Hi,
I would like to know how to start ALTQ kernel support, tom implement
functions with PF.
The GENERIC kernel does have support to ALTQ ?
There is some script that I can use to start the use of the function:
rc.conf or load.conf ?
Thanks a lot
Giuliano
Hello Freebsd-pf,
Sorry for my english.
OpenBSD team is abandon the altq project.
Maybe FreeBSD team does not come as OpenBSD team.
In Kernel is present "options ALTQ_CDNR # Traffic conditioner",
that is may be used for simple ingress traffic shaping (like
dummyne
Hello,
I am trying to get pf to work on my 5.3 machine. I thought that I had
it setup but it says that I don't have ALTQ support? What is that? Can
someone help me set it up?
Thanks
/Brian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
i've got one problem with altq.
I'm using it in 4.9 stable, but on phisical interfaces i have vlan
trunking. My configured interfaces are vlan0,1 etc.
My question is:
If i setup output control on vlan interface, is traffic on this interface
controled in the same way as on phisical
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Giuliano Cardozo
Medalha
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 19:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ALTQ
The GENERIC kernel does have support to ALTQ ?
No, it does not have the support for pf or ALTQ. Refer
Giuliano Cardozo Medalha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The GENERIC kernel does have support to ALTQ ?
It does not.
> There is some script that I can use to start the use of the function:
> rc.conf or load.conf ?
Yes, once you have altq loade
My class is defined with "borrow". Why altqstat show that in this class
some packets are dropped ?
On my link i've got free 10 MBits, and i want to use it in other class.
thanks in advance
AK
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
I want to read many about altq, but i don't found tehnical
documentation or tutorials.
Can u suggest something!?
--
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
regards,
Carstea Catalin
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
Здравствуйте, irix.
It will be great if altq can queue like in dummynet with dst/src masks
Вы писали 17 мая 2009 г., 3:47:37:
i> Hello Freebsd-pf,
i> Sorry for my english.
i> OpenBSD team is abandon the altq project.
i> Maybe FreeBSD team does not come as OpenBSD team.
i&g
try to add these lines to your kernel config,
and recompile after having made that particular
addition ...
# ALTQ
options ALTQ
options ALTQ_CBQ# Class Bases Queueing
options ALTQ_RED# Random Early Drop
options ALTQ_RIO# RED In/Out
options
On Thursday 20 January 2005 05:30 pm, Brian John wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to get pf to work on my 5.3 machine. I thought that I
> had it setup but it says that I don't have ALTQ support? What is
> that? Can someone help me set it up?
>
> Thanks
>
> /Brian
ALTQ
On 01/20/05 18:30:23, Brian John wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get pf to work on my 5.3 machine. I thought that I
had it setup but it says that I don't have ALTQ support? What is
that? Can someone help me set it up?
Thanks
/Brian
___
fr
+++ Brian John [freebsd] [20-01-05 17:30 -0600]:
| Hello,
| I am trying to get pf to work on my 5.3 machine. I thought that I had
| it setup but it says that I don't have ALTQ support? What is that? Can
| someone help me set it up?
|
| Thanks
|
| /Brian
1) man altq
2)
I'm using FreeBSD 4.8 Stable with altq as my firewall for few networks.
Now by FBSD box is connected to my switch with 4 patchcords(one for one
vlan). Altq is working exactly as i want.
Now i would like to have only one cable to switch.
It's simpe and it's working, but how t
Carstea Catalin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want to read many about altq, but i don't found tehnical
> documentation or tutorials.
> Can u suggest something!?
There is a whole section about it in the Handbook.
___
freebsd-q
Dear list.
My pf.conf not working.
I have pf in bridge machine with xl2 to internet firewall and xl1 to
internal switch. Bridging is ok.
This my simple pf.conf
me="172.16.0.228"
altq on xl1 bandwidth 100% cbq queue {me,dflt}
queue mebandwidth 8Kb
queue dflt bandwidt
Hello,
I am trying to find out how to specify services in the below scenario:
ext_if="kue0"
altq on $ext_if priq bandwidth 1024Kb queue { q_pri, q_def }
queue q_pri priority 7
queue q_def priority 1 priq(default)
pass out on $ext_if proto tcp from $ext_if to any flags S/SA
Hey,
I wanted to know if the patches available for ALTQ on FreeBSD 5.x work on
5.2.1.
