On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote:
From: Freddie Cash
Subject: Re: List of packages upgraded last time `pkg upgrade` was executed
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:26:29 -0800
/var/log/messages and I think /var/log/daemon include the output of the pkg
commands. If you have the log files
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:23:57 +0900 (JST)
Yasuhiro Kimura wrote:
> From: Michael Gmelin
> Subject: Re: List of packages upgraded last time `pkg upgrade` was
> executed Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:05:57 +0100
>
> > This will give you a list of all packages that were
> >
From: Michael Gmelin
Subject: Re: List of packages upgraded last time `pkg upgrade` was executed
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:05:57 +0100
> This will give you a list of all packages that were updated/installed
> last:
>
> pkg query -e %t=$(pkg query %t | sort -n | tail -n1) %n
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:35:38 +0200
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:57:22AM +0900, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote:
> > From: Freddie Cash
> > Subject: Re: List of packages upgraded last time `pkg upgrade` was
> > executed Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:26:29 -0800
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:57:22AM +0900, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote:
> From: Freddie Cash
> Subject: Re: List of packages upgraded last time `pkg upgrade` was executed
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:26:29 -0800
>
> > /var/log/messages and I think /var/log/daemon include the
From: Freddie Cash
Subject: Re: List of packages upgraded last time `pkg upgrade` was executed
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:26:29 -0800
> /var/log/messages and I think /var/log/daemon include the output of the pkg
> commands. If you have the log files backed up from the last time it was
>
On Tue., Jan. 26, 2021, 5:18 p.m. Yasuhiro Kimura, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any way to get the list of packages upgraded (and installed
> as new dependency if there are) last time `pkg upgrade` was executed?
>
> Best Regards.
>
> ---
> Yasuhiro Kimura
>
/var
Hello,
Is there any way to get the list of packages upgraded (and installed
as new dependency if there are) last time `pkg upgrade` was executed?
Best Regards.
---
Yasuhiro Kimura
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org
=SPIDER
I think all users of MariaDB 10.1 should be warned in UPDATING
Let me know if you need some more details.
Am I the only one beaten by this issue? I see this on each of our
machines during pkg upgrade.
Miroslav Lachman
Hi Miroslav,
Looks like it. My own servers were upgraded with maria
scratch65...@att.net wrote on 2017/04/19 17:55:
[Default] On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:52:56 +0200, Miroslav Lachman
<000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
I tried it on next machine with pkg upgrade -f but the result is the same:
pkg check -Ba
Checking all packages
(p5-DBD-mysql-4.042)
PTIONS_FILE_SET+=SPIDER
I think all users of MariaDB 10.1 should be warned in UPDATING
Let me know if you need some more details.
Am I the only one beaten by this issue? I see this on each of our
machines during pkg upgrade.
Miroslav Lachman
Hi Miroslav,
Looks like it. My own servers were upgr
on skew, and mariadb *seems* to be all there
>>>> and working correctly. I haven't done any work yet this morning,
>>>> so I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
>>>
>>> Do you use MariaDB version 10.1?
>>>
>>> MariaDB server is runni
ibmysqlclient_r.so.18: No such file or
directory" on each upgraded server until i run *pkg upgrade -f
mariadb101-client*
Yes, I do have that file. Could the difference in our results be
due to my having used the -f switch, which forces upgrade of
EVERYthing instead of just those bits that pkg thinks
0.1?
>
>MariaDB server is running without problems, only some "mysql client"
>libraries are missing, but if you use only PHP to connect to "mysql
>server" then you will not notice any problem, because PHP uses internal
>mysql client.
>So first time I overlook
machine - PHP website was still running.
Can you check this?
ls -l /usr/local/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient_r.so.18
I see "ls: /usr/local/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient_r.so.18: No such file or
directory" on each upgraded server until i run *pkg upgrade -f
mariadb101-client*
Miroslav Lachman
[Default] On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 21:45:47 +0200, Miroslav Lachman
<000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>Miroslav Lachman wrote on 2017/03/31 15:31:
>> I don't know if it was "pkg" fault or mariadb101-server and
>> mariadb101-client conflict.
