nd attach the
"/usr/ports/security/gnupg/work/gnupg-2.2.15/config.log" including the output
of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide
an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. a
/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea).
*** Error code 1
Sen
I *think* the issue is that I needed to update ~/.muttrc for the change
in gnupg; in particular:
set pgp_decrypt_command="gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --passphrase-fd 0
--no-verbose --batch -o - %f"
was changed to
set pgp_decrypt_command="gpg2 %?p?--passphrase-fd 0 --pinentry-mode=loopback?
--n
I have been using mail/mutt & security/gnupg (latter switched to
security/gnupg20 back when gnupg20 port was created because of a
similar-looking issue to what's described in the first part of the
below narrative) for several years -- without enabling "gpgme" (in
case that turns
Hi,
I would like to have the ability to use PGP with my favorite mailer
(alpine). But after installing security/gnupg I've no idea where to go
from there. Couldn't find a clear description in Google how to make this
work in FreeBSD and Alpine.
So what is the right way to make P
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> after some updates security/gnupg and security/signing-party stop building
> with OPTIONS_UNSET+= X11:
>
> [00:00:40] >> [02][00:00:01] Finished build of sysutils/rsnapshot:
> Ignored: is marked as broken: Does not bu
Dear colleagues,
after some updates security/gnupg and security/signing-party stop building
with OPTIONS_UNSET+= X11:
[00:00:40] >> [02][00:00:01] Finished build of sysutils/rsnapshot: Ignored:
is marked as broken: Does not build with Perl 5.18 or above
[00:00:55] >> [
Here is the workaround:
> sqlite3 /var/db/pkg/local.sqlite "delete from deps where name =
'dirmngr'" && pkg delete dirmng
Then gnupg would update successfully.
security/dirmngr moved into gnupg, and should be labeled as deleted.
Yuri
___
freebsd-port
Jerry wrote:
> The "nvidia-driver" port had a similar problem. That problem has been
> corrected. Perhaps applying the same methodology here would be fruitful.
If doing that would fix it, then at least I think it's good news that the
problems are with individual ports and not with the ports infra
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 14:39:00 +0100, Matthieu Volat stated:
>The issue was reported[1], mentionned[2], without action being taken yet...
>Is gnupg such an obscure and unused port?
>
>[1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195489
>[2] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 13:56:31 +0100
"A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" wrote:
> Yuri wrote:
>
> > ===> Registering installation for gnupg-2.1.0_1 as automatic
> > pkg-static: gnupg-2.1.0_1 conflicts with dirmngr-1.1.0_12 (installs
> > files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/dirmngr
On 11/29/2014 04:56, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote:
Yes, that sort of thing seems to be happening a lot lately. I found
out that it often helps if you temporarily uninstall the offending
port, then install the other one and finally reinstall the uninstalled
one. Or in your case: 1. delete dirmng
Yuri wrote:
> ===> Registering installation for gnupg-2.1.0_1 as automatic
> pkg-static: gnupg-2.1.0_1 conflicts with dirmngr-1.1.0_12 (installs
> files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/dirmngr
Yes, that sort of thing seems to be happening a lot lately. I found out
that
===> Registering installation for gnupg-2.1.0_1 as automatic
pkg-static: gnupg-2.1.0_1 conflicts with dirmngr-1.1.0_12 (installs
files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/dirmngr
UPDATING has no info about this.
Yuri
___
freebsd
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 08:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Beeblebrox wrote:
> Hello.
> Is there a particular reason that security/gnupg on FreeBSD does not include
> the ecdh/ecdsa algorithm?
Elliptic curves algorithms will be supported in GnuPG from version 2.1, which
have been beta only for quite a
Hello.
Is there a particular reason that security/gnupg on FreeBSD does not include
the ecdh/ecdsa algorithm?
$ gpg2 --version
gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.26
libgcrypt 1.6.1
..
Supported algorithms:
Pubkey: RSA, ELG, DSA
Cipher: IDEA, 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH
upport
> DOCS=off: Build and/or install documentation
> SUID_GPG=off: Install GPG with suid
> ===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings
>
>
> Installation fails like this:
> ===> Checking if security/gnupg already installed
> ===> Regist
2013/2/2 Jason Helfman :
>> > [ ] STD_SOCKET Use standard socket for agent
...
