On 1/11/2013 7:36 AM, RW wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:31:54 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Walter Jansen wrote:
So sorry, I obviously missed news about Portmaster which I have
been using many years to update the installed ports.
Is it gone forever? Is there a
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:24:27 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block articulated:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
BTW portmanager was excellent the for the first few years. One
could begin an update, then cntl-c after a few minutes when it
actually began building ports, and up in the
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:31:54 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Walter Jansen wrote:
So sorry, I obviously missed news about Portmaster which I have
been using many years to update the installed ports.
Is it gone forever? Is there a successor?
port*manager* is
On 10/01/2013 22:31, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Walter Jansen wrote:
So sorry, I obviously missed news about Portmaster which I have been
using
many years to update the installed ports.
Is it gone forever? Is there a successor?
port*manager* is gone, portmaster and portupgrade
So sorry, I obviously missed news about Portmaster which I have been using
many years to update the installed ports.
Is it gone forever? Is there a successor?
Kind regards,
Walter Jansen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Walter Jansen wrote:
So sorry, I obviously missed news about Portmaster which I have been using
many years to update the installed ports.
Is it gone forever? Is there a successor?
port*manager* is gone, portmaster and portupgrade are still available.
--- On Thu, 1/10/13, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
Is it gone forever? Is there a successor?
port*manager* is gone, portmaster and portupgrade are still available.
BTW portmanager was excellent the for the first few years. One could begin an
update, then cntl-c after a few
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
BTW portmanager was excellent the for the first few years. One could begin an
update, then cntl-c after a few minutes when it actually began building ports,
and up in the terminal would be a concise list of what needed to be installed
or upgraded.
On 04/05/07, Robert Noland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:32 +0530, Avinash Duduskar wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting the following error when using portmanager:
barge# /usr/local/bin/portmanager -ui
rParseCommandLine 0.4.1_9 error: /usr/ports/-ui is not a valid port
directory
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 00:10 +0100, RW wrote:
On Wed, 02 May 2007 18:53:22 -0400
Robert Noland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:32 +0530, Avinash Duduskar wrote:
Hi,
I’m getting the following error when using portmanager:
barge# /usr/local/bin/portmanager
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:32 +0530, Avinash Duduskar wrote:
Hi,
I’m getting the following error when using portmanager:
barge# /usr/local/bin/portmanager -ui
rParseCommandLine 0.4.1_9 error: /usr/ports/-ui is not a valid port
directory
rParseCommandLine 0.4.1_9 info:either you have used
On Wed, 02 May 2007 18:53:22 -0400
Robert Noland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:32 +0530, Avinash Duduskar wrote:
Hi,
I’m getting the following error when using portmanager:
barge# /usr/local/bin/portmanager -ui
The options must be seperate flags. i.e.
12 matches
Mail list logo
