On 6/15/06, Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greg Barniskis wrote:
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>
docs, because then no one else would be able to use my documents. Am I
wrong in considering the FDP generated documentation as being in that
category, not terribly uselful outside the FreeBSD project
--- nicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nikolas Britton wrote:
> > On 6/13/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> --- Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 6/13/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > I tried unsuccessfully to build OpenOffice 2.0 on my 5.4 box.
>
For a while now I have been getting cron emails with a problem with
/usr/libexec/save-entropy
Message is - Line 1: socket: Operation not permitted
/var/db/entropy is owned and writable by operator and the saved-entropy
files are modified each time through (going by file timestamp)
Any ideas on
Garrett Cooper wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mac Newbold wrote:
Today at 2:55pm, Mikhail Goriachev said:
Jun 14 11:27:21 mybox kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_CD HARDWARE ERROR
asc=0x08 ascq=0x01 error=0
Jun 14 11:27:21 mybox kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_CD ILLEGAL REQUEST
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mac Newbold wrote:
> Today at 2:55pm, Mikhail Goriachev said:
>
>>> Jun 14 11:27:21 mybox kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_CD HARDWARE ERROR
>>> asc=0x08 ascq=0x01 error=0
>>> Jun 14 11:27:21 mybox kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_CD ILLEGAL REQUEST
>>> asc=0
Greg Barniskis wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
Greg Barniskis wrote:
You know, I don't want to argue about thread hijacking, I only want my
question answered, so i will try again. Has anyone out there used a
tool from the ports set, to be able to do general purpose creation and
formatting of X
I believe this is a simple fix, but I sure can't find it.
I set up 2 FreeBSD boxes as dual-stack network routers and I'm using them to
test an application capable of generating both TCP and UDP messaging. The TCP
part of this equation is working great -- my message fly around the network
just
Today at 2:55pm, Mikhail Goriachev said:
Jun 14 11:27:21 mybox kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_CD HARDWARE ERROR
asc=0x08 ascq=0x01 error=0
Jun 14 11:27:21 mybox kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_CD ILLEGAL REQUEST
asc=0x64 ascq=0x00 error=0
Jun 14 11:27:22 mybox last message repeated 11 times
This i
In response to RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thursday 15 June 2006 21:02, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> > Are you sure you completed the process successfully? If you'd had
> > tag=., this would reports something like 6-STABLE. If you'd had
> > 6_0_RELENG, it would report 6.0-RELEASE-p9.
>
> Surely tag
Bob Johnson wrote:
On 6/15/06, Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greg Barniskis wrote:
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>
docs, because then no one else would be able to use my documents. Am I
wrong in considering the FDP generated documentation as being in that
category, not terribly uselful outsi
RW writes:
> > Are you sure you completed the process successfully? If you'd had
> > tag=., this would reports something like 6-STABLE. If you'd had
> > 6_0_RELENG, it would report 6.0-RELEASE-p9.
>
> Surely tag=. is 7-CURRENT, not 6-STABLE. Or am I missing
> something?
That was
Like Mikhail was mentioning, the DMCA appears to be in your way; many
companies thought it was necessary to copyright protect CDs and they
have accomplished that feat by added various protection features to CDs,
some of which are intentional CD track errors.
Are those even CD's? IIRC they cant u
On Thursday 15 June 2006 21:02, Bill Moran wrote:
> Are you sure you completed the process successfully? If you'd had
> tag=., this would reports something like 6-STABLE. If you'd had
> 6_0_RELENG, it would report 6.0-RELEASE-p9.
Surely tag=. is 7-CURRENT, not 6-STABLE. Or am I missing somethi
--- Paul Marciano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You couldn't do 100Mb/s with em on a 100Mb/s
> line
> > with min packets, because there are gaps
> between
> > packets so its impossible.
>
> Thanks for the detailed reply Danial.
>
> By 100Mbps I mea
I'm trying to use posix_getpwuid(), but it doesn't appear to be there
in php5.1.4 Does anyone know if it's availible as part of the php5-XXX
ports? If not, where can I find it?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
In response to Greg Groth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 6/15/2006 3:02 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Greg Groth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> On 6/15/2006 2:42 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
> >> > In response to Greg Groth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> >> mail# uname -a
> >> FreeBSD mail
On 6/15/2006 3:02 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Greg Groth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> On 6/15/2006 2:42 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
>> > In response to Greg Groth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> [snip]
>
>> >> Contents of cvsupfile:
>> >>
>> >> *default host=cvsup6.FreeBSD.org
>> >> *default bas
--- Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You couldn't do 100Mb/s with em on a 100Mb/s line
> with min packets, because there are gaps between
> packets so its impossible.
