Doug Barton wrote on 10.09.2011 10:26:
... otherwise it misses the need to upgrade xproto, thus:
checking for XSET... configure: error: Package requirements (xproto>=
7.0.17 xmuu) were not met:
Requested 'xproto>= 7.0.17' but version of Xproto is 7.0.16
http://bugs.freebsd.org/160595
--
Reg
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote on 10.09.2011 09:35:
While I haven't done an extensive search for alternative language
translation software (truth is, I was in a bit of a hurry to get
something useful installed as quickly as possible, and ksteak seemed
the most appealing), I do think ksteak is one of t
On 10 September 2011 06:45, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:05:49 +0200
> Matthias Andree wrote:
>
>> Am 09.09.2011 11:09, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier:
>> > On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:54:36 +0200
>> > Matthias Andree wrote:
>> >>
>> >> No, you'd use a managed installation. Nobody
... otherwise it misses the need to upgrade xproto, thus:
checking for XSET... configure: error: Package requirements (xproto >=
7.0.17 xmuu) were not met:
Requested 'xproto >= 7.0.17' but version of Xproto is 7.0.16
Index: Makefile
===
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:05:49 +0200
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 09.09.2011 11:09, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier:
> > On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:54:36 +0200
> > Matthias Andree wrote:
> >>
> >> No, you'd use a managed installation. Nobody stands there
> >> pointing a gun at your head and forces you to u
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:29:15 +0200
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 09.09.2011 13:15, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier:
> > On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:33:08 +0200 (CEST)
> > lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
> >
> >> portname: german/ksteak
> >> description:KDE frontend for steak, an english - german
> I wanted to propose the addition of a standalone mksh in shells/, which , of
> course, is compiled with -static and installs to /bin . Attached is the
> modified Makefile.
1) Please submit unified diffs, not entire files. It makes it easier
to see what changed and it makes it easier to actually
Hallo,
I recently had a quick look at net/librsync and was puzzled that
it installs rdiff, but not the man page for rdiff. Looking at the
history, this has happened with the update to 0.9.6, submitted in
PR ports/55469 [1]. However, I fail to see the reason for removing
the man page. Leaving it i
On 9/9/11 9:48 PM, Chris Brennan wrote:
> On 9/9/2011 7:35 AM, Aioanei Rares wrote:
>> Attached is the modified Makefile.
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> Aioanei,
> No attachment, I think it got filtered out by the list.
>
I received the Makefile.
--
Glen Barber
_
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:37:08PM +, b. f. wrote:
> Could someone please place the latest devel/git distfiles on the local
> mirrors, so that they are available while kernel.org is recovering
> from being hacked? The github mirror only has gzipped development
> tarballs, that don't work with
On 9/9/2011 7:35 AM, Aioanei Rares wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to propose the addition of a standalone mksh in shells/, which , of
> course, is compiled with -static and installs to /bin . Attached is the
> modified Makefile.
>
> Thanks,
Aioanei,
No attachment, I think it got filtered out by t
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:37:08PM +, b. f. wrote:
> Could someone please place the latest devel/git distfiles on the local
> mirrors, so that they are available while kernel.org is recovering
> from being hacked? The github mirror only has gzipped development
> tarballs, that don't work with
Could someone please place the latest devel/git distfiles on the local
mirrors, so that they are available while kernel.org is recovering
from being hacked? The github mirror only has gzipped development
tarballs, that don't work with the current ports Makefile.
b.
___
Le mar 6 sep 11 à 17:10:01 +0200, Andrea Venturoli
écrivait :
> Hello.
Hello,
> Port is at 6.3, but 6.5.1 is out.
> Is upgrading under way or planned?
Yes, I know, but unfortunately I have been too busy. Hope to work on it
RSN. Anyway, patches are welcome!
Regards,
--
Th. Thomas.
__
Am 09.09.2011 13:15, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier:
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:33:08 +0200 (CEST)
> lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
>> portname: german/ksteak
>> description:KDE frontend for steak, an english - german dictionary
>> maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
>> deprecated becau
Am 09.09.2011 14:38, schrieb Matt Burke:
> If someone deletes a package I use from ports, they are FORCING me to jump
> through an awful load of hoops to get what I want/need.
No. If people would please take note that the package does *not*
magically disappear from your computers because someone
Am 09.09.2011 11:09, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier:
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:54:36 +0200
> Matthias Andree wrote:
>
>> Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:
>>
>>> I want machines, tools, to do as *I* say not the other way round,
>>> whether it's good for me or not. If I wanted nannying and
>>> i
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:05:42PM +0100, Klaus T. Aehlig wrote:
> > > * due to autogeneration, you're quite likely to get a http-redirect,
> > Does fetch support redirects?
>
> Yes. But for good reasons, Mk/bsd.ports.mk contains the line
>
> FETCH_ARGS?=-AFpr
>
> Note the -A. Of course, it
> Until recently, github required two requests to get a tarball: one to
> initiate the tarball creation, the other to download it.
Yes, that's what I remember. The URL you got after the first redirect
was then good for a couple of days -- till eventually it wasn't used
for long enough time and th
Good day,
I'm the current maintainer (as of July 2011) of mod_gnutls.
I have noticed that you are responsible the FreeBSD port, and have
include the current version (0.5.10).
I greatly appreciate your help.
The latest tarball can be downloaded from mod_gnutls' official page at:
http://modgnutl
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote on 09.09.2011 18:38:
Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 06:26:13PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
3. postgresql9x-client unbreak:
Taking those three. Will test them on the coming Monday
and will commit afterwards.
Hmm, actually only
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159
Hello, FreeBSD.
New revision of this vital port.
Changes:
(1) No external FreeBSD hack patch anymore -- ${PATCH_DIR} located
extra-patches instead.
