thank you.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Mike Brown wrote:
> alexus wrote:
> > ok, I just did fetch & install and got bumped from p5 to p9
> >
> > # uname -a
> > FreeBSD XX.X.org 7.4-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE-p9 #0: Mon Jun
> 11
> > 19:47:58 UT
ar 1 00:00:00 UTC 2013
will not have been corrected.
# freebsd-update install
No updates are available to install.
Run '/usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch' first.
#
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:13 PM, alexus wrote:
> ok, I just did fetch & install and got bumped from p5 to p9
&g
tch again, hoping it will
do that)
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013, at 14:22, alexus wrote:
> > bash-4.2# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.4-RELEASE-p12
>
> Just freebsd-update fetch && freebsd-update install is all you should
> have
bash-4.2# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.4-RELEASE-p12
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
Fetching metadata signature for 7.4-RELEASE from update4.freebsd.org...
done.
Fetching metadata index... done.
Inspecting system... done.
The following components of FreeBSD seem to be ins
] [-g group] [-m mode]
[-o owner] file1 ... fileN directory
install -d [-v] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] directory ...
*** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src and install files to
the temproot environment
[root@f9 ~]#
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM
, alexus wrote:
> I've tried upgrading my FreeBSD 9.1 to 9.2 via freebsd-update and I guess
> I did something wrong and now I'm trying to run mergemaster and I'm unable
> to do so, although I do remember merging passwd file w/ new user auditdistd
>
> how can I re-run me
I've tried upgrading my FreeBSD 9.1 to 9.2 via freebsd-update and I guess I
did something wrong and now I'm trying to run mergemaster and I'm unable to
do so, although I do remember merging passwd file w/ new user auditdistd
how can I re-run mergemaster?
f9# mergemaster
*** The directory specifi
nevermind) I forgot I'm using csh, so right syntax is:
service bsnmpd status ; if ( $? != 0 ) service bsnmpd start ; endif
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:52 AM, alexus wrote:
> so mean while, I'm thinking adding something like this to cron as @daily,
> but I'm getting error(
&
Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> El 03/09/2013 21:47, "alexus" escribió:
>
> >
> > I use bsnmpd w/ mrtg (have been for very long time and everything was
> ok, till recently), mrtg just monitor
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:22 PM, alexus wrote:
>
>> #13156 0x in ?? ()
>> #13157 0x0001 in ?? ()
>> #13158 0x7fffae80 in ?? ()
>> #13159 0x00080063c400 in ?? ()
>> #13160 0x7fffae90 in ??
/ld-elf.so.1
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(gdb)
http://pastebin.com/qhQGC5A4
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> El 03/09/2013 21:11, "alexus" escribió:
>
> >
> > it's _
.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:04 PM, alexus wrote:
>
>> can you guide me through to get "whole backtrace" please?
>>
>
> After opening the core like you did, type "bt" and press enter.
>
>
>>
>
can you guide me through to get "whole backtrace" please?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> El 27/08/2013 05:03, "alexus" escribió:
>
> >
> > f9# gdb `which bsnmpd` /bsnmpd.core
>
snmpd.config is standard
[alexus@f9 ~]$ head -1 /etc/snmpd.config
# $FreeBSD: release/9.1.0/etc/snmpd.config 216595 2010-12-20 17:28:15Z
syrinx $
[alexus@f9 ~]$
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:03 PM, alexus wrote:
> f9# gdb `which bsnmpd` /bsnmpd.core
> GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> Copyr
13 at 10:42 PM, James Gosnell wrote:
> What's the core dump and your config file look like?
