On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:33 -0700, anti_spam256@ wrote:
Message: 29
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:45:18 -0600
From: Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com
Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: 20091004054518.gd37...@guilt.hydra
Content
-- Leandro F Silva wrote :
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
___
freebsd-questi...@free... mailing list
Leandro F Silva fsilvalean...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
The latest Linuxulator works quite well on -current with
the Linux flash binary + pluginwrapper port, doesn't it?
Works for me, at least.
We just have to create
--- On Sun, 10/4/09, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
From: jhell jh...@dataix.net
Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player
To: James Phillips anti_spam...@yahoo.ca
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 1:07 PM
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:33
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 10:01:14PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Leandro F Silva fsilvalean...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
The latest Linuxulator works quite well on -current with
the Linux flash binary + pluginwrapper port
Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote:
And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows
7 source under the GPL.
Reality called...your request to
Rolf G Nielsen writes:
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a
FreeBSD version of that crap?
Is your objection to Flash in particular, or to any product in
that specific niche
--
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 06:28:29 +0100
From: Lucian @ lastdot.org luc...@lastdot.org
Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID:
5a3c8f45091008k3c196b6ay1acc3031716d6
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:50:16AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Google apparently favours HTML-5 as their future direction, rather than
Flash. And where YouTube goes, the rest of the world will surely follow,
at least as far as Video streaming is concerned.
Oh, thank goodness. Flash video
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 07:56:53AM +0200, Rolf G Nielsen wrote:
Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a FreeBSD
version of that crap?
If you s/Free/Open/ I think the question answers itself.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:04:00AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Rolf G Nielsen writes:
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a
FreeBSD version of that crap?
Is your objection to Flash
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:01:07AM -0700, James Phillips wrote:
I have this fantasy that if I design and build a better streaming video
format, They (broadcasters) will use it, if properly marketed.
It may be a fantasy, but as fantasies go, it's not a bad one.
This would be despite the
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Good luck the community has tried for years to get it and adobe seems to
not care
Leandro F Silva wrote:
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman
aryeh.fried...@gmail.comwrote:
Good luck the community has tried for years to get it and adobe seems to
not care
Leandro F Silva wrote:
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote:
And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows
7 source under the GPL.
Reality called...your request to ignore it was denied.
Actually, we *could*. The problem is the definition of enough. I'm
sure
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote:
And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows
7 source under the GPL.
Reality called...your request to ignore it was denied.
Leandro F Silva wrote:
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
David Southwell wrote:
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Frank
Steinborn
You should be able to restore the bind from base by using the
install.sh script in /usr/src/contrib/bind9. Deinstall the
port first,
though.
ThanksI deinstalled the port and tried to run
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of
da...@vizion2000.net
Sent: 29 September 2009 13:06
To: 'Frank Steinborn'
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: How to restore Base_Bind on amd64 7.2
Hi
I installed bind96 without keeping base-bind and am now having problems with
some ports not compiling.
What is the simpliest way to restore the original system Base_Bind?
Thanks in advance
David
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Исходное сообщение
Тема: Re: How to restore Base_Bind on amd64 7.2 p3 -
Дата: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:51:00 +0400
От: Алексеев Александр aleks...@rumonitor.ru
Кому: David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net
Ссылки: f26af28b92f447f7a85c19c38cbcf...@sleuth64
Please
...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of
?
Sent: 29 September 2009 03:52
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: How to restore Base_Bind on amd64 7.2 p3
Исходное сообщение
Тема: Re: How to restore Base_Bind on amd64 7.2 p3 -
Дата: Tue, 29 Sep
David Southwell wrote:
By base-bind I mean the version of bind that is included in freebsd 7.2
operating system which is a version earlier than the latest Bind96.
When installing bind96 and I did not keep base-bind.
Now multiple ports give the following type of problem -this is just one
Base_Bind on amd64 7.2 p3
David Southwell wrote:
By base-bind I mean the version of bind that is included in freebsd
7.2 operating system which is a version earlier than the
latest Bind96.
When installing bind96 and I did not keep base-bind.
Now multiple ports give the following type
Hello,
I'm running FreeBSD AMD64 7.1-p4 After the server experienced a DoS attack,
it ended up with many sockets stuck in LACK_ACK state as reported by
netstat -na
Is this a bug or something else is wrong, how would I troubleshoot this?
Please CC me.
Thank you very much!