Thanks for the detailed reply Danial.
By 100Mbps I mean line-rate: 148809 packets/sec for
64-byte Ethernet frames + IPG an
In response to Greg Groth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 6/15/2006 2:42 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Greg Groth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> >> Contents of cvsupfile:
> >>
> >> *default host=cvsup6.FreeBSD.org
> >> *default base=/var/db
> >> *default prefix=/usr
> >> *default rele
--- Paul Marciano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am running FreeBSD-5.4 on a 3GHz P4 with two
> Intel
> fxp NICs running IP forwarding with polling
> enabled.
>
> For larger packets (e.g. 700 bytes) I am
> getting
> 100Mbps throughput port to port.
>
> For min-size packets (64 byte
Chuck Robey wrote:
Greg Barniskis wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
This is a delayed reposting of something that I might have sent to an
initially poorly chosen list; if it still gets no reponse in another
day, I might try again, if I can figure out a better FreeBSD list to
choose. My predilect
On 6/15/2006 2:42 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Greg Groth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I have a FreeBSD 6.0 server that I manage that is used as a DNS / mail
>> server. In the wake of the recent sendmail security announcement, I'd
>> like to make sure I'm keeping the thing up to date. I
The port of ethereal that comes with FreeBSD 6.1 is ver. 10.14.
I had to download one required package (adns-1.1.tar.gz) but everything seems
fine now.
Thanks for the assist.
Rich Mayo
SRI International
x76435
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Schuele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Se
In response to Greg Groth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a FreeBSD 6.0 server that I manage that is used as a DNS / mail
> server. In the wake of the recent sendmail security announcement, I'd
> like to make sure I'm keeping the thing up to date. I tried to run the
> patch as listed in the ann
I have a FreeBSD 6.0 server that I manage that is used as a DNS / mail
server. In the wake of the recent sendmail security announcement, I'd
like to make sure I'm keeping the thing up to date. I tried to run the
patch as listed in the announcement, but the patch just seemed to hang,
so I kill
Greg Barniskis wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
This is a delayed reposting of something that I might have sent to an
initially poorly chosen list; if it still gets no reponse in another
day, I might try again, if I can figure out a better FreeBSD list to
choose. My predilection for FreeBSD is s
On Jun 15, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Paul Marciano wrote:
For larger packets (e.g. 700 bytes) I am getting
100Mbps throughput port to port.
For min-size packets (64 bytes) I am only seeing
around 60Mbps. Increasing HZ and the polling
parameters does not help.
You should be aware that the minimum 64-b
Hello.
I am running FreeBSD-5.4 on a 3GHz P4 with two Intel
fxp NICs running IP forwarding with polling enabled.
For larger packets (e.g. 700 bytes) I am getting
100Mbps throughput port to port.
For min-size packets (64 bytes) I am only seeing
around 60Mbps. Increasing HZ and the polling
parame
On 6/14/06, YTResearch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone been successful with using Verizon Wireless on FreeBSD. I
have read where the PC5740 card has been successfully used on Linux
claiming 160mbps with a ohci-hcd module. If that's true, I was
thinking this should be possible on FreeBSD. I
Hi, I am the fml ML manager for the ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Be Seeing You!
If you have any questions or problems,
please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Look at the other logs in /var/log to see if there are any log entries that
might point to something.
You can trim down the system and build a custom kernel, and go through
/etc/rc.conf and /usr/local/etc/rc.d and make sure you are only starting
essential services.
Depending on what you are
hi
Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>First you should cvsup and rebuild everything to the latest release
>versions so all security fixes are loaded.
yes, that's already done.
>
>With everything rebuilt, let it run and see if it still locks up.
yes, it still does.
>Did you change any h
Mikhail Goriachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabian Keil wrote:
> >> This is an anti-piracy feature included on some discs. Nowadays
> >> there are more and more protected discs around. Some of them even
> >> crash computers when loading. How silly is that? Programs like
> >> CloneCD can handle
First you should cvsup and rebuild everything to the latest release
versions so all security fixes are loaded.
With everything rebuilt, let it run and see if it still locks up.
Did you change any hardware recently?
-Derek
At 07:17 AM 6/15/2006, George Donnelly wrote:
hi
two nights
NMI means a non-maskable interupt. So this would be a hardware component
generating this.
-Derek
At 06:33 AM 6/15/2006, D G Teed wrote:
Hi,
A server spontaneously rebooted last night.
I don't see why. The last item in the messages
file prior to reboot was:
Jun 15 01:40:39 machinen
>From the original: "I'm attempting to install Ethereal 10.14 from source."
