On 08 Mar 2021, at 01:49, Serpent7776 wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:44:29 +1300
> Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
>> ===> libreoffice-7.1.0.3_2 depends on shared library: libBox2D.so - not
>> found ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/Box2D-2.4.1.txz
>> Installing Box2D-2.4.1...
>> Extra
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:44:29 +1300
Jonathan Chen wrote:
> ===> libreoffice-7.1.0.3_2 depends on shared library: libBox2D.so - not
> found ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/Box2D-2.4.1.txz
> Installing Box2D-2.4.1...
> Extracting Box2D-2.4.1: .. done
> ===> libreoffice-
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 14:44, Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> editors/libreoffice is currently failing to build with:
> ===> libreoffice-7.1.0.3_2 depends on shared library:
> libboost_date_time.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libboost_date_time.so)
> ===> Returning to build of libreoffice-7.1.0.3_
Hi,
editors/libreoffice is currently failing to build with:
===> libreoffice-7.1.0.3_2 depends on shared library:
libboost_date_time.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libboost_date_time.so)
===> Returning to build of libreoffice-7.1.0.3_2
===> libreoffice-7.1.0.3_2 depends on shared library: libBox
On 24/03/2018 19:07, tech-lists wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Building libreoffice (libreoffice-en_GB) complains about illegal
> instruction and dumps core. Full script output is at
> https://www.zyxst.net/errors/libreofficebuildfail.txt
please ignore, libreoffice builds fine on a pristine installation.
--
Hi,
Building libreoffice (libreoffice-en_GB) complains about illegal
instruction and dumps core. Full script output is at
https://www.zyxst.net/errors/libreofficebuildfail.txt
last few lines of make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes -DBATCH
##
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Yes, you are right.
The update is finish.
Thanks for your help.
Best regards
Suri
Am 22.07.2012 14:18, schrieb Robert Backhaus:
> On 22 July 2012 20:13, Joerg Surmann wrote:
>>
> /usr/bin/unzip -uo test.zip
> unzip: -n, -o and -u are contradictory
On 22 July 2012 20:13, Joerg Surmann wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> /usr/bin/unzip -uo test.zip
> unzip: -n, -o and -u are contradictory
>
> /usr/local/bin/unzip -uo test.zip
> Archive: test.zip
>
> i will create a symlink to /usr/bin/zip
> and run a test in libr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
/usr/bin/unzip -uo test.zip
unzip: -n, -o and -u are contradictory
/usr/local/bin/unzip -uo test.zip
Archive: test.zip
i will create a symlink to /usr/bin/zip
and run a test in libreoffice.
Am 22.07.2012 11:20, schrieb Robert Backhaus:
> On 22 J
On 22 July 2012 18:21, Joerg Surmann wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> think the unzip path is ok.
> i have reinstall unzip.
> now will update libreoffice.
>
> # whereis unzip
> unzip: /usr/bin/unzip /usr/share/man/en.ISO8859-15/man1/unzip.1.gz
> /usr/src/usr.bin/un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
think the unzip path is ok.
i have reinstall unzip.
now will update libreoffice.
# whereis unzip
unzip: /usr/bin/unzip /usr/share/man/en.ISO8859-15/man1/unzip.1.gz
/usr/src/usr.bin/unzip
# locate \*/unzip
/media/disk/usr/bin/unzip
/usr/bin/unzip
/
On 22 July 2012 06:39, Joerg Surmann wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> #build
> mkdir -p ../../unxfbsd.pro/misc/java_src/
> cp
> /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/solver/unxfbsd.pro/bin/jurt_src.zip
> ../../unxfbsd.pro/misc/java_src/jurt_sr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
#build
mkdir -p ../../unxfbsd.pro/misc/java_src/
cp
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/solver/unxfbsd.pro/bin/jurt_src.zip
../../unxfbsd.pro/misc/java_src/jurt_src.zip
cd ../../unxfbsd.pro/misc/java_src && unzip -quo
Yes i have.
Same error.
--
mobile
Robert Huff schrieb:
Oliver Heesakkers writes:
> Please keep in mind that Qt3, KDE3 and all their accompanying
> ports (which AFAICT includes arts) are dying a slow and agonizing
> death as was announced a little over a year ago:
> http://mail.kde.org/piper
On 21 July 2012 21:46, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Oliver Heesakkers writes:
>
>> Please keep in mind that Qt3, KDE3 and all their accompanying
>> ports (which AFAICT includes arts) are dying a slow and agonizing
>> death as was announced a little over a year ago:
>> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/k
Oliver Heesakkers writes:
> Please keep in mind that Qt3, KDE3 and all their accompanying
> ports (which AFAICT includes arts) are dying a slow and agonizing
> death as was announced a little over a year ago:
> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/2011-July/011076.html
The key w
Joerg Surmann writes:
> I have delete all qt3.
