On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 05/02/2014 23:57, Kevin Oberman wrote:
1. The ports/packages system is not total crap. In fact, at the time jkh
started it, it was far superior to any tool available.
When I first encountered the
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
Am 06.02.2014 08:52 (UTC+1) schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 07:03:22AM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Am 05.02.2014 22:20 (UTC+1) schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 09:19:51PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 05.02.2014 21:08, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
#17
Am 06.02.2014 08:23 (UTC+1) schrieb Dimitry Andric:
On 06 Feb 2014, at 07:48, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
...
I just recognized, that in my CURRENT boxes in base their are two
versions of libc++:
#ll /usr/lib/libc++.so*
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel -134 3 Aug 22:33:00 2013
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
I'd be interested to hear what features you think are missing. We will
implement anything (eventually...) that there is
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
I'd be interested to hear what features you think
Michel Talon wrote:
--Apple-Mail=_102D913B-49CA-4129-972A-758AABCAA293
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=Apple-Mail=_16E0BC5A-FE3D-444D-8437-47827626590A
--Apple-Mail=_16E0BC5A-FE3D-444D-8437-47827626590A
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type:
El día Thursday, February 06, 2014 a las 01:27:50PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey
escribió:
Michel Talon wrote:
The old package system was total =
crap,
local.sqlite is also crap, breaks decades of accessibility by find grep
other text pipe / search tools.
Since many years I have always
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Daniel Nebdal dneb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Matthew Seaman
On 2/6/2014 13:27, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Michel Talon wrote:
charset=us-ascii
Junk mail format, not impressed. Use Ascii
This is petty.
i can only conclude, like
Matthew that you are being absurd.
Personal inuendo does not impress.
While you may take this as an unnecessary
Hi,
For many years I have set NO_MANCOMPRESS (and before that NOMANCOMPRESS)
in /etc/make.conf on all my machines. In the last few weeks I have
noticed that this setting is being ignored by port updates. Has this
setting been silently depreciated?
Cheers,
Nick.
--
On 2/6/2014 13:58, Rick Miller wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Daniel Nebdal dneb...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect he meant a certain version, and *not* newer - sometimes
you might want to hold back a package.
Correct. My wish is the functionality be extended further to mean a
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
El día Thursday, February 06, 2014 a las 01:27:50PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey
escribió:
Michel Talon wrote:
The old package system was total =
crap,
local.sqlite is also crap, breaks decades of accessibility by find
On 2/6/2014 13:54, N.J. Mann wrote:
For many years I have set NO_MANCOMPRESS (and before that NOMANCOMPRESS)
in /etc/make.conf on all my machines. In the last few weeks I have
noticed that this setting is being ignored by port updates. Has this
setting been silently depreciated?
You have
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 23:26:18 -0800
Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote:
If you use poudriere, you can roll your own packages with custom
options and maintain things pretty reasonably, but for a single
system (or two), this is a bit of overkill. As things stand, this is
a real pain to use
In message 52f388ee.30...@marino.st,
John Marino (freebsd.cont...@marino.st) wrote:
On 2/6/2014 13:54, N.J. Mann wrote:
For many years I have set NO_MANCOMPRESS (and before that NOMANCOMPRESS)
in /etc/make.conf on all my machines. In the last few weeks I have
noticed that this
On 2/6/2014 14:31, N.J. Mann wrote:
I don't believe it was ever a user variable.
It was and still is for the base system - this machine was updated to
8-STABLE r261161 ten days ago and all base manual pages are
uncompressed.
okay, that's right.
It's a case where ports honored a base variable
- Stage support
-
Build ID: 20140206122802-62035
Job owner: m...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 94 minutes
Enddate: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:01:48 GMT
Revision: r343053
Repository:
Am 2014-02-06 14:05, schrieb Daniel Nebdal:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de
wrote:
El día Thursday, February 06, 2014 a las 01:27:50PM +0100, Julian H.
Stacey escribió:
Michel Talon wrote:
The old package system was total =
crap,
local.sqlite is also crap,
In message 52f39326.2040...@marino.st,
John Marino (freebsd.cont...@marino.st) wrote:
On 2/6/2014 14:31, N.J. Mann wrote:
You are asking for an infrastructure
change.
No I am not. I _am_ asking that something which used to be supported
(and was documented), that has silently been
On 2/6/14, 9:36 AM, N.J. Mann wrote:
In message 52f39326.2040...@marino.st,
John Marino (freebsd.cont...@marino.st) wrote:
On 2/6/2014 14:31, N.J. Mann wrote:
You are asking for an infrastructure
change.
No I am not. I _am_ asking that something which used to be supported
(and was
Hey there.
Totally new to FreeBSD here, trying to migrate a piece of my
infrastructure from .. Linux.
One thing I'm relying on is prosody, you seem to maintain that port.
0.8.2 was released around the 20.06.2011.
Starting from 20.08.2013 prosody is on 0.9, 0.9.2 was released in
January 2014.
El día Thursday, February 06, 2014 a las 02:36:30PM +0100, Christopher J. Ruwe
escribió:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 23:26:18 -0800
Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote:
If you use poudriere, you can roll your own packages with custom
options and maintain things pretty reasonably, but for a
On Thu, February 6, 2014 4:27 am, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Michel Talon wrote:
ports/ is not just for package addicts. I never install packages, but
only build install from ports/. sqlite junk obstructs /var/db/pkg
being accessed by find grep to debug breaking ports =
builds.
As
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 15:49:24 +0100
Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
El día Thursday, February 06, 2014 a las 02:36:30PM +0100,
Christopher J. Ruwe escribió:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 23:26:18 -0800
Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote:
If you use poudriere, you can roll your own
Hi!