>>
>> I did standard "pkg upgrade" and at the end I have half files
Miroslav Lachman wrote on 2017/03/31 15:31:
I don't know if it was "pkg" fault or mariadb101-server and
mariadb101-client conflict.
I did standard "pkg upgrade" and at the end I have half files of
mariadb101-client missing:
# pkg check -Ba
Checking all packages: ...
pkg: fstat() failed
I don't know if it was "pkg" fault or mariadb101-server and
mariadb101-client conflict.
I did standard "pkg upgrade" and at the end I have half files of
mariadb101-client missing:
# pkg check -Ba
Checking all packages: ...
pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/bin/msql2mysql): No such file or
Hi!
> I've just updated a port I maintain (gohugo) for the first time.
> I've made changes to the Makefile, distinfo and pkg-plist files,
> then made an svn diff and attached that to a bug
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213309
> Do I now just wait for a committer to review
Afternoon all,
I've just updated a port I maintain (gohugo) for the first time. I've made
changes to the Makefile, distinfo and pkg-plist files, then made an svn diff
and attached that to a bug
(https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213309
On 09/08/16 15:58, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 03:54:17PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote:
Greetings,
Since I upgraded to 11/stable from 10/stable, it appears that my video
card is no longer supported by either nvidia-driver or nvidia-driver-340:
...
Any ideas?
Thanks
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:54:17 -0700
Russell L. Carter wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Since I upgraded to 11/stable from 10/stable, it appears that my video
> card is no longer supported by either nvidia-driver or
> nvidia-driver-340:
>
> 77.208] (WW) NV: Ignoring unsupported dev
On Friday, 9 September 2016, Russell L. Carter <rcar...@pinyon.org> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Since I upgraded to 11/stable from 10/stable, it appears that my video
> card is no longer supported by either nvidia-driver or nvidia-driver-340:
>
> 77.208] (WW) NV: Ign
Greetings,
Since I upgraded to 11/stable from 10/stable, it appears that my video
card is no longer supported by either nvidia-driver or nvidia-driver-340:
77.208] (WW) NV: Ignoring unsupported device 0x10de1380 (GM107
[GeForce GTX 750 Ti]) at 01@00:00:0
The error message is identical
kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port
devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a
little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it
should stay with the older version? If not, I'll submit a PR.
B.R.
HU Dong
Copying in maintainer.
On 10 Aug 2012 10:42, HU Dong itechb...@gmail.com wrote:
kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port
devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a
little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it
should stay
wrote:
kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port
devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a
little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it
should stay with the older version? If not, I'll submit a PR.
B.R.
HU Dong
2012 10:42, HU Dong itechb...@gmail.com wrote:
kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port
devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a
little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it
should stay with the older version
On Thursday 26 January 2012 20:43:08 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
Weird, these errors used to show up only with clang. I fixed them
upstream [1] some time ago, but 4.7.4 was released before that.
You'll find the patch attached, put it in files/.
Are you using some special gcc flags to turn
I have trouble with one of our boxes running FBSD 10.0/amd64 while
updating ports with portmaster. The box in question refuses
compiling/upgrading x11/kde4-workspace. I tried compiling with both
legacy GCC and CLANG.
What's going wrong and how can this repaired?
Thanks in advance,
Oliver
[
O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
I have trouble with one of our boxes running FBSD 10.0/amd64 while
updating ports with portmaster. The box in question refuses
compiling/upgrading x11/kde4-workspace. I tried compiling with both
legacy GCC and CLANG.
What's going wrong and how
Thanks in advance for any help
I reported problems following an upgrade ro 4.3.5 in a previous thread:
kde4 Upgrade to 4.3.5 -problems
The major problem was solved BUT I am now left without a working keyboard
although the mouse works.
After kde4 loaded with usual plasmas but no keyboard input
was Google the error message, but
nothing really matched. After that I decided to rebuild trac and deps
(portupgrade -rR), which didn't fix the problem. I then got
frustrated and ran a portupgrade -fa, which again didn't fix the
problem. I upgraded python from python25 to python26, using
the problem. I then got frustrated
and ran a portupgrade -fa, which again didn't fix the problem. I
upgraded python from python25 to python26, using the procedure outlined
in /usr/ports/UPDATING which didn't fix the problem either.