> Agreed with all of stated above, and please use the documentation as well to
> see if it is noted there. Enabling the flag in the port adds
> --enable-standard-socket to the CONFIGURE arguments for the ports build
> p
On 2 February 2013 12:26, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 2 Feb 2013 16:51, "Thomas Mueller" wrote:
> /etc/make.conf, use OPTIONS_SET=list of options. You can also use UNSET in
> the same way for the converse. Setting BATCH=yes stops the dialogs
> appearing.
BATCH does more than just stopping the dialo
On 3 February 2013 14:23, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
>> /etc/make.conf, use OPTIONS_SET=list of options. You can also use UNSET in
>> the same way for the converse. Setting BATCH=yes stops the dialogs
>> appearing.
>
>> Chris
>
> I want to know what ports have settable options, and might miss some.
> /etc/make.conf, use OPTIONS_SET=list of options. You can also use UNSET in
> the same way for the converse. Setting BATCH=yes stops the dialogs
> appearing.
> Chris
I want to know what ports have settable options, and might miss some.
I guess I could
make showconfig-recursive |& tee showco
On 2 Feb 2013 16:51, "Thomas Mueller" wrote:
>
>
> > Many users have reported in the past that one of the problems with the
> > ports system is that "OPTIONS" are not properly documented. Usually, if
> > I spend some time, I can locate it but it is
> Many users have reported in the past that one of the problems with the
> ports system is that "OPTIONS" are not properly documented. Usually, if
> I spend some time, I can locate it but it is a PIA. However, with the
> "security/gnupg" port, I cannot find o
I spend some time, I can locate it but it is a PIA. However, with the
> > "security/gnupg" port, I cannot find out specifically what this option
> > does:
> >
> > [ ] STD_SOCKET Use standard socket for agent
> >
> > This is off by default. Is th
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:42:46 +
Chris Rees articulated:
> You're right, and ports will move towards more verbose option
> descriptions in the future. However, the version dialog in older
> (but still supported) versions of FreeBSD chokes on long
> descriptions. Once we are free of supporting o
On 1 Feb 2013 15:34, "Jerry" wrote:
>
> Many users have reported in the past that one of the problems with the
> ports system is that "OPTIONS" are not properly documented. Usually, if
> I spend some time, I can locate it but it is a PIA. However, with the
> &
Many users have reported in the past that one of the problems with the
ports system is that "OPTIONS" are not properly documented. Usually, if
I spend some time, I can locate it but it is a PIA. However, with the
"security/gnupg" port, I cannot find out specifically w
> 2009/11/9 David Southwell :
> >> 2009/11/8 David Southwell :
> >
> > What puzzles me is why the gnupg maintainer is so reluctant to
> > provide alternative options to using pth when there are both system
> > libraries and libpthread-stubs-0.1 available as an alternative.
> > Dependencuy
2009/11/9 David Southwell :
>> 2009/11/8 David Southwell :
> What puzzles me is why the gnupg maintainer is so reluctant to provide
> alternative options to using pth when there are both system libraries and
> libpthread-stubs-0.1 available as an alternative. Dependencuy upon
> libpthread-
> 2009/11/8 David Southwell :
> > I dropped this task -- got too tied up elsewhere. Then some ports were
> > updated and security/gnupg was rebuilt and the problem re-emerged. Can
> > someone please amend the gnupg port so it does not install pth when
> > system threads
2009/11/8 David Southwell :
> I dropped this task -- got too tied up elsewhere. Then some ports were updated
> and security/gnupg was rebuilt and the problem re-emerged. Can someone please
> amend the gnupg port so it does not install pth when system threads are
> available!!
For example x11-toolkits/py-qt4-gui build fails with
> > > > >
> > > > > pth-2.0.7 installed.
> > > > >
> > > > > > After deletion py-qt4-gui builds and installs correctly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Something wrong wit
> > After deletion py-qt4-gui builds and installs correctly.
> > > >
> > > > Something wrong with your system. Noone from KDE/FreeBSD team
> > > > reports about such bugs..