Starting from 20.08.2013 prosody is on 0.9, 0.9.2 was released in
January 2014.
Have a look at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/182075
there is an update to 0.9.1 as a patch and one open question
someone has to solve.
Is there any chance to see an update to this port?
Hi.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Kurt Jaeger p...@opsec.eu wrote:
Hi!
Starting from 20.08.2013 prosody is on 0.9, 0.9.2 was released in
January 2014.
Have a look at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/182075
there is an update to 0.9.1 as a patch and one open question
Hi!
Starting from 20.08.2013 prosody is on 0.9, 0.9.2 was released in
January 2014.
Have a look at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/182075
there is an update to 0.9.1 as a patch and one open question
someone has to solve.
Thanks for the link. I .. didn't know
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 23:26:18 -0800
Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 05/02/2014 23:57, Kevin Oberman wrote:
1. The ports/packages system is not total crap. In fact, at the time jkh
started
05/02/14 18:41(e)an, Kevin Oberman(e)k idatzi zuen:
Let's see. The instructions said to notify tms...@freebsd.org. I don't see
any indication that you did so. They also say to attach the config.log
file. I see no attached file.
While it is possible that someone other than the maintainer of
Stagify.
-
Build ID: 20140206155000-62431
Job owner: k...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 38 minutes
Enddate: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 16:27:48 GMT
Revision: r343109
Repository:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Randy Pratt bsd-u...@embarqmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 23:26:18 -0800
Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 05/02/2014 23:57, Kevin Oberman wrote:
https://plus.google.com/110946378055202199166/posts/8iTsSCatk4x
The process has been started :
http://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=39t=44691
Dependencies needed- referenced in howto and webrtc dependencies:
libbrlapi from brltty.
Benefits: Native client and sever side of WebRTC
El día Thursday, February 06, 2014 a las 03:55:57PM +0100, Christopher J. Ruwe
escribió:
I think anybody who compiles from ports should _really_ use
poudriere. I even think it should be strongly suggested in the
handbook. (I'd be willing to write that up for that matter.)
Please
Le 6 févr. 2014 à 13:27, Julian H. Stacey a écrit :
you =
have to spend a couple of minutes
learning the basic SQL queries, which is no more difficult that learning =
obtuse find and grep options.
Package addicts were so myopic they ignored some people won't even
use packages, just
On 2014-02-06 13:45, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, February 06, 2014 a las 01:27:50PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey
escribió:
Michel Talon wrote:
The old package system was total =
crap,
local.sqlite is also crap, breaks decades of accessibility by find grep
other text pipe /
On 02/06, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
If you can try to coordinate with the luasec and luasocket maintainers ?
Actually I think that's a non-issue (now). The comment from lx/the
maintainer of prosody claims that s2s is broken (no idea, haven't tried the
patch just yet) and wonders if we'd need
On 2014-02-06 19:17, Michel Talon wrote:
Le 6 févr. 2014 à 13:27, Julian H. Stacey a écrit :
you =
have to spend a couple of minutes
learning the basic SQL queries, which is no more difficult that learning =
obtuse find and grep options.
Package addicts were so myopic they ignored some
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:55 PM, David Thiel l...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 02/06, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
If you can try to coordinate with the luasec and luasocket maintainers
?
Actually I think that's a non-issue (now). The comment from lx/the
maintainer of prosody claims that s2s is
On 2/6/2014 17:13, Randy Pratt wrote:
My experience with mixing ports and packages dates back to 2.2.5 and
the disasters it created. Most of the problems were created by the
ports tree and package builds not being syncronized. I switched to
ports exclusively and have not had those problems
On 02/06, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
Maybe I can help with that - since I plan to migrate/relocate and
that's a core part of what I need here (which is why I'm diving into
ports about 30min after my first FreeBSD installation in years). So -
one tester, ready to help out. ;-)
Thanks!
W dniu 2014-02-06 14:04, John Marino pisze:
On 2/6/2014 13:58, Rick Miller wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Daniel Nebdal dneb...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect he meant a certain version, and *not* newer - sometimes
you might want to hold back a package.
Correct. My wish is the
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:05 PM, David Thiel
l...@redundancy.redundancy.orgwrote:
On 02/06, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
Maybe I can help with that - since I plan to migrate/relocate and
that's a core part of what I need here (which is why I'm diving into
ports about 30min after my first
On 2014-02-03 08:32, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
On 2/02/2014 9:51 PM, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-02-02 10:11, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
I filed a PR against textproc/htdig which should really be against the
ports systems.
Would someone be kind enough to advise the current method to specify the
On 06/02/2014 12:45, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Since many years I have always compiled my (i.e. the ports I need)
from CVS or now SVN ports tree on some fast baquery maschine. After
compiling I just did something like:
# mkdir PKG
# cd PKG
# pkg_create -Rnb `cd /var/db/pkg ; ls -C1`
and
I'll see what I can find out. According to the (generally
lua-knowledgable) prosody folks these libraries might even be merged in the
future..
For now I'll see if I can use the 0.9.1 patch (and bump it maybe?) so that
I can prosody as my test application.
Sorry for replying to myself. I
Hi,
I just faced the same problem.
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:27:12 +0100
Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
Am 06.02.2014 08:52 (UTC+1) schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 07:03:22AM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Am 05.02.2014 22:20 (UTC+1) schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 01:36:45PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
It appears that really weird SRCBASE assumptions are made throughout the
code. I'll have to put a temporary hack in to just make SRCBASE appear
inside the chroot whatever it's set to. Setting and unsetting SRCBASE just
breaks
48 matches
Mail list logo
