update of security/pssh

2010-12-02 Thread Olivier Smedts
Hello, According to : http://www.theether.org/pssh/ parallel-ssh (pssh) is now maintained on http://code.google.com/p/parallel-ssh/ by Andrew McNabb. Current version is 2.1.1. Would you have time to look into a maintainer-update ? Cheers, Olivier -- Olivier Smedts                             

confused build_depends

2010-12-02 Thread Dominic Fandrey
# cd /usr/ports/net/wireshark # make -VBUILD_DEPENDS /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8:/usr/ports/cad/linux-eagle5 ... Well, eagle5 does not install the file libcrypto.so.8, thus it doesn't exist and the ports system will try to install linux-eagle5 when building wireshark. Of course linux-eagle5 is a

Re: www/firefox & mail/thunderbird fail to build

2010-12-02 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
> Hello, > > I suppose the system on which the port is being compiled on is low > in swap space. > > Try to disable compiler optimizations (make config). > > Here's a similar (same ?) problem > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gecko/2010-February/000682.html > > With a workaround,

Re: math/py-numpy size mismatch

2010-12-02 Thread David Southwell ARPS
> On Wednesday 01 December 2010 12:34:38 David Southwell ARPS wrote: > > > On 01.12.2010 18:16 (UTC+1), David Southwell ARPS wrote: > > > > File size mismatch error > > > > > > > > dns1# make clean > > > > ===> Cleaning for py26-numpy-1.5.1,1 > > > > dns1# make > > > > ===> License check disab

Re: www/firefox & mail/thunderbird fail to build

2010-12-02 Thread dan
On 12/02/2010 14:37, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: Hello, I suppose the system on which the port is being compiled on is low in swap space. Try to disable compiler optimizations (make config). Here's a similar (same ?) problem http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gecko/2010-February/000682

Re: updated dialog(1) replacement for ports

2010-12-02 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Eitan Adler on Thursday, 02 December 2010: > I've been working on a dialog(1) replacement as used in the ports system. > The goal is to replace both the options and the license screen with a > single binary. It also features long descriptions, mutually exclusive > options, and some other nice

Re: updated dialog(1) replacement for ports

2010-12-02 Thread Eitan Adler
Thank you for your comments > Every keystroke causes the screen to completely repaint. This can't be fully helped. Any valid key stroke is going to cause this. However I did make invalid keystrokes skip the repainting. > If I accidentally leave off --port name, it core dumps. Heh - I didn't test

Re: updated dialog(1) replacement for ports

2010-12-02 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Eitan Adler on Thursday, 02 December 2010: > Thank you for your comments > > > Every keystroke causes the screen to completely repaint. > This can't be fully helped. Any valid key stroke is going to cause > this. However I did make invalid keystrokes skip the repainting. Ugh -- I haven't lo

Re: confused build_depends

2010-12-02 Thread Olli Hauer
On 2010-12-02 14:12, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > # cd /usr/ports/net/wireshark > # make -VBUILD_DEPENDS > /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8:/usr/ports/cad/linux-eagle5 ... > > Well, eagle5 does not install the file libcrypto.so.8, thus it > doesn't exist and the ports system will try to install linux-eag

Looking for a JOB?

2010-12-02 Thread Preeti
Dear Reader! Greetings of the Day!!! Are you a Fresher? Looking for a JOB? Good News is Right Here!!! Openings in Airtel and Reliance Company as a DSL Engineer with attractive packages. JUST 4 YOU. Call Now. Priya Netroute-X Infotech (P) Ltd. Your JOB search ends here. 9971466888, 42421114 _

Re: updated dialog(1) replacement for ports

2010-12-02 Thread Eitan Adler
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Chip Camden wrote: > Quoth Eitan Adler on Thursday, 02 December 2010: >> Thank you for your comments >> >> > Every keystroke causes the screen to completely repaint. >> This can't be fully helped. Any valid key stroke is going to cause >> this. However I did make i

ftp/proftpd 1.3.3c with a version which contained a backdoor.

2010-12-02 Thread Ivan Klymenko
Hello, people! What do you think is it worth to pay attention to these events: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=alpine.DEB.2.00.1012011542220.12930%40familiar.castaglia.org and that in this case needs to be done with the port ftp/proftpd itself? Thanks!

Re: ftp/proftpd 1.3.3c with a version which contained a backdoor.

2010-12-02 Thread Ivan Klymenko
В Thu, 2 Dec 2010 23:22:06 +0200 Ivan Klymenko пишет: > Hello, people! > What do you think is it worth to pay attention to these events: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=alpine.DEB.2.00.1012011542220.12930%40familiar.castaglia.org > > and that in this case needs to be do

Re: ftp/proftpd 1.3.3c with a version which contained a backdoor.

2010-12-02 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Dec 2, 2010, at 1:22 PM, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > What do you think is it worth to pay attention to these events: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=alpine.DEB.2.00.1012011542220.12930%40familiar.castaglia.org > > and that in this case needs to be done with the port ftp/pro

Re: math/py-numpy size mismatch

2010-12-02 Thread ajtiM
On Thursday 02 December 2010 08:38:12 David Southwell ARPS wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 December 2010 12:34:38 David Southwell ARPS wrote: > > > > On 01.12.2010 18:16 (UTC+1), David Southwell ARPS wrote: > > > > > File size mismatch error > > > > > > > > > > dns1# make clean > > > > > ===> Cleanin

A few questions about bsd.port.mk

2010-12-02 Thread Eitan Adler
I noticed a line in bsd.port.mk "Kludge for pre-3.0 systems" # Kludge for pre-3.0 ystems MACHINE_ARCH?= i386 According to cvs blame asami@ added both lines in revision 1.306 in 1999 Furthermore in bsd.port.mk it says ports should test against ARCH and not MACHINE_ARCH but bsd.port.subdir.m

Re: ftp/proftpd 1.3.3c with a version which contained a backdoor.

2010-12-02 Thread Rob Farmer
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 14:00, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Presumably/hopefully, the proftpd tarball which contained the backdoor would > fail to match the distinfo for the port: > > SHA256 (proftpd-1.3.3c.tar.bz2) = > ea7f02e21f81e6ce79ebde8bbbd334bd269a039ac9137196a35309f791b24db1 > SIZE (proftpd-1.3

Re: update of security/pssh

2010-12-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 12:24:27PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: > Hello, > > According to : > http://www.theether.org/pssh/ > > parallel-ssh (pssh) is now maintained on > http://code.google.com/p/parallel-ssh/ by Andrew McNabb. Current > version is 2.1.1. > > Would you have time to look into a m

Re: ftp/proftpd 1.3.3c with a version which contained a backdoor.

2010-12-02 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Dec 2, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Rob Farmer wrote: >> Checking, the tarball you now fetch is the one which matches their md5 and >> GnuPG signing from the link above... > > For several hours on Wednesday the distinfo was updated to the > compromised version (it has been reverted), so anyone who update

Re: ftp/proftpd 1.3.3c with a version which contained a backdoor.

2010-12-02 Thread Ade Lovett
On Dec 02, 2010, at 17:56 , Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Dec 2, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Rob Farmer wrote: >> >> For several hours on Wednesday the distinfo was updated to the >> compromised version (it has been reverted), so anyone who updated this >> port recently should check their system. > > I see-- t