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:28 PM, alexus wrote:
>
> > My bsnmpd(1) keep crashing(
> >
> > f9# uname -a
> > FreeBSD f9.alexus.org 9.1-RELEASE-
My bsnmpd(1) keep crashing(
f9# uname -a
FreeBSD f9.alexus.org 9.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p6 #0: Wed Aug 21
20:40:52 UTC 2013
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
f9# bzip2 -cd all.log.1.bz2 | grep snmpd
Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detec
I just update snort (using portmaster -PP snort) and now I'm getting this:
# pkg_info | grep ^snort
pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without
argument), ignoring
pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without
argument), ignoring
pkg_info:
I appreciate everyone's input on this matter and the bottom line is:
mod_php and/or php-fpm should be created as a _separate_package_
for users who have no need for it, should _NOT_ install it in fact if
this package exists or not it shouldn't even concern you (since you
not using it)
for users w
according to:
http://www.fastcgi.com/mod_fastcgi/docs/mod_fastcgi.html#FastCgiExternalServer
---
Note: Using FastCgiServer within a VirtualHost does not necessarily
limited access to that host. If filename is accessible via other
virtual hosts, they too can leverage the same definition.
---
how
se for your default vhost ?
>
>
>
> On 10 Mar 2012, at 02:35, alexus wrote:
>
>> if it would be incorrectly it wouldn't work the first time (default host)
>> virtualhost has a copy from a default host, the only difference is
>> local path to directory, th
ate vs not operate at all and
other virtual hosts can work as well otherwise i have to go and
comment out alot of lines manually so it's not ifmodule as that proven
to work, but in any case i added ifmodule after, line was there before
without ifmodule so it didn't work before either..
mbp:~
i'd like to follow up with this question if possible
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:31 PM, alexus wrote:
> ---
> LoadModule fastcgi_module libexec/apache22/mod_fastcgi.so
>
>
> AddHandler php5-fastcgi .php
> FastCgiExternalServer /usr/local/www/apache22/data
---
LoadModule fastcgi_module libexec/apache22/mod_fastcgi.so
AddHandler php5-fastcgi .php
FastCgiExternalServer /usr/local/www/apache22/data/php -socket
/var/run/spawn_fcgi.sock
---
this works for my apache for default virtualhost, yet if i use same
thing under a virtualhos
I can't install phpMyAdmin on my FreeBSD-9.0
wx3# pkg_add -r phpMyAdmin
Fetching
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.0-release/Latest/phpMyAdmin.tbz...
Done.
Error: Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.0-release/All/pdflib-7.0.4.tbz:
File una
LoadModule fastcgi_module libexec/apache22/mod_fastcgi.so
AddHandler php5-fastcgi .php
FastCgiExternalServer /usr/local/www/apache22/data/ -socket
/var/run/spawn_fcgi.sock
wx3# ls -al /var/run/spawn_fcgi.sock
srwxrwxrwx 1 www www 0 Feb 24 02:41 /var/run/spawn_fcgi.sock
w
my last resort (at
least that i know of to try) is to go with spawn-fcgi. i dont have
alot of requirements but i do need apache22 + php5 to talk to each
others and i want to know if it can be done with pkg_add vs /usr/ports
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Michael Powell wrote:
> alexus
ed package: sudo-1.8.3_1
Type of problem: sudo -- format string vulnerability.
Reference:
http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/7c920bb7-4b5f-11e1-9f47-00e0815b8da8.html
Affected package: ruby-1.8.7.352_2,1
Type of problem: Multiple implementations -- DoS via hash algorithm collision.
Reference:
http://
this point of time, I'd highly appreciate if you can
post it here.
Thank you in advance.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2012, at 5:14 PM, alexus wrote:
>> is there a way to make apache22 w/ php5 without using /usr/ports?
>
> Yes, you could download
is there a way to make apache22 w/ php5 without using /usr/ports?
just using pkg_add -r apache22 && pkg_add -r php5
maybe through spawn-fcgi somehow?
anyone have a good example/docs how to do it?