> > > > For example, I have pth installed already for all my systems,
> >
our system. Noone from KDE/FreeBSD team
> > > reports about such bugs..
> > > For example, I have pth installed already for all my systems,
> > > and py-qt4 always build fine.
> > >
> > > please show your /etc/make.conf and buildlog with errors.
> &g
r all my systems,
> > and py-qt4 always build fine.
> >
> > please show your /etc/make.conf and buildlog with errors.
> >
> > > What is the best way to deal with this when security/gnupg
> >
> > is required?
> >
> > > Would it be possible fo
> -Original Message-
> From: Dima Panov [mailto:flu...@fluffy.khv.ru]
> Sent: 01 October 2009 06:09
> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> Cc: da...@vizion2000.net; r...@gnu.org; kuriy...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: security/gnupg installing pth-2.0.7 causing problems
&
-qt4 always
build
fine.
please show your /etc/make.conf and buildlog with errors.
> What is the best way to deal with this when security/gnupg is required?
> Would it be possible for the gnupg to detect it is on an amd64 system and
> adjust its dependencies accordingly? Should the problem
-gui builds and installs correctly.
What is the best way to deal with this when security/gnupg is required?
Would it be possible for the gnupg to detect it is on an amd64 system and
adjust its dependencies accordingly? Should the problem also be dealt with
at source in the devel/pth port?
David
Tobias Rehbein wrote:
> Or is there some way to use gpg without pinentry?
You could use security/gnupg1 instead (which is still developed, just
a seperate branch), which doens't require pinentry.
Ciao,
Johan
pgp2IwUtXegLB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:25:56 +0200
Tobias Rehbein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps someone can share his wisdom with me. I just installed security/gnupg
> and tried to create a key pair using "gpg --gen-key". After issuing the
> command
> gnupg barfed at me that p
Hi all.
Perhaps someone can share his wisdom with me. I just installed security/gnupg
and tried to create a key pair using "gpg --gen-key". After issuing the command
gnupg barfed at me that pinentry could not be started. Now I wonder why pinentry
is not a dependency of gpg as it seems
Hello,
thank you Doug Barton and Johan van Selst for your answers.
Actually I use gnupg with spamassassin to download new filtering rules
(sa-update -D) and spamassassin does not need GUI at all.
Regards
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou wrote:
I try to install security/gnupg on a server with portmanager. I have this
kind of output:
The change that caused that has been backed out. You can install gnupg on
its own now, and then please heed the pkg-message that tells you how to
Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou wrote:
> security/gnupg (or one dependance) need xorg now?
gnupg2 requires with a standard interface to read passphrases and
PIN codes (in combination with smartcards) in a secure way. For this
security/pinentry is needed. It comes in several flavours: curses,
I try to install security/gnupg on a server with portmanager. I have
this kind of output:
#portmanager security/gnupg
-0001 gnupg-2.0.4 /security/gnupg
-0002 pinentry-0.7.2_6 /security/pinentry
-0003 dirmngr-0.9.7_2 /security/dirmngr
-0004 libgcrypt-1.2.4_1 /security/libgcrypt
-0005 libgpg-error
I try to install security/gnupg on a server with portmanager. I have
this kind of output:
#portmanager security/gnupg
-0001 gnupg-2.0.4 /security/gnupg
-0002 pinentry-0.7.2_6 /security/pinentry
-0003 dirmngr-0.9.7_2 /security/dirmngr
-0004 libgcrypt-1.2.4_1 /security/libgcrypt
-0005 libgpg-error
nnect call failed
gpg-agent[86284]: command get_passphrase failed: No pinentry
gpg: problem with the agent: No pinentry
gpg: no default secret key: General error
gpg: configure: clearsign failed: General error
Exit 2
security/pinentry is not a requisite for security/gnupg. Should it be?
Regards.
ps: p
On 19/12/06, martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-Dec-11 23:43:48 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> If this is your plan, it leads me to the next question, which is how
>> are you going to handle the fact that GnuPG 2.x does not install a
>> binary named "gpg?"
