Re: VirtualBox 4.3.6 + FreeBSD 10 + clang, [SUCCESS]

2014-01-20 Thread Lapo Luchini
Mike Jakubik wrote: > > On 01/13/14 03:42, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Craig Rodrigues >> wrote: >>> >>> There is really no reason to make that dance so complicated or why you >>> need to destroy your /usr/ports. >>> >>> WARNING: If there are issues with that port

Re: VirtualBox 4.3.6 + FreeBSD 10 + clang, [SUCCESS]

2014-01-17 Thread Mike Jakubik
On 01/17/14 14:17, Mike Jakubik wrote: Just wanted to let everyone know this compiles and works perfect for me on 10.0-PRE. The only issue I have is with the vboxwebsrv rc.d script, when I try to start it nothing happens, no errors, however manually running vboxwebsrv -b does the job. Thanks

Re: VirtualBox 4.3.6 + FreeBSD 10 + clang, [SUCCESS]

2014-01-17 Thread Robert Eckardt
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:17:50 -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote > On 01/13/14 03:42, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Craig Rodrigues > > wrote: > >> > >> There is really no reason to make that dance so complicated or why you > >> need to destroy your /usr/ports. > >> > >> WAR

Re: VirtualBox 4.3.6 + FreeBSD 10 + clang, [SUCCESS]

2014-01-17 Thread Mike Jakubik
On 01/13/14 03:42, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: There is really no reason to make that dance so complicated or why you need to destroy your /usr/ports. WARNING: If there are issues with that ports please contact jkim@ Just wanted to let

Re: VirtualBox 4.3.6 + FreeBSD 10 + clang, [SUCCESS]

2014-01-13 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Miguel Clara wrote: > >> I tried this approach and still get errors: >> >> kmk: *** >> [/tmp/tmp/xy/jkim/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-4.3.6/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/VBox

Re: VirtualBox 4.3.6 + FreeBSD 10 + clang, [SUCCESS]

2014-01-12 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Miguel Clara wrote: > I tried this approach and still get errors: > > kmk: *** > [/tmp/tmp/xy/jkim/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-4.3.6/out/freebsd.amd64/release/obj/VBoxSVC/src-server/ApplianceImpl.o] > I tried the following on a s

Re: VirtualBox 4.3.6 + FreeBSD 10 + clang, [SUCCESS]

2014-01-11 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: > I still think this is the wrong approach and I won't maintain all those > clang patches in the official port. The problem that I see is that we are > diverging from upstream vbox too much and end up maintaining a very special > usecase an

Re: VirtualBox 4.3.6 + FreeBSD 10 + clang, [SUCCESS]

2014-01-11 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: > > Am 11.01.2014 03:49 schrieb "Craig Rodrigues" : > > > (5) Build and install gsoap from jkim's port (you need to do this > because the version of gsoap in the ports tree will result in failed > compilation): > > > > cd /tmp/xy/jkim/dev

Re: VirtualBox 4.3.6 + FreeBSD 10 + clang, [SUCCESS]

2014-01-11 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
Am 11.01.2014 03:49 schrieb "Craig Rodrigues" : > > Hi, > > I had problems with the virtualbox-ose-4.22 port > under FreeBSD 10.0-RC5, where VirtualBox would occasionally > crash. > It looks like the mix of QT C++ libraries compiled with clang, > vs. the virtualbox-ose port compiled with g++46 was

VirtualBox 4.3.6 + FreeBSD 10 + clang, [SUCCESS]

2014-01-10 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, I had problems with the virtualbox-ose-4.22 port under FreeBSD 10.0-RC5, where VirtualBox would occasionally crash. It looks like the mix of QT C++ libraries compiled with clang, vs. the virtualbox-ose port compiled with g++46 was not a good mix After reading this post: http://lists.freebsd.