This isn't right, when using the -m flag su uses your current
environment, keeping your shell, prompt etc the same as in your
own account. All I can think of is that it executes something
when it opens the new shell which changes it, which shouldn't
be root's cshrc. Perhaps some shell script condit
That's a keymap thing... Depends on your keyboard layout,
I'm not sure what the au layout is, but if it's anything
like the UK one, it's the opposite way round to the
default US keyboard layout for those keys, amongst other
things. The easiest way of setting your keymap is probably
with sysinstall,
Well, the upstream DNS servers you use from your ISP are
quite unlikely to have a change of IP address, and with
the way that BIND works, when you set up forwarders, it
checks them first, then runs its queries to the root
servers if it can't get through. You could also configure
it just to use the
rch 2004 17:35
> To: Edmund Craske
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Where is 4.9-STABLE?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Edmund Craske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Remko Lodder'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Mar
MAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Remko Lodder
> Sent: 06 March 2004 14:54
> To: Mark; Edmund Craske
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Where is 4.9-STABLE?
>
>
> go to /usr/src
> and do a make world
>
> then it recompiles everything,
>
> note your uname -a no
ISO images are not made of a constantly changing source, you
will need to install 4.9-RELEASE and then update with cvsup
to 4.9-STABLE source, and make world.
Ed
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
> Sent: 06 March 2004 11:47
> To:
> I guess that 's what so confusing. Who would benefit using
>
> RELENG_4_9_0_RELEASE?
Noone really, except for diagnosis purposes. It's just a tag
to mark the release of 4.9, so more an administrative
reference than of everyday use.
Ed
___
[EMAIL PR
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Perry
> Sent: 14 February 2004 17:17
> To: FreeBSD-Questions
> Subject: Branch Tags vs Release Tags
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Need to upgrade to FreeBSD 4.9 so all my ports will run. Not sure,
> howeve
As far as I know, there are no packages yet built for amd64, so
the only install disc is the miniinst one, which is essentially
what you would normally get, but without packages. This one is
the one to use.
Ed
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Yeah, I must have been asleep. Should have reread the message
before replying! I'm so stupid sometimes :-P
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 February 2004 14:17
> To: Edmund Craske
> Cc: 'Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharc
1.2 is not greater than 1.7. Check your logic.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko
> Sent: 04 February 2004 13:17
> To: treeml
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: verify md5 for /sbin/init (v1.7.2.3 200
Try it without the -j4, then if it still breaks at least we'll
be able to make sense of the log.
Ed
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan B
> Sent: 03 February 2004 23:04
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Error on buildworld
>
>
>
xterm-color
Ed
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian McCann
> Sent: 02 February 2004 19:51
> To: 'Khairil Yusof'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Colors in VIM
>
>
> Actually...I was beginning to wonder the same thing when I
Ahh, problem solved :]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Yahoo!Groups Customer Care
> Sent: 30 January 2004 23:51
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Please confirm request to change your email preferences
>
>
>
> Hello [EMAIL PR
Note that the procedure shown will likely break your system
if you're upgrading from 5.1 or earlier, so do:
shutdown -r now
then boot into single user mode, as described in the handbook,
instead of shutdown now.
The process described by Kai is not as depicted in UPDATING...
Edmund C
There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install the bind9 port
over the base bind8 (by doing a make
-DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9) because of differences in
command line arguments. Of course, you could just
work it out and hash it together, or leave
Wow, exactly the same problem as me... Was just thinking of writing
exactly this mail. Thanks for doing it for me :] Good luck...
Edmund Craske
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jonathan T. Sage
> Sent: 29 January
17 matches
Mail list logo