Hello Yasuhiro,
On 3/10/21 6:30 PM, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote:
> From: "Janky Jay, III"
> Subject: MariaDB Options for Port.,MariaDB Options for Port.
> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:59:35 -0700
>
>> I've been trying to add a MariaDB option to a port I maintain but
&g
eady doing this? I've
searched the ports tree but failed to find anything helpful.
[1] - https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/#uses-mysql
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rd to testing more in the future once I can completely
rely on ports/pkg for the installation of all software. I'm not going to
use "pip" to install anything on a production FBSD server as I fear
keeping the software up-to-date will be sketchy at best.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
In the future, if you can, try using "screen" or "tmux" to run these
large builds in so you don't take the risk of losing the
terminal/console. Or, maybe I'm completely off-base as to how it was
lost to begin with.
On 7/8/20 9:30 AM, bob prohaska wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 10:44:03AM +0200,
qt5-core-5.14.2_2
qt5-concurrent-5.14.2
desktop-file-utils-0.24
I don't see any mention of "xcb-util". Granted, I'm also running
xpdf in a very minimal xfce4 environment so maybe there are other
underlying issues?
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
___
On 3/6/20 7:41 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2020, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>
>> Still broken for me as well. I just figured I'd look into it when I
>> got a chance. Also using FBSD 12.1 RELEASE.
>
> Maybe it depends on the mirror being used?
Perhaps. I'm not
Still broken for me as well. I just figured I'd look into it when I got a
chance. Also using FBSD 12.1 RELEASE.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
On March 7, 2020 12:38:55 AM UTC, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>On Friday, 6 March 2020 at 12:29:44 +0100, Lars Engels wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020
uot;MAINTAINER=" line in the port's "Makefile".
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi @lbutlr,
On 6/6/19 12:22 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2019, at 8:15 AM, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>> I had to do a "portsnap fetch extract" and install audio/lame via ports
>> to get this to work. Now I have a full ports environment for just one
>> dependency. It
e real issue, though, is that this was installed using "pkg" and does
not work correctly due to audio/lame being a dependency that does not
have a package. Hence the reason the maintainer will be removing
audio/lame as a dependency.
On 6/6/19 5:06 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2019,
ssue
for me. So, hopefully that can help troubleshoot the package install of
xrdp-devel (I haven't tried the port but I'd imagine it probably works
fine).
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
On 5/8/19 4:00 PM, Janky Jay, III wrote:
> Hello Koichiro,
>
> Is there any update to this? I've since upgra
on the other.
Also, can you please provide a link to the GH post/report that you
created? I'd like to take a look and follow that as well if I can.
Thanks again!
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
On 2019-02-17 12:23, Janky Jay, III wrote:
> Hello Meta,
>
> On 2/16/19 6:37 PM, Koichiro I
Hello Meta,
On 2/16/19 6:37 PM, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:31:36AM -0700, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>> This also causes the connection to take 16 seconds to open XFCE4 once
>> it finally gives up on channels. I see 4 errors so I'm guessing there's
>&g
e to connect to channels while the other is not? If anyone has
any ideas or wants additional info/logs/etc... I'm all ears and will be
more than happy to provide any additional details.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to see what ports "portname"
depends on (IE: What dependencies "portname" installed). You can also
use "pkg info -r portname" to see the what the portname is a dependency
of (what installed this port). Does that help at all?
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
it should be painless to replace old noncompatible version with this one.
Again, thank you for the information. I remember quite a while back
I tried using Smarty3 as opposed to Smarty2 but it caused nothing but
issues so I rolled back. I can go ahead and give this another shot now
(especially as Smarty2 and Smarty3 can be installed in parallel) and see
what I get. Another thanks!
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
5.6 to 7.1.
Thank you for the information! You're likely very much correct as
that seems to be a more proper fix for the array (and there are likely
other arrays that need to be fixed). I will test this and see if it
works (I don't see why it wouldn't). Thanks again!
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
udrier tonight to make sure everything is good and I'll submit
the port update as soon as it's verified. In the meantime, if anyone
wants to test the patch [1] (or at least look at it to make sure I'm
doing it right regarding the PHP flavoring, linking variables, etc... to
make sure it's done correctly), that would be great! Thanks again, Miroslav!
1. https://www.purplehat.org/downloads/maia/maia-1.0.4-g20181202.diff
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Perfect! Thanks for the replies and the clarification, guys!
On 12/11/18 11:21 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 11.12.18 um 18:51 schrieb Janky Jay, III:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> After a portsnap to pull ${latest), I'm seeing the following:
>>
>> clamav-0.101.0_2
ite and it appears
version 0.101.0 is, in fact, the latest. So, I'm wondering if there was
possibly a revision issue that's causing this?