--
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
what else I can do then?
i don't need syslogd..
this is vm, it runs nothing but squid, squid generates its own
logging, so no reason to run syslogd
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 20/02/2012 17:29, alexus wrote:
>> /var/log/squid/access.log <7J&g
ill trim at Tue Feb 21 00:00:00 2012
/var/log/squid/cache.log <7J>: --> will trim at Tue Feb 21 00:00:00 2012
Signal all daemon process(es)...
sleep 10
s#
one thing that I noticed:
newsyslog: pid file doesn't exist: /var/run/syslog.pid
s# grep ^syslogd /etc/rc.conf
syslogd_e
s# tail -1 /etc/newsyslog.conf
/etc/newsyslog-local.conf
s# cat /etc/newsyslog-local.conf
/var/log/squid/access.log squid:squid 640 7 *@T00 J
/var/run/squid/squid.pid
/var/log/squid/cache.logsquid:squid 640 7 *@T00 J
s# ls -la /var/log/squid/
total 95672
d
What's the procedure on updating packages (not ports), can someone
point me (preferably in a handbook) or else where is fine too...
--
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qu
Thank you so much for this wonderful feedback!
One of the things I'm seeing is that unfortunately packages are
somewhat limited vs ports...
For example:
I'm trying to get Apache httpd + PHP to work, after pkg_add -r php5,
php5 doesn't have libphp5.so that links Apache and PHP together... so
unle
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peter wrote:
>> I created a jail and within a jail I did
>>
>> pkg_add -r apache22
>> pkg_add -r php5
>>
>> now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php,
>> I see source
I created a jail and within a jail I did
pkg_add -r apache22
pkg_add -r php5
now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php,
I see source code... I dont think php5 added inside of apache22
--
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-quest
Ports vs Packages?
/usr/ports vs pkg_*
pros/cons
--
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.o
0 0.0.0.0/10643641781 00 0
32 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/10724353920 00 0
48 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/2104 3 595 00 0
su-4.2#
why is it seeing source ip/port as 0/0 and dest 0/? i dont understand
that at all
thanks, but did u actually tried it? i'd prefer an example from a live
system if possible
its just its not working for me, so maybe i'm doing something off, so
thats why i wanted to see a working example from someone's system
2011/9/11 Коньков Евгений :
> Здравствуйте, alexus
can someone provide a real (working) live example of traffic shaping with ipfw
i just can't get mine to work no matter what...
--
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio
PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:36 AM, alexus wrote:
>> su-3.2# tcpdump -nnAvvvw webmail.west.cox.net 'dst host 68.6.19.1 and
>> (dst port 80 or 443)'
>> tcpdump: listening on bce0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96
>> bytes
>> Got
5, 2011 2:04:27 PM -0400 alexus wrote:
>
>> I personally leaning towards that these headers are being modified and
>> that there is no spam leaving my box (I may be wrong of couse)
>>
>> here is what I did to come up with that thought
>>
>> I sent myself a
Robert Bonomi:
I didn't received anything from you other then part of my own email...
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Aug 15 12:37:33 2011
>> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:05:15 -0400
>> From: alexus
&
s?
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2011, at 10:05 AM, alexus wrote:
>> what else can I do to find it on my system who's trying to connect to
>> remote webmail.west.cox.net ?
>
> Monitor your network for SMTP traffic:
>
> tcpdump -nA -s
I received a SPAM complain from my ISP and we're trying to figure out
what/where the problem is...
from headers:
Received: from 64.237.55.83 by webmail.west.cox.net; Sun, 14 Aug 2011
18:43:41 -0400
64.237.55.83 is an IP that resides on my box, obviously I'm not
sending out any spam intentionally
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> On 23/07/10 18.58, alexus wrote:
>
>> i just did jail on public ip where i dont need to use ipnat, so
>> obviously that works fine no problem
>> not really what i wanted though but as a temporary fix its fine...
>
small update: i just re-build jail and again where I was...
so it seems like its not jail related issue
although ... I also tried new rdr rule but to resides on same
interface and that worked no problem...
i just did jail on public ip where i dont need to use ipnat, so
obviously that works fine n
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> On 20/07/10 20.07, alexus wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Erik Norgaard
>> wrote:
>> plan b is to run natd, but i'd rather run ipnat especially that ipnat
>> used to work before no probl
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Aiza wrote:
> alexus wrote:
>>>
>>> su-3.2# grep ^firewall /etc/rc.conf
>>> firewall_enable="YES"
>>> firewall_type="open"
>>>
>>> su-3.2# grep ^ip /etc/rc.conf
>>> ipfi
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> On 20/07/10 18.37, alexus wrote:
>
>>> You are running 2 different firewalls at the same time.