On 06/14/06 15:29, Mayo, Richard A RDECOM CERDEC STCD SRI wrote:
> I'm attempting to install Ethereal 10.14 from source.
What version are you attempting to install?? 0.99.0 was "released"
April 26 2006 and is in
hi
two nights in a row now at different times one of my servers has locked
up at different times (6:00AM, 3:40AM). No access is available even to
keyboard, the machine does not ping. nothing unusual or special shows up
in messages or dmesg. i have to hard-boot it.
where do i start in debugging th
Fabian Keil wrote:
>> This is an anti-piracy feature included on some discs. Nowadays there
>> are more and more protected discs around. Some of them even crash
>> computers when loading. How silly is that? Programs like CloneCD can
>> handle such things on Windows boxes. That is what I use after h
Hi,
A server spontaneously rebooted last night.
I don't see why. The last item in the messages
file prior to reboot was:
Jun 15 01:40:39 machinename /kernel: NMI ISA 24, EISA ff
There is nothing atypical in the messages log prior to that.
The server is running fine again now.
Does that messa
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 10:37 +0300, Yousef Raffah wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 09:05 -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > Yousef Raffah wrote:
> >
> > > I'm trying to build deskutils/taskjuggler but it keeps on failing
> > > saying:
> > >
> > >
> > > le.Tpo" -c -o ProjectFile.lo ProjectFile.cpp; \
Joel Hatton wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:15:14 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
The phrase "Upgrade your vulnerable system" implies performing the full
upgrade as per handbook, which means kernel and world.
No, it doesn't. It means upgrade as much as is necessary to get the
sendmail chan
RW wrote:
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 11:12, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
[portversion -L =] would be quicker. Any > needs upgrading. Any < would mean
you somehow
had an installed version newer that the port version!
Presumably that could happen if the port were reverted.
For completeness,
Rene van Hoek wrote:
> While applying security advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:17.sendmail, the
> compilation of sendmail stops with error code 1.
>
> In applying the patch, it gives me some failures. Some hunks failed.
> When I continue with the compile, it stops while compiling
> contrib/sendmail/src/mim
Joe Auty wrote:
On Jun 14, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
And one which may spew quite a lot. Cut it off if it gets to
printing help.
$ python -v /usr/local/mailman/bin/qrunner
jauty# python -v /usr/local/mailman/bin/qrunner
[...snip...]
# /usr/local/lib/python2.4/getopt.pyc m
Hello,
While applying security advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:17.sendmail, the compilation of
sendmail stops with error code 1.
In applying the patch, it gives me some failures. Some hunks failed.
When I continue with the compile, it stops while compiling
contrib/sendmail/src/mime.c: on line 106.
T
I found for netbsd a kernel config named "options IPSEC_NAT_T", this doesn't
exist (I have fbsd 6.0 stable). Also OpenBSD has support since 3.6.
Is there any way to get Nat-Traversal run, or whatever thing to encapsulate
esp-packets into UDP? I'm using racoon, out of the ipsec-tools Port, w
Mikhail Goriachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mac Newbold wrote:
> > I'm on a 5-STABLE box, currently 5.5-PRERELEASE. I use cdparanoia
> > and lame (via abcde) to rip my CDs to MP3. (This has happened to me
> > with other rippers, like cdda2wav, IIRC, also.) Whenever I try to
> > rip an "enhance
On 6/15/06, DSA - JCR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all
I am installing a new and all Freebsd system (no other OS in it). The goal
is to have a NFS for a network that has 2x200Gb in RAID 1 disks for data.
It has 3 disks:
- 80Gb Seagate IDE for FreeBSD OS alone
- 2xSATA Seagate 200Gb disks in RA
In sysinstall appears:
- ad0 => HD 80GB (for FreeBSD OS at complete)
- ad12 => oine of the SATA HD I think
- ad8 => The other SATA HD I think
- ar0 => ??? (I suppose this is the RAID isnt'it?)
What must I do?
- Make only for ar0?
Is the right alternative - ad8 and ad12 do not
Hi all
I am installing a new and all Freebsd system (no other OS in it). The goal
is to have a NFS for a network that has 2x200Gb in RAID 1 disks for data.
It has 3 disks:
- 80Gb Seagate IDE for FreeBSD OS alone
- 2xSATA Seagate 200Gb disks in RAID 1 with the ICH7R motherboard chipset
configured
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mikhail Goriachev wrote:
> Mac Newbold wrote:
>> This has finally caused me enough grief that I'm going to ask about it
>> and see if there's something I'm doing wrong or some nice solution to
>> this really annyoing problem.
>>
>> I'm on a 5-STABLE bo
51 matches
Mail list logo