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Okay. No sweat. I'll work on getting a port patch going as that seems
it would be the easiest way to push this out. I'll provide a download as
soon as I have something available for testing.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
work with PHP 7.2 without any issues (that I've seen, anyway).
If you're interested in that, I can provide those changes/patches if
you'd like to upgrade to PHP7 before the upstream code is ready.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-rf /var/db/freebsd-update/*
Is there a reason you're moving the directory and creating a new, empty
one?
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Mel,
On 02/16/2018 05:02 AM, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> On 2018-02-14 19:13, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> May have spoken too soon...
>>
>> On 2/14/2018 7:45 PM, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>>> Hello Mel,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
May have spoken too soon...
On 2/14/2018 7:45 PM, Janky Jay, III wrote:
> Hello Mel,
>
> On 2/13/2018 7:42 AM, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
>> (Putting on my mail/postfixadmin maintainer hat)
>
>> On 2018-02-11 15:24, Janky Jay,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mel,
On 2/13/2018 7:42 AM, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> (Putting on my mail/postfixadmin maintainer hat)
>
> On 2018-02-11 15:24, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Versions: FreeBSD - 11.1-RELEASE-p6 PostfixAdmi
, as mentioned) it *IS*
a Smarty3 version issue. I'll just contact the maintainer and wait for
the next PFA release.
Thanks again!
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
On 2/11/2018 4:41 PM, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote:
> No answer?
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/postfixadmin/discussion/676076/thread
this behavior or is this a configuration issue of some type, maybe?
I will mention that PFA was working perfectly fine less than a month ago.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Never mind. I ended up figuring this out. I basically re-created all my
jails and started from scratch. Anyone else that might be struggling
with the same issue can find what I did at the URL below.
http://www.purplehat.org/?page_id=566
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
Looks like the latest update broken more of the previously fixed issues.
Also, it appears that F2B 0.9.X is the latest stable and 0.10.X is
"experimental". Why is the default port experimental? Shouldn't this be
broken up into two ports?
Anywho, below is an example of the fail2ban.log output when
uot;{ tcp, udp, ipv6, icmp, esp, ipencap }"
privnets = "{ 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.0.0/16, 172.16.0.0/12, 10.0.0.0/8 }"
set loginterface $ext_if
scrub in on $ext_if no-df random-id
>
> 17.10.2017 23:15, Janky Jay, III пишет:
>> In the new 0.10 version, the action rule cre
Hello,
In the new 0.10 version, the action rule creates the tables for you
based on the jail configuration. If you look at the jail files, you'll
see that you now call pfctl using additional arguments such as ports
that are affected and a suffix to add to the default "f2b-" table name.
as well.
> Is your ports tree up-to-date?
>
Ports tree is up-to-date using portsnap as of 11pm Mountain Time
yesterday.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello Matthew,
On 12/14/2016 10:22 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 2016/12/14 16:53, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> So, mail/p5-Net-SMTP-SSL is a requirement of security/maia (a port I
>> maintain) and it is apparently being deprecated as of March of nex
My question is, what port am I supposed to use instead of
p5-Net-SMTP-SSL? I see no configuration options for SSL in the other
ports. Just want to make sure I do this correctly. Any information will
be greatly appreciated!
Kind Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Vlad,
On 12/11/2016 07:58 PM, Vlad K. wrote:
> On 2016-12-12 03:42, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>> This very, VERY rarely happens to me and I use ports *ONLY* in
>> production environments. If you could please provide examples and report
>> the issues to the port ma
with my port, how would I fix it? So, please, PLEASE report any
issues with ports that aren't building. It's not too time consuming on
your part. Just a simple BUG report and how to re-produce and you're
finished.
Kind Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
Can someone please commit this (it's been waiting a while and is only a
simple "sed" change in the Makefile). If there's anything else I need to
do, let me know. Thanks!
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210138
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
D
ree.
>
This was actually covered in this thread (first post, actually) by
Torfinn Ingolfsen:
"Better to use this:
pw groupmod dialer -m myuser
it will ony affect the dialer group, and not mess with any other groups.
"
The above will add the user "myus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Torfinn,
On 03/25/2016 10:20 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Janky Jay, III <jan...@unfs.us>
> wrote:
>>
>> While your solution is not incorrect, your assumption on the
>> propose
ngs
to groups admin,wheel,test and you run the suggested "pw" command from
the port, your user will now be in groups admin,wheel,test,dialer.
It's the '-g' (lower-case) switch you want to avoid...
That being said, your suggestion does the exact same thing. So,
really, either wor
t;
> I ultimately fixed it by switching to the "latest" repo (the repo
> config edit you mentioned). I was already disinterested in the
> quarterly repos because it smacks of Debian-ness, and this
> confirms why stability-by-staleness is a bad idea.