Simon
Le 11/09/2009 à 15:03:36+1000, Alex R a écrit
Any ideas??? Anyone??
No.
But I got this kind of message since 7.0.
Do you have «no classic» network ?
Regards.
JAS
--
Albert SHIH
SIO batiment 15
Observatoire de Paris Meudon
5 Place Jules Janssen
92195 Meudon Cedex
Téléphone : 01 45 07 76
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:03:44 +1000
Alex R a...@mailinglist.ahhyes.net wrote:
Hi everyone,
I was wondering whether anyone could shed some light on the following
messages I am seeing in dmesg:
33aarrpp:: uunnkknnoowwnn hhaarrddwwaarree aaress format
(0x)
Any ideas??? Anyone??
Alex R wrote:
Hi everyone,
I was wondering whether anyone could shed some light on the following
messages I am seeing in dmesg:
33aarrpp:: uunnkknnoowwnn hhaarrddwwaarree aaress format
(0x)
ress format (0x)
arp: unakrnpo:w nu
Hi everyone,
I was wondering whether anyone could shed some light on the following
messages I am seeing in dmesg:
33aarrpp:: uunnkknnoowwnn hhaarrddwwaarree aaress format (0x)
ress format (0x)
arp: unakrnpo:w nu nhkanrodwwna rhea raddwdarrees sa
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM, b. f.bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
You've given some of your reasons for using amd64 -- but are your
reasons for using 32-bit binaries on amd64 strong enough to make all
of this worthwhile? Why not just use 64-bit binaries for all but the
32-bit-only ports
First, I hope that you have a good reason for doing this, because it
is going to be a PITA, and prone to all sorts of problems. [...]
Unfortunately I do. The 32 bit stuff is *would be really nice, but not
necessary*, but the ability to use extra memory *and* dynamically load
kernel modules is a
Also note that it is possible to have an i386 port-building jail on an
amd64 system.
So, make/build/run a normal jail using the 64 bit os world, add -m32
to the make.conf CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS, build stuff in the jail, and
copy it to main (non-jailed) system, and run ldconfig on the library
So, make/build/run a normal jail using the 64 bit os world, add -m32
to the make.conf CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS, build stuff in the jail, and
copy it to main (non-jailed) system, and run ldconfig on the library
directories? I'd probably also change PREFIX/LOCALBASE to prevent the
files from the ports
Well, this would certainly help with building the ports safely. But I
think we -- at least I was -- were thinking that you would actually
leave them in the jail, and run them from the jailed environment, so
there would be fewer run-time problems, and no work to transfer them
over. Remember
to use extra memory *and* dynamically load
kernel modules is a bit more important to me.
All FreeBSD supported platforms can dynamically load native kernel modules, so
why should that be a factor in choosing between i386 and amd64?
Roland
--
R.F.Smith http
[...] but the ability to use extra memory *and* dynamically load
kernel modules is a bit more important to me.
All FreeBSD supported platforms can dynamically load native kernel modules, so
why should that be a factor in choosing between i386 and amd64?
Roland
I didn't specify just loading
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:49:47AM -0400, Jim wrote:
Also note that it is possible to have an i386 port-building jail on an
amd64 system.
So, make/build/run a normal jail using the 64 bit os world, add -m32
to the make.conf CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS, build stuff in the jail, and
copy
You've given some of your reasons for using amd64 -- but are your
reasons for using 32-bit binaries on amd64 strong enough to make all
of this worthwhile? Why not just use 64-bit binaries for all but the
32-bit-only ports? Sure, some 32-bit applications will actually run
faster (the opposite
On 9/1/09, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
. If you
don't use a jail ... well, I have not tried to install a large number
of 32-bit and 64-bit ports in parallel, so I am not sure if the
default setup for our loader will make the appropriate distinctions
between 32-bit and 64-bit versions
I want to compile some 32 bit ports on an AMD64 system. I know the GCC
has to receive the -m32 flag to compile the ports as 32 bit, but I
also want to change the install directory with 32 bit ports, I was
wondering which would be the most appropriate root given unix themes
and standard FreeBSD
I want to compile some 32 bit ports on an AMD64 system. I know the GCC
has to receive the -m32 flag to compile the ports as 32 bit, but I
also want to change the install directory with 32 bit ports, I was
wondering which would be the most appropriate root given unix themes
and standard FreeBSD
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 09:28:44AM -0400, Jim wrote:
I want to compile some 32 bit ports on an AMD64 system. I know the GCC
has to receive the -m32 flag to compile the ports as 32 bit, but I
also want to change the install directory with 32 bit ports, I was
wondering which would be the most
Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl writes:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 09:28:44AM -0400, Jim wrote:
I want to compile some 32 bit ports on an AMD64 system. I know the GCC
has to receive the -m32 flag to compile the ports as 32 bit, but I
also want to change the install directory with 32 bit ports, I
/usr/local/[same-as-before]-32 (i.e. [...]/bin32, [...]/lib32,
[...]/libexec32, etc)
The one above sounds most logical. The base system puts 32 bit libraries in
/usr/lib32.