>
> now i have a new error:
>
>internal build errors:
>
> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
> /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/odk/pack/gendocu
>
> it seems that the error is inside 'odk', please r
Robert Backhaus writes:
> In my case, the arts upgrade had installed qt3 (!), an
> libreoffice was linking against it. I 'pkg_delete -f'd it, and
> the build seems to be running fine now, although time will
> tell. I will have to find out why, as it has happened before. So
> check whether qt
Op za 21 jul 2012 18:24:10 schreef Robert Backhaus:
> On 21 July 2012 17:40, Robert Backhaus wrote:
> > In my case, the arts upgrade had installed qt3 (!), an libreoffice was
> > linking against it. I 'pkg_delete -f'd it, and the build seems to be
> > running fine now, although time will tell.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks for replay.
I have delete all qt3.
now i have a new error:
internal build errors:
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/odk/pack/gendocu
it seems that the error is inside
On 21 July 2012 17:40, Robert Backhaus wrote:
> In my case, the arts upgrade had installed qt3 (!), an libreoffice was
> linking against it. I 'pkg_delete -f'd it, and the build seems to be
> running fine now, although time will tell.
That's a success for me. Without qt33 it builds and installs c
In my case, the arts upgrade had installed qt3 (!), an libreoffice was
linking against it. I 'pkg_delete -f'd it, and the build seems to be
running fine now, although time will tell. I will have to find out
why, as it has happened before. So check whether qt3 is on your
system, and, if so, nuke it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
when i build libreoffice without the kde option:
internal build errors:
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/odk/pack/gendocu
Am 21.07.2012 08:05, schrieb Joerg Surmann:
> Yes i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Yes i use the KDE option.
9.0p3 amd64.
..
12 errors generated.
gmake[2]: ***
[/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/workdir/unxfbsd.pro/CxxObject/vcl/unx/kde4/KDEData.o]
Fehler 1
dmake: Error code 2, w
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Joerg Surmann wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> update libreoffice faild.
> internal build errors.
>
> ERROR: error 65280 ocurred while making
> /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/vlc/prj
>
> it seems t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
update libreoffice faild.
internal build errors.
ERROR: error 65280 ocurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/vlc/prj
it seems that the error is inside 'vlc' , please re-run buld
inside this module to is
2012/7/19 Robert Huff :
> There is at least one person out there who has successfully
> built LibreOffice 3.5.5 using (system) clang 3.2?
Yes, using stock 9-STABLE (but a recent one as the clang patch has
been MFC'ed) and the latest libreoffice port WITH_SYSTEM_CLANG.
Thanks for the work
On 07/19/2012 12:47, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 2012-07-19 15:32:56 -0400, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 07/19/2012 12:17, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>> On 2012-07-19 21:06, Robert Huff wrote: ...
Let me be clear: There is at least one person out there who has
successfully built LibreOffice 3.5.5 usi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-19 15:32:56 -0400, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/19/2012 12:17, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2012-07-19 21:06, Robert Huff wrote: ...
>>> Let me be clear: There is at least one person out there who has
>>> successfully built LibreOffice 3.5.5 us
On 07/19/2012 12:17, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-07-19 21:06, Robert Huff wrote:
> ...
>> Let me be clear:
>> There is at least one person out there who has successfully
>> built LibreOffice 3.5.5 using (system) clang 3.2?
>
> The version of clang in base is 3.1. I have successfully
On 2012-07-19 21:06, Robert Huff wrote:
...
> Let me be clear:
> There is at least one person out there who has successfully
> built LibreOffice 3.5.5 using (system) clang 3.2?
The version of clang in base is 3.1. I have successfully compiled
LibreOffice with it, and it even seemed to
Kevin Oberman writes:
> I do wish a note had been made in ports/UPDATING that 3.5.5
> requires either the latest clang port or a world built
> yesterday. Actually, the commit to stable was almost exactly two
> days ago, but with mirror propagation and time zones, I think
> "yesterday" is the
On 2012-07-18 17:46, Robert Huff wrote:
...
> FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64
>
> and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.5 gets stuck at:
...
> Making:libuno_sal.so.3
> : ERROR: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.15 required by
> ../unxfbsd.pro/l
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 19 Jul 2012 01:09, "Robert Huff" wrote:
>>
>>
>> Doug Barton writes:
>>
>> > >On a system running:
>> > >
>> > > FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64
>> > >
>> > >and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.
On 19 Jul 2012 01:09, "Robert Huff" wrote:
>
>
> Doug Barton writes:
>
> > >On a system running:
> > >
> > > FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64
> > >
> > >and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.5
> >
> > Built cleanly for me last night on r238444. Are you s
Doug Barton writes:
> >On a system running:
> >
> > FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64
> >
> >and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.5
>
> Built cleanly for me last night on r238444. Are you sure your
> world is current enough to get the latest clan
On 07/18/2012 08:46, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> On a system running:
>
> FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64
>
> and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.5
Built cleanly for me last night on r238444. Are you sure your world is
current enough to get the latest c
On a system running:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64
and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.5 gets stuck at:
=
(1/1) Building module sal
=
Entering
/data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3
38 matches
Mail list logo