>
I r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hrm... Numerous inquiries regarding this and no response is somewhat
disappointing. If anyone gets any feedback from anywhere else, please
update the rest of us (BSDCan contacts/update included... I can't make
it... :( )
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlVniZsACgkQGK3MsUbJZn78mQCfYA9HqU8/94CqMfle8wbKdAdS
syQAnjp+Hptkc8hsfbh4bWzFEJpI2Zi7
=dvQG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
as this latest PR
contains the previous fix(es) plus the version update.
Thanks!
-Janky Jay, III
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr
excluded.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Jay, III
On 02/14/2014 11:00 AM, Greg Rivers wrote:
Since the recent update of pidgin to version 2.10.9, pidgin aborts
(signal 6) whenever I connect to a Office Communicator account via the
pidgin-sipe plugin. The pidgin-sipe port is very much out of date, so I
suspect that pidgin has diverged
Hi Ruslan,
I most certainly will (providing that it actually works)! :) Once it's
verified, I'll submit the PR.
On 02/14/2014 02:21 PM, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Janky Jay, III wrote on 15.02.2014 01:16:
Hello Greg,
Simply editing the Makefile and the distinfo file inside the
net
:01:47PM -0700, Janky Jay, III wrote:
Hi Ruslan,
I most certainly will (providing that it actually works)! :) Once it's
verified, I'll submit the PR.
On 02/14/2014 02:21 PM, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Janky Jay, III wrote on 15.02.2014 01:16:
Hello Greg,
Simply editing
not causing any problems. It's
just confusing
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
On 02/13/2014 04:39 PM, LuKreme wrote:
I was running FreeBSD 8-2 and used freebsd-update to update:
FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p7 #0: Sat Jan 11 01:45:47 UTC 2014
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
findings.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hi Dimitry,
On 06/04/2013 01:31 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 18:01, Janky Jay, III jan...@unfs.us wrote:
On 06/04/2013 12:44 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 06:52, Janky Jay jan...@unfs.us wrote:
...
aterm: ca't open pseudo-tty
aterm: aborting
Have you tried
nearly 8GB of free space on Dropbox going to
waste...
Same! I've been voting this up for quite some time. All my votes are
dedicated to this. Hopefully it will be implemented soon. Just keep the
votes coming and I'm sure they'll take it seriously at some point.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
On 03/05/2013 11:18 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:37:17 -0700
Janky Jay, III articulated:
Same! I've been voting this up for quite some time. All my
votes are dedicated to this. Hopefully it will be implemented soon.
Just keep the votes coming and I'm sure they'll take
if I delete images or other files they are always accessible via
Dropbox. It's also handy for sharing files between a lot of devices as
well, I suppose. *shrug*
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
format. Maybe the commiters should bring
this up and have a few less to deal with..? Just a suggestion.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkzqBzgACgkQGK3MsUbJZn5X
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Martin,
On 05/13/2010 11:38 AM, Martin Turgeon wrote:
Le 2010-05-11 18:36, Janky Jay, III a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Darrell,
Darrell Betts wrote:
Hey Jay,
I have been in contact with the author
,
Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkvp2+oACgkQZ5znzUsaCyTK8QCfbigMkFq8/Wyu5nj0bmm4sKf7
YpIAoIpLsXEYPixiR90FGNioVzcL4QUY
=30ba
-END PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi List,
Raphael Becker wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:29:08PM -0800, Simon Shapiro wrote:
Hey,
I just updated ports on a few machines and the CLI version of php
dumps its core rather than end nicely. The mhash module appears to be
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi List,
Janky Jay, III wrote:
Hi List,
Raphael Becker wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:29:08PM -0800, Simon Shapiro wrote:
Hey,
I just updated ports on a few machines and the CLI version of php
dumps its core rather than end nicely
mail agent, I seriously doubt there will be any
migration to it from Sendmail in the near future.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
Michel Talon wrote:
Hello,
would it not be interesting to have the DragonFlyBSD mail agent in
FreeBSD? It is a very simple mail agent, like ssmtp, but with some more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Michel.
Ah! Okay. This makes much more sense... Its not a problem at all to
port the mail agent to FreeBSD. Just create a port, test and submit it
and voila! Sorry for the misunderstanding earlier...
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
Michel Talon
and submit a port.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
I see no reason for it not to be in ports. If it's useful like you
described above then I'm sure other people will make use of it and be
glad it is maintained in the ports tree. If you're willing to maintain
it please submit a PR
had any issues with this at all. Can anyone confirm if
specifying the complete port name wrapped in single quotes allows
portupgrade to finish successfully?
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
Rainer Hurling wrote:
I have the same trouble with portupgrade some times:
Am 07.10.2008 10:21 (UTC+1) schrieb
64 matches
Mail list logo