(2) FreeBSD hacks splitted into three:
(a) Perforce-style conflict markers
(b) Enhanced keywords
(c) FreeBSD-specific comm
Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 06:26:13PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > >>3. postgresql9x-client unbreak:
>
> Taking those three. Will test them on the coming Monday
> and will commit afterwards.
Hmm, actually only
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159844
the others are already committed.
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:24:37PM +0100, Klaus T. Aehlig wrote:
>
>
> > The main problem with that is: we have no way to keep a valid sum of the
> > distfiles if it is autogenerated (in particular with github) and this sum is
> > really important.
>
>
> With github this fortunately is a non-is
Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 02:17:09PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Hi, for me it's too many time has passed for maintainer timeout.
> Please commit this anybody, until this port wasn't removed because
> it doesn't builds with some NOTEXISTENT PostgreSQL version.
>
> Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 3
> > * due to autogeneration, you're quite likely to get a http-redirect,
> Does fetch support redirects?
Yes. But for good reasons, Mk/bsd.ports.mk contains the line
FETCH_ARGS?=-AFpr
Note the -A. Of course, it's no problem to make an exception for github, but
at least, one should be aware
Hello, Klaus.
You wrote 9 сентября 2011 г., 17:24:37:
> * due to autogeneration, you're quite likely to get a http-redirect,
Does fetch support redirects?
> * filenames like 2011.07.25 are not too suitable for a distfile.
DIST_SUBIDR=${PORTNAME} is solution for this.
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev
> I've thought about checksums, but my simple experiment shows, that
> tag-related (not tip-related, of course) archives give same chsum
> after re-downloading in short time. But I don't check it for long-term
> stability.
Well, let's do at least one check with a one and a half year old tar ball.
Hello, Baptiste.
You wrote 9 сентября 2011 г., 17:04:58:
> The main problem with that is: we have no way to keep a valid sum of the
> distfiles if it is autogenerated (in particular with github) and this sum is
> really important.
I've thought about checksums, but my simple experiment shows, that
> The main problem with that is: we have no way to keep a valid sum of the
> distfiles if it is autogenerated (in particular with github) and this sum is
> really important.
With github this fortunately is a non-issue. Even though they autogenerate their
tar balls, they keep enough information
When reinstalling net/clamz I noticed that it is necessary to have a cookie
from the local amazon site (amazon.com, amazon.de) confirming that the amazon
downloader is installed when in fact it is not and you are using clamz.
That information will only be accessible from the project website,
ht
Lev Serebryakov wrote on 09.09.2011 14:35:
Hello, Freebsd-ports.
Why some groups of sites in ports system are make variables and some --
special
strings?
They are not. You can use both ${MASTER_SITE_GNU} and just GNU (it will
expanded automatically to corresponding make variable). Just c
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:30:52PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-ports.
>
> I notice, that many software projects are hosted on social DVCS
> hostings nowadays.
>
> Other common "feature" among them is absence of "official" tarballs
> for versions. I don't say, that ALL proje
On 09/08/11 17:54, Matthias Andree wrote:
> The port isn't perfectly usable (because that would mean it's usable in
> all circumstances for all advertised purposes, which is explicitly not
> the case in the light of known vulnerabilities).
In British Engligh at least, "perfectly" can mean "adequat
Hi,
Since upgrading to version 5.7, the Gauge32 of .1.3.6.1.2.1.6.9.0
(TCP-MIB::tcpCurrEstab.0) only returns zero.
Tested on 8.2-RELEASE-p2 with 5.7_3 today.
--
Med venlig hilsen - Sincerely
Uffe R. B. Andersen - mailto:u...@twe.net
http://blog.andersen.nu/
___
Hi all,
I wanted to propose the addition of a standalone mksh in shells/, which , of
course, is compiled with -static and installs to /bin . Attached is the
modified Makefile.
Thanks,
--
Rares Aioanei
Makefile
Description: Binary data
___
freebsd-po
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:54:36 +0200
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:
>
> > What the current FreeBSD policy of actively deleting perfectly
> > usable ports instead of putting a mild hurdle in the way is saying,
> > is that FreeBSD will stop me doing what I may want
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:33:08 +0200 (CEST)
lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
> portname: german/ksteak
> description:KDE frontend for steak, an english - german dictionary
> maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
> deprecated because: Development has ceased.
> expiration date:2011-09-0
Hello, Freebsd-ports.
Why some groups of sites in ports system are make variables and some --
special
strings?
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
Hello, Freebsd-ports.
I notice, that many software projects are hosted on social DVCS
hostings nowadays.
Other common "feature" among them is absence of "official" tarballs
for versions. I don't say, that ALL projects whith primary hosting on
these DVCS sites don't publish official tarballs.
Greg Byshenk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 07:27:51AM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:54:36PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:
Changing to a hypothetical example, why would an Apache vulnerability in
mod_rewrite in the least bit b
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:54:36 +0200
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:
>
> > I want machines, tools, to do as *I* say not the other way round,
> > whether it's good for me or not. If I wanted nannying and
> > interference, I'd install Ubuntu.
>
> No, you'd use a ma
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 07:27:51AM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:54:36PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:
> > > Changing to a hypothetical example, why would an Apache vulnerability in
> > > mod_rewrite in the least bit bother a
> - no 'make clean' and reusing the object files of the current version for
> building the new, updated,
> version. That should save significant compilation time. Does that work as
> of today?
I doubt that that will work in that form. In fact, I quite like that
'make clean' in ports throws aw
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:45:30PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
>
> Both portmaster and portupgrade have 'package' mode, which uses
> packages when available. If one can live with default optimization
> (which is usually good anyways) and if most times the default options
> would satisfy his/her need, or
45 matches
Mail list logo
