Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
Regards
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a
On 28/07/2010 11:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
I've seen kdelibs fail on 2 x
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
I've seen kdelibs fail on 2 x amd64 8.1-RC2, breaking build of
Dear porters,
This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ .
A list by MAINTAINER is
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/
so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In
addition, the
On Wednesday 28 July 2010 03:13:56 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
Regards
I did install Arch Linux on my wifes
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 28/07/2010 11:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
I've
On Wednesday 28 July 2010 11:13:56 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
It already started
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/2010-July/008931.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
Marcin Wisnicki mwisnicki+free...@gmail.com wrote:
At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in
other mirrors:
...
yet it does not have those packages.
How could something like this happen ?
By being examined
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:15:42 +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
Yeah that was it, but it is really, really bad. Mirroring must be atomic
(mirror to temporary directory then rename). Otherwise there is a large
window of time every couple of days when upgrading packages will at best
fail or leave
Mirroring must be atomic (mirror to temporary directory then rename).
That could double disc requirement, reduce mirror sites willing
to provide space ?
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Mail plain text. Not HTML, Not
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:43:43 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Mirroring must be atomic (mirror to temporary directory then rename).
That could double disc requirement, reduce mirror sites willing to
provide space ?
Indeed it would. But there is no other way to solve it.
Alternatively it
I can no longer maintain the following ports:
* multimedia/abby
* multimedia/cclive
* multimedia/clive
* multimedia/clive-utils
* multimedia/quvi
* multimedia/umph
Perhaps someone reading this list could take them over.
clive-utils could be removed from the collection, altogether.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Toni Gundogdu lega...@gmail.com wrote:
I can no longer maintain the following ports:
* multimedia/abby
* multimedia/cclive
* multimedia/clive
* multimedia/clive-utils
* multimedia/quvi
* multimedia/umph
Perhaps someone reading this list could take
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 04:01:19PM +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Toni Gundogdu lega...@gmail.com wrote:
I can no longer maintain the following ports:
?* multimedia/abby
?* multimedia/cclive
?* multimedia/clive
?* multimedia/clive-utils
?*
Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:43:43 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Mirroring must be atomic (mirror to temporary directory then rename).
That could double disc requirement, reduce mirror sites willing to
provide space ?
Indeed it would. But there is no other way to
On 28/07/2010 15:15, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
Marcin Wisnicki mwisnicki+free...@gmail.com wrote:
At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in
other mirrors:
...
yet it does not have those packages.
How could
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:39:17 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 28/07/2010 15:15, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
Marcin Wisnicki mwisnicki+free...@gmail.com wrote:
At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in
other mirrors:
On Monday 26 July 2010 22:05:06 Thomas Zander wrote:
Hi folks,
recently an update to x264 version 98 has been committed to the ports
tree. I now have prepared an mplayer snapshot that requires it :-)
You can find a tarball containing mplayer and mencoder ports at:
Hi
Build failure in portupgrade of gnome-terminal
Thanks in advance for any information on how to fix this one
David
Extract from scripted console output:
terminal-util.c: In function 'terminal_util_array_to_strv':
terminal-util.c:624: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
David
config.status: executing depfiles commands
config.status: executing libtool commands
=== Building for
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:11:25 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
Alternatively it could be prevented with no disk cost by putting
MIRROR-IN-PROGRESS file and making all package utilities check for
its existence and fail with explanation to try again later.
Perhaps a
28.07.2010 20:53, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
Build failure in portupgrade of gnome-terminal
Thanks in advance for any information on how to fix this one
David
Extract from scripted console output:
/usr/local/lib/libICE.so -lutil -pthread -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,-
rpath
David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net writes:
[ 72%] Building CXX object
src/highgui/CMakeFiles/highgui.dir/grfmt_imageio.o [ 72%] Building CXX
object src/highgui/CMakeFiles/highgui.dir/grfmt_pxm.o Linking CXX shared
library ../../lib/libhighgui.so
[ 73%] Built target highgui
[ 73%]
28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
David
config.status: executing depfiles commands
config.status:
28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
David
config.status:
On 28/07/2010 17:58, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:39:17 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 28/07/2010 15:15, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
Marcin Wisnicki mwisnicki+free...@gmail.com wrote:
At this very moment, french package mirror
28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
David
On Jul 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, David Southwell wrote:
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to take
a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
No, that script contains syntax that doesn't work with
On Jul 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, David Southwell wrote:
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
take a look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
No, that script contains syntax that doesn't work
On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:13 AM, David Southwell wrote:
In that case should the port not call for 26?
Here is an extract from my pkgdb from which you can see python26 is installed
on the system. If the port needs 26 surely should it not call for it as a
dependency rather than failing because
28.07.2010 22:05, David Southwell пишет:
28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that
On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:13 AM, David Southwell wrote:
In that case should the port not call for 26?
Here is an extract from my pkgdb from which you can see python26 is
installed on the system. If the port needs 26 surely should it not call
for it as a dependency rather than failing
28.07.2010 22:26, David Southwell пишет:
28.07.2010 22:05, David Southwell пишет:
28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:28 AM, David Southwell wrote:
I believe the porters handbook recomends that ports should set the
appropriate
python environment at build time to prevent this problem occuring.
Sure, modulo that setting USE_PYTHON isn't going to change the default Python
which gets run
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:13:56 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
Regards
Port for k3b-2.0.0 is available
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:02:40 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 28/07/2010 17:58, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
I think you could also detect inconsistent mirror by comparing
modification time of package against mtime of INDEX. If pkg is newer
than INDEX then it's a sign of incomplete sync.
True,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 18:39, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote:
On 28/07/2010 15:15, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
Marcin Wisnicki mwisnicki+free...@gmail.com wrote:
At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in
other
On 28/07/2010 23:24, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 18:39, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote:
On 28/07/2010 15:15, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
Marcin Wisnicki mwisnicki+free...@gmail.com wrote:
At this very moment,
On 28/07/2010 23:36, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:02:40 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 28/07/2010 17:58, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
I think you could also detect inconsistent mirror by comparing
modification time of package against mtime of INDEX. If pkg is newer
than INDEX
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:18:01 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 28/07/2010 23:24, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
Excuse me? The ports check downloaded source tarball against SHA
checksum. Just for nay case like downloading error or malicious
inject. Did you try to say that binary package have no
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:23:58 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 28/07/2010 23:36, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
What do you mean by master ? If you think about ftp-master then it's
password protected. AFAIK there is no publicly available ftp site that
is an authoritative source, ftp.freebsd.org is
These are the results that I get on my home machine:
$ make index
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait..make_index: thunderbird-3.0.5_1: no entry for
:/home/pcvs/ports/lang
make_index: thunderbird-3.0.5_1: no entry for :/home/pcvs/ports/lang
make_index: thunderbird-3.0.5_1: no entry for
Its a bit to late for me to think about this tonight, but on quick
glance our diffs not equivalent.
On 7/29/2010 12:14 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
These are the results that I get on my home machine:
$ make index
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait..make_index: thunderbird-3.0.5_1: no entry
43 matches
Mail list logo