>>> comment out
>>> firewall_enable="YES"
>>> firewall_type="open"
>>>
&g
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> On 20/07/10 18.02, alexus wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Erik Norgaard
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19/07/10 16.46, alexus wrote:
>>> Can't help you more, really, you need to in
> su-3.2# grep ^firewall /etc/rc.conf
> firewall_enable="YES"
> firewall_type="open"
>
> su-3.2# grep ^ip /etc/rc.conf
> ipfilter_enable="YES"
> ipmon_enable="YES"
> ipnat_enable="YES"
> ipnat_flags="-d"
>
> This is not good.
> You are running 2 different firewalls at the same time.
> comme
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> On 19/07/10 16.46, alexus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Use tcpdump, you should see if your rdr/map rules work as expected.
>>>>> Also,
>>>>> pfctl -ss and similar.
>>>>
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> On 16/07/10 02.56, alexus wrote:
>
>>>>> su-3.2# cat /etc/ipnat.rules
>>>>> map fxp0 lama -> 0/32
>>>>> rdr fxp0 64.52.58.58 port ssh -> lama port ssh tcp
>>>
>>&
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 7/15/10 5:07 PM, alexus wrote:
>>
>> Software error:
>>
>> The ./data/params file does not exist. You probably need to run
>> checksetup.pl. at Bugzilla/Config.pm line 337.
>> Compilation fail
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> On 15/07/10 21.17, alexus wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:32 PM, alexus wrote:
>>>
>>> I can't put my mind around it, before reboot I was able to ssh in from
>>> outside to my jail and
Software error:
The ./data/params file does not exist. You probably need to run
checksetup.pl. at Bugzilla/Config.pm line 337.
Compilation failed in require at /var/www/html/bugzilla/index.cgi line 34.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /var/www/html/bugzilla/index.cgi line 34.
For help, please
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:32 PM, alexus wrote:
> I can't put my mind around it, before reboot I was able to ssh in from
> outside to my jail and right now I can't!
> I even rebuild the whole system and even that didn't help:(
> anyone have any ideas?
>
> su-3.2
f
gateway_enable="YES"
su-3.2# sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding
net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1
su-3.2#
and this is me from outside trying to ssh to my box and getting time out...
mp:~ alexus$ ssh -v jothost.com
OpenSSH_5.2p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8l 5 Nov 2009
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh_config
debug1:
su-3.2# uname -a
FreeBSD dd.alexus.org 7.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE #13: Tue Mar 23
20:47:52 UTC 2010 xx...@x.xxx.:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
su-3.2#
why is it showing up #13 here? back when I had 7.2-RELEASE-pX i've had
#12, I then did following:
rm -rf /usr/src
csup /usr/shar
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:21 PM, andrew clarke wrote:
> On Fri 2010-03-12 00:16:35 UTC-0500, Steve Bertrand (st...@ibctech.ca) wrote:
>
>> > The machine has a Motherboard that supports 2 double pentium III
>> > processors with 1GB of ram and a hard disk with 40GB.
>
> I run FreeBSD 7.2 on a headle
Hi
I'm trying to do traffic shaping with FreeBSD, here are my rules
su-3.2# ipfw pipe show
1: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail
mask: 0x00 0x/0x -> 0x/0x
BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp
0
this is my ntp.conf
su-3.2# cat /usr/local/etc/ntp.conf
server 0.us.pool.ntp.org
server 1.us.pool.ntp.org
server 2.us.pool.ntp.org
server 3.us.pool.ntp.org
su-3.2# ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
===
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:22 PM, alexus wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Brent Bloxam wrote:
>> alexus wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm trying to fight with ipfw and unfortunately unsuccessfully...
>>>
>>> I created following rules
>>>
>
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Brent Bloxam wrote:
> alexus wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to fight with ipfw and unfortunately unsuccessfully...