It's too much trouble to append a 32 to every subdirectory of
/usr/local/ -- I'd still recommend something like
Hi Guys,
I ran into the same problem as this person did (see the link below):
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-...@freebsd.org/msg24337.html
ppp starts fine if invoked from shell prompt, however the problem above
occurs for me when I attempt to start it automatically at boot via
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 06:20:00PM +1000, Alex R typed:
Hi Guys,
I ran into the same problem as this person did (see the link below):
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-...@freebsd.org/msg24337.html
ppp starts fine if invoked from shell prompt, however the problem above
occurs for me
Hi Ruben,
Output is as follows:
/usr/bin/su:
libutil.so.7 = /lib/libutil.so.7 (0x800635000)
libpam.so.4 = /usr/lib/libpam.so.4 (0x800744000)
libbsm.so.2 = /usr/lib/libbsm.so.2 (0x80084c000)
libc.so.7 = /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800962000)
Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Fri, Aug
There are also some interesting responses in comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
about this (I opened a thread there too).
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 09:49:48PM +1000, Alex R typed:
Hi Ruben,
Output is as follows:
/usr/bin/su:
libutil.so.7 = /lib/libutil.so.7 (0x800635000)
libpam.so.4 = /usr/lib/libpam.so.4 (0x800744000)
libbsm.so.2 = /usr/lib/libbsm.so.2 (0x80084c000)
libc.so.7 =
Actually I did change the root shell to bash. U think that might cause it?
Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 09:49:48PM +1000, Alex R typed:
Hi Ruben,
Output is as follows:
/usr/bin/su:
libutil.so.7 = /lib/libutil.so.7 (0x800635000)
libpam.so.4 =
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:08:48PM +1000, Alex R typed:
Actually I did change the root shell to bash. U think that might cause it?
Definately. before ldconfig is run, only the system libraries in /lib and
/usr/lib
are known. Doing a su -m root at that time, as /etc/rc.d/ppp is doing, will
Thank you Ruben :-) :-)
I wouldn't have thought in a million years that could be the issue, but
what you have said makes perfect sense. Looks like its back to /bin/sh
for root.
Cheers, Alex.
Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:08:48PM +1000, Alex R typed:
Actually I did
Alex R wrote:
I am in the process of deleting /usr/src and completely csup'ing the
source tree from scratch, and will try another rebuild, however I am
skeptical this will fix anything.
This seems to have fixed it... but why...
___
Hi Guys,
Have done tonnes of buildworld's before and never ran into the problem I
a having on this new machine.
Basically I have csup'd my source tree on a freshly installed
7.2-RELEASE/amd64 box (tracking the 7.2-RELEASE branch).
make buildworld -- works ok.
make buildkernel KERNCONF=custom
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:30:22 +1000 Alex R wrote:
/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/../btx/btx/btx -l boot2.ldr -o
boot2.ld -P 1 boot2.bin
btxld:No such file or directory
*** Error code 1
This error (not only with btxld but with some random file) often
occures when the system timer has
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:30:22 +1000 Alex R wrote:
/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/../btx/btx/btx -l boot2.ldr -o
boot2.ld -P 1 boot2.bin
btxld:No such file or directory
*** Error code 1
This error (not only with btxld but with some random file) often
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:17:09 +1000 Alex R wrote:
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:30:22 +1000 Alex R wrote:
/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/../btx/btx/btx -l boot2.ldr -o
boot2.ld -P 1 boot2.bin
btxld:No such file or directory
*** Error code 1
This error (not only
in the BIOS that had a title of DRAM performance enhance, it was set to
turbo by default, I have set it back to standard in case that was
causing stability issues (the machine is not overclocked). I have also
gone back to the i386 release instead of amd64. Done a build world and
have built
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:14:49 +0100
David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean
why does
Mel Flynn wrote:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:27:55 Erik Trulsson wrote:
The amd64 architecture is called that because it was AMD who invented and
created it and was for a while the only one using it and since AMD named
the architecture AMD64 that was the name FreeBSD used too. Later
Mark Stapper st...@mapper.nl wrote:
... PowerPC is dead ...