I can't test this myself because the only 5.2.1 server I have is a
production server and I'd like to be 100% sure it will work first.
I don't know if the patches will apply cleanly, the latest I
dear all,
i have patch for ipfw altq support. i've patch it and rebuild the
kernel. i have 5.3 stable with ipfw and pf enabled.
but when i rebuild the kernel by make buildkernel KERNCONF="conf" i
have error :
cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wst
Hello,
I'm setting up pf with altq support in my kernel on freebsd 9.0-Stable
(soon to switch to the -RELEASE once it's available).
The system is a quad-core Xeon E31220, running amd64.
I've done a bit of googling and found various results. I know the
freebsd handbook says ALTQ_NO
"
table file "/etc/pf/spyware"
set skip on lo0
# Normalization: reassemble fragments and resolve or reduce traffic
ambiguities.
scrub in all
# Queueing: rule-based bandwidth control.
altq on $ext_if priq queue { std_out, voip_out, ack_out, high_out, low_out }
queue std_out priori
Hello guys
I have this example from OpenBSD:
altq on $br1_if cbq bandwidth 20Mb qlimit 100 tbrsize 1000 queue { std1,
customer_1 }
queue customer_1 bandwidth 1Mb cbq(red,ecn) { customer_1_bulk, customer_1_ack }
queue customer_1_ack priority 7
queue customer_1_bulk priority 0
I want to use CBQ
2008/8/19 Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to find out how to specify services in the below scenario:
>
> ext_if="kue0"
>
> altq on $ext_if priq bandwidth 1024Kb queue { q_pri, q_def }
> queue q_pri priority 7
> queue q_d
Yes, they apply cleanly.
Regards,
Alex.
Hugo Silva wrote:
Hey,
I wanted to know if the patches available for ALTQ on FreeBSD 5.x work on
5.2.1.
I can't test this myself because the only 5.2.1 server I have is a
production server and I'd like to be 100% sure it will work first.
I don
Hello!
altq(4) says:
SUPPORTED DEVICES
The driver modifications described in altq(9) and required to use
a certain network card with ALTQ have been applied to the
following hardware drivers an(4), ath(4), awi(4), bfe(4), dc(4),
em(4), fxp(4), hme(4), lnc(4), wi(4), de(4), rl(4
Hi,
I want to use pf/altq to give ssh a high priority so I don't get lagged
down when something is downloading.
I have:
altq on ath0 priq queue { default, ssh }
queue default priq(default)
queue ssh priority 15 priq(red)
I'm pretty sure this ``works'' but I was re
I apologize if this is the wrong list for this, but if it is, please let
me know. Basically when queue1 on my firewall starts pushing the full
amount of bandwidth, things that use the dflt queue become unreachable
or VERY slow. The dflt queue NEVER uses it's full amount of bandwidth,
generall
APseudoUtopia wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm setting up pf with altq support in my kernel on freebsd 9.0-Stable
> (soon to switch to the -RELEASE once it's available).
> The system is a quad-core Xeon E31220, running amd64.
> I've done a bit of googling and found various
hi there :)
I was planning to migrate a 4.11 firewall using a combo of ipf/ipnat and ipfw
pipe/dummynets to pf + ALTQ.
One thing I haven't figured out how to do with pf is the plr option to the
dummynet configuration - we use it to simulate modem connections or just simply
bad links.