>>
>> I created following rules
>>
>> ipfw pipe 1 config bw 1Mbit/s
>> ifpw add 8080 pipe 1 tcp from a
I'm trying to fight with ipfw and unfortunately unsuccessfully...
I created following rules
ipfw pipe 1 config bw 1Mbit/s
ifpw add 8080 pipe 1 tcp from any to any src-port www
ifpw add 8080 pipe 1 tcp from any to any dst-port www
yet I see peaks of my traffic is way higher them 1Mbit/s
i have fo
;\012 MLST
modify*;perm*;size*;type*;unique*;UNIX\000]
and on my client I get this
mbp:~ alexus$ ftp 64.237.55.83
Connected to 64.237.55.83.
220 64.237.55.83 FTP server ready
Name (64.237.55.83:alexus): ftp
331 Anonymous login ok, send your complete email address as your password
Password:
230
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Sun 28 Jun 2009 at 16:10:51 PDT Michael Powell wrote:
>>
>> alexus wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Michael Powell
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> alexus wrote:
&
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Mel
Flynn wrote:
> On Sunday 28 June 2009 12:40:24 alexus wrote:
>
>> company policy not too use ports, any other suggestions?
>
> Understand GNU autotools in detail, the patches for it in the respective
> ports, how to read config.log and whet
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> alexus wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to compile something and I'm getting these lines while I'm
>> doing ./configure
>>
>> checking if libtool supports shared libraries... no
>> checking whether to
I'm trying to compile something and I'm getting these lines while I'm
doing ./configure
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... no
checking whether to build shared libraries... no
I went and even recompiled libtool
# ./configure | grep -i share
checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/bin/
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to "Gary Gatten" :
>
>> OK - this thread is scaring me. Anything that involves a "backdoor"
>> threat is very concerning - I keep looking over my shoulder to make sure
>> no one is sneaking up on me!
>
> My job here is done ...
>
>
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Mel Flynn
wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009 22:56:26 alexus wrote:
>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra
> wrote:
>> > 2009/5/20 alexus :
>> >> inside of my jail i get following emails...
>>
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:43 PM, wrote:
> alexus wrote:
>> ... i guess my main concern it not to run it as root now
>
> AFAIK it is normal for a daemon to run as root if it expects to
> receive login credentials:
>
> * For any but the most minimal authentication schem
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:57 PM, alexus wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Mel Flynn
> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 20 May 2009 16:13:15 alexus wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Mel Flynn
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Tuesday 19 May 2009
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Mel Flynn
wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009 16:13:15 alexus wrote:
>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Mel Flynn
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 19 May 2009 21:18:48 alexus wrote:
>> >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Mehu
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> 2009/5/20 alexus :
>> inside of my jail i get following emails...
>>
>> adjkerntz[25058]: sysctl(set: "machdep.adjkerntz"): Operation not permitted
>>
>> i dont remember getting these before...
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:34 AM, v wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:42 PM, alexus wrote:
>> inside of my jail i get following emails...
>>
>> adjkerntz[25058]: sysctl(set: "machdep.adjkerntz"): Operation not permitted
>>
>> i dont remember getting
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:18 AM, alexus wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:13 AM, alexus wrote:
>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Mel Flynn
>> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 19 May 2009 21:18:48 alexus wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Mehul Ved wrot
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:13 AM, alexus wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Mel Flynn
> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 19 May 2009 21:18:48 alexus wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Mehul Ved wrote:
>>> > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:14 PM, alexus wrote:
&g
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Mel Flynn
wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 May 2009 21:18:48 alexus wrote:
>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Mehul Ved wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:14 PM, alexus wrote:
>> >> i start it as a root, but it switchs to non-root
>
inside of my jail i get following emails...
adjkerntz[25058]: sysctl(set: "machdep.adjkerntz"): Operation not permitted
i dont remember getting these before...
i did changed time zone recently though...