>
> As
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-Dec-11 23:43:48 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> If this is your plan, it leads me to the next question, which is how
>> are you going to handle the fact that GnuPG 2.x does not install a
>> binary named "gpg?"
>
> As an end user, I see this as a real issue. If I up
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:08:06PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Vasil Dimov wrote:
[...]
> > - NLS "Native Language Support" on \
> > [...]
> > +OPTIONS= NLS "Include National Language Support" on \
> >
> > I believe the N in NLS stands for Native.
>
> It's National. That's why you hav
Vasil Dimov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:44:00AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
>> At Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:28:21 -0800,
>> Doug Barton wrote:
> [...]
>>> What might make sense is for the gnupg 2.x port to install a gpg
>>> symlink to gpg2. I've done that on my own system for convenience sake.
>>>
On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
Anyway, this way maybe old-porters thinking. I liked to use
"/" directory name (without version number).
Using version number in ports directory is very exceptional event for
keeping old ports (like "emacs", "emacs19", "emacs20"). I thought
thi
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:44:00AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> At Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:28:21 -0800,
> Doug Barton wrote:
[...]
> > What might make sense is for the gnupg 2.x port to install a gpg
> > symlink to gpg2. I've done that on my own system for convenience sake.
> > That will get hairy if t
At Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:28:21 -0800,
Doug Barton wrote:
> >> I have no clue about last problem for now (only pkg-message or
> >> UPDATING). This maybe critical for casual portupgrade users.
> >
> > Err... I wonder... How about repo-copying (or rather, repo-moving)
binary consumer is ports-installed one and have explicit
>> dependency on its Makefile, "portupgrade -R gnupg" will install
>> security/gnupg *AND* security/gnupg1. But if is is not from ports,
>> just only users from command line or have implicit dependency (like
&g
elled gpg.
>
> Yes, that's my difficult decision in this upgrade. I understand you
> care about existing users not to violate POLA, but I basically choose
> this way for new users. :-(
>
> If "gpg" binary consumer is ports-installed one and have explicit
> depende
On Mon, 2006-Dec-11 23:43:48 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>If this is your plan, it leads me to the next question, which is how
>are you going to handle the fact that GnuPG 2.x does not install a
>binary named "gpg?"
As an end user, I see this as a real issue. If I upgrade a port,
I expect the upgra
users not to violate POLA, but I basically choose
this way for new users. :-(
If "gpg" binary consumer is ports-installed one and have explicit
dependency on its Makefile, "portupgrade -R gnupg" will install
security/gnupg *AND* security/gnupg1. But if is is not from port
Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> At first, thank you for your helping to upgrade our gnupg world to
> 2.0.x. And sorry I cannot explain as you can feel reasonable.
I just want to make sure that the relevant issues are well thought
out, which it sounds like you have done.
> I just think "
On 12/12/06, Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just think "security/gnupg" should be used as "what
you should choose" for "GnuPG". If new ports user
wants to install GnuPG, I hope there is
"security/gnupg" as recommended stable version
o
> FreeBSD from other platforms, to adopt the naming scheme that I
> proposed, although not necessarily the exact patches I sent you to
> implement it.
>
> If you choose not to go that direction, I would be interested in
> hearing your reasoning.
At first, thank you for your helping t
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:15:59AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm planning to upgrade security/gnupg to 2.0.1. This upgrade
> > includes portrevision bumps to indicate dependency changes.
> >
> > I'
El domingo 10 de diciembre a las 16:15:07 CET, GalaxyPC.Net escribió:
> install-info --quiet /usr/local/info/gnupg1.info /usr/local/info/dir
> install-info: menu item `gpg' already exists, for file `gpg'
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-February/114123.html
Check if /usr/
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 07:42:00PM +, Shaun Amott wrote:
>
> In addition: I would guess that mail/imp, and maybe others, expect
> bin/gpg to be present. If this is indeed the case, it would need
> additional patching.
>
Sorry - ignore that last bit. I wasn't thinking. :-)
--
Shaun Amott //
Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning to upgrade security/gnupg to 2.0.1. This upgrade
> includes portrevision bumps to indicate dependency changes.
>
> I'm testing conditional plist, upgrading procedure by portupgrade.
> But I think it's almost ready
64 matches
Mail list logo