Als
On Saturday 13 October 2007 00:17:32 Ovi wrote:
> Hello guys
>
> I have this example from OpenBSD:
>
> altq on $br1_if cbq bandwidth 20Mb qlimit 100 tbrsize 1000 queue { std1,
> customer_1 } queue customer_1 bandwidth 1Mb cbq(red,ecn) { customer_1_bulk,
> customer_1_ack }
Mel wrote:
On Saturday 13 October 2007 00:17:32 Ovi wrote:
Hello guys
I have this example from OpenBSD:
altq on $br1_if cbq bandwidth 20Mb qlimit 100 tbrsize 1000 queue { std1,
customer_1 } queue customer_1 bandwidth 1Mb cbq(red,ecn) { customer_1_bulk,
customer_1_ack } queue
On Saturday 13 October 2007 16:04:10 Ovi wrote:
> Mel wrote:
> >On Saturday 13 October 2007 00:17:32 Ovi wrote:
> >>Hello guys
> >>
> >>I have this example from OpenBSD:
> >>
> >>altq on $br1_if cbq bandwidth 20Mb qlimit 100 tbrsize 1000 que
Dear all,
I want to ask something that strange for me. I Have freebsd 5.4 Stable
with pf+altq compiled in kernel. i try to use the altq for bandwidth
shaping. the script is :
altq on $internet_if bandwidth 64Kb cbq queue { gateway, internet }
queue gateway priority 1 bandwidth 64Kb cbq
Lewis Thompson wrote:
I'm pretty sure this ``works'' but I was really hoping for more.
Without the 5.3 miniinst ISO downloading a SSH connection is perfect (no
lag, just like the local machine) but as soon as I set it going it
becomes a bit laggy. Am I expecting too much to have a lag-free SSH
c
Christopher McGee wrote:
I apologize if this is the wrong list for this, but if it is, please
let me know. Basically when queue1 on my firewall starts pushing the
full amount of bandwidth, things that use the dflt queue become
unreachable or VERY slow. The dflt queue NEVER uses it's full amoun
Should ixgbe 2.4.8 (supplied with 9.1-RELEASE) support ALTQ?
My card:
ix0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0xa12c8086 chip=0x150b8086
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = '82598EB 10-Gigabit AT2 Server Adapter'
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 18:24, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> hi there :)
> I was planning to migrate a 4.11 firewall using a combo of ipf/ipnat and
> ipfw pipe/dummynets to pf + ALTQ.
pf/ipf/ipfw & dummynet/ALTQ are available since 5.3-R if I recall correctly.
> One thing I hav
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:20:19 +0300
Nikos Vassiliadis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 18:24, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > hi there :)
> > I was planning to migrate a 4.11 firewall using a combo of ipf/ipnat and
> > ipfw pipe/dummynets to
w/dummynet and pf/ALTQ.
I know for sure that you can use pf and ipfw at the same
time. The filtering is done in a serial way(packets that
are allowed through the first packet filter, go through the
second etc). You can load the modules in any order you like
and this will be the order packets fl
Dear all
any one here have some sample script to limit
connection for p2p ( edonkey , kazza , etc ) with pf
also how to limit some ip not port with pf .
sory if my question so newbie
thx
My Regard's
SONJAYA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Hi all,
One quick question: is it possible to filter specific kinds of traffic
with altq, traffic that is not bound to specific IP addresses, like online
radio?
Thanks in advance.
Peter
--
http://www.boosten.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Hello all,
I have a problem and I can't seem to find a solution to it by just goggling;
so maybe you can help me.
I am trying to set up a traffic shaper using pf and altq with hfsc queues.
Actually I did set that up about a year ago and it worked perfectly. But
lately the number of cl
I need help moving from ipfw and dummynet to pf and altq. So far I
have converted most ipfw rules to pf.
Can someone tell me if there is something for altq like this for dummynet
# ipfw add 1 pipe 1 config bw 64Kbit/s queue 10Kbytes mask src-ip 0x
# ipfw add 2 pipe 2 confg bw 128Kbit/s
What are they?
I can't use Intel cards because they are crashing my Adaptec RAID...
-AL.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello all,
I'm configuring pf on FreeBSD 7.3 and would like to use the following
altq settings:
altq on $ext priq bandwidth 9240Kb queue {low, red, med, top}
altq on {$int1, $int2, $srv} priq bandwidth 100Mb queue {low, red, med, top}
queue low priority 1 priq(default) # Default priority
Back in 5.2 development when OpenBSD pf was being included
in the base system there was talk that ALTQ for bandwidth
management was also being worked on to become part of
the base system.
