I think that is probably a comment on git, not Xorg. I guess, seeing that there's about 1/4 the amount of work

Re: Status of devel/boost upgrade

2009-03-31 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:02:46 -0600, Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru wrote: Hi! By the way, I've just ran into this sample of code in www/openvrml: .if exists(${LOCALBASE}/include/boost/python.hpp) LIB_DEPENDS+= boost_python.4:${PORTSDIR}/devel/boost-python .else LIB_DEPENDS+=

Re: why was XFree86 dropped for ports?

2009-03-31 Thread Robert Noland
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 22:36 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 matt donovan wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com mailto:lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:13:46PM -0400, Chuck

INDEX build failed for 6.x

2009-03-31 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait../a/erwin/tindex/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 634: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk part is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOME=yes before bsd.port.pre.mk? === palm/synce-vdccm failed *** Error code 1 pkg_info: not found