--
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-questions@fr
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Mehul Ved wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:14 PM, alexus wrote:
>> i start it as a root, but it switchs to non-root
>>
>> nobody 52346 0.0 0.1 11820 4208 ?? SsJ Sun06PM 0:00.66
>> proftpd: (accepting connections) (proftpd)
&g
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:36 PM, alexus wrote:
> I'm running system with 2 jails
>
> host runs named
> 1st jail runs mail
> 2nd jail runs web
>
> jails needs to be able to reach out to outside world, for example mail
> server needs to be able to communicate with
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> alexus wrote:
>>
>> i just enable TLS for my proftpd and in tls.log I'm getting following
>> messages
>>
>> mod_tls/2.2.1[45739]: error locking passphrase into memory: Operation
>> not
I'm running system with 2 jails
host runs named
1st jail runs mail
2nd jail runs web
jails needs to be able to reach out to outside world, for example mail
server needs to be able to communicate with remote server
for that i decided to use ipnat, here is rule i used
map bce0 mx -> mx
same goes
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Roger Olofsson <240olofs...@telia.com> wrote:
>
>
> alexus skrev:
>>
>> 2009/5/16 Roger Olofsson <240olofs...@telia.com>:
>>>
>>> Odhiambo ワシントン skrev:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at
2009/5/17 Patrick Lamaizière :
> Le Sun, 17 May 2009 16:16:51 -0400,
> alexus :
>
>> i dont see how things are obvious for you as they not so obvious for
>> me. first of all my ipf default policy to allow everything.
>>
>> so the original question is for ipnat
2009/5/16 Roger Olofsson <240olofs...@telia.com>:
>
>
> Odhiambo ワシントン skrev:
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:09 PM, alexus wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:58 PM, alexus wrote:
>>>>
>>>> i need to redirect bunch of ports,
i just enable TLS for my proftpd and in tls.log I'm getting following messages
mod_tls/2.2.1[45739]: error locking passphrase into memory: Operation
not permitted
mod_tls/2.2.1[45739]: TLS/TLS-C requested, starting TLS handshake
anyone had this in the past?
___
2009/5/14 Odhiambo ワシントン :
>
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:09 PM, alexus wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:58 PM, alexus wrote:
>> > i need to redirect bunch of ports, or port-range from outside to my jail
>> >
>> > # /etc/rc.d/ipna
is there a way to have FreeBSD work as BGP router and/or at least
failover between 2 different ISPs?
--
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send an
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:58 PM, alexus wrote:
> i need to redirect bunch of ports, or port-range from outside to my jail
>
> # /etc/rc.d/ipnat reload
> /etc/rc.d/ipnat: DEBUG: checkyesno: ipnat_enable is set to YES.
> /etc/rc.d/ipnat: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: /sbin/ipnat
i need to redirect bunch of ports, or port-range from outside to my jail
# /etc/rc.d/ipnat reload
/etc/rc.d/ipnat: DEBUG: checkyesno: ipnat_enable is set to YES.
/etc/rc.d/ipnat: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: /sbin/ipnat -F -C -f
/etc/ipnat.rules
0 entries flushed from NAT table
2 entries flushed f
-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of alexus
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 4:40 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: forcing traffic into leaving from not first ip
>
> i have many IPs assigned to my i
i have many IPs assigned to my interface
is there a way to force traffic to leave from specific IP vs another
(default) first one?
--
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qu
2009/4/8 Festin Alexander :
> В Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:08:32 -0400
> alexus пишет:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Vasadi I. Claudiu Florin
>> wrote:
>> > All out of ideas. try with a script...maybe, i dnt know.
>> >
>>
>> I understand there
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 14:19:27 -0400, alexus wrote:
> a> I have bsnmpd enabled in rc.conf
> a>
> a>
> a> r...@lama ~ 501$ grep ^b /etc/rc.conf
> a> bsnmpd_enable="YES"
> a> r...@lama ~ 502$
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, alexus wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Adam Vandemore
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 15:27 -0400, alexus
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Adam Vandemore wrote:
> Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 15:27 -0400, alexus wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> cannot stop jail mx. No jail id in /var/run
>>>
>>
>> $ uname -a
>> There were prob
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