What is the status of ALTQ is it a port or in the base system now
Hello to all
I am trying to install the diffserv model in my testbed. I have computers
with freebsd4.11 and kame + altq kernel options and computers with freebsd
5.4 + kame + altq and pf kernel options.
The first doubt that I have is:
My border routers are those with the freebsd5.4
I have recently installed FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE i386 on a box that uses a
Supermicro P8SCT motherboard containing two Broadcom 5721 Gigabit Ethernet
controllers.
These are working fine and are recognized on boot, but when I tried to
configure pf to utilize ALTQ I received the following message
> also how to limit some ip not port with pf .
you set up your queues, then assign traffic to them via your pass
rules. Your pass rules can use whichever criteria you like, ie
altq on $ext_if cbq bandwidth 10Mb queue { def, mostofmybandwidth, notalot }
queue def bandwidth 20% cbq(defa
On 14:03:29 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> One quick question: is it possible to filter specific kinds of traffic
> with altq, traffic that is not bound to specific IP addresses, like online
> radio?
>
Yes.
Not altq(It is for QoS).
But pf can of c
On Sun, November 11, 2007 15:43, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> On 14:03:29 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> One quick question: is it possible to filter specific kinds of traffic
>> with altq, traffic that is not bound to specific IP address
On Sun, November 11, 2007 15:43, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> On 14:03:29 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> One quick question: is it possible to filter specific kinds of traffic
>> with altq, traffic that is not bound to specific IP address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Peter Boosten wrote:
> On Sun, November 11, 2007 15:43, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
>> On 14:03:29 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>> One quick question: is it possible to filt
On Sun, November 11, 2007 20:16, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>
>>> On 14:03:29 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> One quick question: is it possible to filter specific kinds of
>>>> traffic with altq, traffic tha
On 18:49:37 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
> Thanks for your answer, although that's not quite what I'm looking for:
>
Okay. Find my answer below.
> I know it's possible to 'shape' the traffic with altq, so it's possible in
> theory to shape certain kind
On Mon, November 12, 2007 08:04, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
>
> Hope the above explanation suffices.
Yu, it does. Very nice explanation, thanx.
>
>
> Can you clarify your needs a bit more?
Well, it's actually quite simple: our internet access line, which is used
by several people (directly, wi
Peter Boosten wrote:
> On Mon, November 12, 2007 08:04, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
>
>> Hope the above explanation suffices.
>
> Yu, it does. Very nice explanation, thanx.
>
>>
>> Can you clarify your needs a bit more?
>
> Well, it's actually quite simple: our internet access line, which is us
to the first mail I sent in this thread. All the info you need is
right there.
Don't worry about altq.
Best,
Girish
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 14:03:29 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> One quick question: is it possible to filter specific kinds of traffic
> with altq, traffic that is not bound to specific IP addresses, like online
> radio?
>
Looks like I finally understood what you want.
You want to
I am trying to setup traffic shaping on our network. I was wondering if it
was possible to limit a users download bandwidth and upload bandwidth within
the same state connection. For example, say a user connects to an external
FTP site and does some uploading and downloading. Can I allow him to
dow
I am trying to setup traffic shaping on our network. I was wondering if it
was possible to limit a users download bandwidth and upload bandwidth within
the same state connection. For example, say a user connects to an external
FTP site and does some uploading and downloading. Can I allow him to
dow
On 3 July 2010 00:05, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm configuring pf on FreeBSD 7.3 and would like to use the following
> altq settings:
>
> altq on $ext priq bandwidth 9240Kb queue {low, red, med, top}
> altq on {$int1, $int2, $srv} priq bandwidth 100Mb q
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:17 PM, krad wrote:
>
>
> On 3 July 2010 00:05, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm configuring pf on FreeBSD 7.3 and would like to use the following
>> altq settings:
>>
>> altq on $ext priq bandwidth 92
On 3/29/06, fbsd_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Back in 5.2 development when OpenBSD pf was being included
> in the base system there was talk that ALTQ for bandwidth
> management was also being worked on to become part of
> the base system.
>
> What is the status of ALT
Reading the pf firewall man pages says to use ALTQ with PF a
custom kernel has to be complied with the ALTQ options included.