I suspect both IBM and Freescale would beg to differ :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Mark Stapper st...@mapper.nl wrote:
... PowerPC is dead ...
Well yes
(lousy excuse coming up!) I meant in the PC/Mac world... ;-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 06 August 2009 pm 14:35:40 Mark Stapper wrote:
Mel Flynn wrote:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:27:55 Erik Trulsson wrote:
The amd64 architecture is called that because it was AMD who
invented and created it and was for a while the only one
Now I come to think of it, isn't
Erich Dollansky wrote:
Because people using them, new what they were doing.
And probably didn't care...
IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for the
Itanium?
The one that didn't stick... indeed.
Yes, also Intel can fail. Intel also failed with their first 32
bit
Hi,
On 06 August 2009 pm 16:40:41 Mark Stapper wrote:
Erich Dollansky wrote:
IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for the
Itanium?
The one that didn't stick... indeed.
do they really sell machines with this CPU in numbers?
I have not seen one in the wild.
Yes, also
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:18:09PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On 06 August 2009 pm 16:40:41 Mark Stapper wrote:
Erich Dollansky wrote:
IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for the
Itanium?
The one that didn't stick... indeed.
do they really sell
Somewhere in *.freebsd.org is a page that lists which ports run
natively on amd64 and what the status is for the others. I've seen it,
I have it bookmarked in a place that is currently unavailable, and I
can't find it by hand. Anyone have the URL handy?
Respectfully
On Thursday 06 August 2009 10:19:47 Robert Huff wrote:
Somewhere in *.freebsd.org is a page that lists which ports run
natively on amd64 and what the status is for the others. I've seen it,
I have it bookmarked in a place that is currently unavailable, and I
can't find it by hand
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 10:19:47AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Somewhere in *.freebsd.org is a page that lists which ports run
natively on amd64 and what the status is for the others. I've seen it,
I have it bookmarked in a place that is currently unavailable, and I
can't find
John Nielsen wrote:
There's always the build logs on pointyhat:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/
And some reports here:
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/index.html
These are not the droids I'm looking for.
As I remember the page, it has three columns: the port name, the
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:14:49 +0100
David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean
why does freebsd
Hi,
On 06 August 2009 pm 19:07:12 Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:18:09PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
On 06 August 2009 pm 16:40:41 Mark Stapper wrote:
Erich Dollansky wrote:
IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for
the Itanium?
The one that
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for systems
with Intel Quad Core processors.
It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean why does
freebsd use a single manufacturer's name to represent a genre?
David
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:14:49PM +0100, David Southwell wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for systems
with Intel Quad Core processors.
That depends on if you installed the amd64 version of FreeBSD or the i386
version. The kernel should
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 15:14:49 David Southwell wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean why
does freebsd use a single
David Southwell wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for systems
with Intel Quad Core processors.
It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean why
does
freebsd use a single manufacturer's name to represent a genre
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:14:49PM +0100, David Southwell wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
That depends on if you installed the amd64 version of FreeBSD or the i386
version. The kernel
David Southwell wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean why
does freebsd use a single manufacturer's
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:27:55 Erik Trulsson wrote:
The amd64 architecture is called that because it was AMD who invented and
created it and was for a while the only one using it and since AMD named
the architecture AMD64 that was the name FreeBSD used too. Later Intel
also started
Hi,
since I upgraded to FreeBSD 8.0-BETA2 amd64 my sound device doesn't work
anymore.
In my /boot/loader.conf I have got
snd_uaudio_load=YES
# kldstat shows
Id Refs AddressSize Name
1 35 0x8010 ce46e0 kernel
21
Dell PE 1950
FreeBSD 7.2 amd64
boot from disc01 into sysinstall, do our regular setup, reboot, and df shows
only / and /devfs. f
stab has /usr and /var missing.
so we go into sysinstall, slices are correct:
Disk name: mfid0 FDISK Partition Editor
DISK
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
Dell PE 1950
FreeBSD 7.2 amd64
boot from disc01 into sysinstall, do our regular setup, reboot, and df
shows only / and /devfs. f
stab has /usr and /var missing.
so we go into sysinstall, slices are correct
PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca writes:
Now that my 7.2 on Acer Travelmate 4400 amd64 is working fine, what do
I have to do to make it work on 7.1?