Through all this, I did notice that if I run tracd
dear list,
i just upgraded my system from 5.4R to 6.3-p3
when i now try to install php5 w/ apache integration (apache module) i
get the following error when i try to start apache20:
Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache2/libphp5.so into server:
/usr/local/libexec/apache2/libphp5.so: Undefined
FreeBSD Daemon pisze:
dear list,
i just upgraded my system from 5.4R to 6.3-p3
when i now try to install php5 w/ apache integration (apache module) i
get the following error when i try to start apache20:
Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache2/libphp5.so into server:
/usr/local/libexec/apache2
did you rebuild apache first after doing the upgrade?
--
From: FreeBSD Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 6:13 AM
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: php5 on a system upgraded from FBSD5.4R to FBSD6.3-p3
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I am almost new to portmaster, so I got a question - is there any
possibility to restart installed services as in portupgrade with defined
BEFOREBUILD / BEFOREDEINSTALL / AFTERINSTALL? Or is there any future
plan to do so? It is annoying if I end up with some dead
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:22:56 -0500, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
snip
And last question - /etc/portmaster.rc - is it realy right place
according to man hier? I would expect it in
/usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc.
You're absolutely right. I copied the code for
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:22:56 -0500, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
snip
And last question - /etc/portmaster.rc - is it realy right place
according to man hier? I would expect it in
/usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc.
You're absolutely right.
I am almost new to portmaster, so I got a question - is there any
possibility to restart installed services as in portupgrade with defined
BEFOREBUILD / BEFOREDEINSTALL / AFTERINSTALL? Or is there any future
plan to do so? It is annoying if I end up with some dead services after
upgrade just
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:48:23AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 02:52:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I am almost new to portmaster, so I got a question - is there any
possibility to restart installed services as in portupgrade with defined
BEFOREBUILD /
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 07:48:23 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 02:52:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I am almost new to portmaster, so I got a question - is there any
possibility to restart installed services as in portupgrade with
defined
Wesley Shields wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:48:23AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 02:52:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I am almost new to portmaster, so I got a question - is there any
possibility to restart installed services as in portupgrade with defined
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 04:27:21PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Wesley Shields wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:48:23AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 02:52:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I am almost new to portmaster, so I got a question - is there any
Hello,
editors/emacs port is upgraded to 22.1.
Since this is a major upgrade, all installed elisp ports should be
reinstalled.
Please add EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs22 to /etc/make.conf and
upgrade Emacs and related ports with:
# portupgrade -fr emacs
If you want to keep using Emacs 21.3, please add
Hi!
At last I've upgraded portupgrade port to portupgrade-devel version
(with a little fix). You can back now from portupgrade-devel to
portupgrade with the command:
portupgrade -o ports-mgmt/portupgrade portupgrade-devel
--
Dixi.
Sem.
___
freebsd
KAYVEN RIESE unleashed the infinite monkeys on 21/05/2007 23:10 producing:
so u get to be mean to me and here i sit with
X connection to :0.0 broken
something to do with fonts but now i can't even do startx
Please don't top post.
What's the output of: uname -a
--
Rob | Oh my God! They
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Rob MacGregor wrote:
KAYVEN RIESE unleashed the infinite monkeys on 21/05/2007 23:10 producing:
so u get to be mean to me and here i sit with
X connection to :0.0 broken
something to do with fonts but now i can't even do startx
Please don't top post.
What's the
i thought i upgraded to freeBSD-STABLE 6.2 but i just tried
to install this timeseal port and got this strange message
that seems to contradict this:
bsd@/root# cd /usr/ports/games/timeseal
bsd@/root# make; make install clean
On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default
replied to.
Many FreeBSD developers and users use thread-enabled mail clients so
they may not even see your message if the original thread isn't
something they would normally look at.
Headers from your message i thought i upgraded to freeBSD-STABLE 6.2:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References
if the original thread isn't
something they would normally look at.