This seems to indicate that ALTQ is only available when
used with the pf firewall.
ALTQ used to be available as a port so it could be used
stand-a-lone.
Can ALTQ support
> Can ALTQ support be compiled into a custom kernel and be
> used stand-a-lone?
They can be used in anything which is compiled to use them, yes.
--
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
Then if what you say is true, there would be man pages in the
base system for using ALTQ stand-a-lone and there are none.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 10:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
On Thursday 30 March 2006 16:42, fbsd_user wrote:
> >> Can ALTQ support be compiled into a custom kernel and be
> >> used stand-a-lone?
>>
>> They can be used in anything which is compiled to use them, yes.
>
> Then if what you say is true, there would be man
Hi!
I want to enable altq to use in conjunction with ipfw.
How can do that?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello
I am trying a simple setup to shape bandwidth on up and down using
FreeBSD 6.2, PF, ALTQ with CBQ and on download everything works well,
but on upload it works only at half of asigned bandwidth, with packets
dropped.
Here is my pf.conf
# pf.conf
On 18:18:09 Mar 27, Joe Ryan wrote:
> I am trying to setup traffic shaping on our network. I was wondering if it
> was possible to limit a users download bandwidth and upload bandwidth within
> the same state connection. For example, say a user connects to an external
> FTP site and does some uploa
I've read everything I could find on the topic of configuring hfsc
altq in pf (4.5, FreeBSD 9), but I still have no clear idea of how it
is actually implemented. I even started looking through the source
code, but that might take a while. My main questions are:
1. Difference between
Hey Vladone,
I was looking for the same thing a while back, wanting to use ALTQ for
PF. Enable support in the kernel by adding the following lines:
# ALTQ support
options ALTQ
options ALTQ_CBQ# Class Bases Queuing (CBQ)
options ALTQ_RED# Random Early
I have been using PF for several years now and used IPFW previous to
PF that I've grown more and more fond of. I now need to manage
bidirectional traffic I have used Dummynet before to do similar
things but it is my understanding that Altq can only manage outgoing
traffic.
My ques
I have been using PF for several years now and used IPFW previous to
PF that I've grown more and more fond of. I now need to manage
bidirectional traffic I have used Dummynet before to do similar
things but it is my understanding that Altq can only manage outgoing
traffic although I
Ovi wrote:
Hello
I am trying a simple setup to shape bandwidth on up and down using
FreeBSD 6.2, PF, ALTQ with CBQ and on download everything works well,
but on upload it works only at half of asigned bandwidth, with packets
dropped.
Here is my pf.conf
# pf.conf
ult HISADDR
# enable lqr
disable ipv6cp
# set lqrperiod 25
enable dns
----
server:~ $ cat /etc/pf.conf
## Macros
NoRoute = "{ 127.0.0.1/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 10.0.0.0/8, 255.255.255.255/32 }"
## Tables
##
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:51:39 -0500
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> I've read everything I could find on the topic of configuring hfsc
> altq in pf (4.5, FreeBSD 9), but I still have no clear idea of how it
> is actually implemented. I even started looking through the source
> code, but
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:15 AM, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:51:39 -0500
> Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>
>> I've read everything I could find on the topic of configuring hfsc
>> altq in pf (4.5, FreeBSD 9), but I still have no clear idea of how it
>> is actu
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:52:15 -0500
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:15 AM, RW
> wrote:
> > It's about latency, realtime has priority over non-realtime.
>
> I sort of understand this, but I can't figure out how that would apply
> to my example:
&
since the boxes have fixed IP addresses, but how
do I do the priority. The altq man pages say that each driver has to
support altq, and the sr driver doesn't.
Can I do this with netgraph? Is there something else I'm missing?
TIA,
___
freebsd
Thanks! And pf how it's enabled? I think need some device in /dev
This is created when compiling kernel with these options or need to
compile and options for pf?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
Edwin L. Culp wrote:
I have been using PF for several years now and used IPFW previous to PF
that I've grown more and more fond of. I now need to manage
bidirectional traffic I have used Dummynet before to do similar things
but it is my understanding that Altq can only manage outgoing tr
default:
> set log Phase Chat IPCP CCP tun command
> # set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command
> # nat enable yes
> # nat same_ports yes
> # nat use_sockets yes
> set device PPPoE:fxp0 # replace fxp0 with your Ethernet device
> set mtu 1492
> set mru 1492
> enable m
So, this may be the wrong list to post to, but it seemed the most
appropriate. If someone could suggest a better location to move/cross
post to let me know.