I'd advise you to upgrade the OS at least to 7.2. There have been
many changes to linuxulator since 7.1.
--
WBR, bsam
Good day! I'm install freebsd 7.2 on computer with Asus K8S-MX motherboard, and
there is such problems: Not recognized LAN. Here info about this M/B:
http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=0kP4nePr06XiYdYQ
--
С уважением, Гуляев Гоша.
PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca writes:
I already had f8 installed as well as fc-4
That's wrong. Two linux_base ports should not be installed
at a system. Please, read /usr/ports/UPDATING on instructions
whow to recover (i.e. do a clean install). I'd recommend
deletting /compat/linux/* after you
Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote:
PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca writes:
I already had f8 installed as well as fc-4
That's wrong. Two linux_base ports should not be installed
at a system ...
Might it be advisable for each new linux_base port to declare
itself incompatible with all earlier ones,
On Saturday 25 July 2009 23:25:41 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote:
PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca writes:
I already had f8 installed as well as fc-4
That's wrong. Two linux_base ports should not be installed
at a system ...
Might it be advisable for each
:
� �
� � � � Has anyone SUCCESSFULLY installed Adobe Flash for
Firefox on
� � FBSD 7.2
� � � � running on amd64?
� � � � I have managed to install about everything I need
on an Acer
� � � � TravelMate
� � mailto:af.gour...@videotron.ca
mailto:af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
� �
� � � � Has anyone SUCCESSFULLY installed Adobe Flash for
Firefox on
� � FBSD 7.2
� � � � running on amd64?
� � � � I have managed
deletting /compat/linux/* after you remove all linux
ports/packages.
Hi again, guys,
Now that my 7.2 on Acer Travelmate 4400 amd64 is working fine, what do
I have to do to make it work on 7.1?
I've followed all the instructions pretty well but neither flash9 or 10
want to work on my i386 Fbsd
Has anyone SUCCESSFULLY installed Adobe Flash for Firefox on FBSD 7.2
running on amd64?
I have managed to install about everything I need on an Acer TravelMate
4400 except Flash.
I have found that someone did install it in version 7.1 but the same
procedures do not work on 7.2. linux_base-f8
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:25 PM, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Has anyone SUCCESSFULLY installed Adobe Flash for Firefox on FBSD 7.2
running on amd64?
I have managed to install about everything I need on an Acer TravelMate
4400 except Flash.
I have found that someone did install
Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:25 PM, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Has anyone SUCCESSFULLY installed Adobe Flash for Firefox on FBSD 7.2
running on amd64?
I have managed to install about everything I need on an Acer TravelMate
4400 except Flash
Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:25 PM, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca
mailto:af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Has anyone SUCCESSFULLY installed Adobe Flash for Firefox on FBSD 7.2
running on amd64?
I have managed to install about everything I need on an Acer
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 6:03 PM, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:25 PM, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca
mailto:af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Has anyone SUCCESSFULLY installed Adobe Flash for Firefox on FBSD 7.2
running on amd64
mailto:af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Has anyone SUCCESSFULLY installed Adobe Flash for Firefox on
FBSD 7.2
running on amd64?
I have managed to install about everything I need on an Acer
TravelMate
4400 except Flash.
I have found
mailto:af.gour...@videotron.ca
mailto:af.gour...@videotron.ca
mailto:af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Has anyone SUCCESSFULLY installed Adobe Flash for Firefox on
FBSD 7.2
running on amd64?
I have managed to install about everything I need
running on amd64?
I have managed to install about everything I need on an Acer
TravelMate
4400 except Flash.
I have found that someone did install it in version 7.1 but
the same
procedures do not work on 7.2. linux_base-f8
(linux_base
for other vm's (test servers etc).
My problem is performance. I'm only willing to make this box virtual if
I can keep the abstraction performance loss to 25% (my ultimate goal
would be 15%).
The following is what I have, followed by my benchmark findings:
# 7.2-RELEASE AMD64
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #0
601 - 700 of 2012 matches
Mail list logo