Headers from your message i thought i upgraded to freeBSD-STABLE 6.2:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Headers from Keith Beattie's message:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Keith Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED
a port,
I expect the upgraded port to have a similar user interface. From
the comments in this thread, it seems that there are significant
changes between gnupg 1.x and gnupg 2.x.
to suggest to users that 2.x is the default, I think we need to
provide support for those legacy(?) apps that think
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:44:00AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
At Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:28:21 -0800,
Doug Barton wrote:
[...]
What might make sense is for the gnupg 2.x port to install a gpg
symlink to gpg2. I've done that on my own system for convenience sake.
That will get hairy if the user
On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
Anyway, this way maybe old-porters thinking. I liked to use
category/portname directory name (without version number).
Using version number in ports directory is very exceptional event for
keeping old ports (like emacs, emacs19, emacs20). I
Vasil Dimov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:44:00AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
At Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:28:21 -0800,
Doug Barton wrote:
[...]
What might make sense is for the gnupg 2.x port to install a gpg
symlink to gpg2. I've done that on my own system for convenience sake.
That will get
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:08:06PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Vasil Dimov wrote:
[...]
- NLS Native Language Support on \
[...]
+OPTIONS= NLS Include National Language Support on \
I believe the N in NLS stands for Native.
It's National. That's why you have things like
At Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:43:48 -0800,
Doug Barton wrote:
If this is your plan, it leads me to the next question, which is how
are you going to handle the fact that GnuPG 2.x does not install a
binary named gpg? Will you install a symlink if gnupg1 is not
installed? And if so, will it CONFLICT
On Mon, 2006-Dec-11 23:43:48 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
If this is your plan, it leads me to the next question, which is how
are you going to handle the fact that GnuPG 2.x does not install a
binary named gpg?
As an end user, I see this as a real issue. If I upgrade a port,
I expect the upgraded
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 05:46:50PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
At Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:43:48 -0800,
Doug Barton wrote:
If this is your plan, it leads me to the next question, which is how
are you going to handle the fact that GnuPG 2.x does not install a
binary named gpg? Will you install a
Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 05:46:50PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
At Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:43:48 -0800,
Doug Barton wrote:
If this is your plan, it leads me to the next question, which is how
are you going to handle the fact that GnuPG 2.x does not install a
binary named gpg?
At Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:28:21 -0800,
Doug Barton wrote:
I have no clue about last problem for now (only pkg-message or
UPDATING). This maybe critical for casual portupgrade users.
Err... I wonder... How about repo-copying (or rather, repo-moving)
the current security/gnupg to
Jun Kuriyama wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to upgrade security/gnupg to 2.0.1. This upgrade
includes portrevision bumps to indicate dependency changes.
I'm testing conditional plist, upgrading procedure by portupgrade.
But I think it's almost ready to commit.
If you have further
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 07:42:00PM +, Shaun Amott wrote:
In addition: I would guess that mail/imp, and maybe others, expect
bin/gpg to be present. If this is indeed the case, it would need
additional patching.
Sorry - ignore that last bit. I wasn't thinking. :-)
--
Shaun Amott //
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:15:59AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Jun Kuriyama wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to upgrade security/gnupg to 2.0.1. This upgrade
includes portrevision bumps to indicate dependency changes.
I'm testing conditional plist, upgrading procedure by portupgrade.
But
At Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:15:59 -0800,
Doug Barton wrote:
Thanks for letting us know what you're plans are. I think you know
what I'm going to say next. ;) As I suggested when I wrote to you in
private e-mail some time ago, I think it would be more in line with
the plans that the developers have
On 12/12/06, Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just think security/gnupg should be used as what
you should choose for GnuPG. If new ports user
wants to install GnuPG, I hope there is
security/gnupg as recommended stable version.
An unversioned directory is the maintainer-designated
Jun Kuriyama wrote:
At first, thank you for your helping to upgrade our gnupg world to
2.0.x. And sorry I cannot explain as you can feel reasonable.
I just want to make sure that the relevant issues are well thought
out, which it sounds like you have done.
I just think security/gnupg should
Flagstar Bank Online website has been upgraded. You will need to
re-enroll your Flagstar Bank online profile to gain access to these
changes. Simply enter your login information and follow the prompts.
To re-enroll for Flagstar Bank Online [1]click here
69 matches
Mail list logo