I've been running some tests with using FreeBSD to filter and rate
limit traffic. My first thoughts were to goto the latest stable re
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 03:11:04AM -, John Levine wrote:
> I am putting together a FreeBSD router to replace a tired old BSD/OS
> one. My external line is a T1, so I got a Wanic 400 on ebay. I have a
> /24 that is about half full so I don't do NAT and don't expect to need
> to do so.
[snip pa
If you're using IPFW, there's no reason to enable PF. But here's the
code to enable in your kernel config:
# pf support
device pf
device pflog
device pfsync
Here's the handbook page on PF and ALTQ:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/book
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:03:41 -0800, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
>
> I suppose my concerns are two-fold. Why is 6.x collapsing under traffic
>that 4.11 could easily block and run merrily along with, and is there a
>queueing mechanism in place that doesn't tie up the box so much o
I've actually already done everything you've suggested with little or no
impact at all. One point where we have different results is with
ADAPTIVE_GIANT, I actually noticed a drop of about 50kpps thruput when
disabling it.
Mike Tancsa wrote:
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:03:41 -0800, in sentex.li
At 09:53 PM 2/5/2007, Justin Robertson wrote:
I've actually already done everything you've suggested with little
or no impact at all.
Are you sure you had kern.polling.idle_poll=1 enabled ? It makes a
big difference in RELENG_6 with it on or off in my tests.
---Mike
___
On 06/02/07, Justin Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've actually already done everything you've suggested with little or no
impact at all. One point where we have different results is with
ADAPTIVE_GIANT, I actually noticed a drop of about 50kpps thruput when
disabling it.
Hmm I am surp
At 08:03 AM 2/6/2007, Chris wrote:
On 06/02/07, Justin Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've actually already done everything you've suggested with little or no
impact at all. One point where we have different results is with
ADAPTIVE_GIANT, I actually noticed a drop of about 50kpps thruput
ut it another way: When I max out my upstream, and my upstream is
capped lower than my downstream, my downstream becomes useless and I am
forced to wait until the upload finishes before I can resume using the
downstream. This is a problem, and I'd like to solve it.)
I have looked at various
)
I have looked at various ALTQ + pf setups on the Web, but I have one
caveat. I use FreeBSD 6.4 on my home gateway, and it is also using the
default natd server, which relies on an ipfw divert rule. I don't know
if this matters, or if I need to switch from natd to a pf-based NAT setup.
ve it.)
This is exactly the reason why I built my own router several years ago.
> I have looked at various ALTQ + pf setups on the Web, but I have one
> caveat. I use FreeBSD 6.4 on my home gateway, and it is also using the
> default natd server, which relies on an ipfw divert rule. I do
Morgan Wesström wrote:
I've put together a documentation, mainly to help myself being
consistent, but your free to look at my examples there and the reasoning
behind it. It's in the "Firewall setup" guide but it's rather long since
I explain in detail every part of the firewall rule set:
>
h
>> http://homerouters.info/wiki/Main_Page
>>
>> Be aware that I'm not a very good teacher... ;-)
>
> On the contrary, you're an excellent teacher, and I now have a working
> pf configuration handling my NAT duties as well as outbound traffic
> shaping (and handy graphs, too). Thank you very much
;> downstream. This is a problem, and I'd like to solve it.)
> This is exactly the reason why I built my own router several years ago.
I have done the same with PF and AltQ for the past few years. It is so
effective on my 1536/384 ADSL that I now have the opposite problem: a
large download
nishes before I can resume using the
>>> downstream. This is a problem, and I'd like to solve it.)
>> This is exactly the reason why I built my own router several years ago.
>
> I have done the same with PF and AltQ for the past few years. It is so
> effective on
99 matches
Mail list logo
